Would Earth plants grow in an alien environment?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












This is a second question about the same world described in this question about human reaction to an alien world.



So here's the idea: human beings travel to and land on an Earth-like world with the intention of colonizing it.



This world is remarkably Earth-like: gravity close to 1G, oxygen-nitrogen atmosphere with very close to the same proportions as Earth, similar climate, and similar life forms. So, in principle, a human could walk around unprotected on this world.



However...



The life on this planet, while at a similar level of development to that of Earth, is not based on the same DNA/RNA bases or the same amino acids in proteins. In short, the lifeforms on this planet resemble Earth life, but the chemistry is different.



Would our familiar Earth plants grow in such an environment?



It seems unlikely to me that alien bacteria, viruses, etc. would attack our plants - after all, the genetic material and proteins are different.



But what about the soil? My first thought is that humus on this planet would be made up of organic material from decomposing alien life (decomposed by alien bacteria), and therefore wouldn't provide a medium in which Earth plants could get the nutrients they need. But is that correct? I guess to some extent it depends on how much the humus is decomposed (ie. just down to proteins & amino acids, or broken down even further).






biology xenobiology biochemistry







share|improve this question



















  • 1




    You'll probably be interested in my old question Would humans be able to derive nutrition from foodstuffs found on alien planets?
    – Michael Kjörling♦
    3 hours ago










  • Do the lifeforms on this planet use similar building blocks even if they don’t use the same DNA/RNA? I.e., can we assume that they also use PO4(3-) phosphate and NH3 ammonia molecules, or will they need to synthesize those from the atoms?
    – Dubukay
    2 hours ago














up vote
3
down vote

favorite












This is a second question about the same world described in this question about human reaction to an alien world.



So here's the idea: human beings travel to and land on an Earth-like world with the intention of colonizing it.



This world is remarkably Earth-like: gravity close to 1G, oxygen-nitrogen atmosphere with very close to the same proportions as Earth, similar climate, and similar life forms. So, in principle, a human could walk around unprotected on this world.



However...



The life on this planet, while at a similar level of development to that of Earth, is not based on the same DNA/RNA bases or the same amino acids in proteins. In short, the lifeforms on this planet resemble Earth life, but the chemistry is different.



Would our familiar Earth plants grow in such an environment?



It seems unlikely to me that alien bacteria, viruses, etc. would attack our plants - after all, the genetic material and proteins are different.



But what about the soil? My first thought is that humus on this planet would be made up of organic material from decomposing alien life (decomposed by alien bacteria), and therefore wouldn't provide a medium in which Earth plants could get the nutrients they need. But is that correct? I guess to some extent it depends on how much the humus is decomposed (ie. just down to proteins & amino acids, or broken down even further).






biology xenobiology biochemistry







share|improve this question



















  • 1




    You'll probably be interested in my old question Would humans be able to derive nutrition from foodstuffs found on alien planets?
    – Michael Kjörling♦
    3 hours ago










  • Do the lifeforms on this planet use similar building blocks even if they don’t use the same DNA/RNA? I.e., can we assume that they also use PO4(3-) phosphate and NH3 ammonia molecules, or will they need to synthesize those from the atoms?
    – Dubukay
    2 hours ago












up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











This is a second question about the same world described in this question about human reaction to an alien world.



So here's the idea: human beings travel to and land on an Earth-like world with the intention of colonizing it.



This world is remarkably Earth-like: gravity close to 1G, oxygen-nitrogen atmosphere with very close to the same proportions as Earth, similar climate, and similar life forms. So, in principle, a human could walk around unprotected on this world.



However...



The life on this planet, while at a similar level of development to that of Earth, is not based on the same DNA/RNA bases or the same amino acids in proteins. In short, the lifeforms on this planet resemble Earth life, but the chemistry is different.



Would our familiar Earth plants grow in such an environment?



It seems unlikely to me that alien bacteria, viruses, etc. would attack our plants - after all, the genetic material and proteins are different.



But what about the soil? My first thought is that humus on this planet would be made up of organic material from decomposing alien life (decomposed by alien bacteria), and therefore wouldn't provide a medium in which Earth plants could get the nutrients they need. But is that correct? I guess to some extent it depends on how much the humus is decomposed (ie. just down to proteins & amino acids, or broken down even further).






biology xenobiology biochemistry







share|improve this question















This is a second question about the same world described in this question about human reaction to an alien world.



So here's the idea: human beings travel to and land on an Earth-like world with the intention of colonizing it.



