Singular or Plural of a popular word
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is 'guts' singular or plural? Like, which is correct: "Guts are required for this" or "Guts is required for this"?
singular-vs-plural
New contributor
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is 'guts' singular or plural? Like, which is correct: "Guts are required for this" or "Guts is required for this"?
singular-vs-plural
New contributor
noun [plural] informal macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/guts
â Ronald Sole
3 hours ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Is 'guts' singular or plural? Like, which is correct: "Guts are required for this" or "Guts is required for this"?
singular-vs-plural
New contributor
Is 'guts' singular or plural? Like, which is correct: "Guts are required for this" or "Guts is required for this"?
singular-vs-plural
singular-vs-plural
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 3 hours ago
Dikshit Gautam
61
61
New contributor
New contributor
noun [plural] informal macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/guts
â Ronald Sole
3 hours ago
add a comment |Â
noun [plural] informal macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/guts
â Ronald Sole
3 hours ago
noun [plural] informal macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/guts
â Ronald Sole
3 hours ago
noun [plural] informal macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/guts
â Ronald Sole
3 hours ago
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
It could be singular or plural depending on the context. "Gut" and "guts" have several different meanings which could be used in the OP's sentence.
If "guts" means "the entrails of an animal, removed by a butcher" or "personal courage or determination" then it is plural - "Guts are required for this".
IF "gut" is a mass noun meaning "Fibre made from the intestines of animals, used especially for violin or racket strings or for surgical use." then like all mass nouns it is singular - "Gut is required for this."
Reference for meanings of "gut(s)" : https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/gut #s 1.2, 3, and 4.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Guts is used widely used informally especially in British English to mean fortitude, courage or determination:
guts [plural]
informal the courage and determination you need to do
something difficult or unpleasant
It takes guts to start a new business on your own.
have the guts (to do something)
No one had the guts to tell Paul what a mistake he was making.
Guts (Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English)
The plural designation is also shown in the entries in Merriam-Webster, Collins, and Oxford Learner's dictionaries.
Yeah, but I think almost all native speakers (except grammatically-cowed "hypercorrectionists") would prefer singular Guts is what you need for this job over plural Guts are what you need for this job. Well, that's what I think off the top of my head anyway. Obviously I know which I prefer, but I might check out Google Books for the same syntactic issue with a more common "ambiguous plurality" noun... (Brains is what you need to solve a problem like this :)
â FumbleFingers
54 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
The cited use of guts is exactly paralleled by brains. We tend to think of the "idiomatic" senses (courage / intelligence) as only applying to the plural form, because we never use He has gut / brain to mean He's brave / clever.
But noting that many if not most native speakers would prefer Guts / brains is something he's never been short of, rather than ...are something..., I think it's reasonable to say that semantically, we think of the idiomatic plural usage as representing singular quality / attribute.
It's almost meaningless to ask which version is "right", and Anglophones in general have a long history of ignoring pedants anyway (consider the data is vs the data are :). But unquestionably I personally would favour semantics over syntax in OP's case.
It may not be directly relevant to OP's exact example, but when searching for relevant pronouncements on the usage, I came across this delightfully ambiguous example...
These animals have brains Semantics: A Reader (2004) - Page 420
...which could be literal - each of the animals actually does have at least some kind organ containing neurons. But it could also be figurative - some or all of them are [unusually] smart. And exactly the same ambiguity would apply with guts in that example (digestive organ / bravery).
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
It could be singular or plural depending on the context. "Gut" and "guts" have several different meanings which could be used in the OP's sentence.
If "guts" means "the entrails of an animal, removed by a butcher" or "personal courage or determination" then it is plural - "Guts are required for this".
IF "gut" is a mass noun meaning "Fibre made from the intestines of animals, used especially for violin or racket strings or for surgical use." then like all mass nouns it is singular - "Gut is required for this."
Reference for meanings of "gut(s)" : https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/gut #s 1.2, 3, and 4.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
It could be singular or plural depending on the context. "Gut" and "guts" have several different meanings which could be used in the OP's sentence.
If "guts" means "the entrails of an animal, removed by a butcher" or "personal courage or determination" then it is plural - "Guts are required for this".
IF "gut" is a mass noun meaning "Fibre made from the intestines of animals, used especially for violin or racket strings or for surgical use." then like all mass nouns it is singular - "Gut is required for this."
Reference for meanings of "gut(s)" : https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/gut #s 1.2, 3, and 4.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
It could be singular or plural depending on the context. "Gut" and "guts" have several different meanings which could be used in the OP's sentence.
If "guts" means "the entrails of an animal, removed by a butcher" or "personal courage or determination" then it is plural - "Guts are required for this".
