Why is super-dense coding called the inverse of quantum teleportation?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I am new to quantum computation and I recently came across the statement that super-dense coding can be called the inverse of quantum teleportation
superdense-coding
New contributor
Aditya Panda is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I am new to quantum computation and I recently came across the statement that super-dense coding can be called the inverse of quantum teleportation
superdense-coding
New contributor
Aditya Panda is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
For me, teleportation is more physically fundamental than superdense coding. tt seems superdence coding is just to carry 2 classical bits by applying 4 different unitary operators. But teleportation, 2 classical bits seem to deliver an infinite amount of information.
– XXDD
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I am new to quantum computation and I recently came across the statement that super-dense coding can be called the inverse of quantum teleportation
superdense-coding
New contributor
Aditya Panda is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I am new to quantum computation and I recently came across the statement that super-dense coding can be called the inverse of quantum teleportation
superdense-coding
superdense-coding
New contributor
Aditya Panda is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Aditya Panda is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Aditya Panda is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago
Aditya Panda
133
133
New contributor
Aditya Panda is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Aditya Panda is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Aditya Panda is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
For me, teleportation is more physically fundamental than superdense coding. tt seems superdence coding is just to carry 2 classical bits by applying 4 different unitary operators. But teleportation, 2 classical bits seem to deliver an infinite amount of information.
– XXDD
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
For me, teleportation is more physically fundamental than superdense coding. tt seems superdence coding is just to carry 2 classical bits by applying 4 different unitary operators. But teleportation, 2 classical bits seem to deliver an infinite amount of information.
– XXDD
1 hour ago
For me, teleportation is more physically fundamental than superdense coding. tt seems superdence coding is just to carry 2 classical bits by applying 4 different unitary operators. But teleportation, 2 classical bits seem to deliver an infinite amount of information.
– XXDD
1 hour ago
For me, teleportation is more physically fundamental than superdense coding. tt seems superdence coding is just to carry 2 classical bits by applying 4 different unitary operators. But teleportation, 2 classical bits seem to deliver an infinite amount of information.
– XXDD
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
In quantum teleportation, one starts with an entangled state shared between two parties, and (after some messing at the sender's side), two classical bits are transmitted from one party to the other so that the net effect is a quantum state is sent from the first party to the second without sending any quantum data.
In superdense coding, the parties start with an entangled state shared between two parties, and (after some messing at the sender's side), a quantum state is sent from one party to the other so that the net effect is two classical bits are sent from the first party to the second.
Hopefully I've written that in such a way that it conveys the symmetry between the two settings. Where I say "quantum state", I specifically mean a single qubit in an unknown state.
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
In quantum teleportation, one starts with an entangled state shared between two parties, and (after some messing at the sender's side), two classical bits are transmitted from one party to the other so that the net effect is a quantum state is sent from the first party to the second without sending any quantum data.
In superdense coding, the parties start with an entangled state shared between two parties, and (after some messing at the sender's side), a quantum state is sent from one party to the other so that the net effect is two classical bits are sent from the first party to the second.
Hopefully I've written that in such a way that it conveys the symmetry between the two settings. Where I say "quantum state", I specifically mean a single qubit in an unknown state.
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
In quantum teleportation, one starts with an entangled state shared between two parties, and (after some messing at the sender's side), two classical bits are transmitted from one party to the other so that the net effect is a quantum state is sent from the first party to the second without sending any quantum data.
In superdense coding, the parties start with an entangled state shared between two parties, and (after some messing at the sender's side), a quantum state is sent from one party to the other so that the net effect is two classical bits are sent from the first party to the second.
Hopefully I've written that in such a way that it conveys the symmetry between the two settings. Where I say "quantum state", I specifically mean a single qubit in an unknown state.
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
In quantum teleportation, one starts with an entangled state shared between two parties, and (after some messing at the sender's side), two classical bits are transmitted from one party to the other so that the net effect is a quantum state is sent from the first party to the second without sending any quantum data.
In superdense coding, the parties start with an entangled state shared between two parties, and (after some messing at the sender's side), a quantum state is sent from one party to the other so that the net effect is two classical bits are sent from the first party to the second.
Hopefully I've written that in such a way that it conveys the symmetry between the two settings. Where I say "quantum state", I specifically mean a single qubit in an unknown state.
In quantum teleportation, one starts with an entangled state shared between two parties, and (after some messing at the sender's side), two classical bits are transmitted from one party to the other so that the net effect is a quantum state is sent from the first party to the second without sending any quantum data.
In superdense coding, the parties start with an entangled state shared between two parties, and (after some messing at the sender's side), a quantum state is sent from one party to the other so that the net effect is two classical bits are sent from the first party to the second.
Hopefully I've written that in such a way that it conveys the symmetry between the two settings. Where I say "quantum state", I specifically mean a single qubit in an unknown state.
answered 3 hours ago
DaftWullie
9,8071332
9,8071332
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Aditya Panda is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Aditya Panda is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Aditya Panda is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Aditya Panda is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f4623%2fwhy-is-super-dense-coding-called-the-inverse-of-quantum-teleportation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
For me, teleportation is more physically fundamental than superdense coding. tt seems superdence coding is just to carry 2 classical bits by applying 4 different unitary operators. But teleportation, 2 classical bits seem to deliver an infinite amount of information.
– XXDD
1 hour ago