Can a premium HDMI cable outperform a standard cable?

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP

up vote
4
down vote

favorite

Assuming two cables both conform to the same standards (e.g. HDMI2.0, high-speed, ...) is it possible that a premium cable will outperform a standard cable when using an objective benchmark that measures the quality of picture/audio? Or what experiment would show that a premium cable has a benefit over an 'ordinary' cable?

cables digital-communications hdmi

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

asked 6 hours ago

zr.

1212

New contributor

zr. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  When using a subjective measure, almost anything is possible. (-:
  – Jim Mack
  5 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  I hope this doesn't get closed. It raises issues related to high-speed cabling in general that also apply to things like eSATA, USB SuperSpeed, Ethernet, PCIe, etc.
  – Dave Tweed♦
  5 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  I don't mean to be defensive, but I don't think that this question is about use of electronic devices. Look at the currently leading answer to see how technical and engineering-related this topic is.
  – zr.
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  Define "premium cable" and "standard cable". With technical terms.
  – Chupacabras
  3 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @Chupacabras: See my answer. "Standard" cable is built just well enough to meet the given specifications at the given length(s).
  – Dave Tweed♦
  39 mins ago
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

up vote
4
down vote

favorite

Assuming two cables both conform to the same standards (e.g. HDMI2.0, high-speed, ...) is it possible that a premium cable will outperform a standard cable when using an objective benchmark that measures the quality of picture/audio? Or what experiment would show that a premium cable has a benefit over an 'ordinary' cable?

cables digital-communications hdmi

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

asked 6 hours ago

zr.

1212

New contributor

zr. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  When using a subjective measure, almost anything is possible. (-:
  – Jim Mack
  5 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  I hope this doesn't get closed. It raises issues related to high-speed cabling in general that also apply to things like eSATA, USB SuperSpeed, Ethernet, PCIe, etc.
  – Dave Tweed♦
  5 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  I don't mean to be defensive, but I don't think that this question is about use of electronic devices. Look at the currently leading answer to see how technical and engineering-related this topic is.
  – zr.
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  Define "premium cable" and "standard cable". With technical terms.
  – Chupacabras
  3 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @Chupacabras: See my answer. "Standard" cable is built just well enough to meet the given specifications at the given length(s).
  – Dave Tweed♦
  39 mins ago
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

up vote
4
down vote

favorite

up vote
4
down vote

favorite

Assuming two cables both conform to the same standards (e.g. HDMI2.0, high-speed, ...) is it possible that a premium cable will outperform a standard cable when using an objective benchmark that measures the quality of picture/audio? Or what experiment would show that a premium cable has a benefit over an 'ordinary' cable?

cables digital-communications hdmi

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

asked 6 hours ago

zr.

1212

New contributor

zr. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

Assuming two cables both conform to the same standards (e.g. HDMI2.0, high-speed, ...) is it possible that a premium cable will outperform a standard cable when using an objective benchmark that measures the quality of picture/audio? Or what experiment would show that a premium cable has a benefit over an 'ordinary' cable?

cables digital-communications hdmi

cables digital-communications hdmi

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

asked 6 hours ago

zr.

1212

New contributor

zr. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

asked 6 hours ago

zr.

1212

New contributor

zr. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

edited 4 hours ago

edited 4 hours ago

asked 6 hours ago

zr.

1212

New contributor

zr. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 6 hours ago

zr.

1212

asked 6 hours ago

zr.

1212

1212

New contributor

zr. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

New contributor

zr. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

zr. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  When using a subjective measure, almost anything is possible. (-:
  – Jim Mack
  5 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  I hope this doesn't get closed. It raises issues related to high-speed cabling in general that also apply to things like eSATA, USB SuperSpeed, Ethernet, PCIe, etc.
  – Dave Tweed♦
  5 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  I don't mean to be defensive, but I don't think that this question is about use of electronic devices. Look at the currently leading answer to see how technical and engineering-related this topic is.
  – zr.
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  Define "premium cable" and "standard cable". With technical terms.
  – Chupacabras
  3 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @Chupacabras: See my answer. "Standard" cable is built just well enough to meet the given specifications at the given length(s).
  – Dave Tweed♦
  39 mins ago
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  When using a subjective measure, almost anything is possible. (-:
  – Jim Mack
  5 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  I hope this doesn't get closed. It raises issues related to high-speed cabling in general that also apply to things like eSATA, USB SuperSpeed, Ethernet, PCIe, etc.
  – Dave Tweed♦
  5 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  I don't mean to be defensive, but I don't think that this question is about use of electronic devices. Look at the currently leading answer to see how technical and engineering-related this topic is.
  – zr.
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  Define "premium cable" and "standard cable". With technical terms.
  – Chupacabras
  3 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @Chupacabras: See my answer. "Standard" cable is built just well enough to meet the given specifications at the given length(s).
  – Dave Tweed♦
  39 mins ago
  
