An unorthodox way of converting a recurrent sequence into a non-recurrent one

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












The problem is:



A sequence is given with:
$$ a_1 = 2016, a_n+1 = sqrta_n^2 + 4 + frac1a_n^222$$
Find:
$$ (a) quad lim_n to inftya_n quad (b) lim_n to inftyfraca_n^2n quad (c) lim_n to inftyfracsum_k=1^na_kn sqrtn$$



The (a) part I was able to solve by proving that the sequence is increasing and not bounded by above. Therefore
$$ lim_n to inftya_n = +infty$$



Then for (b) I applied the Stolz theorem:
$$ lim_n to inftyfraca_n^2n = lim_n to inftyfraca_n+1^2 - a_n^2n+1-n = lim_n to infty(a_n^2 + 4 + frac1a_n^222 - a_n^2) = lim_n to infty(4 + frac1a_n^222) = 4$$



But the (c) part is where I get confused. I've tried applying the Stolz theorem there as well but no luck since the n's don't cancel out like they did in (b).



I did have one thing on my mind though but I'm not sure how formally correct it is.
Let's look at the first few sequence members:
$$a_1 = 2016, a_2 = sqrt2016^2 + 4 + frac12016^222, a_3 = sqrt2016^2 + 4 + frac12016^222+ 4 + frac1a_2^222 = sqrt2016^2 + 8 + frac12016^222 + frac1a_2^222$$



And now as we keep going we are going to get a new $$ frac1a_n^222$$ member inside for each n. So that still makes this sequence recursive. But can I simply disregard that part since it obviously always converges to zero, not matter what the value of n is? Or maybe I could say something like



$$ textLet frac1a_n^222 = Z(n) quad text Then lim_n to inftyZ(n) = 0 quad (forall n)$$



And now I rewrite my sequence as:



$$ a_n = sqrt(2016)^2 + 4(n-1) + sum_i=1^n-1Z(i) quad forall n geq 2$$



Now let's finally look at the (c) problem:



$$lim_n to inftyfracsum_k=1^na_kn sqrtn = lim_n to inftyfraca_1 + a_2 + ... +a_nn sqrtn = lim_n to inftyfrac2016 + sqrt2016^2 + 4 + Z(1) + ... + sqrt2016^2 + 4(n-1) + sumZ(n) n sqrtn$$



And now I apply Stolz theorem:



$$ = lim_n to inftyfracsqrt2016^2 + 4n + sumZ(n+1)(n+1)sqrtn+1 - nsqrtn = 0 $$



Since the top degree of $n$ is $frac12$ and the bottom one is $ frac32$.



So can anyone tell me whether this solutions is correct? If it isn't, how would you solve it? If it is correct but my process is wrong I'd also like to know where I went wrong.



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    4
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    The problem is:



    A sequence is given with:
    $$ a_1 = 2016, a_n+1 = sqrta_n^2 + 4 + frac1a_n^222$$
    Find:
    $$ (a) quad lim_n to inftya_n quad (b) lim_n to inftyfraca_n^2n quad (c) lim_n to inftyfracsum_k=1^na_kn sqrtn$$



    The (a) part I was able to solve by proving that the sequence is increasing and not bounded by above. Therefore
    $$ lim_n to inftya_n = +infty$$



    Then for (b) I applied the Stolz theorem:
    $$ lim_n to inftyfraca_n^2n = lim_n to inftyfraca_n+1^2 - a_n^2n+1-n = lim_n to infty(a_n^2 + 4 + frac1a_n^222 - a_n^2) = lim_n to infty(4 + frac1a_n^222) = 4$$



    But the (c) part is where I get confused. I've tried applying the Stolz theorem there as well but no luck since the n's don't cancel out like they did in (b).



