Casting a Smite, then Twinned Spell on a Booming Blade?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let's say as a Stone Sorcerer, I'm fighting two creatures within 5 feet of each other. So I cast Thunderous Smite as a bonus action, then twin spell a Booming Blade on one of the creatures.
Does Thunderous Smite mean that both creatures need to make a saving throw or else be knocked away or only one of them needs to but both of them gets the Booming Blade effect?
dnd-5e spells sorcerer unearthed-arcana
New contributor
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let's say as a Stone Sorcerer, I'm fighting two creatures within 5 feet of each other. So I cast Thunderous Smite as a bonus action, then twin spell a Booming Blade on one of the creatures.
Does Thunderous Smite mean that both creatures need to make a saving throw or else be knocked away or only one of them needs to but both of them gets the Booming Blade effect?
dnd-5e spells sorcerer unearthed-arcana
New contributor
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let's say as a Stone Sorcerer, I'm fighting two creatures within 5 feet of each other. So I cast Thunderous Smite as a bonus action, then twin spell a Booming Blade on one of the creatures.
Does Thunderous Smite mean that both creatures need to make a saving throw or else be knocked away or only one of them needs to but both of them gets the Booming Blade effect?
dnd-5e spells sorcerer unearthed-arcana
New contributor
Let's say as a Stone Sorcerer, I'm fighting two creatures within 5 feet of each other. So I cast Thunderous Smite as a bonus action, then twin spell a Booming Blade on one of the creatures.
Does Thunderous Smite mean that both creatures need to make a saving throw or else be knocked away or only one of them needs to but both of them gets the Booming Blade effect?
dnd-5e spells sorcerer unearthed-arcana
dnd-5e spells sorcerer unearthed-arcana
New contributor
New contributor
edited 1 hour ago
Rubiksmoose
39k5192297
39k5192297
New contributor
asked 1 hour ago
Cyanic
1444
1444
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
One creature is affected by Thunderous Smite, both affected by Booming Blade
The wording on Thunderous Smite is pretty unambiguous:
The first time you hit with a melee weapon attack during this spell's duration, your weapon rings with thunder...
Regardless of the circumstances of Booming Blade, and it being twinned, only one of those melee strikes will be allowed to benefit from Thunderous Smite.
There's no restriction on Booming Blade stacking with Thunderous Smite, though, and Twinned Spell has already been confirmed to work on Booming Blade, so as best as I can determine, this is still a reasonably powerful/viable combo.
3
@Slagmoth Fighters get to attack 2/3/4/8 times in a round and nobody bats an eye, but a Sorcerer attacks twice in a round, and suddenly everyone is losing their mind! =D
â Xirema
1 hour ago
@Slagmoth For Booming Blade specifically, I'm imagining Twinned Spell just making the effect sort of echo to the target next to the initial one since it's sound-based
â Cyanic
56 mins ago
1
If you can twin Shocking Grasp, you can twin Booming Blade.
â T.J.L.
31 mins ago
@T.J.L. I have the same narrative connundrum with that as well.. but again... just a narrative issue... mechanically it is clearly ok.
â Slagmoth
30 mins ago
@Slagmoth I know, but I dislike just handwaving things, especially if we get a cool effect out of explaining it. We could say Twinned Spell actually merges two timelines/possibilities together very temporarily, one where creature A is hit and another where creature B is hit. By merging both timelines, both creatures are hit in both timelines, so the effect would look like growing a second arm, but really it's just a dimensional echo/shadow
â Cyanic
26 mins ago
 |Â
show 4 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
One creature is affected by Thunderous Smite, both affected by Booming Blade
The wording on Thunderous Smite is pretty unambiguous:
The first time you hit with a melee weapon attack during this spell's duration, your weapon rings with thunder...
Regardless of the circumstances of Booming Blade, and it being twinned, only one of those melee strikes will be allowed to benefit from Thunderous Smite.
There's no restriction on Booming Blade stacking with Thunderous Smite, though, and Twinned Spell has already been confirmed to work on Booming Blade, so as best as I can determine, this is still a reasonably powerful/viable combo.