  

  
  
  
  

2

2

When using a subjective measure, almost anything is possible. (-:
– Jim Mack
5 hours ago

When using a subjective measure, almost anything is possible. (-:
– Jim Mack
5 hours ago

I hope this doesn't get closed. It raises issues related to high-speed cabling in general that also apply to things like eSATA, USB SuperSpeed, Ethernet, PCIe, etc.
– Dave Tweed♦
5 hours ago

I hope this doesn't get closed. It raises issues related to high-speed cabling in general that also apply to things like eSATA, USB SuperSpeed, Ethernet, PCIe, etc.
– Dave Tweed♦
5 hours ago

1

1

I don't mean to be defensive, but I don't think that this question is about use of electronic devices. Look at the currently leading answer to see how technical and engineering-related this topic is.
– zr.
4 hours ago

I don't mean to be defensive, but I don't think that this question is about use of electronic devices. Look at the currently leading answer to see how technical and engineering-related this topic is.
– zr.
4 hours ago

Define "premium cable" and "standard cable". With technical terms.
– Chupacabras
3 hours ago

Define "premium cable" and "standard cable". With technical terms.
– Chupacabras
3 hours ago

1

1

@Chupacabras: See my answer. "Standard" cable is built just well enough to meet the given specifications at the given length(s).
– Dave Tweed♦
39 mins ago

@Chupacabras: See my answer. "Standard" cable is built just well enough to meet the given specifications at the given length(s).
– Dave Tweed♦
39 mins ago

add a comment | 

3 Answers
3

active

oldest

votes

up vote
6
down vote

You would do a BERT (bit error rate test) on the cable. Better yet, look at the eye diagram at the far end of the cable.

HDMI is a digital format, which means that there's a threshold effect — cable quality does not directly affect the picture quality until it gets so bad that it actually causes bit errors.

"Premium" cable is (supposedly) built to tighter tolerances (reduced ISI), with thicker wire (reduced attenuation) and/or with better shielding (reduced external interference) so that you can have longer runs of it before that starts to happen.

share|improve this answer

edited 5 hours ago

answered 6 hours ago

Dave Tweed♦

111k9132240

add a comment | 

up vote
2
down vote

If the cables actually conform to the standards specified, then there will be no difference between a "premium" or "ordinary" cable, since the signals in question are digital.

However, in reality you may find cables that do not conform to the standard that are advertised otherwise.

share|improve this answer

answered 6 hours ago

Shamtam

1,9781021

• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  Standards imply a guarantee of minimum performance. One cable can certainly differ from another at the high end.
  – Scott Seidman
  6 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @ScottSeidman Yes, I absolutely agree. I guess I implicitly made the assumption that the user would be operating the cables within their rated limits, but we both know that's not always the case :)
  – Shamtam
  4 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @ScottSeidman even the minimum is enough because it complies the specification and its tolerances.
  – Chupacabras
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @Chupacabras what was asked was "can one cable outperform another?" Not "will both cables meet the minimum standard?"
  – Scott Seidman
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  I agree with it to, @Chupacabras -- but it doesn't address the question being asked.
  – Scott Seidman
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 1 more comment

up vote
0
down vote

For a reasonable cable length (say less than a few meters) no difference will be seen, you'll only stress the cable/EQ system when you stretch into several meters.

share|improve this answer

answered 17 mins ago

amiando

1

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

zr. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

 

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f400005%2fcan-a-premium-hdmi-cable-outperform-a-standard-cable%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name Email

3 Answers
3

active

oldest

votes

3 Answers
3

active

oldest

votes

active

oldest

votes

active

oldest

votes

up vote
6
down vote

You would do a BERT (bit error rate test) on the cable. Better yet, look at the eye diagram at the far end of the cable.

HDMI is a digital format, which means that there's a threshold effect — cable quality does not directly affect the picture quality until it gets so bad that it actually causes bit errors.

"Premium" cable is (supposedly) built to tighter tolerances (reduced ISI), with thicker wire (reduced attenuation) and/or with better shielding (reduced external interference) so that you can have longer runs of it before that starts to happen.

share|improve this answer

edited 5 hours ago

answered 6 hours ago

Dave Tweed♦

111k9132240

add a comment | 

up vote
6
down vote

You would do a BERT (bit error rate test) on the cable. Better yet, look at the eye diagram at the far end of the cable.