IF "gut" is a mass noun meaning "Fibre made from the intestines of animals, used especially for violin or racket strings or for surgical use." then like all mass nouns it is singular - "Gut is required for this."
Reference for meanings of "gut(s)" : https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/gut #s 1.2, 3, and 4.
It could be singular or plural depending on the context. "Gut" and "guts" have several different meanings which could be used in the OP's sentence.
If "guts" means "the entrails of an animal, removed by a butcher" or "personal courage or determination" then it is plural - "Guts are required for this".
IF "gut" is a mass noun meaning "Fibre made from the intestines of animals, used especially for violin or racket strings or for surgical use." then like all mass nouns it is singular - "Gut is required for this."
Reference for meanings of "gut(s)" : https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/gut #s 1.2, 3, and 4.
answered 3 hours ago
alephzero
1,490411
1,490411
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Guts is used widely used informally especially in British English to mean fortitude, courage or determination:
guts [plural]
informal the courage and determination you need to do
something difficult or unpleasant
It takes guts to start a new business on your own.
have the guts (to do something)
No one had the guts to tell Paul what a mistake he was making.
Guts (Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English)
The plural designation is also shown in the entries in Merriam-Webster, Collins, and Oxford Learner's dictionaries.
Yeah, but I think almost all native speakers (except grammatically-cowed "hypercorrectionists") would prefer singular Guts is what you need for this job over plural Guts are what you need for this job. Well, that's what I think off the top of my head anyway. Obviously I know which I prefer, but I might check out Google Books for the same syntactic issue with a more common "ambiguous plurality" noun... (Brains is what you need to solve a problem like this :)
â FumbleFingers
54 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Guts is used widely used informally especially in British English to mean fortitude, courage or determination:
guts [plural]
informal the courage and determination you need to do
something difficult or unpleasant
It takes guts to start a new business on your own.
have the guts (to do something)
No one had the guts to tell Paul what a mistake he was making.
Guts (Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English)
The plural designation is also shown in the entries in Merriam-Webster, Collins, and Oxford Learner's dictionaries.
Yeah, but I think almost all native speakers (except grammatically-cowed "hypercorrectionists") would prefer singular Guts is what you need for this job over plural Guts are what you need for this job. Well, that's what I think off the top of my head anyway. Obviously I know which I prefer, but I might check out Google Books for the same syntactic issue with a more common "ambiguous plurality" noun... (Brains is what you need to solve a problem like this :)
â FumbleFingers
54 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Guts is used widely used informally especially in British English to mean fortitude, courage or determination:
guts [plural]
informal the courage and determination you need to do
something difficult or unpleasant
It takes guts to start a new business on your own.
have the guts (to do something)
No one had the guts to tell Paul what a mistake he was making.
Guts (Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English)
The plural designation is also shown in the entries in Merriam-Webster, Collins, and Oxford Learner's dictionaries.
Guts is used widely used informally especially in British English to mean fortitude, courage or determination:
guts [plural]
informal the courage and determination you need to do
something difficult or unpleasant
It takes guts to start a new business on your own.
have the guts (to do something)
No one had the guts to tell Paul what a mistake he was making.
Guts (Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English)
The plural designation is also shown in the entries in Merriam-Webster, Collins, and Oxford Learner's dictionaries.
answered 2 hours ago
Michael Harvey
8,6631723
8,6631723
Yeah, but I think almost all native speakers (except grammatically-cowed "hypercorrectionists") would prefer singular Guts is what you need for this job over plural Guts are what you need for this job. Well, that's what I think off the top of my head anyway. Obviously I know which I prefer, but I might check out Google Books for the same syntactic issue with a more common "ambiguous plurality" noun... (Brains is what you need to solve a problem like this :)
â FumbleFingers
54 mins ago
add a comment |Â
Yeah, but I think almost all native speakers (except grammatically-cowed "hypercorrectionists") would prefer singular Guts is what you need for this job over plural Guts are what you need for this job. Well, that's what I think off the top of my head anyway. Obviously I know which I prefer, but I might check out Google Books for the same syntactic issue with a more common "ambiguous plurality" noun... (Brains is what you need to solve a problem like this :)
â FumbleFingers
54 mins ago
Yeah, but I think almost all native speakers (except grammatically-cowed "hypercorrectionists") would prefer singular Guts is what you need for this job over plural Guts are what you need for this job. Well, that's what I think off the top of my head anyway. Obviously I know which I prefer, but I might check out Google Books for the same syntactic issue with a more common "ambiguous plurality" noun... (Brains is what you need to solve a problem like this :)
â FumbleFingers
54 mins ago
Yeah, but I think almost all native speakers (except grammatically-cowed "hypercorrectionists") would prefer singular Guts is what you need for this job over plural Guts are what you need for this job. Well, that's what I think off the top of my head anyway. Obviously I know which I prefer, but I might check out Google Books for the same syntactic issue with a more common "ambiguous plurality" noun... (Brains is what you need to solve a problem like this :)
â FumbleFingers
54 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
The cited use of guts is exactly paralleled by brains. We tend to think of the "idiomatic" senses (courage / intelligence) as only applying to the plural form, because we never use He has gut / brain to mean He's brave / clever.
