What is the reasoning behind this exponents question?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
6
down vote

favorite












What is $3^3^3?$



Plugging $3^3^3 $into the calculator gives 7625597484987.
I believe because this implies that
$3^3^3=3^27$, is this true?



And plugging $(3^3)^3$ gives 19683, because $
(3^3)^3=3^3times 3^3times 3^3=3^9=19683$



So which one is the correct answer, and why?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Meghan C is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 2




    People find the notation confusing, but $a^b^c$ means $a^(b^c)$ and not $(a^b)^c$, which of course is just $a^bc$. In practice, I think it's best to add the parentheses, as omitting them always leads to confusion.
    – lulu
    45 mins ago







  • 1




    You can interpret that there is no reason to read $3^3^3$ as $(3^3)^3$ because we can express it as $3^3cdot3$.
    – Yves Daoust
    29 mins ago










  • Thanks a lot. I really appreciate it.
    – Meghan C
    13 mins ago














up vote
6
down vote

favorite












What is $3^3^3?$



Plugging $3^3^3 $into the calculator gives 7625597484987.
I believe because this implies that
$3^3^3=3^27$, is this true?



And plugging $(3^3)^3$ gives 19683, because $
(3^3)^3=3^3times 3^3times 3^3=3^9=19683$



So which one is the correct answer, and why?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Meghan C is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 2




    People find the notation confusing, but $a^b^c$ means $a^(b^c)$ and not $(a^b)^c$, which of course is just $a^bc$. In practice, I think it's best to add the parentheses, as omitting them always leads to confusion.
    – lulu
    45 mins ago







  • 1




    You can interpret that there is no reason to read $3^3^3$ as $(3^3)^3$ because we can express it as $3^3cdot3$.
    – Yves Daoust
    29 mins ago










  • Thanks a lot. I really appreciate it.
    – Meghan C
    13 mins ago












up vote
6
down vote

favorite









up vote
6
down vote

favorite











What is $3^3^3?$



Plugging $3^3^3 $into the calculator gives 7625597484987.
I believe because this implies that
$3^3^3=3^27$, is this true?



And plugging $(3^3)^3$ gives 19683, because $
(3^3)^3=3^3times 3^3times 3^3=3^9=19683$



So which one is the correct answer, and why?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Meghan C is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











What is $3^3^3?$



Plugging $3^3^3 $into the calculator gives 7625597484987.
I believe because this implies that
$3^3^3=3^27$, is this true?



And plugging $(3^3)^3$ gives 19683, because $
(3^3)^3=3^3times 3^3times 3^3=3^9=19683$



So which one is the correct answer, and why?







exponentiation






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Meghan C is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Meghan C is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor




Meghan C is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 48 mins ago









Meghan C

383




383




New contributor




Meghan C is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Meghan C is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Meghan C is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 2




    People find the notation confusing, but $a^b^c$ means $a^(b^c)$ and not $(a^b)^c$, which of course is just $a^bc$. In practice, I think it's best to add the parentheses, as omitting them always leads to confusion.
    – lulu
    45 mins ago







  • 1




    You can interpret that there is no reason to read $3^3^3$ as $(3^3)^3$ because we can express it as $3^3cdot3$.
    – Yves Daoust
    29 mins ago










  • Thanks a lot. I really appreciate it.
    – Meghan C
    13 mins ago












  • 2




    People find the notation confusing, but $a^b^c$ means $a^(b^c)$ and not $(a^b)^c$, which of course is just $a^bc$. In practice, I think it's best to add the parentheses, as omitting them always leads to confusion.
    – lulu
    45 mins ago







  • 1




    You can interpret that there is no reason to read $3^3^3$ as $(3^3)^3$ because we can express it as $3^3cdot3$.
    – Yves Daoust
    29 mins ago










  • Thanks a lot. I really appreciate it.
    – Meghan C
    13 mins ago







2




2




People find the notation confusing, but $a^b^c$ means $a^(b^c)$ and not $(a^b)^c$, which of course is just $a^bc$. In practice, I think it's best to add the parentheses, as omitting them always leads to confusion.
– lulu
45 mins ago





People find the notation confusing, but $a^b^c$ means $a^(b^c)$ and not $(a^b)^c$, which of course is just $a^bc$. In practice, I think it's best to add the parentheses, as omitting them always leads to confusion.
– lulu
45 mins ago





1




1




You can interpret that there is no reason to read $3^3^3$ as $(3^3)^3$ because we can express it as $3^3cdot3$.
– Yves Daoust
29 mins ago




You can interpret that there is no reason to read $3^3^3$ as $(3^3)^3$ because we can express it as $3^3cdot3$.
– Yves Daoust
29 mins ago












Thanks a lot. I really appreciate it.
– Meghan C
13 mins ago




Thanks a lot. I really appreciate it.
– Meghan C
13 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
8
down vote



accepted










Unlike addition and multiplication, exponentiation is not associative:



  • $(a+b)+c=a+(b+c)$

  • $(atimes b)times c=atimes (btimes c)$

but



  • ($a$^$b$)^$cne a!$^($b$^$c$), more commonly written as: $left(a^bright)^c ne a^left( b^c right)$

This means there's no risk in simply writing "$a+b+c$" or "$a times b times c$" since the order in which you perform the operations doesn't matter in both cases.



