What is the correct name of 3-isopropyl-4-methylhexane?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
In the branched alkane shown above, I've been told that 3-isopropyl-4-methylhexane is supposedly the correct name. However, in the alternative numbering scheme on the right, the parent chain is still of the same length (six carbon atoms) and has more substituents, so shouldn't that be the preferred name?
organic-chemistry nomenclature hydrocarbons
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
In the branched alkane shown above, I've been told that 3-isopropyl-4-methylhexane is supposedly the correct name. However, in the alternative numbering scheme on the right, the parent chain is still of the same length (six carbon atoms) and has more substituents, so shouldn't that be the preferred name?
organic-chemistry nomenclature hydrocarbons
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
In the branched alkane shown above, I've been told that 3-isopropyl-4-methylhexane is supposedly the correct name. However, in the alternative numbering scheme on the right, the parent chain is still of the same length (six carbon atoms) and has more substituents, so shouldn't that be the preferred name?
organic-chemistry nomenclature hydrocarbons
In the branched alkane shown above, I've been told that 3-isopropyl-4-methylhexane is supposedly the correct name. However, in the alternative numbering scheme on the right, the parent chain is still of the same length (six carbon atoms) and has more substituents, so shouldn't that be the preferred name?
organic-chemistry nomenclature hydrocarbons
organic-chemistry nomenclature hydrocarbons
edited 10 mins ago
orthocresolâ¦
35.9k7105212
35.9k7105212
asked 9 hours ago
Hema
27210
27210
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
Both the names you have given are not the preferred name for the molecule above. You are correct that the preferred name maximises the number of substituents when there is a choice: see Alkane nomenclature - choosing the parent chain - maximize or minimize substituents? So, a name of the form a-ethyl-(b,c)-dimethylhexane (where a, b, and c are appropriately chosen locant numbers) is preferred over a name of the form a-isopropyl-b-methylhexane, as it has three substituents as opposed to two.
However, the numbering on the right is not correct either. If you number the carbon chain the other way around instead, you would obtain the name 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane:
This is preferred over your proposed name 4-ethyl-3,5-dimethylhexane, because the locant set (2,3,4) in 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane is lower than the locant set (3,4,5) in 4-ethyl-3,5-dimethylhexane.
Note also that according to current IUPAC nomenclature recommendations (P-57.1.1.1 of the 2013 Blue Book), the preferred prefix for $ce-CH(CH3)2$ is "propan-2-yl", not "isopropyl".
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
Both the names you have given are not the preferred name for the molecule above. You are correct that the preferred name maximises the number of substituents when there is a choice: see Alkane nomenclature - choosing the parent chain - maximize or minimize substituents? So, a name of the form a-ethyl-(b,c)-dimethylhexane (where a, b, and c are appropriately chosen locant numbers) is preferred over a name of the form a-isopropyl-b-methylhexane, as it has three substituents as opposed to two.
However, the numbering on the right is not correct either. If you number the carbon chain the other way around instead, you would obtain the name 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane:
This is preferred over your proposed name 4-ethyl-3,5-dimethylhexane, because the locant set (2,3,4) in 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane is lower than the locant set (3,4,5) in 4-ethyl-3,5-dimethylhexane.
Note also that according to current IUPAC nomenclature recommendations (P-57.1.1.1 of the 2013 Blue Book), the preferred prefix for $ce-CH(CH3)2$ is "propan-2-yl", not "isopropyl".
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
Both the names you have given are not the preferred name for the molecule above. You are correct that the preferred name maximises the number of substituents when there is a choice: see Alkane nomenclature - choosing the parent chain - maximize or minimize substituents? So, a name of the form a-ethyl-(b,c)-dimethylhexane (where a, b, and c are appropriately chosen locant numbers) is preferred over a name of the form a-isopropyl-b-methylhexane, as it has three substituents as opposed to two.
However, the numbering on the right is not correct either. If you number the carbon chain the other way around instead, you would obtain the name 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane:
This is preferred over your proposed name 4-ethyl-3,5-dimethylhexane, because the locant set (2,3,4) in 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane is lower than the locant set (3,4,5) in 4-ethyl-3,5-dimethylhexane.
Note also that according to current IUPAC nomenclature recommendations (P-57.1.1.1 of the 2013 Blue Book), the preferred prefix for $ce-CH(CH3)2$ is "propan-2-yl", not "isopropyl".
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
Both the names you have given are not the preferred name for the molecule above. You are correct that the preferred name maximises the number of substituents when there is a choice: see Alkane nomenclature - choosing the parent chain - maximize or minimize substituents? So, a name of the form a-ethyl-(b,c)-dimethylhexane (where a, b, and c are appropriately chosen locant numbers) is preferred over a name of the form a-isopropyl-b-methylhexane, as it has three substituents as opposed to two.
However, the numbering on the right is not correct either. If you number the carbon chain the other way around instead, you would obtain the name 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane:
This is preferred over your proposed name 4-ethyl-3,5-dimethylhexane, because the locant set (2,3,4) in 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane is lower than the locant set (3,4,5) in 4-ethyl-3,5-dimethylhexane.
Note also that according to current IUPAC nomenclature recommendations (P-57.1.1.1 of the 2013 Blue Book), the preferred prefix for $ce-CH(CH3)2$ is "propan-2-yl", not "isopropyl".
Both the names you have given are not the preferred name for the molecule above. You are correct that the preferred name maximises the number of substituents when there is a choice: see Alkane nomenclature - choosing the parent chain - maximize or minimize substituents? So, a name of the form a-ethyl-(b,c)-dimethylhexane (where a, b, and c are appropriately chosen locant numbers) is preferred over a name of the form a-isopropyl-b-methylhexane, as it has three substituents as opposed to two.
However, the numbering on the right is not correct either. If you number the carbon chain the other way around instead, you would obtain the name 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane:
This is preferred over your proposed name 4-ethyl-3,5-dimethylhexane, because the locant set (2,3,4) in 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane is lower than the locant set (3,4,5) in 4-ethyl-3,5-dimethylhexane.
Note also that according to current IUPAC nomenclature recommendations (P-57.1.1.1 of the 2013 Blue Book), the preferred prefix for $ce-CH(CH3)2$ is "propan-2-yl", not "isopropyl".
edited 6 mins ago
orthocresolâ¦
35.9k7105212
35.9k7105212
answered 8 hours ago
Loop Back
1085
1085
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102061%2fwhat-is-the-correct-name-of-3-isopropyl-4-methylhexane%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password