But noting that many if not most native speakers would prefer Guts / brains is something he's never been short of, rather than ...are something..., I think it's reasonable to say that semantically, we think of the idiomatic plural usage as representing singular quality / attribute.
It's almost meaningless to ask which version is "right", and Anglophones in general have a long history of ignoring pedants anyway (consider the data is vs the data are :). But unquestionably I personally would favour semantics over syntax in OP's case.
It may not be directly relevant to OP's exact example, but when searching for relevant pronouncements on the usage, I came across this delightfully ambiguous example...
These animals have brains Semantics: A Reader (2004) - Page 420
...which could be literal - each of the animals actually does have at least some kind organ containing neurons. But it could also be figurative - some or all of them are [unusually] smart. And exactly the same ambiguity would apply with guts in that example (digestive organ / bravery).
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
The cited use of guts is exactly paralleled by brains. We tend to think of the "idiomatic" senses (courage / intelligence) as only applying to the plural form, because we never use He has gut / brain to mean He's brave / clever.
But noting that many if not most native speakers would prefer Guts / brains is something he's never been short of, rather than ...are something..., I think it's reasonable to say that semantically, we think of the idiomatic plural usage as representing singular quality / attribute.
It's almost meaningless to ask which version is "right", and Anglophones in general have a long history of ignoring pedants anyway (consider the data is vs the data are :). But unquestionably I personally would favour semantics over syntax in OP's case.
It may not be directly relevant to OP's exact example, but when searching for relevant pronouncements on the usage, I came across this delightfully ambiguous example...
These animals have brains Semantics: A Reader (2004) - Page 420
...which could be literal - each of the animals actually does have at least some kind organ containing neurons. But it could also be figurative - some or all of them are [unusually] smart. And exactly the same ambiguity would apply with guts in that example (digestive organ / bravery).
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
The cited use of guts is exactly paralleled by brains. We tend to think of the "idiomatic" senses (courage / intelligence) as only applying to the plural form, because we never use He has gut / brain to mean He's brave / clever.
But noting that many if not most native speakers would prefer Guts / brains is something he's never been short of, rather than ...are something..., I think it's reasonable to say that semantically, we think of the idiomatic plural usage as representing singular quality / attribute.
It's almost meaningless to ask which version is "right", and Anglophones in general have a long history of ignoring pedants anyway (consider the data is vs the data are :). But unquestionably I personally would favour semantics over syntax in OP's case.
It may not be directly relevant to OP's exact example, but when searching for relevant pronouncements on the usage, I came across this delightfully ambiguous example...
These animals have brains Semantics: A Reader (2004) - Page 420
...which could be literal - each of the animals actually does have at least some kind organ containing neurons. But it could also be figurative - some or all of them are [unusually] smart. And exactly the same ambiguity would apply with guts in that example (digestive organ / bravery).
The cited use of guts is exactly paralleled by brains. We tend to think of the "idiomatic" senses (courage / intelligence) as only applying to the plural form, because we never use He has gut / brain to mean He's brave / clever.
But noting that many if not most native speakers would prefer Guts / brains is something he's never been short of, rather than ...are something..., I think it's reasonable to say that semantically, we think of the idiomatic plural usage as representing singular quality / attribute.
It's almost meaningless to ask which version is "right", and Anglophones in general have a long history of ignoring pedants anyway (consider the data is vs the data are :). But unquestionably I personally would favour semantics over syntax in OP's case.
It may not be directly relevant to OP's exact example, but when searching for relevant pronouncements on the usage, I came across this delightfully ambiguous example...
These animals have brains Semantics: A Reader (2004) - Page 420
...which could be literal - each of the animals actually does have at least some kind organ containing neurons. But it could also be figurative - some or all of them are [unusually] smart. And exactly the same ambiguity would apply with guts in that example (digestive organ / bravery).
edited 6 mins ago
answered 14 mins ago
FumbleFingers
42.4k150116
42.4k150116
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Dikshit Gautam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Dikshit Gautam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Dikshit Gautam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Dikshit Gautam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f180552%2fsingular-or-plural-of-a-popular-word%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
noun [plural] informal macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/guts
â Ronald Sole
3 hours ago