Singular or Plural of a popular word

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Is 'guts' singular or plural? Like, which is correct: "Guts are required for this" or "Guts is required for this"?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Dikshit Gautam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • noun [plural] informal macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/guts
    – Ronald Sole
    3 hours ago

















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Is 'guts' singular or plural? Like, which is correct: "Guts are required for this" or "Guts is required for this"?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Dikshit Gautam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • noun [plural] informal macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/guts
    – Ronald Sole
    3 hours ago













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Is 'guts' singular or plural? Like, which is correct: "Guts are required for this" or "Guts is required for this"?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Dikshit Gautam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Is 'guts' singular or plural? Like, which is correct: "Guts are required for this" or "Guts is required for this"?







singular-vs-plural






share|improve this question







New contributor




Dikshit Gautam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Dikshit Gautam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Dikshit Gautam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 3 hours ago









Dikshit Gautam

61




61




New contributor




Dikshit Gautam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Dikshit Gautam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Dikshit Gautam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • noun [plural] informal macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/guts
    – Ronald Sole
    3 hours ago

















  • noun [plural] informal macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/guts
    – Ronald Sole
    3 hours ago
















noun [plural] informal macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/guts
– Ronald Sole
3 hours ago





noun [plural] informal macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/guts
– Ronald Sole
3 hours ago











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













It could be singular or plural depending on the context. "Gut" and "guts" have several different meanings which could be used in the OP's sentence.



If "guts" means "the entrails of an animal, removed by a butcher" or "personal courage or determination" then it is plural - "Guts are required for this".



IF "gut" is a mass noun meaning "Fibre made from the intestines of animals, used especially for violin or racket strings or for surgical use." then like all mass nouns it is singular - "Gut is required for this."



Reference for meanings of "gut(s)" : https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/gut #s 1.2, 3, and 4.






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Guts is used widely used informally especially in British English to mean fortitude, courage or determination:




    guts [plural]

    informal the courage and determination you need to do
    something difficult or unpleasant



    It takes guts to start a new business on your own.



    have the guts (to do something)



    No one had the guts to tell Paul what a mistake he was making.




    Guts (Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English)



    The plural designation is also shown in the entries in Merriam-Webster, Collins, and Oxford Learner's dictionaries.






    share|improve this answer




















    • Yeah, but I think almost all native speakers (except grammatically-cowed "hypercorrectionists") would prefer singular Guts is what you need for this job over plural Guts are what you need for this job. Well, that's what I think off the top of my head anyway. Obviously I know which I prefer, but I might check out Google Books for the same syntactic issue with a more common "ambiguous plurality" noun... (Brains is what you need to solve a problem like this :)
      – FumbleFingers
      54 mins ago

















    up vote
    0
    down vote













    The cited use of guts is exactly paralleled by brains. We tend to think of the "idiomatic" senses (courage / intelligence) as only applying to the plural form, because we never use He has gut / brain to mean He's brave / clever.



    But noting that many if not most native speakers would prefer Guts / brains is something he's never been short of, rather than ...are something..., I think it's reasonable to say that semantically, we think of the idiomatic plural usage as representing singular quality / attribute.



    It's almost meaningless to ask which version is "right", and Anglophones in general have a long history of ignoring pedants anyway (consider the data is vs the data are :). But unquestionably I personally would favour semantics over syntax in OP's case.




    It may not be directly relevant to OP's exact example, but when searching for relevant pronouncements on the usage, I came across this delightfully ambiguous example...




    These animals have brains Semantics: A Reader (2004) - Page 420




    ...which could be literal - each of the animals actually does have at least some kind organ containing neurons. But it could also be figurative - some or all of them are [unusually] smart. And exactly the same ambiguity would apply with guts in that example (digestive organ / bravery).






    share|improve this answer






















      Your Answer







      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "481"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      Dikshit Gautam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f180552%2fsingular-or-plural-of-a-popular-word%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      2
      down vote













      It could be singular or plural depending on the context. "Gut" and "guts" have several different meanings which could be used in the OP's sentence.



      If "guts" means "the entrails of an animal, removed by a butcher" or "personal courage or determination" then it is plural - "Guts are required for this".



      IF "gut" is a mass noun meaning "Fibre made from the intestines of animals, used especially for violin or racket strings or for surgical use." then like all mass nouns it is singular - "Gut is required for this."



      Reference for meanings of "gut(s)" : https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/gut #s 1.2, 3, and 4.






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        2
        down vote













        It could be singular or plural depending on the context. "Gut" and "guts" have several different meanings which could be used in the OP's sentence.



        If "guts" means "the entrails of an animal, removed by a butcher" or "personal courage or determination" then it is plural - "Guts are required for this".



        IF "gut" is a mass noun meaning "Fibre made from the intestines of animals, used especially for violin or racket strings or for surgical use." then like all mass nouns it is singular - "Gut is required for this."



        Reference for meanings of "gut(s)" : https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/gut #s 1.2, 3, and 4.






        share|improve this answer






















          up vote
          2
          down vote










          up vote
          2
          down vote









          It could be singular or plural depending on the context. "Gut" and "guts" have several different meanings which could be used in the OP's sentence.



