What is the best way to handle this crack on Nikon 70-300mm?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Wondering what I should do about this crack in my Nikon 70-300mm lens. It seems to work the same and has no negative impact on photos but IâÂÂd still like it fixed or at the least suggestion to help prevent it from getting worse.
nikon
New contributor
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Wondering what I should do about this crack in my Nikon 70-300mm lens. It seems to work the same and has no negative impact on photos but IâÂÂd still like it fixed or at the least suggestion to help prevent it from getting worse.
nikon
New contributor
3
Are you sure that's not a filter on the front of the lens?
â scottbb
2 hours ago
2
Can you take & upload a picture of the side of the lens? Is there printing/embossed lettering around the outside of the rim near the front of the lens? That would show it's probably a filter.
â scottbb
1 hour ago
YouâÂÂre so right!!! It is the filter and IâÂÂm ordering a new one now!!! Thank you all so much for your help! I appreciate it so muchâ£ï¸Â
â Melissa
1 hour ago
3
So, yes, as suspected, with the updated picture - you have a RocketFish RF-CP67 circular polarizer filter on there (67 probably indicates a 67mm diameter thread ring). Remove it, and replace it or don't - I would recommend not, except for certain situations where you know you want to use one. If you really didn't know it was there, then I'd guess you don't really know yet what you would use one for, and so can probably do without, and probably even get better more consistent results in the process.
â twalberg
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Wondering what I should do about this crack in my Nikon 70-300mm lens. It seems to work the same and has no negative impact on photos but IâÂÂd still like it fixed or at the least suggestion to help prevent it from getting worse.
nikon
New contributor
Wondering what I should do about this crack in my Nikon 70-300mm lens. It seems to work the same and has no negative impact on photos but IâÂÂd still like it fixed or at the least suggestion to help prevent it from getting worse.
nikon
nikon
New contributor
New contributor
edited 1 hour ago
Hueco
8,64732143
8,64732143
New contributor
asked 2 hours ago
Melissa
61
61
New contributor
New contributor
3
Are you sure that's not a filter on the front of the lens?
â scottbb
2 hours ago
2
Can you take & upload a picture of the side of the lens? Is there printing/embossed lettering around the outside of the rim near the front of the lens? That would show it's probably a filter.
â scottbb
1 hour ago
YouâÂÂre so right!!! It is the filter and IâÂÂm ordering a new one now!!! Thank you all so much for your help! I appreciate it so muchâ£ï¸Â
â Melissa
1 hour ago
3
So, yes, as suspected, with the updated picture - you have a RocketFish RF-CP67 circular polarizer filter on there (67 probably indicates a 67mm diameter thread ring). Remove it, and replace it or don't - I would recommend not, except for certain situations where you know you want to use one. If you really didn't know it was there, then I'd guess you don't really know yet what you would use one for, and so can probably do without, and probably even get better more consistent results in the process.
â twalberg
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
3
Are you sure that's not a filter on the front of the lens?
â scottbb
2 hours ago
2
Can you take & upload a picture of the side of the lens? Is there printing/embossed lettering around the outside of the rim near the front of the lens? That would show it's probably a filter.
â scottbb
1 hour ago
YouâÂÂre so right!!! It is the filter and IâÂÂm ordering a new one now!!! Thank you all so much for your help! I appreciate it so muchâ£ï¸Â
â Melissa
1 hour ago
3
So, yes, as suspected, with the updated picture - you have a RocketFish RF-CP67 circular polarizer filter on there (67 probably indicates a 67mm diameter thread ring). Remove it, and replace it or don't - I would recommend not, except for certain situations where you know you want to use one. If you really didn't know it was there, then I'd guess you don't really know yet what you would use one for, and so can probably do without, and probably even get better more consistent results in the process.
â twalberg
1 hour ago
3
3
Are you sure that's not a filter on the front of the lens?
â scottbb
2 hours ago
Are you sure that's not a filter on the front of the lens?
â scottbb
2 hours ago
2
2
Can you take & upload a picture of the side of the lens? Is there printing/embossed lettering around the outside of the rim near the front of the lens? That would show it's probably a filter.
