Input editor does not like my Thread over Circle expression

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I am using Mathematica 11.3.0.0, 64 bit.



Here is my code:



Graphics[Thread[Circle[-1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.5]]]


Here is code as it looks in a notebook:





On mouseover on , 1, 0:





However, when I evaluate that code I am getting the right output:





Questions



Why, although is , 1, 0 colored in red, does the expression evaluate correctly? Is it a bug? Or maybe I am doing something wrong?






graphics front-end syntax







share|improve this question























  • Everything is fine. That's just the syntax highlighter. If it makes you feel better, you can use MapThread[Circle, -1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.5] instead.
    – Henrik Schumacher
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    SyntaxInformation[Circle] gives "ArgumentsPattern" -> Optional[_, _], _., Optional[_, _]. That is, the first argument (if it is used) should be a list of two elements.
    – kglr
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    Please do not use bug tag unless it is confurmed by support or community.
    – Kuba♦
    4 hours ago














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I am using Mathematica 11.3.0.0, 64 bit.



Here is my code:



Graphics[Thread[Circle[-1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.5]]]


Here is code as it looks in a notebook:





On mouseover on , 1, 0:





However, when I evaluate that code I am getting the right output:





Questions



Why, although is , 1, 0 colored in red, does the expression evaluate correctly? Is it a bug? Or maybe I am doing something wrong?






graphics front-end syntax







share|improve this question























  • Everything is fine. That's just the syntax highlighter. If it makes you feel better, you can use MapThread[Circle, -1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.5] instead.
    – Henrik Schumacher
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    SyntaxInformation[Circle] gives "ArgumentsPattern" -> Optional[_, _], _., Optional[_, _]. That is, the first argument (if it is used) should be a list of two elements.
    – kglr
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    Please do not use bug tag unless it is confurmed by support or community.
    – Kuba♦
    4 hours ago












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I am using Mathematica 11.3.0.0, 64 bit.



Here is my code:



Graphics[Thread[Circle[-1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.5]]]


Here is code as it looks in a notebook:





On mouseover on , 1, 0:





However, when I evaluate that code I am getting the right output:





Questions



Why, although is , 1, 0 colored in red, does the expression evaluate correctly? Is it a bug? Or maybe I am doing something wrong?






graphics front-end syntax







share|improve this question















I am using Mathematica 11.3.0.0, 64 bit.



Here is my code:



Graphics[Thread[Circle[-1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.5]]]


Here is code as it looks in a notebook:





On mouseover on , 1, 0:





However, when I evaluate that code I am getting the right output:





Questions



Why, although is , 1, 0 colored in red, does the expression evaluate correctly? Is it a bug? Or maybe I am doing something wrong?






graphics front-end syntax




graphics front-end syntax






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 16 mins ago









m_goldberg

82.2k869190




82.2k869190










asked 4 hours ago









vasili111

29517




29517











  • Everything is fine. That's just the syntax highlighter. If it makes you feel better, you can use MapThread[Circle, -1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.5] instead.
    – Henrik Schumacher
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    SyntaxInformation[Circle] gives "ArgumentsPattern" -> Optional[_, _], _., Optional[_, _]. That is, the first argument (if it is used) should be a list of two elements.
    – kglr
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    Please do not use bug tag unless it is confurmed by support or community.
    – Kuba♦
    4 hours ago
















  • Everything is fine. That's just the syntax highlighter. If it makes you feel better, you can use MapThread[Circle, -1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.5] instead.
    – Henrik Schumacher
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    SyntaxInformation[Circle] gives "ArgumentsPattern" -> Optional[_, _], _., Optional[_, _]. That is, the first argument (if it is used) should be a list of two elements.
    – kglr
    4 hours ago






  • 2




    Please do not use bug tag unless it is confurmed by support or community.
    – Kuba♦
    4 hours ago















Everything is fine. That's just the syntax highlighter. If it makes you feel better, you can use MapThread[Circle, -1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.5] instead.
– Henrik Schumacher
4 hours ago




Everything is fine. That's just the syntax highlighter. If it makes you feel better, you can use MapThread[Circle, -1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.5] instead.
– Henrik Schumacher
4 hours ago




1




1




SyntaxInformation[Circle] gives "ArgumentsPattern" -> Optional[_, _], _., Optional[_, _]. That is, the first argument (if it is used) should be a list of two elements.
– kglr
4 hours ago




SyntaxInformation[Circle] gives "ArgumentsPattern" -> Optional[_, _], _., Optional[_, _]. That is, the first argument (if it is used) should be a list of two elements.
– kglr
4 hours ago




2




2




Please do not use bug tag unless it is confurmed by support or community.
– Kuba♦
4 hours ago




Please do not use bug tag unless it is confurmed by support or community.
– Kuba♦
4 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













SyntaxInformation[Circle]



"ArgumentsPattern" -> Optional[_, _], ., Optional[, _]




That is, the first argument (if it is used) should be a list with two elements. Hence, the excess arguments are colored red by the syntax highlighter.






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Is Circle[-1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.5] a valid input? I hope it is clear it is not.