For exponentiation this is not the case and writing "$a!$^$b$^$c$" is ambiguous, but we do have:



$$colorblueleft(a^bright)^c = a^bc ne a^left( b^c right)$$



Because we have this property (in blue), it's common to interpret $a^b^c$ as $a^left( b^c right)$ but if you want to avoid confusion, you can always add the parentheses.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • What a thoughtful explanation. I really appreciate this!
    – Meghan C
    12 mins ago










  • You're welcome, Meghan, and welcome to MSE.
    – StackTD
    12 mins ago










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Meghan C is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2947054%2fwhat-is-the-reasoning-behind-this-exponents-question%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
8
down vote



accepted










Unlike addition and multiplication, exponentiation is not associative:



  • $(a+b)+c=a+(b+c)$

  • $(atimes b)times c=atimes (btimes c)$

but



  • ($a$^$b$)^$cne a!$^($b$^$c$), more commonly written as: $left(a^bright)^c ne a^left( b^c right)$

This means there's no risk in simply writing "$a+b+c$" or "$a times b times c$" since the order in which you perform the operations doesn't matter in both cases.



For exponentiation this is not the case and writing "$a!$^$b$^$c$" is ambiguous, but we do have:



$$colorblueleft(a^bright)^c = a^bc ne a^left( b^c right)$$



Because we have this property (in blue), it's common to interpret $a^b^c$ as $a^left( b^c right)$ but if you want to avoid confusion, you can always add the parentheses.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • What a thoughtful explanation. I really appreciate this!
    – Meghan C
    12 mins ago










  • You're welcome, Meghan, and welcome to MSE.
    – StackTD
    12 mins ago














up vote
8
down vote



accepted










Unlike addition and multiplication, exponentiation is not associative:



  • $(a+b)+c=a+(b+c)$

  • $(atimes b)times c=atimes (btimes c)$

but



  • ($a$^$b$)^$cne a!$^($b$^$c$), more commonly written as: $left(a^bright)^c ne a^left( b^c right)$

This means there's no risk in simply writing "$a+b+c$" or "$a times b times c$" since the order in which you perform the operations doesn't matter in both cases.



For exponentiation this is not the case and writing "$a!$^$b$^$c$" is ambiguous, but we do have:



$$colorblueleft(a^bright)^c = a^bc ne a^left( b^c right)$$



Because we have this property (in blue), it's common to interpret $a^b^c$ as $a^left( b^c right)$ but if you want to avoid confusion, you can always add the parentheses.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • What a thoughtful explanation. I really appreciate this!
    – Meghan C
    12 mins ago










  • You're welcome, Meghan, and welcome to MSE.
    – StackTD
    12 mins ago












up vote
8
down vote



accepted







up vote
8
down vote



accepted






Unlike addition and multiplication, exponentiation is not associative:



  • $(a+b)+c=a+(b+c)$

  • $(atimes b)times c=atimes (btimes c)$

but



  • ($a$^$b$)^$cne a!$^($b$^$c$), more commonly written as: $left(a^bright)^c ne a^left( b^c right)$

This means there's no risk in simply writing "$a+b+c$" or "$a times b times c$" since the order in which you perform the operations doesn't matter in both cases.



For exponentiation this is not the case and writing "$a!$^$b$^$c$" is ambiguous, but we do have:



$$colorblueleft(a^bright)^c = a^bc ne a^left( b^c right)$$



Because we have this property (in blue), it's common to interpret $a^b^c$ as $a^left( b^c right)$ but if you want to avoid confusion, you can always add the parentheses.






share|cite|improve this answer














Unlike addition and multiplication, exponentiation is not associative:



  • $(a+b)+c=a+(b+c)$

  • $(atimes b)times c=atimes (btimes c)$

but



  • ($a$^$b$)^$cne a!$^($b$^$c$), more commonly written as: $left(a^bright)^c ne a^left( b^c right)$

This means there's no risk in simply writing "$a+b+c$" or "$a times b times c$" since the order in which you perform the operations doesn't matter in both cases.



For exponentiation this is not the case and writing "$a!$^$b$^$c$" is ambiguous, but we do have:



$$colorblueleft(a^bright)^c = a^bc ne a^left( b^c right)$$



Because we have this property (in blue), it's common to interpret $a^b^c$ as $a^left( b^c right)$ but if you want to avoid confusion, you can always add the parentheses.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 5 mins ago

























answered 36 mins ago









StackTD

20.6k1544




20.6k1544











  • What a thoughtful explanation. I really appreciate this!
    – Meghan C
    12 mins ago










  • You're welcome, Meghan, and welcome to MSE.
    – StackTD
    12 mins ago
















  • What a thoughtful explanation. I really appreciate this!
    – Meghan C
    12 mins ago










  • You're welcome, Meghan, and welcome to MSE.
    – StackTD
    12 mins ago















What a thoughtful explanation. I really appreciate this!
– Meghan C
12 mins ago




What a thoughtful explanation. I really appreciate this!
– Meghan C
12 mins ago












You're welcome, Meghan, and welcome to MSE.
– StackTD
12 mins ago




You're welcome, Meghan, and welcome to MSE.
– StackTD
12 mins ago










Meghan C is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















Meghan C is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Meghan C is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Meghan C is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2947054%2fwhat-is-the-reasoning-behind-this-exponents-question%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What does second last employer means? [closed]

List of Gilmore Girls characters

One-line joke