3
@Slagmoth Fighters get to attack 2/3/4/8 times in a round and nobody bats an eye, but a Sorcerer attacks twice in a round, and suddenly everyone is losing their mind! =D
â Xirema
1 hour ago
@Slagmoth For Booming Blade specifically, I'm imagining Twinned Spell just making the effect sort of echo to the target next to the initial one since it's sound-based
â Cyanic
56 mins ago
1
If you can twin Shocking Grasp, you can twin Booming Blade.
â T.J.L.
31 mins ago
@T.J.L. I have the same narrative connundrum with that as well.. but again... just a narrative issue... mechanically it is clearly ok.
â Slagmoth
30 mins ago
@Slagmoth I know, but I dislike just handwaving things, especially if we get a cool effect out of explaining it. We could say Twinned Spell actually merges two timelines/possibilities together very temporarily, one where creature A is hit and another where creature B is hit. By merging both timelines, both creatures are hit in both timelines, so the effect would look like growing a second arm, but really it's just a dimensional echo/shadow
â Cyanic
26 mins ago
 |Â
show 4 more comments
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
One creature is affected by Thunderous Smite, both affected by Booming Blade
The wording on Thunderous Smite is pretty unambiguous:
The first time you hit with a melee weapon attack during this spell's duration, your weapon rings with thunder...
Regardless of the circumstances of Booming Blade, and it being twinned, only one of those melee strikes will be allowed to benefit from Thunderous Smite.
There's no restriction on Booming Blade stacking with Thunderous Smite, though, and Twinned Spell has already been confirmed to work on Booming Blade, so as best as I can determine, this is still a reasonably powerful/viable combo.
3
@Slagmoth Fighters get to attack 2/3/4/8 times in a round and nobody bats an eye, but a Sorcerer attacks twice in a round, and suddenly everyone is losing their mind! =D
â Xirema
1 hour ago
@Slagmoth For Booming Blade specifically, I'm imagining Twinned Spell just making the effect sort of echo to the target next to the initial one since it's sound-based
â Cyanic
56 mins ago
1
If you can twin Shocking Grasp, you can twin Booming Blade.
â T.J.L.
31 mins ago
@T.J.L. I have the same narrative connundrum with that as well.. but again... just a narrative issue... mechanically it is clearly ok.
â Slagmoth
30 mins ago
@Slagmoth I know, but I dislike just handwaving things, especially if we get a cool effect out of explaining it. We could say Twinned Spell actually merges two timelines/possibilities together very temporarily, one where creature A is hit and another where creature B is hit. By merging both timelines, both creatures are hit in both timelines, so the effect would look like growing a second arm, but really it's just a dimensional echo/shadow
â Cyanic
26 mins ago
 |Â
show 4 more comments
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
up vote
7
down vote
accepted
One creature is affected by Thunderous Smite, both affected by Booming Blade
The wording on Thunderous Smite is pretty unambiguous:
The first time you hit with a melee weapon attack during this spell's duration, your weapon rings with thunder...
Regardless of the circumstances of Booming Blade, and it being twinned, only one of those melee strikes will be allowed to benefit from Thunderous Smite.
There's no restriction on Booming Blade stacking with Thunderous Smite, though, and Twinned Spell has already been confirmed to work on Booming Blade, so as best as I can determine, this is still a reasonably powerful/viable combo.
One creature is affected by Thunderous Smite, both affected by Booming Blade
The wording on Thunderous Smite is pretty unambiguous:
The first time you hit with a melee weapon attack during this spell's duration, your weapon rings with thunder...
Regardless of the circumstances of Booming Blade, and it being twinned, only one of those melee strikes will be allowed to benefit from Thunderous Smite.
There's no restriction on Booming Blade stacking with Thunderous Smite, though, and Twinned Spell has already been confirmed to work on Booming Blade, so as best as I can determine, this is still a reasonably powerful/viable combo.
answered 1 hour ago
Xirema
6,9871852
6,9871852
3
@Slagmoth Fighters get to attack 2/3/4/8 times in a round and nobody bats an eye, but a Sorcerer attacks twice in a round, and suddenly everyone is losing their mind! =D
â Xirema
1 hour ago
@Slagmoth For Booming Blade specifically, I'm imagining Twinned Spell just making the effect sort of echo to the target next to the initial one since it's sound-based
â Cyanic
56 mins ago
1
If you can twin Shocking Grasp, you can twin Booming Blade.