This world is remarkably Earth-like: gravity close to 1G, oxygen-nitrogen atmosphere with very close to the same proportions as Earth, similar climate, and similar life forms. So, in principle, a human could walk around unprotected on this world.



However...



The life on this planet, while at a similar level of development to that of Earth, is not based on the same DNA/RNA bases or the same amino acids in proteins. In short, the lifeforms on this planet resemble Earth life, but the chemistry is different.



Would our familiar Earth plants grow in such an environment?



It seems unlikely to me that alien bacteria, viruses, etc. would attack our plants - after all, the genetic material and proteins are different.



But what about the soil? My first thought is that humus on this planet would be made up of organic material from decomposing alien life (decomposed by alien bacteria), and therefore wouldn't provide a medium in which Earth plants could get the nutrients they need. But is that correct? I guess to some extent it depends on how much the humus is decomposed (ie. just down to proteins & amino acids, or broken down even further).






biology xenobiology biochemistry




biology xenobiology biochemistry






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









Renan

35.2k1084182




35.2k1084182










asked 3 hours ago









Kryten

1764




1764







  • 1




    You'll probably be interested in my old question Would humans be able to derive nutrition from foodstuffs found on alien planets?
    – Michael Kjörling♦
    3 hours ago










  • Do the lifeforms on this planet use similar building blocks even if they don’t use the same DNA/RNA? I.e., can we assume that they also use PO4(3-) phosphate and NH3 ammonia molecules, or will they need to synthesize those from the atoms?
    – Dubukay
    2 hours ago












  • 1




    You'll probably be interested in my old question Would humans be able to derive nutrition from foodstuffs found on alien planets?
    – Michael Kjörling♦
    3 hours ago










  • Do the lifeforms on this planet use similar building blocks even if they don’t use the same DNA/RNA? I.e., can we assume that they also use PO4(3-) phosphate and NH3 ammonia molecules, or will they need to synthesize those from the atoms?
    – Dubukay
    2 hours ago







1




1




You'll probably be interested in my old question Would humans be able to derive nutrition from foodstuffs found on alien planets?
– Michael Kjörling♦
3 hours ago




You'll probably be interested in my old question Would humans be able to derive nutrition from foodstuffs found on alien planets?
– Michael Kjörling♦
3 hours ago












Do the lifeforms on this planet use similar building blocks even if they don’t use the same DNA/RNA? I.e., can we assume that they also use PO4(3-) phosphate and NH3 ammonia molecules, or will they need to synthesize those from the atoms?
– Dubukay
2 hours ago




Do the lifeforms on this planet use similar building blocks even if they don’t use the same DNA/RNA? I.e., can we assume that they also use PO4(3-) phosphate and NH3 ammonia molecules, or will they need to synthesize those from the atoms?
– Dubukay
2 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote













Scientifically speaking, plants are Autotrophs, and they do not require life to thrive. They don't need DNA, proteins, or anything else produced by life.



After all, life must have begun with something that required no prior life to exist. Those things were molds, algae, perhaps others, and those things evolved into plants (that still require no prior life).



The only thing you might have to worry about is some toxic chemical in the soil (like salt or some metals) to which the native life is immune.






share|improve this answer






















  • Fungi are heterotrophs, so they kind of do need other life forms.
    – SealBoi
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    @SealBoi Corrected.
    – Amadeus
    2 hours ago

















up vote
1
down vote













I am not an expert on the matter, but I would think that so long as earth plants can get access to the nutrients and sunlight they need to survive they will thrive. Bacteria and fungi are not important for plants to grow, they're important to decompose dead organice matter (including plants).



I think the danger will be that earth plants won't be able to decompose eventually leading to the native plans being covered by dead organic matter from the earth plants. There was a period called the Carboniferous that is pretty well known due to the fact most coal formations happened during that time as a result of the decomposing problem.



Basically can your plants get nutrients on some way or not? If yes, they can thrive.






share|improve this answer




















  • There are important exceptions to microorganisms not being important to plant growth. Mycorrhizae are fungi that inhabit the roots of a plant, helping it extract nutrients from the soil: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycorrhiza And nitrogen-fixing bacteria in legumes &c are important for extracting nitrogen from the air: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… But savvy colonists would take a supply of both...
    – jamesqf
    2 hours ago










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127032%2fwould-earth-plants-grow-in-an-alien-environment%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

















2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
4
down vote













Scientifically speaking, plants are Autotrophs, and they do not require life to thrive. They don't need DNA, proteins, or anything else produced by life.



After all, life must have begun with something that required no prior life to exist. Those things were molds, algae, perhaps others, and those things evolved into plants (that still require no prior life).