    Will Thread[Circle[-1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.5]] evaluate to something reasonable? It will but you don't want a front end to evaluate your code behind the hood to determine this. Consider consequences if that was something less trivial.



    Related:



    Why is this semicolon in red?






    share|improve this answer






















      Your Answer




      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "387"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f182424%2finput-editor-does-not-like-my-thread-over-circle-expression%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest

















      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      2
      down vote













      SyntaxInformation[Circle]



      "ArgumentsPattern" -> Optional[_, _], ., Optional[, _]




      That is, the first argument (if it is used) should be a list with two elements. Hence, the excess arguments are colored red by the syntax highlighter.






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        2
        down vote













        SyntaxInformation[Circle]



        "ArgumentsPattern" -> Optional[_, _], ., Optional[, _]




        That is, the first argument (if it is used) should be a list with two elements. Hence, the excess arguments are colored red by the syntax highlighter.






        share|improve this answer






















          up vote
          2
          down vote










          up vote
          2
          down vote









          SyntaxInformation[Circle]



          "ArgumentsPattern" -> Optional[_, _], ., Optional[, _]




          That is, the first argument (if it is used) should be a list with two elements. Hence, the excess arguments are colored red by the syntax highlighter.






          share|improve this answer












          SyntaxInformation[Circle]



          "ArgumentsPattern" -> Optional[_, _], ., Optional[, _]




          That is, the first argument (if it is used) should be a list with two elements. Hence, the excess arguments are colored red by the syntax highlighter.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 hours ago









          kglr

          161k8185385




          161k8185385




















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Is Circle[-1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.5] a valid input? I hope it is clear it is not.



              Will Thread[Circle[-1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.5]] evaluate to something reasonable? It will but you don't want a front end to evaluate your code behind the hood to determine this. Consider consequences if that was something less trivial.



              Related:



              Why is this semicolon in red?






              share|improve this answer


























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                Is Circle[-1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.5] a valid input? I hope it is clear it is not.



                Will Thread[Circle[-1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.5]] evaluate to something reasonable? It will but you don't want a front end to evaluate your code behind the hood to determine this. Consider consequences if that was something less trivial.



                Related:



                Why is this semicolon in red?






                share|improve this answer
























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  Is Circle[-1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.5] a valid input? I hope it is clear it is not.



                  Will Thread[Circle[-1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.5]] evaluate to something reasonable? It will but you don't want a front end to evaluate your code behind the hood to determine this. Consider consequences if that was something less trivial.



                  Related:



                  Why is this semicolon in red?






                  share|improve this answer














                  Is Circle[-1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.5] a valid input? I hope it is clear it is not.



                  Will Thread[Circle[-1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.5]] evaluate to something reasonable? It will but you don't want a front end to evaluate your code behind the hood to determine this. Consider consequences if that was something less trivial.



                  Related:



                  Why is this semicolon in red?







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 3 hours ago


























                  community wiki





                  2 revs
                  Kuba




























                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f182424%2finput-editor-does-not-like-my-thread-over-circle-expression%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest
































































                      Comments

                      Post a Comment

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

                      Image
                      Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote 31 down vote favorite 4 I hold a PhD in mechanical engineering with a 7 year background in self-guided, self-paced research including 2 years as a graduate level course instructor and a subject matter expert for various engineering projects in a university setting in the United States. For the last 10-11 months, I am working in a research industry in France where my task is to debug C++ spaghetti code written over a period of several years by my current supervisor. It is a team of 2: just I and my supervisor. Diurnally, I am posed with a "bug of the day" to get out of this C++ code. My supervisor generally gives me about 15-30 minutes to solve it and then accosts me about whether or not the task is completed and then rinses and repeats this until the end of the day. Off-late, my supervisor has been holding 6-7 hour long "meetin
                      Read more

                      Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

                      Image
                      Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite Many fantasy worlds have multiple humanoid species (elves, orcs, humans, etc) living in the same world, in addition to that, they often have the ability to interbreed. And I can't help but question their believability... fantasy-races reproduction interspecies-relations share | improve this question edited Aug 9 at 14:46 Michael Kjörling ♦ 21.1k 10 85 161 asked Aug 9 at 13:13 Chlodio 118 6 closed as unclear what you're asking by MichaelK, Gryphon, John, Vincent, Frostfyre Aug 9 at 15:25 Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question. 3 Stack Exchange exist to
                      Read more

                      Confectionery

                      Image
                      Prepared foods made with a lot of sugar or other cabohydrates "Sweetmeat" redirects here. For the racehorse, see Sweetmeat (horse). Not to be confused with Sweetbread. This Kransekake is a traditional Scandinavian baker's confection. Confectionery is the art of making confections , which are food items that are rich in sugar and carbohydrates. Exact definitions are difficult. [1] In general, though, confectionery is divided into two broad and somewhat overlapping categories, bakers' confections and sugar confections. [2] Bakers' confectionery, also called flour confections , includes principally sweet pastries, cakes, and similar baked goods. Sugar confectionery includes candies ( sweets in British English), candied nuts, chocolates, chewing gum, bubble gum, pastillage, and other confections that are made primarily of sugar. In some cases, chocolate confections (confections made of chocolate) are treated as a separate category, as are sugar-free versions of
                      Read more