What is this gap in the GNSS satellite trajectories?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












I've recently bought a USB-connected multi-constellation GNSS-receiver with a U-blox 8 chip in it. I've downloaded the U-center software that can display a lot of details about the received signals. One of those is the 'Sky View' window which logs the trajectories of the satellites the receiver is aware of. I've let it run in my windowsill for more than 12 hours, logging trajectories for the GPS, Glonass and Galileo satellites. I'm living in the Netherlands. This is the resulting image:



Sky View



The green lines show the satellite trajectories used for calculating my position, the red ones are the known parts of their trajectories where they were not used. This lines up as expected with the view direction from my window.



My question is about the white area directly to the north where no satellite seems to cross. Is this a bug or effect of my setup or is there really such an area which GNSS-satellites don't cross? If the latter, what is the reason they don't?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Bart Noordervliet is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Don't worry, it's real! space.stackexchange.com/q/28017/12102
    – uhoh
    41 mins ago















up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












I've recently bought a USB-connected multi-constellation GNSS-receiver with a U-blox 8 chip in it. I've downloaded the U-center software that can display a lot of details about the received signals. One of those is the 'Sky View' window which logs the trajectories of the satellites the receiver is aware of. I've let it run in my windowsill for more than 12 hours, logging trajectories for the GPS, Glonass and Galileo satellites. I'm living in the Netherlands. This is the resulting image:



Sky View



The green lines show the satellite trajectories used for calculating my position, the red ones are the known parts of their trajectories where they were not used. This lines up as expected with the view direction from my window.



My question is about the white area directly to the north where no satellite seems to cross. Is this a bug or effect of my setup or is there really such an area which GNSS-satellites don't cross? If the latter, what is the reason they don't?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Bart Noordervliet is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Don't worry, it's real! space.stackexchange.com/q/28017/12102
    – uhoh
    41 mins ago













up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1






1





I've recently bought a USB-connected multi-constellation GNSS-receiver with a U-blox 8 chip in it. I've downloaded the U-center software that can display a lot of details about the received signals. One of those is the 'Sky View' window which logs the trajectories of the satellites the receiver is aware of. I've let it run in my windowsill for more than 12 hours, logging trajectories for the GPS, Glonass and Galileo satellites. I'm living in the Netherlands. This is the resulting image:



Sky View



The green lines show the satellite trajectories used for calculating my position, the red ones are the known parts of their trajectories where they were not used. This lines up as expected with the view direction from my window.



My question is about the white area directly to the north where no satellite seems to cross. Is this a bug or effect of my setup or is there really such an area which GNSS-satellites don't cross? If the latter, what is the reason they don't?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Bart Noordervliet is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I've recently bought a USB-connected multi-constellation GNSS-receiver with a U-blox 8 chip in it. I've downloaded the U-center software that can display a lot of details about the received signals. One of those is the 'Sky View' window which logs the trajectories of the satellites the receiver is aware of. I've let it run in my windowsill for more than 12 hours, logging trajectories for the GPS, Glonass and Galileo satellites. I'm living in the Netherlands. This is the resulting image:



Sky View



The green lines show the satellite trajectories used for calculating my position, the red ones are the known parts of their trajectories where they were not used. This lines up as expected with the view direction from my window.



My question is about the white area directly to the north where no satellite seems to cross. Is this a bug or effect of my setup or is there really such an area which GNSS-satellites don't cross? If the latter, what is the reason they don't?







gps satellite-constellation gnss






share|improve this question







New contributor




Bart Noordervliet is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Bart Noordervliet is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Bart Noordervliet is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 1 hour ago









Bart Noordervliet

261




261




New contributor




Bart Noordervliet is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Bart Noordervliet is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Bart Noordervliet is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • Don't worry, it's real! space.stackexchange.com/q/28017/12102
    – uhoh
    41 mins ago

















  • Don't worry, it's real! space.stackexchange.com/q/28017/12102
    – uhoh
    41 mins ago
















Don't worry, it's real! space.stackexchange.com/q/28017/12102
– uhoh
41 mins ago





Don't worry, it's real! space.stackexchange.com/q/28017/12102
– uhoh
41 mins ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













GPS satellite orbits go up to onlyl 55 degrees inclination, so there are regions over the poles that they do not fly directly over (they are high up enough that they give coverage in the polar regions). If you were sitting up at the North Pole, you would never see a GPS satellite climb higher than 55 degrees from the horizon, whereas if you were on the equator, you would see them pass overhead.






share|improve this answer




















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "508"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Bart Noordervliet is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31824%2fwhat-is-this-gap-in-the-gnss-satellite-trajectories%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    3
    down vote













    GPS satellite orbits go up to onlyl 55 degrees inclination, so there are regions over the poles that they do not fly directly over (they are high up enough that they give coverage in the polar regions). If you were sitting up at the North Pole, you would never see a GPS satellite climb higher than 55 degrees from the horizon, whereas if you were on the equator, you would see them pass overhead.






    share|improve this answer
























      up vote
      3
      down vote













      GPS satellite orbits go up to onlyl 55 degrees inclination, so there are regions over the poles that they do not fly directly over (they are high up enough that they give coverage in the polar regions). If you were sitting up at the North Pole, you would never see a GPS satellite climb higher than 55 degrees from the horizon, whereas if you were on the equator, you would see them pass overhead.






      share|improve this answer






















        up vote
        3
        down vote










        up vote
        3
        down vote









        GPS satellite orbits go up to onlyl 55 degrees inclination, so there are regions over the poles that they do not fly directly over (they are high up enough that they give coverage in the polar regions). If you were sitting up at the North Pole, you would never see a GPS satellite climb higher than 55 degrees from the horizon, whereas if you were on the equator, you would see them pass overhead.






        share|improve this answer












        GPS satellite orbits go up to onlyl 55 degrees inclination, so there are regions over the poles that they do not fly directly over (they are high up enough that they give coverage in the polar regions). If you were sitting up at the North Pole, you would never see a GPS satellite climb higher than 55 degrees from the horizon, whereas if you were on the equator, you would see them pass overhead.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 37 mins ago









        Dave

        49625




        49625




















            Bart Noordervliet is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            Bart Noordervliet is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Bart Noordervliet is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Bart Noordervliet is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31824%2fwhat-is-this-gap-in-the-gnss-satellite-trajectories%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What does second last employer means? [closed]

            Installing NextGIS Connect into QGIS 3?

            One-line joke