Is there any literature discussing whether all conscious entities are separate, discrete experiencers or a single experiencer?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
2












I would like to know if there is any work discussing whether conscious entities (minds) are perceived by different "experiencers," arguably who we are. The other option as far as I know would be whether all consciousness is perceived by one "experiencer" that shifts from consciousness to consciousness and, in this sense, we are all the same person.










share|improve this question























  • You could try the literature of mysticism as this promotes a view similar to your 'one person' idea.
    – PeterJ
    3 hours ago














up vote
3
down vote

favorite
2












I would like to know if there is any work discussing whether conscious entities (minds) are perceived by different "experiencers," arguably who we are. The other option as far as I know would be whether all consciousness is perceived by one "experiencer" that shifts from consciousness to consciousness and, in this sense, we are all the same person.










share|improve this question























  • You could try the literature of mysticism as this promotes a view similar to your 'one person' idea.
    – PeterJ
    3 hours ago












up vote
3
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
3
down vote

favorite
2






2





I would like to know if there is any work discussing whether conscious entities (minds) are perceived by different "experiencers," arguably who we are. The other option as far as I know would be whether all consciousness is perceived by one "experiencer" that shifts from consciousness to consciousness and, in this sense, we are all the same person.










share|improve this question















I would like to know if there is any work discussing whether conscious entities (minds) are perceived by different "experiencers," arguably who we are. The other option as far as I know would be whether all consciousness is perceived by one "experiencer" that shifts from consciousness to consciousness and, in this sense, we are all the same person.







philosophy-of-mind consciousness






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









Geoffrey Thomas

18.5k21472




18.5k21472










asked 8 hours ago









MacroGuy

566




566











  • You could try the literature of mysticism as this promotes a view similar to your 'one person' idea.
    – PeterJ
    3 hours ago
















  • You could try the literature of mysticism as this promotes a view similar to your 'one person' idea.
    – PeterJ
    3 hours ago















You could try the literature of mysticism as this promotes a view similar to your 'one person' idea.
– PeterJ
3 hours ago




You could try the literature of mysticism as this promotes a view similar to your 'one person' idea.
– PeterJ
3 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote













Mind continuous with environment



There is a considerable body of literature on 'the extended mind'. David Chalmers and Andy Clark are major names here. The basic idea is that 'the mind "extends" into the environment in cases in which a human organism and the environment become cognitively coupled systems' (Erik Myin, 'Unbounding the Mind', ' The Extended Mind by Richard Menary', Science, New Series, Vol. 330, No. 6004 (29 October 2010), pp. 589-590 : 589.)



In just a bit more detail :




The Extended Mind Hypothesis (EMH) made its public debut in the pages of Analysis
in 1988, with the appearance of a landmark paper by Clark and Chalmers. They
advanced the bold claim that some cognitive processing has an extent that is beyond
the boundaries of the skin or the skull. Their claim differs from the still much disputed
idea that the content of mental states must be individuated, at least in part, by external
factors. With a different focus, the originators of EMH defend active externalism - the
view which holds that the underlying cognitive processes that make certain mental
happenings possible are, at least sometimes, not entirely brainbound. This kind
of wide ranging cognition allegedly occurs when the use of external resources is
unavoidable for enabling the completion of specific cognitive tasks. (Daniel D. Hutto,
'The Extended Mind by Richard Menary', Analysis, Vol. 71, No. 4 (OCTOBER 2011), pp. 785-787 : 785.)




Mind continuous with other minds



This is a different line of thought, often referred to a 'distributed cognition'.




Ed Hutchins' (1995) analysis of navigation aboard navy ships is a locus
classicus for distributed cognition. Hutchins describes the process by which
a ship's navigation team calculates the position of the ship over time by
plotting a series of lines of position. The process involves several crewmen
who use instruments to determine the bearings of certain landmarks,
another who coordinates their work and records the bearings, and still
another who plots the bearings on a map and projects the ship's future
position. The first several crewmen are clearly involved in a computation
that they do not fully understand. Since the plotter chooses the next set of
landmarks, it may be tempting to see the rest of the system as a sort of
instrument that he uses to determine the position of the ship. Yet it would
be wrong to think that the things happening inside the mind of the plotter
are sufficient to reconstruct the process... (P. D. Magnus, 'Distributed Cognition and the Task of Science', Social Studies of Science, Vol. 37, No. 2 (Apr., 2007), pp. 297-310 : 298;




Fisher, Kimball & Fisher, Mareen D., Distributed Minds, ISBN 10: 0814403670 / ISBN 13: 9780814403679. Published by Amacom, 1997, might also help here.