HDMI is a digital format, which means that there's a threshold effect — cable quality does not directly affect the picture quality until it gets so bad that it actually causes bit errors.

"Premium" cable is (supposedly) built to tighter tolerances (reduced ISI), with thicker wire (reduced attenuation) and/or with better shielding (reduced external interference) so that you can have longer runs of it before that starts to happen.

share|improve this answer

edited 5 hours ago

answered 6 hours ago

Dave Tweed♦

111k9132240

add a comment | 

up vote
6
down vote

up vote
6
down vote

You would do a BERT (bit error rate test) on the cable. Better yet, look at the eye diagram at the far end of the cable.

HDMI is a digital format, which means that there's a threshold effect — cable quality does not directly affect the picture quality until it gets so bad that it actually causes bit errors.

"Premium" cable is (supposedly) built to tighter tolerances (reduced ISI), with thicker wire (reduced attenuation) and/or with better shielding (reduced external interference) so that you can have longer runs of it before that starts to happen.

share|improve this answer

edited 5 hours ago

answered 6 hours ago

Dave Tweed♦

111k9132240

You would do a BERT (bit error rate test) on the cable. Better yet, look at the eye diagram at the far end of the cable.

HDMI is a digital format, which means that there's a threshold effect — cable quality does not directly affect the picture quality until it gets so bad that it actually causes bit errors.

"Premium" cable is (supposedly) built to tighter tolerances (reduced ISI), with thicker wire (reduced attenuation) and/or with better shielding (reduced external interference) so that you can have longer runs of it before that starts to happen.

share|improve this answer

edited 5 hours ago

answered 6 hours ago

Dave Tweed♦

111k9132240

share|improve this answer

share|improve this answer

edited 5 hours ago

edited 5 hours ago

edited 5 hours ago

answered 6 hours ago

Dave Tweed♦

111k9132240

answered 6 hours ago

Dave Tweed♦

111k9132240

answered 6 hours ago

Dave Tweed♦

111k9132240

111k9132240

add a comment | 

add a comment | 

up vote
2
down vote

If the cables actually conform to the standards specified, then there will be no difference between a "premium" or "ordinary" cable, since the signals in question are digital.

However, in reality you may find cables that do not conform to the standard that are advertised otherwise.

share|improve this answer

answered 6 hours ago

Shamtam

1,9781021

• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  Standards imply a guarantee of minimum performance. One cable can certainly differ from another at the high end.
  – Scott Seidman
  6 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @ScottSeidman Yes, I absolutely agree. I guess I implicitly made the assumption that the user would be operating the cables within their rated limits, but we both know that's not always the case :)
  – Shamtam
  4 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @ScottSeidman even the minimum is enough because it complies the specification and its tolerances.
  – Chupacabras
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @Chupacabras what was asked was "can one cable outperform another?" Not "will both cables meet the minimum standard?"
  – Scott Seidman
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  I agree with it to, @Chupacabras -- but it doesn't address the question being asked.
  – Scott Seidman
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 1 more comment

up vote
2
down vote

If the cables actually conform to the standards specified, then there will be no difference between a "premium" or "ordinary" cable, since the signals in question are digital.

However, in reality you may find cables that do not conform to the standard that are advertised otherwise.

share|improve this answer

answered 6 hours ago

Shamtam

1,9781021

• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  Standards imply a guarantee of minimum performance. One cable can certainly differ from another at the high end.
  – Scott Seidman
  6 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @ScottSeidman Yes, I absolutely agree. I guess I implicitly made the assumption that the user would be operating the cables within their rated limits, but we both know that's not always the case :)
  – Shamtam
  4 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @ScottSeidman even the minimum is enough because it complies the specification and its tolerances.
  – Chupacabras
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @Chupacabras what was asked was "can one cable outperform another?" Not "will both cables meet the minimum standard?"
  – Scott Seidman
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  I agree with it to, @Chupacabras -- but it doesn't address the question being asked.
  – Scott Seidman
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 1 more comment

up vote
2
down vote

up vote
2
down vote

If the cables actually conform to the standards specified, then there will be no difference between a "premium" or "ordinary" cable, since the signals in question are digital.

However, in reality you may find cables that do not conform to the standard that are advertised otherwise.

share|improve this answer

answered 6 hours ago

Shamtam

1,9781021

If the cables actually conform to the standards specified, then there will be no difference between a "premium" or "ordinary" cable, since the signals in question are digital.