â T.J.L.
31 mins ago
@T.J.L. I have the same narrative connundrum with that as well.. but again... just a narrative issue... mechanically it is clearly ok.
â Slagmoth
30 mins ago
@Slagmoth I know, but I dislike just handwaving things, especially if we get a cool effect out of explaining it. We could say Twinned Spell actually merges two timelines/possibilities together very temporarily, one where creature A is hit and another where creature B is hit. By merging both timelines, both creatures are hit in both timelines, so the effect would look like growing a second arm, but really it's just a dimensional echo/shadow
â Cyanic
26 mins ago
 |Â
show 4 more comments
3
@Slagmoth Fighters get to attack 2/3/4/8 times in a round and nobody bats an eye, but a Sorcerer attacks twice in a round, and suddenly everyone is losing their mind! =D
â Xirema
1 hour ago
@Slagmoth For Booming Blade specifically, I'm imagining Twinned Spell just making the effect sort of echo to the target next to the initial one since it's sound-based
â Cyanic
56 mins ago
1
If you can twin Shocking Grasp, you can twin Booming Blade.
â T.J.L.
31 mins ago
@T.J.L. I have the same narrative connundrum with that as well.. but again... just a narrative issue... mechanically it is clearly ok.
â Slagmoth
30 mins ago
@Slagmoth I know, but I dislike just handwaving things, especially if we get a cool effect out of explaining it. We could say Twinned Spell actually merges two timelines/possibilities together very temporarily, one where creature A is hit and another where creature B is hit. By merging both timelines, both creatures are hit in both timelines, so the effect would look like growing a second arm, but really it's just a dimensional echo/shadow
â Cyanic
26 mins ago
3
3
@Slagmoth Fighters get to attack 2/3/4/8 times in a round and nobody bats an eye, but a Sorcerer attacks twice in a round, and suddenly everyone is losing their mind! =D
â Xirema
1 hour ago
@Slagmoth Fighters get to attack 2/3/4/8 times in a round and nobody bats an eye, but a Sorcerer attacks twice in a round, and suddenly everyone is losing their mind! =D
â Xirema
1 hour ago
@Slagmoth For Booming Blade specifically, I'm imagining Twinned Spell just making the effect sort of echo to the target next to the initial one since it's sound-based
â Cyanic
56 mins ago
@Slagmoth For Booming Blade specifically, I'm imagining Twinned Spell just making the effect sort of echo to the target next to the initial one since it's sound-based
â Cyanic
56 mins ago
1
1
If you can twin Shocking Grasp, you can twin Booming Blade.
â T.J.L.
31 mins ago
If you can twin Shocking Grasp, you can twin Booming Blade.
â T.J.L.
31 mins ago
@T.J.L. I have the same narrative connundrum with that as well.. but again... just a narrative issue... mechanically it is clearly ok.
â Slagmoth
30 mins ago
@T.J.L. I have the same narrative connundrum with that as well.. but again... just a narrative issue... mechanically it is clearly ok.
â Slagmoth
30 mins ago
@Slagmoth I know, but I dislike just handwaving things, especially if we get a cool effect out of explaining it. We could say Twinned Spell actually merges two timelines/possibilities together very temporarily, one where creature A is hit and another where creature B is hit. By merging both timelines, both creatures are hit in both timelines, so the effect would look like growing a second arm, but really it's just a dimensional echo/shadow
â Cyanic
26 mins ago
@Slagmoth I know, but I dislike just handwaving things, especially if we get a cool effect out of explaining it. We could say Twinned Spell actually merges two timelines/possibilities together very temporarily, one where creature A is hit and another where creature B is hit. By merging both timelines, both creatures are hit in both timelines, so the effect would look like growing a second arm, but really it's just a dimensional echo/shadow
â Cyanic
26 mins ago
 |Â
show 4 more comments
Cyanic is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Cyanic is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Cyanic is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Cyanic is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f132909%2fcasting-a-smite-then-twinned-spell-on-a-booming-blade%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password