_____________________________________________________________________________



Reading



Andy Clark and David Chalmers, 'The Extended Mind', Analysis, Vol. 58, No. 1 (Jan., 1998), pp. 7-19.



Erik Myin, 'Unbounding the Mind', ' The Extended Mind by Richard Menary', Science, New Series, Vol. 330, No. 6004 (29 October 2010), pp. 589-590.



The Extended Mind, ed. R. Menary, МIT Press, 2010 vii + 382.



P. D. Magnus, 'Distributed Cognition and the Task of Science', Social Studies of Science, Vol. 37, No. 2 (Apr., 2007), pp. 297-310.



Edwin Hutchins, Cognition in the Wild, Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 1995.



Kimball Fisher & Mareen D. Fisher, Distributed Minds, ISBN 10: 0814403670 / ISBN 13: 9780814403679. Published by Amacom, 1997.






share|improve this answer




















  • I would also add Bernardo Kastrup's name to the mix, as a (supposedly) critic of Chalmers but still pushes an idealistic view.
    – Yechiam Weiss
    10 mins ago










  • Also Chalmers' "Idealism and the Mind-Body Problem" lays out some basic views in the field, which would be a good reference.
    – Yechiam Weiss
    6 mins ago










Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "265"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f55699%2fis-there-any-literature-discussing-whether-all-conscious-entities-are-separate%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
4
down vote













Mind continuous with environment



There is a considerable body of literature on 'the extended mind'. David Chalmers and Andy Clark are major names here. The basic idea is that 'the mind "extends" into the environment in cases in which a human organism and the environment become cognitively coupled systems' (Erik Myin, 'Unbounding the Mind', ' The Extended Mind by Richard Menary', Science, New Series, Vol. 330, No. 6004 (29 October 2010), pp. 589-590 : 589.)



In just a bit more detail :




The Extended Mind Hypothesis (EMH) made its public debut in the pages of Analysis
in 1988, with the appearance of a landmark paper by Clark and Chalmers. They
advanced the bold claim that some cognitive processing has an extent that is beyond
the boundaries of the skin or the skull. Their claim differs from the still much disputed
idea that the content of mental states must be individuated, at least in part, by external
factors. With a different focus, the originators of EMH defend active externalism - the
view which holds that the underlying cognitive processes that make certain mental
happenings possible are, at least sometimes, not entirely brainbound. This kind
of wide ranging cognition allegedly occurs when the use of external resources is
unavoidable for enabling the completion of specific cognitive tasks. (Daniel D. Hutto,
'The Extended Mind by Richard Menary', Analysis, Vol. 71, No. 4 (OCTOBER 2011), pp. 785-787 : 785.)




Mind continuous with other minds



This is a different line of thought, often referred to a 'distributed cognition'.




Ed Hutchins' (1995) analysis of navigation aboard navy ships is a locus
classicus for distributed cognition. Hutchins describes the process by which
a ship's navigation team calculates the position of the ship over time by
plotting a series of lines of position. The process involves several crewmen
who use instruments to determine the bearings of certain landmarks,
another who coordinates their work and records the bearings, and still
another who plots the bearings on a map and projects the ship's future
position. The first several crewmen are clearly involved in a computation
that they do not fully understand. Since the plotter chooses the next set of
landmarks, it may be tempting to see the rest of the system as a sort of
instrument that he uses to determine the position of the ship. Yet it would
be wrong to think that the things happening inside the mind of the plotter
are sufficient to reconstruct the process... (P. D. Magnus, 'Distributed Cognition and the Task of Science', Social Studies of Science, Vol. 37, No. 2 (Apr., 2007), pp. 297-310 : 298;




Fisher, Kimball & Fisher, Mareen D., Distributed Minds, ISBN 10: 0814403670 / ISBN 13: 9780814403679. Published by Amacom, 1997, might also help here.



_____________________________________________________________________________



Reading



Andy Clark and David Chalmers, 'The Extended Mind', Analysis, Vol. 58, No. 1 (Jan., 1998), pp. 7-19.



