What is the correct name of 3-isopropyl-4-methylhexane?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Structure of 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane



In the branched alkane shown above, I've been told that 3-isopropyl-4-methylhexane is supposedly the correct name. However, in the alternative numbering scheme on the right, the parent chain is still of the same length (six carbon atoms) and has more substituents, so shouldn't that be the preferred name?






organic-chemistry nomenclature hydrocarbons







share|improve this question



























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    Structure of 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane



    In the branched alkane shown above, I've been told that 3-isopropyl-4-methylhexane is supposedly the correct name. However, in the alternative numbering scheme on the right, the parent chain is still of the same length (six carbon atoms) and has more substituents, so shouldn't that be the preferred name?






    organic-chemistry nomenclature hydrocarbons







    share|improve this question

























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      Structure of 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane



      In the branched alkane shown above, I've been told that 3-isopropyl-4-methylhexane is supposedly the correct name. However, in the alternative numbering scheme on the right, the parent chain is still of the same length (six carbon atoms) and has more substituents, so shouldn't that be the preferred name?






      organic-chemistry nomenclature hydrocarbons







      share|improve this question















      Structure of 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane



      In the branched alkane shown above, I've been told that 3-isopropyl-4-methylhexane is supposedly the correct name. However, in the alternative numbering scheme on the right, the parent chain is still of the same length (six carbon atoms) and has more substituents, so shouldn't that be the preferred name?






      organic-chemistry nomenclature hydrocarbons




      organic-chemistry nomenclature hydrocarbons






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 10 mins ago









      orthocresol♦

      35.9k7105212




      35.9k7105212










      asked 9 hours ago









      Hema

      27210




      27210




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          7
          down vote













          Both the names you have given are not the preferred name for the molecule above. You are correct that the preferred name maximises the number of substituents when there is a choice: see Alkane nomenclature - choosing the parent chain - maximize or minimize substituents? So, a name of the form a-ethyl-(b,c)-dimethylhexane (where a, b, and c are appropriately chosen locant numbers) is preferred over a name of the form a-isopropyl-b-methylhexane, as it has three substituents as opposed to two.



          However, the numbering on the right is not correct either. If you number the carbon chain the other way around instead, you would obtain the name 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane:



          3-Ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane



          This is preferred over your proposed name 4-ethyl-3,5-dimethylhexane, because the locant set (2,3,4) in 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane is lower than the locant set (3,4,5) in 4-ethyl-3,5-dimethylhexane.



          Note also that according to current IUPAC nomenclature recommendations (P-57.1.1.1 of the 2013 Blue Book), the preferred prefix for $ce-CH(CH3)2$ is "propan-2-yl", not "isopropyl".






          share|improve this answer






















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "431"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102061%2fwhat-is-the-correct-name-of-3-isopropyl-4-methylhexane%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest

















            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            7
            down vote













            Both the names you have given are not the preferred name for the molecule above. You are correct that the preferred name maximises the number of substituents when there is a choice: see Alkane nomenclature - choosing the parent chain - maximize or minimize substituents? So, a name of the form a-ethyl-(b,c)-dimethylhexane (where a, b, and c are appropriately chosen locant numbers) is preferred over a name of the form a-isopropyl-b-methylhexane, as it has three substituents as opposed to two.



            However, the numbering on the right is not correct either. If you number the carbon chain the other way around instead, you would obtain the name 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane:



            3-Ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane



            This is preferred over your proposed name 4-ethyl-3,5-dimethylhexane, because the locant set (2,3,4) in 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane is lower than the locant set (3,4,5) in 4-ethyl-3,5-dimethylhexane.



            Note also that according to current IUPAC nomenclature recommendations (P-57.1.1.1 of the 2013 Blue Book), the preferred prefix for $ce-CH(CH3)2$ is "propan-2-yl", not "isopropyl".






            share|improve this answer


























              up vote
              7
              down vote













              Both the names you have given are not the preferred name for the molecule above. You are correct that the preferred name maximises the number of substituents when there is a choice: see Alkane nomenclature - choosing the parent chain - maximize or minimize substituents? So, a name of the form a-ethyl-(b,c)-dimethylhexane (where a, b, and c are appropriately chosen locant numbers) is preferred over a name of the form a-isopropyl-b-methylhexane, as it has three substituents as opposed to two.



              However, the numbering on the right is not correct either. If you number the carbon chain the other way around instead, you would obtain the name 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane:



              3-Ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane



              This is preferred over your proposed name 4-ethyl-3,5-dimethylhexane, because the locant set (2,3,4) in 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane is lower than the locant set (3,4,5) in 4-ethyl-3,5-dimethylhexane.



