Termination of employment because of gross misconduct involving ISO 27001

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I work for a small UK company in the IT department.



Hearing other employees struggle with the slow internet connection I discover malicious software (trojan horse) in the Internet access point.



I had concerns that in the installation of Trojan Horse may be involved someone from technical management. Therefore I addressed the issue directly to the company owner also suggesting a non-invasive and silent audit of the internal network. I got permission from Company owner to conduct an examination.



Two months later I have been accused of a possible gross of misconduct addressed as Data Breach according to the ISO 27001 standard.



My concern is that the disciplinary investigation and hearing process which implied in The letter of termination (due to gross of misconduct) has a formality to achieve terminating of my employment in a disciplinary manner.



Till the moment of accusation, I had little if any knowledge of the company's ISO 27001.



Asking about details such as ISO 27001 appendix A where it states as follows




A.5.1 Information security policy
Objective: To provide management direction and support for information security following business requirements and relevant laws and regulations.



A.5.1.1 Information security policy document



Control



An information security policy document shall be approved by management, and published and communicated to all employees and relevant external parties.




I was told that I should have been aware of the policy as it is A daily Jira process.



My further concern is that ISO 27001 was used as a tool to conduct the process procedurally.









share









New contributor




Łukasz D. Tulikowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1




    Do you really mean 'data bridge'? Or 'data breach'?
    – DJClayworth
    2 mins ago










  • Have you actually been terminated? Or is the investigation still ongoing?
    – DJClayworth
    46 secs ago
















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I work for a small UK company in the IT department.



Hearing other employees struggle with the slow internet connection I discover malicious software (trojan horse) in the Internet access point.



I had concerns that in the installation of Trojan Horse may be involved someone from technical management. Therefore I addressed the issue directly to the company owner also suggesting a non-invasive and silent audit of the internal network. I got permission from Company owner to conduct an examination.



Two months later I have been accused of a possible gross of misconduct addressed as Data Breach according to the ISO 27001 standard.



My concern is that the disciplinary investigation and hearing process which implied in The letter of termination (due to gross of misconduct) has a formality to achieve terminating of my employment in a disciplinary manner.



Till the moment of accusation, I had little if any knowledge of the company's ISO 27001.



Asking about details such as ISO 27001 appendix A where it states as follows




A.5.1 Information security policy
Objective: To provide management direction and support for information security following business requirements and relevant laws and regulations.



A.5.1.1 Information security policy document



Control



An information security policy document shall be approved by management, and published and communicated to all employees and relevant external parties.




I was told that I should have been aware of the policy as it is A daily Jira process.



My further concern is that ISO 27001 was used as a tool to conduct the process procedurally.









share









New contributor




Łukasz D. Tulikowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1




    Do you really mean 'data bridge'? Or 'data breach'?
    – DJClayworth
    2 mins ago










  • Have you actually been terminated? Or is the investigation still ongoing?
    – DJClayworth
    46 secs ago












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I work for a small UK company in the IT department.



Hearing other employees struggle with the slow internet connection I discover malicious software (trojan horse) in the Internet access point.



I had concerns that in the installation of Trojan Horse may be involved someone from technical management. Therefore I addressed the issue directly to the company owner also suggesting a non-invasive and silent audit of the internal network. I got permission from Company owner to conduct an examination.



Two months later I have been accused of a possible gross of misconduct addressed as Data Breach according to the ISO 27001 standard.



My concern is that the disciplinary investigation and hearing process which implied in The letter of termination (due to gross of misconduct) has a formality to achieve terminating of my employment in a disciplinary manner.



Till the moment of accusation, I had little if any knowledge of the company's ISO 27001.



Asking about details such as ISO 27001 appendix A where it states as follows




A.5.1 Information security policy
Objective: To provide management direction and support for information security following business requirements and relevant laws and regulations.



A.5.1.1 Information security policy document



Control



An information security policy document shall be approved by management, and published and communicated to all employees and relevant external parties.




I was told that I should have been aware of the policy as it is A daily Jira process.



My further concern is that ISO 27001 was used as a tool to conduct the process procedurally.









share









New contributor




Łukasz D. Tulikowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I work for a small UK company in the IT department.



Hearing other employees struggle with the slow internet connection I discover malicious software (trojan horse) in the Internet access point.



I had concerns that in the installation of Trojan Horse may be involved someone from technical management. Therefore I addressed the issue directly to the company owner also suggesting a non-invasive and silent audit of the internal network. I got permission from Company owner to conduct an examination.



Two months later I have been accused of a possible gross of misconduct addressed as Data Breach according to the ISO 27001 standard.



My concern is that the disciplinary investigation and hearing process which implied in The letter of termination (due to gross of misconduct) has a formality to achieve terminating of my employment in a disciplinary manner.



Till the moment of accusation, I had little if any knowledge of the company's ISO 27001.



Asking about details such as ISO 27001 appendix A where it states as follows




A.5.1 Information security policy
Objective: To provide management direction and support for information security following business requirements and relevant laws and regulations.



A.5.1.1 Information security policy document



Control



An information security policy document shall be approved by management, and published and communicated to all employees and relevant external parties.




I was told that I should have been aware of the policy as it is A daily Jira process.



My further concern is that ISO 27001 was used as a tool to conduct the process procedurally.







software-industry united-kingdom termination fulltime





share









New contributor




Łukasz D. Tulikowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share









New contributor




Łukasz D. Tulikowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share



share








edited 1 min ago





















New contributor




Łukasz D. Tulikowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 6 mins ago









Łukasz D. Tulikowski

101




101




New contributor




Łukasz D. Tulikowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Łukasz D. Tulikowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Łukasz D. Tulikowski is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    Do you really mean 'data bridge'? Or 'data breach'?
    – DJClayworth
    2 mins ago










  • Have you actually been terminated? Or is the investigation still ongoing?
    – DJClayworth
    46 secs ago












  • 1




    Do you really mean 'data bridge'? Or 'data breach'?
    – DJClayworth
    2 mins ago










  • Have you actually been terminated? Or is the investigation still ongoing?
    – DJClayworth
    46 secs ago







1




1




Do you really mean 'data bridge'? Or 'data breach'?
– DJClayworth
2 mins ago




Do you really mean 'data bridge'? Or 'data breach'?
– DJClayworth
2 mins ago












Have you actually been terminated? Or is the investigation still ongoing?
– DJClayworth
46 secs ago




Have you actually been terminated? Or is the investigation still ongoing?
– DJClayworth
46 secs ago















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "423"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Łukasz D. Tulikowski is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f121948%2ftermination-of-employment-because-of-gross-misconduct-involving-iso-27001%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








Łukasz D. Tulikowski is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















Łukasz D. Tulikowski is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Łukasz D. Tulikowski is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Łukasz D. Tulikowski is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f121948%2ftermination-of-employment-because-of-gross-misconduct-involving-iso-27001%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What does second last employer means? [closed]

Installing NextGIS Connect into QGIS 3?

One-line joke