â scottbb
1 hour ago
Can you take & upload a picture of the side of the lens? Is there printing/embossed lettering around the outside of the rim near the front of the lens? That would show it's probably a filter.
â scottbb
1 hour ago
YouâÂÂre so right!!! It is the filter and IâÂÂm ordering a new one now!!! Thank you all so much for your help! I appreciate it so muchâ£ï¸Â
â Melissa
1 hour ago
YouâÂÂre so right!!! It is the filter and IâÂÂm ordering a new one now!!! Thank you all so much for your help! I appreciate it so muchâ£ï¸Â
â Melissa
1 hour ago
3
3
So, yes, as suspected, with the updated picture - you have a RocketFish RF-CP67 circular polarizer filter on there (67 probably indicates a 67mm diameter thread ring). Remove it, and replace it or don't - I would recommend not, except for certain situations where you know you want to use one. If you really didn't know it was there, then I'd guess you don't really know yet what you would use one for, and so can probably do without, and probably even get better more consistent results in the process.
â twalberg
1 hour ago
So, yes, as suspected, with the updated picture - you have a RocketFish RF-CP67 circular polarizer filter on there (67 probably indicates a 67mm diameter thread ring). Remove it, and replace it or don't - I would recommend not, except for certain situations where you know you want to use one. If you really didn't know it was there, then I'd guess you don't really know yet what you would use one for, and so can probably do without, and probably even get better more consistent results in the process.
â twalberg
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
It's probably a filter. If there is printing or embossed lettering around the outside of the rim near the front, that would indicate a filter is screwed on.
Remove the filter by unscrewing it. If it doesn't seem to want to come off, see: How do I get a stuck screw filter off of my lens?
After comments, the filter is a CPL [Circular Polarising Lens] which unscrews using the knurled section highlighted. The section forward of that with the RocketFish logo will turn infinitely - which is how it varies the polarising layer.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
I am sure that is a filter, not the lens. Remove the filter and problem solved.
You probably need to buy a new filter.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
IâÂÂm not at all sure. I didnâÂÂt put a filter on. How would I be able to tell?
New contributor
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
â Hueco
1 hour ago
it's most definitely a cracked filter. Unscrew the thing that says rocketfish, lefty-loosy. Make sure the glass under the filter is in good shape!
â Hueco
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
As previously stated, it looks like the filter is damaged, not the lense. But, of course, take the filter off and inspect the lens for damage too. That being said, I was a professional photographer for years and initially, as a budding amateur, I always had a Sky or UV filter on all my lenses to protect that precious glass from damage. Certainly a Sky or UV filter has some benefit in filtering out certain wavelengths of light that you may find unattractive in your photographs. But, unless you keep them sparkling clean, they will impart some issues in your shots. So, I took any filters off my lenses unless I had a photographic reason to add them, was extra careful in protecting my lenses and used metal sunshades when possible to minimize stray light and put something in front of my glass that would help protect, yet not interfere with the quality of my photos.
After working in a camera store I learned that the sales people always recommended a protective filter on any lense they sold. Why?So they could make additional money on the sale, back then (80âÂÂs) a Sky A1 filter cost you about $20, cost to the camera store was $2 or 3, nice profit margin. I wonâÂÂt tell you what they made on batteries. ð³ Keep your lens clean and use a good shade to help keep it out of harms way.
add a comment |Â
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
It's probably a filter. If there is printing or embossed lettering around the outside of the rim near the front, that would indicate a filter is screwed on.
Remove the filter by unscrewing it. If it doesn't seem to want to come off, see: How do I get a stuck screw filter off of my lens?
After comments, the filter is a CPL [Circular Polarising Lens] which unscrews using the knurled section highlighted. The section forward of that with the RocketFish logo will turn infinitely - which is how it varies the polarising layer.
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
It's probably a filter. If there is printing or embossed lettering around the outside of the rim near the front, that would indicate a filter is screwed on.
Remove the filter by unscrewing it. If it doesn't seem to want to come off, see: How do I get a stuck screw filter off of my lens?
After comments, the filter is a CPL [Circular Polarising Lens] which unscrews using the knurled section highlighted. The section forward of that with the RocketFish logo will turn infinitely - which is how it varies the polarising layer.
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
It's probably a filter. If there is printing or embossed lettering around the outside of the rim near the front, that would indicate a filter is screwed on.