              Note also that according to current IUPAC nomenclature recommendations (P-57.1.1.1 of the 2013 Blue Book), the preferred prefix for $ce-CH(CH3)2$ is "propan-2-yl", not "isopropyl".






              share|improve this answer
























                up vote
                7
                down vote










                up vote
                7
                down vote









                Both the names you have given are not the preferred name for the molecule above. You are correct that the preferred name maximises the number of substituents when there is a choice: see Alkane nomenclature - choosing the parent chain - maximize or minimize substituents? So, a name of the form a-ethyl-(b,c)-dimethylhexane (where a, b, and c are appropriately chosen locant numbers) is preferred over a name of the form a-isopropyl-b-methylhexane, as it has three substituents as opposed to two.



                However, the numbering on the right is not correct either. If you number the carbon chain the other way around instead, you would obtain the name 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane:



                3-Ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane



                This is preferred over your proposed name 4-ethyl-3,5-dimethylhexane, because the locant set (2,3,4) in 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane is lower than the locant set (3,4,5) in 4-ethyl-3,5-dimethylhexane.



                Note also that according to current IUPAC nomenclature recommendations (P-57.1.1.1 of the 2013 Blue Book), the preferred prefix for $ce-CH(CH3)2$ is "propan-2-yl", not "isopropyl".






                share|improve this answer














                Both the names you have given are not the preferred name for the molecule above. You are correct that the preferred name maximises the number of substituents when there is a choice: see Alkane nomenclature - choosing the parent chain - maximize or minimize substituents? So, a name of the form a-ethyl-(b,c)-dimethylhexane (where a, b, and c are appropriately chosen locant numbers) is preferred over a name of the form a-isopropyl-b-methylhexane, as it has three substituents as opposed to two.



                However, the numbering on the right is not correct either. If you number the carbon chain the other way around instead, you would obtain the name 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane:



                3-Ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane



                This is preferred over your proposed name 4-ethyl-3,5-dimethylhexane, because the locant set (2,3,4) in 3-ethyl-2,4-dimethylhexane is lower than the locant set (3,4,5) in 4-ethyl-3,5-dimethylhexane.



                Note also that according to current IUPAC nomenclature recommendations (P-57.1.1.1 of the 2013 Blue Book), the preferred prefix for $ce-CH(CH3)2$ is "propan-2-yl", not "isopropyl".







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 6 mins ago









                orthocresol♦

                35.9k7105212




                35.9k7105212










                answered 8 hours ago









                Loop Back

                1085




                1085



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102061%2fwhat-is-the-correct-name-of-3-isopropyl-4-methylhexane%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest
































































                    Comments

                    Post a Comment

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

                    Image
                    Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote 31 down vote favorite 4 I hold a PhD in mechanical engineering with a 7 year background in self-guided, self-paced research including 2 years as a graduate level course instructor and a subject matter expert for various engineering projects in a university setting in the United States. For the last 10-11 months, I am working in a research industry in France where my task is to debug C++ spaghetti code written over a period of several years by my current supervisor. It is a team of 2: just I and my supervisor. Diurnally, I am posed with a "bug of the day" to get out of this C++ code. My supervisor generally gives me about 15-30 minutes to solve it and then accosts me about whether or not the task is completed and then rinses and repeats this until the end of the day. Off-late, my supervisor has been holding 6-7 hour long "meetin
                    Read more

                    Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

                    Image
                    Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite Many fantasy worlds have multiple humanoid species (elves, orcs, humans, etc) living in the same world, in addition to that, they often have the ability to interbreed. And I can't help but question their believability... fantasy-races reproduction interspecies-relations share | improve this question edited Aug 9 at 14:46 Michael Kjörling ♦ 21.1k 10 85 161 asked Aug 9 at 13:13 Chlodio 118 6 closed as unclear what you're asking by MichaelK, Gryphon, John, Vincent, Frostfyre Aug 9 at 15:25 Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question. 3 Stack Exchange exist to
                    Read more

                    Confectionery

                    Image
                    Prepared foods made with a lot of sugar or other cabohydrates "Sweetmeat" redirects here. For the racehorse, see Sweetmeat (horse). Not to be confused with Sweetbread. This Kransekake is a traditional Scandinavian baker's confection. Confectionery is the art of making confections , which are food items that are rich in sugar and carbohydrates. Exact definitions are difficult. [1] In general, though, confectionery is divided into two broad and somewhat overlapping categories, bakers' confections and sugar confections. [2] Bakers' confectionery, also called flour confections , includes principally sweet pastries, cakes, and similar baked goods. Sugar confectionery includes candies ( sweets in British English), candied nuts, chocolates, chewing gum, bubble gum, pastillage, and other confections that are made primarily of sugar. In some cases, chocolate confections (confections made of chocolate) are treated as a separate category, as are sugar-free versions of
                    Read more