Why is not every vectorbundle trivial and we only need local trivialization?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Why is should the trivialization only need to be local for vectorbundles? For example the tangent bundle. If the tangent space at a point p of a manifold M is identified with let's say $mathbbR^n$ , why can't we just identify the total space of the vectorbundle with M x $mathbbR^n$ ? My questions could be formulated as, why is not every vectorbundle a trivial one? Since I have the feeling that all the fibers can be identified with $mathbbR^n$ and therefore you don't have only local trivialization, but everywhere.










share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    Why is should the trivialization only need to be local for vectorbundles? For example the tangent bundle. If the tangent space at a point p of a manifold M is identified with let's say $mathbbR^n$ , why can't we just identify the total space of the vectorbundle with M x $mathbbR^n$ ? My questions could be formulated as, why is not every vectorbundle a trivial one? Since I have the feeling that all the fibers can be identified with $mathbbR^n$ and therefore you don't have only local trivialization, but everywhere.










    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      Why is should the trivialization only need to be local for vectorbundles? For example the tangent bundle. If the tangent space at a point p of a manifold M is identified with let's say $mathbbR^n$ , why can't we just identify the total space of the vectorbundle with M x $mathbbR^n$ ? My questions could be formulated as, why is not every vectorbundle a trivial one? Since I have the feeling that all the fibers can be identified with $mathbbR^n$ and therefore you don't have only local trivialization, but everywhere.










      share|cite|improve this question













      Why is should the trivialization only need to be local for vectorbundles? For example the tangent bundle. If the tangent space at a point p of a manifold M is identified with let's say $mathbbR^n$ , why can't we just identify the total space of the vectorbundle with M x $mathbbR^n$ ? My questions could be formulated as, why is not every vectorbundle a trivial one? Since I have the feeling that all the fibers can be identified with $mathbbR^n$ and therefore you don't have only local trivialization, but everywhere.







      differential-geometry vector-bundles






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 3 hours ago









      user3397129

      1517




      1517




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          6
          down vote













          The same reason not all manifolds are copies of $mathbbR^n$ --- just because we're gluing things together to locally preserve structure, that doesn't mean the global result has that same structure. (If it did, then differential topology wouldn't be such an interesting area of study!)



          Here are two examples of nontrivializable vector bundles.



          1. Mobius band. This is a 1-dimensional real vector bundle over $mathbbS^1$ and it is not orientable, hence not diffeomorphic to a cylinder (and therefore not trivializable).


          2. Tangent bundle to $mathbbS^2$. By the hairy ball theorem, this has no globally nonzero sections, hence it cannot be trivializable.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • When showing locally trivialization formally, should one make use of charts in general?
            – user3397129
            3 hours ago










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2980713%2fwhy-is-not-every-vectorbundle-trivial-and-we-only-need-local-trivialization%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          6
          down vote













          The same reason not all manifolds are copies of $mathbbR^n$ --- just because we're gluing things together to locally preserve structure, that doesn't mean the global result has that same structure. (If it did, then differential topology wouldn't be such an interesting area of study!)



          Here are two examples of nontrivializable vector bundles.



          1. Mobius band. This is a 1-dimensional real vector bundle over $mathbbS^1$ and it is not orientable, hence not diffeomorphic to a cylinder (and therefore not trivializable).


          2. Tangent bundle to $mathbbS^2$. By the hairy ball theorem, this has no globally nonzero sections, hence it cannot be trivializable.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • When showing locally trivialization formally, should one make use of charts in general?
            – user3397129
            3 hours ago














          up vote
          6
          down vote













          The same reason not all manifolds are copies of $mathbbR^n$ --- just because we're gluing things together to locally preserve structure, that doesn't mean the global result has that same structure. (If it did, then differential topology wouldn't be such an interesting area of study!)



          Here are two examples of nontrivializable vector bundles.



          1. Mobius band. This is a 1-dimensional real vector bundle over $mathbbS^1$ and it is not orientable, hence not diffeomorphic to a cylinder (and therefore not trivializable).


          2. Tangent bundle to $mathbbS^2$. By the hairy ball theorem, this has no globally nonzero sections, hence it cannot be trivializable.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • When showing locally trivialization formally, should one make use of charts in general?
            – user3397129
            3 hours ago












          up vote
          6
          down vote










          up vote
          6
          down vote









          The same reason not all manifolds are copies of $mathbbR^n$ --- just because we're gluing things together to locally preserve structure, that doesn't mean the global result has that same structure. (If it did, then differential topology wouldn't be such an interesting area of study!)



          Here are two examples of nontrivializable vector bundles.



          1. Mobius band. This is a 1-dimensional real vector bundle over $mathbbS^1$ and it is not orientable, hence not diffeomorphic to a cylinder (and therefore not trivializable).


          2. Tangent bundle to $mathbbS^2$. By the hairy ball theorem, this has no globally nonzero sections, hence it cannot be trivializable.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          The same reason not all manifolds are copies of $mathbbR^n$ --- just because we're gluing things together to locally preserve structure, that doesn't mean the global result has that same structure. (If it did, then differential topology wouldn't be such an interesting area of study!)



          Here are two examples of nontrivializable vector bundles.



          1. Mobius band. This is a 1-dimensional real vector bundle over $mathbbS^1$ and it is not orientable, hence not diffeomorphic to a cylinder (and therefore not trivializable).


          2. Tangent bundle to $mathbbS^2$. By the hairy ball theorem, this has no globally nonzero sections, hence it cannot be trivializable.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 3 hours ago









          Neal

          23.1k23582




          23.1k23582











          • When showing locally trivialization formally, should one make use of charts in general?
            – user3397129
            3 hours ago
















          • When showing locally trivialization formally, should one make use of charts in general?
            – user3397129
            3 hours ago















          When showing locally trivialization formally, should one make use of charts in general?
          – user3397129
          3 hours ago




          When showing locally trivialization formally, should one make use of charts in general?
          – user3397129
          3 hours ago

















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2980713%2fwhy-is-not-every-vectorbundle-trivial-and-we-only-need-local-trivialization%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What does second last employer means? [closed]

          Installing NextGIS Connect into QGIS 3?

          One-line joke