          If "guts" means "the entrails of an animal, removed by a butcher" or "personal courage or determination" then it is plural - "Guts are required for this".



          IF "gut" is a mass noun meaning "Fibre made from the intestines of animals, used especially for violin or racket strings or for surgical use." then like all mass nouns it is singular - "Gut is required for this."



          Reference for meanings of "gut(s)" : https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/gut #s 1.2, 3, and 4.






          share|improve this answer












          It could be singular or plural depending on the context. "Gut" and "guts" have several different meanings which could be used in the OP's sentence.



          If "guts" means "the entrails of an animal, removed by a butcher" or "personal courage or determination" then it is plural - "Guts are required for this".



          IF "gut" is a mass noun meaning "Fibre made from the intestines of animals, used especially for violin or racket strings or for surgical use." then like all mass nouns it is singular - "Gut is required for this."



          Reference for meanings of "gut(s)" : https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/gut #s 1.2, 3, and 4.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 3 hours ago









          alephzero

          1,490411




          1,490411






















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Guts is used widely used informally especially in British English to mean fortitude, courage or determination:




              guts [plural]

              informal the courage and determination you need to do
              something difficult or unpleasant



              It takes guts to start a new business on your own.



              have the guts (to do something)



              No one had the guts to tell Paul what a mistake he was making.




              Guts (Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English)



              The plural designation is also shown in the entries in Merriam-Webster, Collins, and Oxford Learner's dictionaries.






              share|improve this answer




















              • Yeah, but I think almost all native speakers (except grammatically-cowed "hypercorrectionists") would prefer singular Guts is what you need for this job over plural Guts are what you need for this job. Well, that's what I think off the top of my head anyway. Obviously I know which I prefer, but I might check out Google Books for the same syntactic issue with a more common "ambiguous plurality" noun... (Brains is what you need to solve a problem like this :)
                – FumbleFingers
                54 mins ago














              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Guts is used widely used informally especially in British English to mean fortitude, courage or determination:




              guts [plural]

              informal the courage and determination you need to do
              something difficult or unpleasant



              It takes guts to start a new business on your own.



              have the guts (to do something)



              No one had the guts to tell Paul what a mistake he was making.




              Guts (Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English)



              The plural designation is also shown in the entries in Merriam-Webster, Collins, and Oxford Learner's dictionaries.






              share|improve this answer




















              • Yeah, but I think almost all native speakers (except grammatically-cowed "hypercorrectionists") would prefer singular Guts is what you need for this job over plural Guts are what you need for this job. Well, that's what I think off the top of my head anyway. Obviously I know which I prefer, but I might check out Google Books for the same syntactic issue with a more common "ambiguous plurality" noun... (Brains is what you need to solve a problem like this :)
                – FumbleFingers
                54 mins ago












              up vote
              1
              down vote










              up vote
              1
              down vote









              Guts is used widely used informally especially in British English to mean fortitude, courage or determination:




              guts [plural]

              informal the courage and determination you need to do
              something difficult or unpleasant



              It takes guts to start a new business on your own.



              have the guts (to do something)



              No one had the guts to tell Paul what a mistake he was making.




              Guts (Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English)



              The plural designation is also shown in the entries in Merriam-Webster, Collins, and Oxford Learner's dictionaries.






              share|improve this answer












              Guts is used widely used informally especially in British English to mean fortitude, courage or determination:




              guts [plural]

              informal the courage and determination you need to do
              something difficult or unpleasant



              It takes guts to start a new business on your own.



              have the guts (to do something)



              No one had the guts to tell Paul what a mistake he was making.




              Guts (Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English)



              The plural designation is also shown in the entries in Merriam-Webster, Collins, and Oxford Learner's dictionaries.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 2 hours ago









              Michael Harvey

              8,6631723




              8,6631723











              • Yeah, but I think almost all native speakers (except grammatically-cowed "hypercorrectionists") would prefer singular Guts is what you need for this job over plural Guts are what you need for this job. Well, that's what I think off the top of my head anyway. Obviously I know which I prefer, but I might check out Google Books for the same syntactic issue with a more common "ambiguous plurality" noun... (Brains is what you need to solve a problem like this :)
                – FumbleFingers
                54 mins ago
















              • Yeah, but I think almost all native speakers (except grammatically-cowed "hypercorrectionists") would prefer singular Guts is what you need for this job over plural Guts are what you need for this job. Well, that's what I think off the top of my head anyway. Obviously I know which I prefer, but I might check out Google Books for the same syntactic issue with a more common "ambiguous plurality" noun... (Brains is what you need to solve a problem like this :)
                – FumbleFingers
                54 mins ago















              Yeah, but I think almost all native speakers (except grammatically-cowed "hypercorrectionists") would prefer singular Guts is what you need for this job over plural Guts are what you need for this job. Well, that's what I think off the top of my head anyway. Obviously I know which I prefer, but I might check out Google Books for the same syntactic issue with a more common "ambiguous plurality" noun... (Brains is what you need to solve a problem like this :)
              – FumbleFingers
              54 mins ago




              Yeah, but I think almost all native speakers (except grammatically-cowed "hypercorrectionists") would prefer singular Guts is what you need for this job over plural Guts are what you need for this job. Well, that's what I think off the top of my head anyway. Obviously I know which I prefer, but I might check out Google Books for the same syntactic issue with a more common "ambiguous plurality" noun... (Brains is what you need to solve a problem like this :)
              – FumbleFingers
              54 mins ago










              up vote
              0
              down vote













              The cited use of guts is exactly paralleled by brains. We tend to think of the "idiomatic" senses (courage / intelligence) as only applying to the plural form, because we never use He has gut / brain to mean He's brave / clever.



