Habitable zone around a Blue Supergiant
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I am writing a story centered around a planet orbiting a Blue Supergiant star.
What I want to know is how far away a planet would have to be to be in the habitable zone of such a star. The star I have in mind is roughly comparable to Rigel and don't mind anything like the need for protection from radiation, the race that inhabits this world can handle radiation and the likes of solar flares to the point they basically thrive in radiation that would utterly destroy a human.
Some side questions I have are these:
How many Earth years would 1 year on this planet be?
Would the 4 seasons still be roughly equally divided in that year?
science-based planets orbital-mechanics
New contributor
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I am writing a story centered around a planet orbiting a Blue Supergiant star.
What I want to know is how far away a planet would have to be to be in the habitable zone of such a star. The star I have in mind is roughly comparable to Rigel and don't mind anything like the need for protection from radiation, the race that inhabits this world can handle radiation and the likes of solar flares to the point they basically thrive in radiation that would utterly destroy a human.
Some side questions I have are these:
How many Earth years would 1 year on this planet be?
Would the 4 seasons still be roughly equally divided in that year?
science-based planets orbital-mechanics
New contributor
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I am writing a story centered around a planet orbiting a Blue Supergiant star.
What I want to know is how far away a planet would have to be to be in the habitable zone of such a star. The star I have in mind is roughly comparable to Rigel and don't mind anything like the need for protection from radiation, the race that inhabits this world can handle radiation and the likes of solar flares to the point they basically thrive in radiation that would utterly destroy a human.
Some side questions I have are these:
How many Earth years would 1 year on this planet be?
Would the 4 seasons still be roughly equally divided in that year?
science-based planets orbital-mechanics
New contributor
I am writing a story centered around a planet orbiting a Blue Supergiant star.
What I want to know is how far away a planet would have to be to be in the habitable zone of such a star. The star I have in mind is roughly comparable to Rigel and don't mind anything like the need for protection from radiation, the race that inhabits this world can handle radiation and the likes of solar flares to the point they basically thrive in radiation that would utterly destroy a human.
Some side questions I have are these:
How many Earth years would 1 year on this planet be?
Would the 4 seasons still be roughly equally divided in that year?
science-based planets orbital-mechanics
science-based planets orbital-mechanics
New contributor
New contributor
edited 2 hours ago
kingledion
67.8k22224384
67.8k22224384
New contributor
asked 2 hours ago
Blue Devil
162
162
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
Ok, so using Rigel as an example:
Rigel has a luminosity of 120,000 sols, so for a planet to receive the same insolation as the Earth does around the sun, it would orbit at a distance of 346.4 AU.
Given a stellar mass of 23 sols, and a planetary mass of 1 Earth, the year length is 1344.09 Earth years.
Seasons are tricky since they have to do with the axial tilt of the planet, and given the year length, precession could actually cause the seasons to shift within that time.
You should also be aware that the spectrum of the host star has an effect of the strength of ice albedo feedback in the climate of planets. It is possible that around a Blue Giant, that more of the total insolation would be reflected back into space, so this hypothetical planet could very well be an irradiated snowball.
Reference: https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.6926
1
Math checks out, good answer!
â kingledion
2 hours ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Note that the lifespan of the star is going to factor here. Rigel is estimated to be only about 10 million years old and will go kablooey in a supernova within the next few million years. That makes the odds of any life-bearing planets around any similar star extremely slim and unlikely as they'd barely have time to finish cooling to a temperature to support life before the big bang. Earth took a few hundred million years before it did it.
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
Ok, so using Rigel as an example:
Rigel has a luminosity of 120,000 sols, so for a planet to receive the same insolation as the Earth does around the sun, it would orbit at a distance of 346.4 AU.
Given a stellar mass of 23 sols, and a planetary mass of 1 Earth, the year length is 1344.09 Earth years.
Seasons are tricky since they have to do with the axial tilt of the planet, and given the year length, precession could actually cause the seasons to shift within that time.
You should also be aware that the spectrum of the host star has an effect of the strength of ice albedo feedback in the climate of planets. It is possible that around a Blue Giant, that more of the total insolation would be reflected back into space, so this hypothetical planet could very well be an irradiated snowball.