The only thing you might have to worry about is some toxic chemical in the soil (like salt or some metals) to which the native life is immune.






share|improve this answer






















  • Fungi are heterotrophs, so they kind of do need other life forms.
    – SealBoi
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    @SealBoi Corrected.
    – Amadeus
    2 hours ago














up vote
4
down vote













Scientifically speaking, plants are Autotrophs, and they do not require life to thrive. They don't need DNA, proteins, or anything else produced by life.



After all, life must have begun with something that required no prior life to exist. Those things were molds, algae, perhaps others, and those things evolved into plants (that still require no prior life).



The only thing you might have to worry about is some toxic chemical in the soil (like salt or some metals) to which the native life is immune.






share|improve this answer






















  • Fungi are heterotrophs, so they kind of do need other life forms.
    – SealBoi
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    @SealBoi Corrected.
    – Amadeus
    2 hours ago












up vote
4
down vote










up vote
4
down vote









Scientifically speaking, plants are Autotrophs, and they do not require life to thrive. They don't need DNA, proteins, or anything else produced by life.



After all, life must have begun with something that required no prior life to exist. Those things were molds, algae, perhaps others, and those things evolved into plants (that still require no prior life).



The only thing you might have to worry about is some toxic chemical in the soil (like salt or some metals) to which the native life is immune.






share|improve this answer














Scientifically speaking, plants are Autotrophs, and they do not require life to thrive. They don't need DNA, proteins, or anything else produced by life.



After all, life must have begun with something that required no prior life to exist. Those things were molds, algae, perhaps others, and those things evolved into plants (that still require no prior life).



The only thing you might have to worry about is some toxic chemical in the soil (like salt or some metals) to which the native life is immune.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 hours ago

























answered 2 hours ago









Amadeus

19.8k42977




19.8k42977











  • Fungi are heterotrophs, so they kind of do need other life forms.
    – SealBoi
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    @SealBoi Corrected.
    – Amadeus
    2 hours ago
















  • Fungi are heterotrophs, so they kind of do need other life forms.
    – SealBoi
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    @SealBoi Corrected.
    – Amadeus
    2 hours ago















Fungi are heterotrophs, so they kind of do need other life forms.
– SealBoi
2 hours ago




Fungi are heterotrophs, so they kind of do need other life forms.
– SealBoi
2 hours ago




1




1




@SealBoi Corrected.
– Amadeus
2 hours ago




@SealBoi Corrected.
– Amadeus
2 hours ago










up vote
1
down vote













I am not an expert on the matter, but I would think that so long as earth plants can get access to the nutrients and sunlight they need to survive they will thrive. Bacteria and fungi are not important for plants to grow, they're important to decompose dead organice matter (including plants).



I think the danger will be that earth plants won't be able to decompose eventually leading to the native plans being covered by dead organic matter from the earth plants. There was a period called the Carboniferous that is pretty well known due to the fact most coal formations happened during that time as a result of the decomposing problem.



Basically can your plants get nutrients on some way or not? If yes, they can thrive.






share|improve this answer




















  • There are important exceptions to microorganisms not being important to plant growth. Mycorrhizae are fungi that inhabit the roots of a plant, helping it extract nutrients from the soil: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycorrhiza And nitrogen-fixing bacteria in legumes &c are important for extracting nitrogen from the air: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… But savvy colonists would take a supply of both...
    – jamesqf
    2 hours ago














up vote
1
down vote













I am not an expert on the matter, but I would think that so long as earth plants can get access to the nutrients and sunlight they need to survive they will thrive. Bacteria and fungi are not important for plants to grow, they're important to decompose dead organice matter (including plants).



I think the danger will be that earth plants won't be able to decompose eventually leading to the native plans being covered by dead organic matter from the earth plants. There was a period called the Carboniferous that is pretty well known due to the fact most coal formations happened during that time as a result of the decomposing problem.



Basically can your plants get nutrients on some way or not? If yes, they can thrive.






share|improve this answer




















  • There are important exceptions to microorganisms not being important to plant growth. Mycorrhizae are fungi that inhabit the roots of a plant, helping it extract nutrients from the soil: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycorrhiza And nitrogen-fixing bacteria in legumes &c are important for extracting nitrogen from the air: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… But savvy colonists would take a supply of both...
    – jamesqf
    2 hours ago












up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









I am not an expert on the matter, but I would think that so long as earth plants can get access to the nutrients and sunlight they need to survive they will thrive. Bacteria and fungi are not important for plants to grow, they're important to decompose dead organice matter (including plants).