              But noting that many if not most native speakers would prefer Guts / brains is something he's never been short of, rather than ...are something..., I think it's reasonable to say that semantically, we think of the idiomatic plural usage as representing singular quality / attribute.



              It's almost meaningless to ask which version is "right", and Anglophones in general have a long history of ignoring pedants anyway (consider the data is vs the data are :). But unquestionably I personally would favour semantics over syntax in OP's case.




              It may not be directly relevant to OP's exact example, but when searching for relevant pronouncements on the usage, I came across this delightfully ambiguous example...




              These animals have brains Semantics: A Reader (2004) - Page 420




              ...which could be literal - each of the animals actually does have at least some kind organ containing neurons. But it could also be figurative - some or all of them are [unusually] smart. And exactly the same ambiguity would apply with guts in that example (digestive organ / bravery).






              share|improve this answer


























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                The cited use of guts is exactly paralleled by brains. We tend to think of the "idiomatic" senses (courage / intelligence) as only applying to the plural form, because we never use He has gut / brain to mean He's brave / clever.



                But noting that many if not most native speakers would prefer Guts / brains is something he's never been short of, rather than ...are something..., I think it's reasonable to say that semantically, we think of the idiomatic plural usage as representing singular quality / attribute.



                It's almost meaningless to ask which version is "right", and Anglophones in general have a long history of ignoring pedants anyway (consider the data is vs the data are :). But unquestionably I personally would favour semantics over syntax in OP's case.




                It may not be directly relevant to OP's exact example, but when searching for relevant pronouncements on the usage, I came across this delightfully ambiguous example...




                These animals have brains Semantics: A Reader (2004) - Page 420




                ...which could be literal - each of the animals actually does have at least some kind organ containing neurons. But it could also be figurative - some or all of them are [unusually] smart. And exactly the same ambiguity would apply with guts in that example (digestive organ / bravery).






                share|improve this answer
























                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  The cited use of guts is exactly paralleled by brains. We tend to think of the "idiomatic" senses (courage / intelligence) as only applying to the plural form, because we never use He has gut / brain to mean He's brave / clever.



                  But noting that many if not most native speakers would prefer Guts / brains is something he's never been short of, rather than ...are something..., I think it's reasonable to say that semantically, we think of the idiomatic plural usage as representing singular quality / attribute.



                  It's almost meaningless to ask which version is "right", and Anglophones in general have a long history of ignoring pedants anyway (consider the data is vs the data are :). But unquestionably I personally would favour semantics over syntax in OP's case.




                  It may not be directly relevant to OP's exact example, but when searching for relevant pronouncements on the usage, I came across this delightfully ambiguous example...




                  These animals have brains Semantics: A Reader (2004) - Page 420




                  ...which could be literal - each of the animals actually does have at least some kind organ containing neurons. But it could also be figurative - some or all of them are [unusually] smart. And exactly the same ambiguity would apply with guts in that example (digestive organ / bravery).






                  share|improve this answer














                  The cited use of guts is exactly paralleled by brains. We tend to think of the "idiomatic" senses (courage / intelligence) as only applying to the plural form, because we never use He has gut / brain to mean He's brave / clever.



                  But noting that many if not most native speakers would prefer Guts / brains is something he's never been short of, rather than ...are something..., I think it's reasonable to say that semantically, we think of the idiomatic plural usage as representing singular quality / attribute.



                  It's almost meaningless to ask which version is "right", and Anglophones in general have a long history of ignoring pedants anyway (consider the data is vs the data are :). But unquestionably I personally would favour semantics over syntax in OP's case.




                  It may not be directly relevant to OP's exact example, but when searching for relevant pronouncements on the usage, I came across this delightfully ambiguous example...




                  These animals have brains Semantics: A Reader (2004) - Page 420




                  ...which could be literal - each of the animals actually does have at least some kind organ containing neurons. But it could also be figurative - some or all of them are [unusually] smart. And exactly the same ambiguity would apply with guts in that example (digestive organ / bravery).







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 6 mins ago

























                  answered 14 mins ago









                  FumbleFingers

                  42.4k150116




                  42.4k150116




















                      Dikshit Gautam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded


















                      Dikshit Gautam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Dikshit Gautam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      Dikshit Gautam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f180552%2fsingular-or-plural-of-a-popular-word%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      Comments

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

                      Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

                      Confectionery