Reference: https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.6926
1
Math checks out, good answer!
â kingledion
2 hours ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Ok, so using Rigel as an example:
Rigel has a luminosity of 120,000 sols, so for a planet to receive the same insolation as the Earth does around the sun, it would orbit at a distance of 346.4 AU.
Given a stellar mass of 23 sols, and a planetary mass of 1 Earth, the year length is 1344.09 Earth years.
Seasons are tricky since they have to do with the axial tilt of the planet, and given the year length, precession could actually cause the seasons to shift within that time.
You should also be aware that the spectrum of the host star has an effect of the strength of ice albedo feedback in the climate of planets. It is possible that around a Blue Giant, that more of the total insolation would be reflected back into space, so this hypothetical planet could very well be an irradiated snowball.
Reference: https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.6926
1
Math checks out, good answer!
â kingledion
2 hours ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Ok, so using Rigel as an example:
Rigel has a luminosity of 120,000 sols, so for a planet to receive the same insolation as the Earth does around the sun, it would orbit at a distance of 346.4 AU.
Given a stellar mass of 23 sols, and a planetary mass of 1 Earth, the year length is 1344.09 Earth years.
Seasons are tricky since they have to do with the axial tilt of the planet, and given the year length, precession could actually cause the seasons to shift within that time.
You should also be aware that the spectrum of the host star has an effect of the strength of ice albedo feedback in the climate of planets. It is possible that around a Blue Giant, that more of the total insolation would be reflected back into space, so this hypothetical planet could very well be an irradiated snowball.
Reference: https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.6926
Ok, so using Rigel as an example:
Rigel has a luminosity of 120,000 sols, so for a planet to receive the same insolation as the Earth does around the sun, it would orbit at a distance of 346.4 AU.
Given a stellar mass of 23 sols, and a planetary mass of 1 Earth, the year length is 1344.09 Earth years.
Seasons are tricky since they have to do with the axial tilt of the planet, and given the year length, precession could actually cause the seasons to shift within that time.
You should also be aware that the spectrum of the host star has an effect of the strength of ice albedo feedback in the climate of planets. It is possible that around a Blue Giant, that more of the total insolation would be reflected back into space, so this hypothetical planet could very well be an irradiated snowball.
Reference: https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.6926
edited 4 mins ago
answered 2 hours ago
Arkenstein
780212
780212
1
Math checks out, good answer!
â kingledion
2 hours ago
add a comment |Â
1
Math checks out, good answer!
â kingledion
2 hours ago
1
1
Math checks out, good answer!
â kingledion
2 hours ago
Math checks out, good answer!
â kingledion
2 hours ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Note that the lifespan of the star is going to factor here. Rigel is estimated to be only about 10 million years old and will go kablooey in a supernova within the next few million years. That makes the odds of any life-bearing planets around any similar star extremely slim and unlikely as they'd barely have time to finish cooling to a temperature to support life before the big bang. Earth took a few hundred million years before it did it.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Note that the lifespan of the star is going to factor here. Rigel is estimated to be only about 10 million years old and will go kablooey in a supernova within the next few million years. That makes the odds of any life-bearing planets around any similar star extremely slim and unlikely as they'd barely have time to finish cooling to a temperature to support life before the big bang. Earth took a few hundred million years before it did it.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Note that the lifespan of the star is going to factor here. Rigel is estimated to be only about 10 million years old and will go kablooey in a supernova within the next few million years. That makes the odds of any life-bearing planets around any similar star extremely slim and unlikely as they'd barely have time to finish cooling to a temperature to support life before the big bang. Earth took a few hundred million years before it did it.
Note that the lifespan of the star is going to factor here. Rigel is estimated to be only about 10 million years old and will go kablooey in a supernova within the next few million years. That makes the odds of any life-bearing planets around any similar star extremely slim and unlikely as they'd barely have time to finish cooling to a temperature to support life before the big bang. Earth took a few hundred million years before it did it.
answered 14 mins ago
Keith Morrison
4,7861819
4,7861819
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Blue Devil is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Blue Devil is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Blue Devil is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Blue Devil is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f129356%2fhabitable-zone-around-a-blue-supergiant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password