Erik Myin, 'Unbounding the Mind', ' The Extended Mind by Richard Menary', Science, New Series, Vol. 330, No. 6004 (29 October 2010), pp. 589-590.



The Extended Mind, ed. R. Menary, МIT Press, 2010 vii + 382.



P. D. Magnus, 'Distributed Cognition and the Task of Science', Social Studies of Science, Vol. 37, No. 2 (Apr., 2007), pp. 297-310.



Edwin Hutchins, Cognition in the Wild, Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 1995.



Kimball Fisher & Mareen D. Fisher, Distributed Minds, ISBN 10: 0814403670 / ISBN 13: 9780814403679. Published by Amacom, 1997.






share|improve this answer




















  • I would also add Bernardo Kastrup's name to the mix, as a (supposedly) critic of Chalmers but still pushes an idealistic view.
    – Yechiam Weiss
    10 mins ago










  • Also Chalmers' "Idealism and the Mind-Body Problem" lays out some basic views in the field, which would be a good reference.
    – Yechiam Weiss
    6 mins ago














up vote
4
down vote













Mind continuous with environment



There is a considerable body of literature on 'the extended mind'. David Chalmers and Andy Clark are major names here. The basic idea is that 'the mind "extends" into the environment in cases in which a human organism and the environment become cognitively coupled systems' (Erik Myin, 'Unbounding the Mind', ' The Extended Mind by Richard Menary', Science, New Series, Vol. 330, No. 6004 (29 October 2010), pp. 589-590 : 589.)



In just a bit more detail :




The Extended Mind Hypothesis (EMH) made its public debut in the pages of Analysis
in 1988, with the appearance of a landmark paper by Clark and Chalmers. They
advanced the bold claim that some cognitive processing has an extent that is beyond
the boundaries of the skin or the skull. Their claim differs from the still much disputed
idea that the content of mental states must be individuated, at least in part, by external
factors. With a different focus, the originators of EMH defend active externalism - the
view which holds that the underlying cognitive processes that make certain mental
happenings possible are, at least sometimes, not entirely brainbound. This kind
of wide ranging cognition allegedly occurs when the use of external resources is
unavoidable for enabling the completion of specific cognitive tasks. (Daniel D. Hutto,
'The Extended Mind by Richard Menary', Analysis, Vol. 71, No. 4 (OCTOBER 2011), pp. 785-787 : 785.)




Mind continuous with other minds



This is a different line of thought, often referred to a 'distributed cognition'.




Ed Hutchins' (1995) analysis of navigation aboard navy ships is a locus
classicus for distributed cognition. Hutchins describes the process by which
a ship's navigation team calculates the position of the ship over time by
plotting a series of lines of position. The process involves several crewmen
who use instruments to determine the bearings of certain landmarks,
another who coordinates their work and records the bearings, and still
another who plots the bearings on a map and projects the ship's future
position. The first several crewmen are clearly involved in a computation
that they do not fully understand. Since the plotter chooses the next set of
landmarks, it may be tempting to see the rest of the system as a sort of
instrument that he uses to determine the position of the ship. Yet it would
be wrong to think that the things happening inside the mind of the plotter
are sufficient to reconstruct the process... (P. D. Magnus, 'Distributed Cognition and the Task of Science', Social Studies of Science, Vol. 37, No. 2 (Apr., 2007), pp. 297-310 : 298;




Fisher, Kimball & Fisher, Mareen D., Distributed Minds, ISBN 10: 0814403670 / ISBN 13: 9780814403679. Published by Amacom, 1997, might also help here.



_____________________________________________________________________________



Reading



Andy Clark and David Chalmers, 'The Extended Mind', Analysis, Vol. 58, No. 1 (Jan., 1998), pp. 7-19.



Erik Myin, 'Unbounding the Mind', ' The Extended Mind by Richard Menary', Science, New Series, Vol. 330, No. 6004 (29 October 2010), pp. 589-590.



The Extended Mind, ed. R. Menary, МIT Press, 2010 vii + 382.



P. D. Magnus, 'Distributed Cognition and the Task of Science', Social Studies of Science, Vol. 37, No. 2 (Apr., 2007), pp. 297-310.



Edwin Hutchins, Cognition in the Wild, Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 1995.