    I did have one thing on my mind though but I'm not sure how formally correct it is.
    Let's look at the first few sequence members:
    $$a_1 = 2016, a_2 = sqrt2016^2 + 4 + frac12016^222, a_3 = sqrt2016^2 + 4 + frac12016^222+ 4 + frac1a_2^222 = sqrt2016^2 + 8 + frac12016^222 + frac1a_2^222$$



    And now as we keep going we are going to get a new $$ frac1a_n^222$$ member inside for each n. So that still makes this sequence recursive. But can I simply disregard that part since it obviously always converges to zero, not matter what the value of n is? Or maybe I could say something like



    $$ textLet frac1a_n^222 = Z(n) quad text Then lim_n to inftyZ(n) = 0 quad (forall n)$$



    And now I rewrite my sequence as:



    $$ a_n = sqrt(2016)^2 + 4(n-1) + sum_i=1^n-1Z(i) quad forall n geq 2$$



    Now let's finally look at the (c) problem:



    $$lim_n to inftyfracsum_k=1^na_kn sqrtn = lim_n to inftyfraca_1 + a_2 + ... +a_nn sqrtn = lim_n to inftyfrac2016 + sqrt2016^2 + 4 + Z(1) + ... + sqrt2016^2 + 4(n-1) + sumZ(n) n sqrtn$$



    And now I apply Stolz theorem:



    $$ = lim_n to inftyfracsqrt2016^2 + 4n + sumZ(n+1)(n+1)sqrtn+1 - nsqrtn = 0 $$



    Since the top degree of $n$ is $frac12$ and the bottom one is $ frac32$.



    So can anyone tell me whether this solutions is correct? If it isn't, how would you solve it? If it is correct but my process is wrong I'd also like to know where I went wrong.



    Thanks in advance.










    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      The problem is:



      A sequence is given with:
      $$ a_1 = 2016, a_n+1 = sqrta_n^2 + 4 + frac1a_n^222$$
      Find:
      $$ (a) quad lim_n to inftya_n quad (b) lim_n to inftyfraca_n^2n quad (c) lim_n to inftyfracsum_k=1^na_kn sqrtn$$



      The (a) part I was able to solve by proving that the sequence is increasing and not bounded by above. Therefore
      $$ lim_n to inftya_n = +infty$$



      Then for (b) I applied the Stolz theorem:
      $$ lim_n to inftyfraca_n^2n = lim_n to inftyfraca_n+1^2 - a_n^2n+1-n = lim_n to infty(a_n^2 + 4 + frac1a_n^222 - a_n^2) = lim_n to infty(4 + frac1a_n^222) = 4$$



      But the (c) part is where I get confused. I've tried applying the Stolz theorem there as well but no luck since the n's don't cancel out like they did in (b).



      I did have one thing on my mind though but I'm not sure how formally correct it is.
      Let's look at the first few sequence members:
      $$a_1 = 2016, a_2 = sqrt2016^2 + 4 + frac12016^222, a_3 = sqrt2016^2 + 4 + frac12016^222+ 4 + frac1a_2^222 = sqrt2016^2 + 8 + frac12016^222 + frac1a_2^222$$



      And now as we keep going we are going to get a new $$ frac1a_n^222$$ member inside for each n. So that still makes this sequence recursive. But can I simply disregard that part since it obviously always converges to zero, not matter what the value of n is? Or maybe I could say something like



      $$ textLet frac1a_n^222 = Z(n) quad text Then lim_n to inftyZ(n) = 0 quad (forall n)$$



      And now I rewrite my sequence as:



      $$ a_n = sqrt(2016)^2 + 4(n-1) + sum_i=1^n-1Z(i) quad forall n geq 2$$



      Now let's finally look at the (c) problem:



      $$lim_n to inftyfracsum_k=1^na_kn sqrtn = lim_n to inftyfraca_1 + a_2 + ... +a_nn sqrtn = lim_n to inftyfrac2016 + sqrt2016^2 + 4 + Z(1) + ... + sqrt2016^2 + 4(n-1) + sumZ(n) n sqrtn$$



      And now I apply Stolz theorem:



      $$ = lim_n to inftyfracsqrt2016^2 + 4n + sumZ(n+1)(n+1)sqrtn+1 - nsqrtn = 0 $$



      Since the top degree of $n$ is $frac12$ and the bottom one is $ frac32$.



      So can anyone tell me whether this solutions is correct? If it isn't, how would you solve it? If it is correct but my process is wrong I'd also like to know where I went wrong.



