Mixing
How to convince manager of need for additional testing before release
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I work in the InfoSec profession as an IT auditor. One of my duties at work is testing and verifying that necessary security controls are in place before builds and application updates are promoted to production environment. Our team in conjunction with QA function signs off on documentation indicating successful completion of testing. I am the team lead of my team.
One of our PCI scoped applications will be upgraded in production soon, and updates to be deployed are being tested. This application will directly interface with credit card information of customers in addition to other sensitive customer data. Automated security testing have been completed already and results are OK. I wrote additional test cases today, intending to perform manual security testing later this week to supplement the results of automated scanning tools, given the data sensitivity. However my manager told me that he does not feel additional testing is necessary due to coverage and the business need to deploy to PROD timely. I anticipate execution of manual test cases to take at most 2 - 3 days.
Automated testing (e.g: Metasploit, Nessus etc.) excels in detecting commonly known vulnerabilities such as SQL injection, but are often insufficient to detect more complex issues or flaws in business logic of application. Without additional manual testing, at least of what I feel would be high-impact vulnerabilities, I am not comfortable in signing off on security controls testing results.
How do I make a business case to convince my manager of additional testing?
manager security
asked 1 min ago
Anthony
5,4201456
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I work in the InfoSec profession as an IT auditor. One of my duties at work is testing and verifying that necessary security controls are in place before builds and application updates are promoted to production environment. Our team in conjunction with QA function signs off on documentation indicating successful completion of testing. I am the team lead of my team.
One of our PCI scoped applications will be upgraded in production soon, and updates to be deployed are being tested. This application will directly interface with credit card information of customers in addition to other sensitive customer data. Automated security testing have been completed already and results are OK. I wrote additional test cases today, intending to perform manual security testing later this week to supplement the results of automated scanning tools, given the data sensitivity. However my manager told me that he does not feel additional testing is necessary due to coverage and the business need to deploy to PROD timely. I anticipate execution of manual test cases to take at most 2 - 3 days.
Automated testing (e.g: Metasploit, Nessus etc.) excels in detecting commonly known vulnerabilities such as SQL injection, but are often insufficient to detect more complex issues or flaws in business logic of application. Without additional manual testing, at least of what I feel would be high-impact vulnerabilities, I am not comfortable in signing off on security controls testing results.
How do I make a business case to convince my manager of additional testing?
manager security
asked 1 min ago
Anthony
5,4201456
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I work in the InfoSec profession as an IT auditor. One of my duties at work is testing and verifying that necessary security controls are in place before builds and application updates are promoted to production environment. Our team in conjunction with QA function signs off on documentation indicating successful completion of testing. I am the team lead of my team.
One of our PCI scoped applications will be upgraded in production soon, and updates to be deployed are being tested. This application will directly interface with credit card information of customers in addition to other sensitive customer data. Automated security testing have been completed already and results are OK. I wrote additional test cases today, intending to perform manual security testing later this week to supplement the results of automated scanning tools, given the data sensitivity. However my manager told me that he does not feel additional testing is necessary due to coverage and the business need to deploy to PROD timely. I anticipate execution of manual test cases to take at most 2 - 3 days.
Automated testing (e.g: Metasploit, Nessus etc.) excels in detecting commonly known vulnerabilities such as SQL injection, but are often insufficient to detect more complex issues or flaws in business logic of application. Without additional manual testing, at least of what I feel would be high-impact vulnerabilities, I am not comfortable in signing off on security controls testing results.
How do I make a business case to convince my manager of additional testing?
manager security
asked 1 min ago
Anthony
5,4201456
I work in the InfoSec profession as an IT auditor. One of my duties at work is testing and verifying that necessary security controls are in place before builds and application updates are promoted to production environment. Our team in conjunction with QA function signs off on documentation indicating successful completion of testing. I am the team lead of my team.
One of our PCI scoped applications will be upgraded in production soon, and updates to be deployed are being tested. This application will directly interface with credit card information of customers in addition to other sensitive customer data. Automated security testing have been completed already and results are OK. I wrote additional test cases today, intending to perform manual security testing later this week to supplement the results of automated scanning tools, given the data sensitivity. However my manager told me that he does not feel additional testing is necessary due to coverage and the business need to deploy to PROD timely. I anticipate execution of manual test cases to take at most 2 - 3 days.
Automated testing (e.g: Metasploit, Nessus etc.) excels in detecting commonly known vulnerabilities such as SQL injection, but are often insufficient to detect more complex issues or flaws in business logic of application. Without additional manual testing, at least of what I feel would be high-impact vulnerabilities, I am not comfortable in signing off on security controls testing results.
How do I make a business case to convince my manager of additional testing?
manager security
manager security
asked 1 min ago
Anthony
5,4201456
asked 1 min ago
Anthony
5,4201456
asked 1 min ago
Anthony
5,4201456
asked 1 min ago
Anthony
5,4201456
asked 1 min ago
Anthony
5,4201456
5,4201456
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f120490%2fhow-to-convince-manager-of-need-for-additional-testing-before-release%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