Kimball Fisher & Mareen D. Fisher, Distributed Minds, ISBN 10: 0814403670 / ISBN 13: 9780814403679. Published by Amacom, 1997.






share|improve this answer




















  • I would also add Bernardo Kastrup's name to the mix, as a (supposedly) critic of Chalmers but still pushes an idealistic view.
    – Yechiam Weiss
    10 mins ago










  • Also Chalmers' "Idealism and the Mind-Body Problem" lays out some basic views in the field, which would be a good reference.
    – Yechiam Weiss
    6 mins ago












up vote
4
down vote










up vote
4
down vote









Mind continuous with environment



There is a considerable body of literature on 'the extended mind'. David Chalmers and Andy Clark are major names here. The basic idea is that 'the mind "extends" into the environment in cases in which a human organism and the environment become cognitively coupled systems' (Erik Myin, 'Unbounding the Mind', ' The Extended Mind by Richard Menary', Science, New Series, Vol. 330, No. 6004 (29 October 2010), pp. 589-590 : 589.)



In just a bit more detail :




The Extended Mind Hypothesis (EMH) made its public debut in the pages of Analysis
in 1988, with the appearance of a landmark paper by Clark and Chalmers. They
advanced the bold claim that some cognitive processing has an extent that is beyond
the boundaries of the skin or the skull. Their claim differs from the still much disputed
idea that the content of mental states must be individuated, at least in part, by external
factors. With a different focus, the originators of EMH defend active externalism - the
view which holds that the underlying cognitive processes that make certain mental
happenings possible are, at least sometimes, not entirely brainbound. This kind
of wide ranging cognition allegedly occurs when the use of external resources is
unavoidable for enabling the completion of specific cognitive tasks. (Daniel D. Hutto,
'The Extended Mind by Richard Menary', Analysis, Vol. 71, No. 4 (OCTOBER 2011), pp. 785-787 : 785.)




Mind continuous with other minds



This is a different line of thought, often referred to a 'distributed cognition'.




Ed Hutchins' (1995) analysis of navigation aboard navy ships is a locus
classicus for distributed cognition. Hutchins describes the process by which
a ship's navigation team calculates the position of the ship over time by
plotting a series of lines of position. The process involves several crewmen
who use instruments to determine the bearings of certain landmarks,
another who coordinates their work and records the bearings, and still
another who plots the bearings on a map and projects the ship's future
position. The first several crewmen are clearly involved in a computation
that they do not fully understand. Since the plotter chooses the next set of
landmarks, it may be tempting to see the rest of the system as a sort of
instrument that he uses to determine the position of the ship. Yet it would
be wrong to think that the things happening inside the mind of the plotter
are sufficient to reconstruct the process... (P. D. Magnus, 'Distributed Cognition and the Task of Science', Social Studies of Science, Vol. 37, No. 2 (Apr., 2007), pp. 297-310 : 298;




Fisher, Kimball & Fisher, Mareen D., Distributed Minds, ISBN 10: 0814403670 / ISBN 13: 9780814403679. Published by Amacom, 1997, might also help here.



_____________________________________________________________________________



Reading



Andy Clark and David Chalmers, 'The Extended Mind', Analysis, Vol. 58, No. 1 (Jan., 1998), pp. 7-19.



Erik Myin, 'Unbounding the Mind', ' The Extended Mind by Richard Menary', Science, New Series, Vol. 330, No. 6004 (29 October 2010), pp. 589-590.



The Extended Mind, ed. R. Menary, МIT Press, 2010 vii + 382.



P. D. Magnus, 'Distributed Cognition and the Task of Science', Social Studies of Science, Vol. 37, No. 2 (Apr., 2007), pp. 297-310.



Edwin Hutchins, Cognition in the Wild, Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 1995.



Kimball Fisher & Mareen D. Fisher, Distributed Minds, ISBN 10: 0814403670 / ISBN 13: 9780814403679. Published by Amacom, 1997.






share|improve this answer












Mind continuous with environment



There is a considerable body of literature on 'the extended mind'. David Chalmers and Andy Clark are major names here. The basic idea is that 'the mind "extends" into the environment in cases in which a human organism and the environment become cognitively coupled systems' (Erik Myin, 'Unbounding the Mind', ' The Extended Mind by Richard Menary', Science, New Series, Vol. 330, No. 6004 (29 October 2010), pp. 589-590 : 589.)



