Proving inequalities hold when applying exponentials
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
So I'm set out to prove that for all $a,binmathbbR^+$ where $a,b > 0$, and for all $rinmathbbQ$ where $r > 0$,
$$
a < b if and only if a^r<b^r
$$
This seems so obvious that it shouldn't have to be proved, and thus I'm not really sure how to start.
real-analysis inequality
New contributor
Sam Kim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
So I'm set out to prove that for all $a,binmathbbR^+$ where $a,b > 0$, and for all $rinmathbbQ$ where $r > 0$,
$$
a < b if and only if a^r<b^r
$$
This seems so obvious that it shouldn't have to be proved, and thus I'm not really sure how to start.
real-analysis inequality
New contributor
Sam Kim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Hint: $lnx$ is a strictly increasing function, so if $a < b$, $lna < lnb$.
– Taliant
3 hours ago
First prove the problem for $a=1$ and then note that the problem can be reduced to this special case by dividing the inequality by $a^r$.
– Paramanand Singh
43 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
So I'm set out to prove that for all $a,binmathbbR^+$ where $a,b > 0$, and for all $rinmathbbQ$ where $r > 0$,
$$
a < b if and only if a^r<b^r
$$
This seems so obvious that it shouldn't have to be proved, and thus I'm not really sure how to start.
real-analysis inequality
New contributor
Sam Kim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
So I'm set out to prove that for all $a,binmathbbR^+$ where $a,b > 0$, and for all $rinmathbbQ$ where $r > 0$,
$$
a < b if and only if a^r<b^r
$$
This seems so obvious that it shouldn't have to be proved, and thus I'm not really sure how to start.
real-analysis inequality
real-analysis inequality
New contributor
Sam Kim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Sam Kim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 2 hours ago


SlightlyDeviant
428
428
New contributor
Sam Kim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago


Sam Kim
61
61
New contributor
Sam Kim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Sam Kim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Sam Kim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Hint: $lnx$ is a strictly increasing function, so if $a < b$, $lna < lnb$.
– Taliant
3 hours ago
First prove the problem for $a=1$ and then note that the problem can be reduced to this special case by dividing the inequality by $a^r$.
– Paramanand Singh
43 mins ago
add a comment |Â
Hint: $lnx$ is a strictly increasing function, so if $a < b$, $lna < lnb$.
– Taliant
3 hours ago
First prove the problem for $a=1$ and then note that the problem can be reduced to this special case by dividing the inequality by $a^r$.
– Paramanand Singh
43 mins ago
Hint: $lnx$ is a strictly increasing function, so if $a < b$, $lna < lnb$.
– Taliant
3 hours ago
Hint: $lnx$ is a strictly increasing function, so if $a < b$, $lna < lnb$.
– Taliant
3 hours ago
First prove the problem for $a=1$ and then note that the problem can be reduced to this special case by dividing the inequality by $a^r$.
– Paramanand Singh
43 mins ago
First prove the problem for $a=1$ and then note that the problem can be reduced to this special case by dividing the inequality by $a^r$.
– Paramanand Singh
43 mins ago
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
The hint:
$$b^r-a^r=a^rleft(left(fracbaright)^r-1right).$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
A strategy can be like this:
prove that it holds for $rinBbb Nsetminus0$;
use (1) to prove that it holds when $frac1rinBbb N$;
use (1) and (2) to prove that it holds for all $rinBbb Q_>0$.
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
The hint:
$$b^r-a^r=a^rleft(left(fracbaright)^r-1right).$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
The hint:
$$b^r-a^r=a^rleft(left(fracbaright)^r-1right).$$
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
The hint:
$$b^r-a^r=a^rleft(left(fracbaright)^r-1right).$$
The hint:
$$b^r-a^r=a^rleft(left(fracbaright)^r-1right).$$
answered 3 hours ago
Michael Rozenberg
91.7k1584181
91.7k1584181
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
A strategy can be like this:
prove that it holds for $rinBbb Nsetminus0$;
use (1) to prove that it holds when $frac1rinBbb N$;
use (1) and (2) to prove that it holds for all $rinBbb Q_>0$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
A strategy can be like this:
prove that it holds for $rinBbb Nsetminus0$;
use (1) to prove that it holds when $frac1rinBbb N$;
use (1) and (2) to prove that it holds for all $rinBbb Q_>0$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
A strategy can be like this:
prove that it holds for $rinBbb Nsetminus0$;
use (1) to prove that it holds when $frac1rinBbb N$;
use (1) and (2) to prove that it holds for all $rinBbb Q_>0$.
A strategy can be like this:
prove that it holds for $rinBbb Nsetminus0$;
use (1) to prove that it holds when $frac1rinBbb N$;
use (1) and (2) to prove that it holds for all $rinBbb Q_>0$.
answered 30 mins ago
Saucy O'Path
4,464424
4,464424
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sam Kim is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sam Kim is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sam Kim is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sam Kim is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2956105%2fproving-inequalities-hold-when-applying-exponentials%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Hint: $lnx$ is a strictly increasing function, so if $a < b$, $lna < lnb$.
– Taliant
3 hours ago
First prove the problem for $a=1$ and then note that the problem can be reduced to this special case by dividing the inequality by $a^r$.
– Paramanand Singh
43 mins ago