Remove the filter by unscrewing it. If it doesn't seem to want to come off, see: How do I get a stuck screw filter off of my lens?
After comments, the filter is a CPL [Circular Polarising Lens] which unscrews using the knurled section highlighted. The section forward of that with the RocketFish logo will turn infinitely - which is how it varies the polarising layer.
It's probably a filter. If there is printing or embossed lettering around the outside of the rim near the front, that would indicate a filter is screwed on.
Remove the filter by unscrewing it. If it doesn't seem to want to come off, see: How do I get a stuck screw filter off of my lens?
After comments, the filter is a CPL [Circular Polarising Lens] which unscrews using the knurled section highlighted. The section forward of that with the RocketFish logo will turn infinitely - which is how it varies the polarising layer.
edited 52 mins ago
Tetsujin
6,77721740
6,77721740
answered 1 hour ago
scottbb
17.7k75185
17.7k75185
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
I am sure that is a filter, not the lens. Remove the filter and problem solved.
You probably need to buy a new filter.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
I am sure that is a filter, not the lens. Remove the filter and problem solved.
You probably need to buy a new filter.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
I am sure that is a filter, not the lens. Remove the filter and problem solved.
You probably need to buy a new filter.
I am sure that is a filter, not the lens. Remove the filter and problem solved.
You probably need to buy a new filter.
answered 1 hour ago
Rafael
12.5k11838
12.5k11838
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
IâÂÂm not at all sure. I didnâÂÂt put a filter on. How would I be able to tell?
New contributor
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
â Hueco
1 hour ago
it's most definitely a cracked filter. Unscrew the thing that says rocketfish, lefty-loosy. Make sure the glass under the filter is in good shape!
â Hueco
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
IâÂÂm not at all sure. I didnâÂÂt put a filter on. How would I be able to tell?
New contributor
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
â Hueco
1 hour ago
it's most definitely a cracked filter. Unscrew the thing that says rocketfish, lefty-loosy. Make sure the glass under the filter is in good shape!
â Hueco
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
IâÂÂm not at all sure. I didnâÂÂt put a filter on. How would I be able to tell?
New contributor
IâÂÂm not at all sure. I didnâÂÂt put a filter on. How would I be able to tell?
New contributor
New contributor
answered 1 hour ago
Melissa
11
11
New contributor
New contributor
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
â Hueco
1 hour ago
it's most definitely a cracked filter. Unscrew the thing that says rocketfish, lefty-loosy. Make sure the glass under the filter is in good shape!
â Hueco
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
â Hueco
1 hour ago
it's most definitely a cracked filter. Unscrew the thing that says rocketfish, lefty-loosy. Make sure the glass under the filter is in good shape!
â Hueco
1 hour ago
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
â Hueco
1 hour ago
This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review
â Hueco
1 hour ago
it's most definitely a cracked filter. Unscrew the thing that says rocketfish, lefty-loosy. Make sure the glass under the filter is in good shape!
â Hueco
1 hour ago
it's most definitely a cracked filter. Unscrew the thing that says rocketfish, lefty-loosy. Make sure the glass under the filter is in good shape!
â Hueco
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
As previously stated, it looks like the filter is damaged, not the lense. But, of course, take the filter off and inspect the lens for damage too. That being said, I was a professional photographer for years and initially, as a budding amateur, I always had a Sky or UV filter on all my lenses to protect that precious glass from damage. Certainly a Sky or UV filter has some benefit in filtering out certain wavelengths of light that you may find unattractive in your photographs. But, unless you keep them sparkling clean, they will impart some issues in your shots. So, I took any filters off my lenses unless I had a photographic reason to add them, was extra careful in protecting my lenses and used metal sunshades when possible to minimize stray light and put something in front of my glass that would help protect, yet not interfere with the quality of my photos.