      Thanks in advance.










      share|cite|improve this question













      The problem is:



      A sequence is given with:
      $$ a_1 = 2016, a_n+1 = sqrta_n^2 + 4 + frac1a_n^222$$
      Find:
      $$ (a) quad lim_n to inftya_n quad (b) lim_n to inftyfraca_n^2n quad (c) lim_n to inftyfracsum_k=1^na_kn sqrtn$$



      The (a) part I was able to solve by proving that the sequence is increasing and not bounded by above. Therefore
      $$ lim_n to inftya_n = +infty$$



      Then for (b) I applied the Stolz theorem:
      $$ lim_n to inftyfraca_n^2n = lim_n to inftyfraca_n+1^2 - a_n^2n+1-n = lim_n to infty(a_n^2 + 4 + frac1a_n^222 - a_n^2) = lim_n to infty(4 + frac1a_n^222) = 4$$



      But the (c) part is where I get confused. I've tried applying the Stolz theorem there as well but no luck since the n's don't cancel out like they did in (b).



      I did have one thing on my mind though but I'm not sure how formally correct it is.
      Let's look at the first few sequence members:
      $$a_1 = 2016, a_2 = sqrt2016^2 + 4 + frac12016^222, a_3 = sqrt2016^2 + 4 + frac12016^222+ 4 + frac1a_2^222 = sqrt2016^2 + 8 + frac12016^222 + frac1a_2^222$$



      And now as we keep going we are going to get a new $$ frac1a_n^222$$ member inside for each n. So that still makes this sequence recursive. But can I simply disregard that part since it obviously always converges to zero, not matter what the value of n is? Or maybe I could say something like



      $$ textLet frac1a_n^222 = Z(n) quad text Then lim_n to inftyZ(n) = 0 quad (forall n)$$



      And now I rewrite my sequence as:



      $$ a_n = sqrt(2016)^2 + 4(n-1) + sum_i=1^n-1Z(i) quad forall n geq 2$$



      Now let's finally look at the (c) problem:



      $$lim_n to inftyfracsum_k=1^na_kn sqrtn = lim_n to inftyfraca_1 + a_2 + ... +a_nn sqrtn = lim_n to inftyfrac2016 + sqrt2016^2 + 4 + Z(1) + ... + sqrt2016^2 + 4(n-1) + sumZ(n) n sqrtn$$



      And now I apply Stolz theorem:



      $$ = lim_n to inftyfracsqrt2016^2 + 4n + sumZ(n+1)(n+1)sqrtn+1 - nsqrtn = 0 $$



      Since the top degree of $n$ is $frac12$ and the bottom one is $ frac32$.



      So can anyone tell me whether this solutions is correct? If it isn't, how would you solve it? If it is correct but my process is wrong I'd also like to know where I went wrong.



      Thanks in advance.







      real-analysis limits convergence






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 2 hours ago









      Koy

      1776




      1776




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted










          For $a$ we can go like this:



          The sequence is clearly increasing, it's also positive, we just need to prove that the limit is infinite. If it were finite and equal to $ggeq a_1>0$, we would have
          $$g=sqrtg^2+4+frac1g^222implies frac1g^222=-4 $$
          which is impossible, so that $lim_ntoinfty a_n = infty$.



          Your solution for $b$ looks good.



          For $c$:



          $$lim_ntoinfty fracsumlimits_k=1^n a_kn^3/2 = lim_ntoinfty fraca_n+1sqrtn+1+fracnsqrtn+1+sqrtn = lim_ntoinfty fraca_n(3/2)sqrtn = frac23cdot2 = frac43 $$
          First equality is Stolz's theorem, $$(n+1)^3/2-n^3/2 = n(n+1)^1/2+(n+1)^1/2-n^3/2=\=n(sqrtn+1-sqrtn)+sqrtn+1=fracnsqrtn+1+sqrtn+sqrtn+1,$$ for the second we used that $fracfracnsqrtn+1+sqrtn+sqrtn+1sqrtn+1to 3/2$ as $ntoinfty$, third we calculated earlier.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2927652%2fan-unorthodox-way-of-converting-a-recurrent-sequence-into-a-non-recurrent-one%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            4
            down vote



            accepted










            For $a$ we can go like this:



            The sequence is clearly increasing, it's also positive, we just need to prove that the limit is infinite. If it were finite and equal to $ggeq a_1>0$, we would have
            $$g=sqrtg^2+4+frac1g^222implies frac1g^222=-4 $$
            which is impossible, so that $lim_ntoinfty a_n = infty$.



            Your solution for $b$ looks good.



