Time complexity of a language whose alphabet has a single symbol

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Consider a language $L$ such that $L subseteq Sigma^*$, where the cardinality of $Sigma$ is $1$ (i.e. the alphabet has only one symbol). E.g. $L subseteq a^*$.



Can anything be said about the time complexity of $L$? Is it the case that $L in P$?



I can't come up with any example of a language with a single symbol that is not in $P$.










share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    Consider a language $L$ such that $L subseteq Sigma^*$, where the cardinality of $Sigma$ is $1$ (i.e. the alphabet has only one symbol). E.g. $L subseteq a^*$.



    Can anything be said about the time complexity of $L$? Is it the case that $L in P$?



    I can't come up with any example of a language with a single symbol that is not in $P$.










    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      Consider a language $L$ such that $L subseteq Sigma^*$, where the cardinality of $Sigma$ is $1$ (i.e. the alphabet has only one symbol). E.g. $L subseteq a^*$.



      Can anything be said about the time complexity of $L$? Is it the case that $L in P$?



      I can't come up with any example of a language with a single symbol that is not in $P$.










      share|cite|improve this question













      Consider a language $L$ such that $L subseteq Sigma^*$, where the cardinality of $Sigma$ is $1$ (i.e. the alphabet has only one symbol). E.g. $L subseteq a^*$.



      Can anything be said about the time complexity of $L$? Is it the case that $L in P$?



      I can't come up with any example of a language with a single symbol that is not in $P$.







      time-complexity decision-problem






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 5 hours ago









      denidare

      182




      182




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          The language $a^n : text the $n$th Turing machine halts on the empty string $ is undecidable.



          In fact, a random unary language is undecidable almost surely, for the simple reason that there are only countably many computable languages.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Thanks, this makes sense. Would anything change if we restricted $L$ to be decidable?
            – denidare
            5 hours ago










          • Perhaps you can search a bit on the Internet. You might find things like "if there exists a unary language that is NP-complete, then P = NP" and other interesting observations.
            – Pål GD
            4 hours ago






          • 1




            Not really. You can ask whether the $n$th Turing machine halts within $T(n)$ steps on the empty string, which should be hard to determine given much less than $T(n)$ time.
            – Yuval Filmus
            4 hours ago










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "419"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f99454%2ftime-complexity-of-a-language-whose-alphabet-has-a-single-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          3
          down vote













          The language $a^n : text the $n$th Turing machine halts on the empty string $ is undecidable.



          In fact, a random unary language is undecidable almost surely, for the simple reason that there are only countably many computable languages.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Thanks, this makes sense. Would anything change if we restricted $L$ to be decidable?
            – denidare
            5 hours ago










          • Perhaps you can search a bit on the Internet. You might find things like "if there exists a unary language that is NP-complete, then P = NP" and other interesting observations.
            – Pål GD
            4 hours ago






          • 1




            Not really. You can ask whether the $n$th Turing machine halts within $T(n)$ steps on the empty string, which should be hard to determine given much less than $T(n)$ time.
            – Yuval Filmus
            4 hours ago














          up vote
          3
          down vote













          The language $a^n : text the $n$th Turing machine halts on the empty string $ is undecidable.



          In fact, a random unary language is undecidable almost surely, for the simple reason that there are only countably many computable languages.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Thanks, this makes sense. Would anything change if we restricted $L$ to be decidable?
            – denidare
            5 hours ago










          • Perhaps you can search a bit on the Internet. You might find things like "if there exists a unary language that is NP-complete, then P = NP" and other interesting observations.
            – Pål GD
            4 hours ago






          • 1




            Not really. You can ask whether the $n$th Turing machine halts within $T(n)$ steps on the empty string, which should be hard to determine given much less than $T(n)$ time.
            – Yuval Filmus
            4 hours ago












          up vote
          3
          down vote










          up vote
          3
          down vote









          The language $a^n : text the $n$th Turing machine halts on the empty string $ is undecidable.



          In fact, a random unary language is undecidable almost surely, for the simple reason that there are only countably many computable languages.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          The language $a^n : text the $n$th Turing machine halts on the empty string $ is undecidable.



          In fact, a random unary language is undecidable almost surely, for the simple reason that there are only countably many computable languages.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 5 hours ago









          Yuval Filmus

          185k12176337




          185k12176337











          • Thanks, this makes sense. Would anything change if we restricted $L$ to be decidable?
            – denidare
            5 hours ago










          • Perhaps you can search a bit on the Internet. You might find things like "if there exists a unary language that is NP-complete, then P = NP" and other interesting observations.
            – Pål GD
            4 hours ago






          • 1




            Not really. You can ask whether the $n$th Turing machine halts within $T(n)$ steps on the empty string, which should be hard to determine given much less than $T(n)$ time.
            – Yuval Filmus
            4 hours ago
















          • Thanks, this makes sense. Would anything change if we restricted $L$ to be decidable?
            – denidare
            5 hours ago










          • Perhaps you can search a bit on the Internet. You might find things like "if there exists a unary language that is NP-complete, then P = NP" and other interesting observations.
            – Pål GD
            4 hours ago






          • 1




            Not really. You can ask whether the $n$th Turing machine halts within $T(n)$ steps on the empty string, which should be hard to determine given much less than $T(n)$ time.
            – Yuval Filmus
            4 hours ago















          Thanks, this makes sense. Would anything change if we restricted $L$ to be decidable?
          – denidare
          5 hours ago




          Thanks, this makes sense. Would anything change if we restricted $L$ to be decidable?
          – denidare
          5 hours ago












          Perhaps you can search a bit on the Internet. You might find things like "if there exists a unary language that is NP-complete, then P = NP" and other interesting observations.
          – Pål GD
          4 hours ago




          Perhaps you can search a bit on the Internet. You might find things like "if there exists a unary language that is NP-complete, then P = NP" and other interesting observations.
          – Pål GD
          4 hours ago




          1




          1




          Not really. You can ask whether the $n$th Turing machine halts within $T(n)$ steps on the empty string, which should be hard to determine given much less than $T(n)$ time.
          – Yuval Filmus
          4 hours ago




          Not really. You can ask whether the $n$th Turing machine halts within $T(n)$ steps on the empty string, which should be hard to determine given much less than $T(n)$ time.
          – Yuval Filmus
          4 hours ago

















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f99454%2ftime-complexity-of-a-language-whose-alphabet-has-a-single-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What does second last employer means? [closed]

          Installing NextGIS Connect into QGIS 3?

          One-line joke