In just a bit more detail :




The Extended Mind Hypothesis (EMH) made its public debut in the pages of Analysis
in 1988, with the appearance of a landmark paper by Clark and Chalmers. They
advanced the bold claim that some cognitive processing has an extent that is beyond
the boundaries of the skin or the skull. Their claim differs from the still much disputed
idea that the content of mental states must be individuated, at least in part, by external
factors. With a different focus, the originators of EMH defend active externalism - the
view which holds that the underlying cognitive processes that make certain mental
happenings possible are, at least sometimes, not entirely brainbound. This kind
of wide ranging cognition allegedly occurs when the use of external resources is
unavoidable for enabling the completion of specific cognitive tasks. (Daniel D. Hutto,
'The Extended Mind by Richard Menary', Analysis, Vol. 71, No. 4 (OCTOBER 2011), pp. 785-787 : 785.)




Mind continuous with other minds



This is a different line of thought, often referred to a 'distributed cognition'.




Ed Hutchins' (1995) analysis of navigation aboard navy ships is a locus
classicus for distributed cognition. Hutchins describes the process by which
a ship's navigation team calculates the position of the ship over time by
plotting a series of lines of position. The process involves several crewmen
who use instruments to determine the bearings of certain landmarks,
another who coordinates their work and records the bearings, and still
another who plots the bearings on a map and projects the ship's future
position. The first several crewmen are clearly involved in a computation
that they do not fully understand. Since the plotter chooses the next set of
landmarks, it may be tempting to see the rest of the system as a sort of
instrument that he uses to determine the position of the ship. Yet it would
be wrong to think that the things happening inside the mind of the plotter
are sufficient to reconstruct the process... (P. D. Magnus, 'Distributed Cognition and the Task of Science', Social Studies of Science, Vol. 37, No. 2 (Apr., 2007), pp. 297-310 : 298;




Fisher, Kimball & Fisher, Mareen D., Distributed Minds, ISBN 10: 0814403670 / ISBN 13: 9780814403679. Published by Amacom, 1997, might also help here.



_____________________________________________________________________________



Reading



Andy Clark and David Chalmers, 'The Extended Mind', Analysis, Vol. 58, No. 1 (Jan., 1998), pp. 7-19.



Erik Myin, 'Unbounding the Mind', ' The Extended Mind by Richard Menary', Science, New Series, Vol. 330, No. 6004 (29 October 2010), pp. 589-590.



The Extended Mind, ed. R. Menary, МIT Press, 2010 vii + 382.



P. D. Magnus, 'Distributed Cognition and the Task of Science', Social Studies of Science, Vol. 37, No. 2 (Apr., 2007), pp. 297-310.



Edwin Hutchins, Cognition in the Wild, Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 1995.



Kimball Fisher & Mareen D. Fisher, Distributed Minds, ISBN 10: 0814403670 / ISBN 13: 9780814403679. Published by Amacom, 1997.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 hours ago









Geoffrey Thomas

18.5k21472




18.5k21472











  • I would also add Bernardo Kastrup's name to the mix, as a (supposedly) critic of Chalmers but still pushes an idealistic view.
    – Yechiam Weiss
    10 mins ago










  • Also Chalmers' "Idealism and the Mind-Body Problem" lays out some basic views in the field, which would be a good reference.
    – Yechiam Weiss
    6 mins ago
















  • I would also add Bernardo Kastrup's name to the mix, as a (supposedly) critic of Chalmers but still pushes an idealistic view.
    – Yechiam Weiss
    10 mins ago










  • Also Chalmers' "Idealism and the Mind-Body Problem" lays out some basic views in the field, which would be a good reference.
    – Yechiam Weiss
    6 mins ago















I would also add Bernardo Kastrup's name to the mix, as a (supposedly) critic of Chalmers but still pushes an idealistic view.
– Yechiam Weiss
10 mins ago




I would also add Bernardo Kastrup's name to the mix, as a (supposedly) critic of Chalmers but still pushes an idealistic view.
– Yechiam Weiss
10 mins ago












Also Chalmers' "Idealism and the Mind-Body Problem" lays out some basic views in the field, which would be a good reference.
– Yechiam Weiss
6 mins ago




Also Chalmers' "Idealism and the Mind-Body Problem" lays out some basic views in the field, which would be a good reference.
– Yechiam Weiss
6 mins ago

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f55699%2fis-there-any-literature-discussing-whether-all-conscious-entities-are-separate%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

Confectionery