            For $c$:



            $$lim_ntoinfty fracsumlimits_k=1^n a_kn^3/2 = lim_ntoinfty fraca_n+1sqrtn+1+fracnsqrtn+1+sqrtn = lim_ntoinfty fraca_n(3/2)sqrtn = frac23cdot2 = frac43 $$
            First equality is Stolz's theorem, $$(n+1)^3/2-n^3/2 = n(n+1)^1/2+(n+1)^1/2-n^3/2=\=n(sqrtn+1-sqrtn)+sqrtn+1=fracnsqrtn+1+sqrtn+sqrtn+1,$$ for the second we used that $fracfracnsqrtn+1+sqrtn+sqrtn+1sqrtn+1to 3/2$ as $ntoinfty$, third we calculated earlier.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              up vote
              4
              down vote



              accepted










              For $a$ we can go like this:



              The sequence is clearly increasing, it's also positive, we just need to prove that the limit is infinite. If it were finite and equal to $ggeq a_1>0$, we would have
              $$g=sqrtg^2+4+frac1g^222implies frac1g^222=-4 $$
              which is impossible, so that $lim_ntoinfty a_n = infty$.



              Your solution for $b$ looks good.



              For $c$:



              $$lim_ntoinfty fracsumlimits_k=1^n a_kn^3/2 = lim_ntoinfty fraca_n+1sqrtn+1+fracnsqrtn+1+sqrtn = lim_ntoinfty fraca_n(3/2)sqrtn = frac23cdot2 = frac43 $$
              First equality is Stolz's theorem, $$(n+1)^3/2-n^3/2 = n(n+1)^1/2+(n+1)^1/2-n^3/2=\=n(sqrtn+1-sqrtn)+sqrtn+1=fracnsqrtn+1+sqrtn+sqrtn+1,$$ for the second we used that $fracfracnsqrtn+1+sqrtn+sqrtn+1sqrtn+1to 3/2$ as $ntoinfty$, third we calculated earlier.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                4
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                4
                down vote



                accepted






                For $a$ we can go like this:



                The sequence is clearly increasing, it's also positive, we just need to prove that the limit is infinite. If it were finite and equal to $ggeq a_1>0$, we would have
                $$g=sqrtg^2+4+frac1g^222implies frac1g^222=-4 $$
                which is impossible, so that $lim_ntoinfty a_n = infty$.



                Your solution for $b$ looks good.



                For $c$:



                $$lim_ntoinfty fracsumlimits_k=1^n a_kn^3/2 = lim_ntoinfty fraca_n+1sqrtn+1+fracnsqrtn+1+sqrtn = lim_ntoinfty fraca_n(3/2)sqrtn = frac23cdot2 = frac43 $$
                First equality is Stolz's theorem, $$(n+1)^3/2-n^3/2 = n(n+1)^1/2+(n+1)^1/2-n^3/2=\=n(sqrtn+1-sqrtn)+sqrtn+1=fracnsqrtn+1+sqrtn+sqrtn+1,$$ for the second we used that $fracfracnsqrtn+1+sqrtn+sqrtn+1sqrtn+1to 3/2$ as $ntoinfty$, third we calculated earlier.






                share|cite|improve this answer














                For $a$ we can go like this:



                The sequence is clearly increasing, it's also positive, we just need to prove that the limit is infinite. If it were finite and equal to $ggeq a_1>0$, we would have
                $$g=sqrtg^2+4+frac1g^222implies frac1g^222=-4 $$
                which is impossible, so that $lim_ntoinfty a_n = infty$.



                Your solution for $b$ looks good.



                For $c$:



                $$lim_ntoinfty fracsumlimits_k=1^n a_kn^3/2 = lim_ntoinfty fraca_n+1sqrtn+1+fracnsqrtn+1+sqrtn = lim_ntoinfty fraca_n(3/2)sqrtn = frac23cdot2 = frac43 $$
                First equality is Stolz's theorem, $$(n+1)^3/2-n^3/2 = n(n+1)^1/2+(n+1)^1/2-n^3/2=\=n(sqrtn+1-sqrtn)+sqrtn+1=fracnsqrtn+1+sqrtn+sqrtn+1,$$ for the second we used that $fracfracnsqrtn+1+sqrtn+sqrtn+1sqrtn+1to 3/2$ as $ntoinfty$, third we calculated earlier.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 2 hours ago

























                answered 2 hours ago









                Jakobian

                1,963515




                1,963515



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2927652%2fan-unorthodox-way-of-converting-a-recurrent-sequence-into-a-non-recurrent-one%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

                    Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

                    Confectionery