However, in reality you may find cables that do not conform to the standard that are advertised otherwise.

share|improve this answer

answered 6 hours ago

Shamtam

1,9781021

share|improve this answer

share|improve this answer

answered 6 hours ago

Shamtam

1,9781021

answered 6 hours ago

Shamtam

1,9781021

answered 6 hours ago

Shamtam

1,9781021

1,9781021

• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  Standards imply a guarantee of minimum performance. One cable can certainly differ from another at the high end.
  – Scott Seidman
  6 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @ScottSeidman Yes, I absolutely agree. I guess I implicitly made the assumption that the user would be operating the cables within their rated limits, but we both know that's not always the case :)
  – Shamtam
  4 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @ScottSeidman even the minimum is enough because it complies the specification and its tolerances.
  – Chupacabras
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @Chupacabras what was asked was "can one cable outperform another?" Not "will both cables meet the minimum standard?"
  – Scott Seidman
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  I agree with it to, @Chupacabras -- but it doesn't address the question being asked.
  – Scott Seidman
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 1 more comment

• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  Standards imply a guarantee of minimum performance. One cable can certainly differ from another at the high end.
  – Scott Seidman
  6 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @ScottSeidman Yes, I absolutely agree. I guess I implicitly made the assumption that the user would be operating the cables within their rated limits, but we both know that's not always the case :)
  – Shamtam
  4 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @ScottSeidman even the minimum is enough because it complies the specification and its tolerances.
  – Chupacabras
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @Chupacabras what was asked was "can one cable outperform another?" Not "will both cables meet the minimum standard?"
  – Scott Seidman
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  I agree with it to, @Chupacabras -- but it doesn't address the question being asked.
  – Scott Seidman
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

3

3

Standards imply a guarantee of minimum performance. One cable can certainly differ from another at the high end.
– Scott Seidman
6 hours ago

Standards imply a guarantee of minimum performance. One cable can certainly differ from another at the high end.
– Scott Seidman
6 hours ago

@ScottSeidman Yes, I absolutely agree. I guess I implicitly made the assumption that the user would be operating the cables within their rated limits, but we both know that's not always the case :)
– Shamtam
4 hours ago

@ScottSeidman Yes, I absolutely agree. I guess I implicitly made the assumption that the user would be operating the cables within their rated limits, but we both know that's not always the case :)
– Shamtam
4 hours ago

@ScottSeidman even the minimum is enough because it complies the specification and its tolerances.
– Chupacabras
3 hours ago

@ScottSeidman even the minimum is enough because it complies the specification and its tolerances.
– Chupacabras
3 hours ago

@Chupacabras what was asked was "can one cable outperform another?" Not "will both cables meet the minimum standard?"
– Scott Seidman
2 hours ago

@Chupacabras what was asked was "can one cable outperform another?" Not "will both cables meet the minimum standard?"
– Scott Seidman
2 hours ago

1

1

I agree with it to, @Chupacabras -- but it doesn't address the question being asked.
– Scott Seidman
1 hour ago

I agree with it to, @Chupacabras -- but it doesn't address the question being asked.
– Scott Seidman
1 hour ago

 | 
show 1 more comment

up vote
0
down vote

For a reasonable cable length (say less than a few meters) no difference will be seen, you'll only stress the cable/EQ system when you stretch into several meters.

share|improve this answer

answered 17 mins ago

amiando

1

add a comment | 

up vote
0
down vote

For a reasonable cable length (say less than a few meters) no difference will be seen, you'll only stress the cable/EQ system when you stretch into several meters.

share|improve this answer

answered 17 mins ago

amiando

1

add a comment | 

up vote
0
down vote

up vote
0
down vote

For a reasonable cable length (say less than a few meters) no difference will be seen, you'll only stress the cable/EQ system when you stretch into several meters.

share|improve this answer

answered 17 mins ago

amiando

1

For a reasonable cable length (say less than a few meters) no difference will be seen, you'll only stress the cable/EQ system when you stretch into several meters.

share|improve this answer

answered 17 mins ago

amiando

1

share|improve this answer

share|improve this answer

answered 17 mins ago

amiando

1

answered 17 mins ago

amiando

1

answered 17 mins ago

amiando

1

1

add a comment | 

add a comment | 

zr. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

 

draft saved

draft discarded

zr. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

zr. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

zr. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

 

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f400005%2fcan-a-premium-hdmi-cable-outperform-a-standard-cable%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name Email

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

Name Email

Name

Email

Name Email

Name

Email