After working in a camera store I learned that the sales people always recommended a protective filter on any lense they sold. Why?So they could make additional money on the sale, back then (80âÂÂs) a Sky A1 filter cost you about $20, cost to the camera store was $2 or 3, nice profit margin. I wonâÂÂt tell you what they made on batteries. ð³ Keep your lens clean and use a good shade to help keep it out of harms way.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
As previously stated, it looks like the filter is damaged, not the lense. But, of course, take the filter off and inspect the lens for damage too. That being said, I was a professional photographer for years and initially, as a budding amateur, I always had a Sky or UV filter on all my lenses to protect that precious glass from damage. Certainly a Sky or UV filter has some benefit in filtering out certain wavelengths of light that you may find unattractive in your photographs. But, unless you keep them sparkling clean, they will impart some issues in your shots. So, I took any filters off my lenses unless I had a photographic reason to add them, was extra careful in protecting my lenses and used metal sunshades when possible to minimize stray light and put something in front of my glass that would help protect, yet not interfere with the quality of my photos.
After working in a camera store I learned that the sales people always recommended a protective filter on any lense they sold. Why?So they could make additional money on the sale, back then (80âÂÂs) a Sky A1 filter cost you about $20, cost to the camera store was $2 or 3, nice profit margin. I wonâÂÂt tell you what they made on batteries. ð³ Keep your lens clean and use a good shade to help keep it out of harms way.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
As previously stated, it looks like the filter is damaged, not the lense. But, of course, take the filter off and inspect the lens for damage too. That being said, I was a professional photographer for years and initially, as a budding amateur, I always had a Sky or UV filter on all my lenses to protect that precious glass from damage. Certainly a Sky or UV filter has some benefit in filtering out certain wavelengths of light that you may find unattractive in your photographs. But, unless you keep them sparkling clean, they will impart some issues in your shots. So, I took any filters off my lenses unless I had a photographic reason to add them, was extra careful in protecting my lenses and used metal sunshades when possible to minimize stray light and put something in front of my glass that would help protect, yet not interfere with the quality of my photos.
After working in a camera store I learned that the sales people always recommended a protective filter on any lense they sold. Why?So they could make additional money on the sale, back then (80âÂÂs) a Sky A1 filter cost you about $20, cost to the camera store was $2 or 3, nice profit margin. I wonâÂÂt tell you what they made on batteries. ð³ Keep your lens clean and use a good shade to help keep it out of harms way.
As previously stated, it looks like the filter is damaged, not the lense. But, of course, take the filter off and inspect the lens for damage too. That being said, I was a professional photographer for years and initially, as a budding amateur, I always had a Sky or UV filter on all my lenses to protect that precious glass from damage. Certainly a Sky or UV filter has some benefit in filtering out certain wavelengths of light that you may find unattractive in your photographs. But, unless you keep them sparkling clean, they will impart some issues in your shots. So, I took any filters off my lenses unless I had a photographic reason to add them, was extra careful in protecting my lenses and used metal sunshades when possible to minimize stray light and put something in front of my glass that would help protect, yet not interfere with the quality of my photos.
After working in a camera store I learned that the sales people always recommended a protective filter on any lense they sold. Why?So they could make additional money on the sale, back then (80âÂÂs) a Sky A1 filter cost you about $20, cost to the camera store was $2 or 3, nice profit margin. I wonâÂÂt tell you what they made on batteries. ð³ Keep your lens clean and use a good shade to help keep it out of harms way.
answered 42 mins ago
Tony
1312
1312
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Melissa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Melissa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Melissa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Melissa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f101888%2fwhat-is-the-best-way-to-handle-this-crack-on-nikon-70-300mm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
3
Are you sure that's not a filter on the front of the lens?
â scottbb
2 hours ago
2
Can you take & upload a picture of the side of the lens? Is there printing/embossed lettering around the outside of the rim near the front of the lens? That would show it's probably a filter.
â scottbb
1 hour ago
YouâÂÂre so right!!! It is the filter and IâÂÂm ordering a new one now!!! Thank you all so much for your help! I appreciate it so muchâ£ï¸Â
â Melissa
1 hour ago
3
So, yes, as suspected, with the updated picture - you have a RocketFish RF-CP67 circular polarizer filter on there (67 probably indicates a 67mm diameter thread ring). Remove it, and replace it or don't - I would recommend not, except for certain situations where you know you want to use one. If you really didn't know it was there, then I'd guess you don't really know yet what you would use one for, and so can probably do without, and probably even get better more consistent results in the process.
â twalberg
1 hour ago