How did Apollo missions solve the cosmic radiation problem
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
One of the major hurdles of space exploration is cosmic radiation. How did the Apollo missions solve the radiation problem.
Edit:
NASA would have shielded the astronauts to some level by some material. My question how did they try to atleast minimalise the effect.
apollo-program radiation cosmic-radiation
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
One of the major hurdles of space exploration is cosmic radiation. How did the Apollo missions solve the radiation problem.
Edit:
NASA would have shielded the astronauts to some level by some material. My question how did they try to atleast minimalise the effect.
apollo-program radiation cosmic-radiation
Also: Could an Apollo crew have been killed by Solar radiation?
â DarkDust
2 hours ago
NASA knows that this problem exists and took a risk?. they would have shielded the astronauts to some level by some material. My question how did they try to atleast minimalise the effect.
â r2_d2
2 hours ago
IIRC, the largest amount of radiation the astronauts were subjected to occurred when flying through the Van Allen belt. No idea how long that took (a few hours?)
â DarkDust
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
One of the major hurdles of space exploration is cosmic radiation. How did the Apollo missions solve the radiation problem.
Edit:
NASA would have shielded the astronauts to some level by some material. My question how did they try to atleast minimalise the effect.
apollo-program radiation cosmic-radiation
One of the major hurdles of space exploration is cosmic radiation. How did the Apollo missions solve the radiation problem.
Edit:
NASA would have shielded the astronauts to some level by some material. My question how did they try to atleast minimalise the effect.
apollo-program radiation cosmic-radiation
apollo-program radiation cosmic-radiation
edited 2 hours ago
asked 3 hours ago
r2_d2
1139
1139
Also: Could an Apollo crew have been killed by Solar radiation?
â DarkDust
2 hours ago
NASA knows that this problem exists and took a risk?. they would have shielded the astronauts to some level by some material. My question how did they try to atleast minimalise the effect.
â r2_d2
2 hours ago
IIRC, the largest amount of radiation the astronauts were subjected to occurred when flying through the Van Allen belt. No idea how long that took (a few hours?)
â DarkDust
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
Also: Could an Apollo crew have been killed by Solar radiation?
â DarkDust
2 hours ago
NASA knows that this problem exists and took a risk?. they would have shielded the astronauts to some level by some material. My question how did they try to atleast minimalise the effect.
â r2_d2
2 hours ago
IIRC, the largest amount of radiation the astronauts were subjected to occurred when flying through the Van Allen belt. No idea how long that took (a few hours?)
â DarkDust
1 hour ago
Also: Could an Apollo crew have been killed by Solar radiation?
â DarkDust
2 hours ago
Also: Could an Apollo crew have been killed by Solar radiation?
â DarkDust
2 hours ago
NASA knows that this problem exists and took a risk?. they would have shielded the astronauts to some level by some material. My question how did they try to atleast minimalise the effect.
â r2_d2
2 hours ago
NASA knows that this problem exists and took a risk?. they would have shielded the astronauts to some level by some material. My question how did they try to atleast minimalise the effect.
â r2_d2
2 hours ago
IIRC, the largest amount of radiation the astronauts were subjected to occurred when flying through the Van Allen belt. No idea how long that took (a few hours?)
â DarkDust
1 hour ago
IIRC, the largest amount of radiation the astronauts were subjected to occurred when flying through the Van Allen belt. No idea how long that took (a few hours?)
â DarkDust
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
While cosmic radiation is a problem, it's the same as with radiation on Earth: the risk is cumulative. The levels were low enough that missions of 1-2 weeks at this level did not pose a big health risk, so no shielding was necessary.
The big remaining problem was radiation from solar flares and CMEs. These produce so much radiation it wasn't possible to build a shield thick enough to protect from them (within the weight budgets available for Apollo). So NASA looked at solar activity, launched during periods when activity was low and hoped a CME wouldn't occur.
The Apollo spacecraft had a thin aluminium hull. This blocks some of the radiation, but not much.
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
While cosmic radiation is a problem, it's the same as with radiation on Earth: the risk is cumulative. The levels were low enough that missions of 1-2 weeks at this level did not pose a big health risk, so no shielding was necessary.
The big remaining problem was radiation from solar flares and CMEs. These produce so much radiation it wasn't possible to build a shield thick enough to protect from them (within the weight budgets available for Apollo). So NASA looked at solar activity, launched during periods when activity was low and hoped a CME wouldn't occur.
The Apollo spacecraft had a thin aluminium hull. This blocks some of the radiation, but not much.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
While cosmic radiation is a problem, it's the same as with radiation on Earth: the risk is cumulative. The levels were low enough that missions of 1-2 weeks at this level did not pose a big health risk, so no shielding was necessary.
The big remaining problem was radiation from solar flares and CMEs. These produce so much radiation it wasn't possible to build a shield thick enough to protect from them (within the weight budgets available for Apollo). So NASA looked at solar activity, launched during periods when activity was low and hoped a CME wouldn't occur.
The Apollo spacecraft had a thin aluminium hull. This blocks some of the radiation, but not much.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
While cosmic radiation is a problem, it's the same as with radiation on Earth: the risk is cumulative. The levels were low enough that missions of 1-2 weeks at this level did not pose a big health risk, so no shielding was necessary.
The big remaining problem was radiation from solar flares and CMEs. These produce so much radiation it wasn't possible to build a shield thick enough to protect from them (within the weight budgets available for Apollo). So NASA looked at solar activity, launched during periods when activity was low and hoped a CME wouldn't occur.
The Apollo spacecraft had a thin aluminium hull. This blocks some of the radiation, but not much.
While cosmic radiation is a problem, it's the same as with radiation on Earth: the risk is cumulative. The levels were low enough that missions of 1-2 weeks at this level did not pose a big health risk, so no shielding was necessary.
The big remaining problem was radiation from solar flares and CMEs. These produce so much radiation it wasn't possible to build a shield thick enough to protect from them (within the weight budgets available for Apollo). So NASA looked at solar activity, launched during periods when activity was low and hoped a CME wouldn't occur.
The Apollo spacecraft had a thin aluminium hull. This blocks some of the radiation, but not much.
answered 2 hours ago
Hobbes
80.5k2222362
80.5k2222362
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31820%2fhow-did-apollo-missions-solve-the-cosmic-radiation-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Also: Could an Apollo crew have been killed by Solar radiation?
â DarkDust
2 hours ago
NASA knows that this problem exists and took a risk?. they would have shielded the astronauts to some level by some material. My question how did they try to atleast minimalise the effect.
â r2_d2
2 hours ago
IIRC, the largest amount of radiation the astronauts were subjected to occurred when flying through the Van Allen belt. No idea how long that took (a few hours?)
â DarkDust
1 hour ago