I think the danger will be that earth plants won't be able to decompose eventually leading to the native plans being covered by dead organic matter from the earth plants. There was a period called the Carboniferous that is pretty well known due to the fact most coal formations happened during that time as a result of the decomposing problem.



Basically can your plants get nutrients on some way or not? If yes, they can thrive.






share|improve this answer












I am not an expert on the matter, but I would think that so long as earth plants can get access to the nutrients and sunlight they need to survive they will thrive. Bacteria and fungi are not important for plants to grow, they're important to decompose dead organice matter (including plants).



I think the danger will be that earth plants won't be able to decompose eventually leading to the native plans being covered by dead organic matter from the earth plants. There was a period called the Carboniferous that is pretty well known due to the fact most coal formations happened during that time as a result of the decomposing problem.



Basically can your plants get nutrients on some way or not? If yes, they can thrive.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









TheShadowOfZama

1,41738




1,41738











  • There are important exceptions to microorganisms not being important to plant growth. Mycorrhizae are fungi that inhabit the roots of a plant, helping it extract nutrients from the soil: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycorrhiza And nitrogen-fixing bacteria in legumes &c are important for extracting nitrogen from the air: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… But savvy colonists would take a supply of both...
    – jamesqf
    2 hours ago
















  • There are important exceptions to microorganisms not being important to plant growth. Mycorrhizae are fungi that inhabit the roots of a plant, helping it extract nutrients from the soil: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycorrhiza And nitrogen-fixing bacteria in legumes &c are important for extracting nitrogen from the air: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… But savvy colonists would take a supply of both...
    – jamesqf
    2 hours ago















There are important exceptions to microorganisms not being important to plant growth. Mycorrhizae are fungi that inhabit the roots of a plant, helping it extract nutrients from the soil: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycorrhiza And nitrogen-fixing bacteria in legumes &c are important for extracting nitrogen from the air: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… But savvy colonists would take a supply of both...
– jamesqf
2 hours ago




There are important exceptions to microorganisms not being important to plant growth. Mycorrhizae are fungi that inhabit the roots of a plant, helping it extract nutrients from the soil: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycorrhiza And nitrogen-fixing bacteria in legumes &c are important for extracting nitrogen from the air: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… But savvy colonists would take a supply of both...
– jamesqf
2 hours ago

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127032%2fwould-earth-plants-grow-in-an-alien-environment%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest
































































Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote 31 down vote favorite 4 I hold a PhD in mechanical engineering with a 7 year background in self-guided, self-paced research including 2 years as a graduate level course instructor and a subject matter expert for various engineering projects in a university setting in the United States. For the last 10-11 months, I am working in a research industry in France where my task is to debug C++ spaghetti code written over a period of several years by my current supervisor. It is a team of 2: just I and my supervisor. Diurnally, I am posed with a "bug of the day" to get out of this C++ code. My supervisor generally gives me about 15-30 minutes to solve it and then accosts me about whether or not the task is completed and then rinses and repeats this until the end of the day. Off-late, my supervisor has been holding 6-7 hour long "meetin
Read more

Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite Many fantasy worlds have multiple humanoid species (elves, orcs, humans, etc) living in the same world, in addition to that, they often have the ability to interbreed. And I can't help but question their believability... fantasy-races reproduction interspecies-relations share | improve this question edited Aug 9 at 14:46 Michael Kjörling ♦ 21.1k 10 85 161 asked Aug 9 at 13:13 Chlodio 118 6 closed as unclear what you're asking by MichaelK, Gryphon, John, Vincent, Frostfyre Aug 9 at 15:25 Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question. 3 Stack Exchange exist to
Read more

Confectionery

Image
Prepared foods made with a lot of sugar or other cabohydrates "Sweetmeat" redirects here. For the racehorse, see Sweetmeat (horse). Not to be confused with Sweetbread. This Kransekake is a traditional Scandinavian baker's confection. Confectionery is the art of making confections , which are food items that are rich in sugar and carbohydrates. Exact definitions are difficult. [1] In general, though, confectionery is divided into two broad and somewhat overlapping categories, bakers' confections and sugar confections. [2] Bakers' confectionery, also called flour confections , includes principally sweet pastries, cakes, and similar baked goods. Sugar confectionery includes candies ( sweets in British English), candied nuts, chocolates, chewing gum, bubble gum, pastillage, and other confections that are made primarily of sugar. In some cases, chocolate confections (confections made of chocolate) are treated as a separate category, as are sugar-free versions of
Read more