Can I use a wooden flat screw head with a washer to mimick a pan head screw?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












For example - I am installing a fold up table from Ikea, it needs to hang from the wall, https://i.imgur.com/ZDVHaJs.png, it explicitly says to use pan head instead of flat screw heads like shown in the picture, I would drill into hollow concrete and will use nylon anchors but my question is, would a washer on a flat screw head be a hack here to do the job of the pan head screw?










share|improve this question





















  • It's not just about the shape of the head, but the flank angle of these two screws are different, also those have two different threads, anyway as far as the construction is static, and you use steel ring (washer) not rubber, then yes the ring provides enough surface for torque.
    – Sam Farjamirad
    3 hours ago














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












For example - I am installing a fold up table from Ikea, it needs to hang from the wall, https://i.imgur.com/ZDVHaJs.png, it explicitly says to use pan head instead of flat screw heads like shown in the picture, I would drill into hollow concrete and will use nylon anchors but my question is, would a washer on a flat screw head be a hack here to do the job of the pan head screw?










share|improve this question





















  • It's not just about the shape of the head, but the flank angle of these two screws are different, also those have two different threads, anyway as far as the construction is static, and you use steel ring (washer) not rubber, then yes the ring provides enough surface for torque.
    – Sam Farjamirad
    3 hours ago












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











For example - I am installing a fold up table from Ikea, it needs to hang from the wall, https://i.imgur.com/ZDVHaJs.png, it explicitly says to use pan head instead of flat screw heads like shown in the picture, I would drill into hollow concrete and will use nylon anchors but my question is, would a washer on a flat screw head be a hack here to do the job of the pan head screw?










share|improve this question













For example - I am installing a fold up table from Ikea, it needs to hang from the wall, https://i.imgur.com/ZDVHaJs.png, it explicitly says to use pan head instead of flat screw heads like shown in the picture, I would drill into hollow concrete and will use nylon anchors but my question is, would a washer on a flat screw head be a hack here to do the job of the pan head screw?







bolting drilling






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 3 hours ago









appwizcpl

1111




1111











  • It's not just about the shape of the head, but the flank angle of these two screws are different, also those have two different threads, anyway as far as the construction is static, and you use steel ring (washer) not rubber, then yes the ring provides enough surface for torque.
    – Sam Farjamirad
    3 hours ago
















  • It's not just about the shape of the head, but the flank angle of these two screws are different, also those have two different threads, anyway as far as the construction is static, and you use steel ring (washer) not rubber, then yes the ring provides enough surface for torque.
    – Sam Farjamirad
    3 hours ago















It's not just about the shape of the head, but the flank angle of these two screws are different, also those have two different threads, anyway as far as the construction is static, and you use steel ring (washer) not rubber, then yes the ring provides enough surface for torque.
– Sam Farjamirad
3 hours ago




It's not just about the shape of the head, but the flank angle of these two screws are different, also those have two different threads, anyway as far as the construction is static, and you use steel ring (washer) not rubber, then yes the ring provides enough surface for torque.
– Sam Farjamirad
3 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













It seems reasonable to believe that the flat head (countersunk) screw would apply enough force to split the wood, hence the restriction.



If you use a flat head screw and the washer prevents the countersunk portion from exerting wedge-type force on the wood, you will have accomplished the objective.



Consider also that if you use a fender washer (large diameter), the compression force is going to be distributed over a wider area, providing more confidence in not damaging the wood brace.






share|improve this answer




















  • Hey, that is not wood, its actually metal, pretty hard one. Also, I was wondering why they do not even use washers in their example, even though its pan head, wouldn't that be better?
    – appwizcpl
    2 hours ago










  • I think using washers in the kit would be better, but for a manufacturer, it's an additional expense for product and handling. Even though the brace is metal, a countersunk head can distort the hole, resulting in a loose fastener over time. You'd have to check the tightness of each fastener at least once a year if you used countersunk screws.
    – fred_dot_u
    1 hour ago










  • ^this is the correct answer. A thick washer that will not distort under continuous tension like the thin metal of the bracket would) with a countersunk screw will work fine. A Pan head isn’t so hard to come by, however, so I’d just follow the guidelines, personally.
    – Jonathan R Swift
    1 hour ago










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "595"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f24143%2fcan-i-use-a-wooden-flat-screw-head-with-a-washer-to-mimick-a-pan-head-screw%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote













It seems reasonable to believe that the flat head (countersunk) screw would apply enough force to split the wood, hence the restriction.



If you use a flat head screw and the washer prevents the countersunk portion from exerting wedge-type force on the wood, you will have accomplished the objective.



Consider also that if you use a fender washer (large diameter), the compression force is going to be distributed over a wider area, providing more confidence in not damaging the wood brace.






share|improve this answer




















  • Hey, that is not wood, its actually metal, pretty hard one. Also, I was wondering why they do not even use washers in their example, even though its pan head, wouldn't that be better?
    – appwizcpl
    2 hours ago










  • I think using washers in the kit would be better, but for a manufacturer, it's an additional expense for product and handling. Even though the brace is metal, a countersunk head can distort the hole, resulting in a loose fastener over time. You'd have to check the tightness of each fastener at least once a year if you used countersunk screws.
    – fred_dot_u
    1 hour ago










  • ^this is the correct answer. A thick washer that will not distort under continuous tension like the thin metal of the bracket would) with a countersunk screw will work fine. A Pan head isn’t so hard to come by, however, so I’d just follow the guidelines, personally.
    – Jonathan R Swift
    1 hour ago














up vote
2
down vote













It seems reasonable to believe that the flat head (countersunk) screw would apply enough force to split the wood, hence the restriction.



If you use a flat head screw and the washer prevents the countersunk portion from exerting wedge-type force on the wood, you will have accomplished the objective.



Consider also that if you use a fender washer (large diameter), the compression force is going to be distributed over a wider area, providing more confidence in not damaging the wood brace.






share|improve this answer




















  • Hey, that is not wood, its actually metal, pretty hard one. Also, I was wondering why they do not even use washers in their example, even though its pan head, wouldn't that be better?
    – appwizcpl
    2 hours ago










  • I think using washers in the kit would be better, but for a manufacturer, it's an additional expense for product and handling. Even though the brace is metal, a countersunk head can distort the hole, resulting in a loose fastener over time. You'd have to check the tightness of each fastener at least once a year if you used countersunk screws.
    – fred_dot_u
    1 hour ago










  • ^this is the correct answer. A thick washer that will not distort under continuous tension like the thin metal of the bracket would) with a countersunk screw will work fine. A Pan head isn’t so hard to come by, however, so I’d just follow the guidelines, personally.
    – Jonathan R Swift
    1 hour ago












up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









It seems reasonable to believe that the flat head (countersunk) screw would apply enough force to split the wood, hence the restriction.



If you use a flat head screw and the washer prevents the countersunk portion from exerting wedge-type force on the wood, you will have accomplished the objective.



Consider also that if you use a fender washer (large diameter), the compression force is going to be distributed over a wider area, providing more confidence in not damaging the wood brace.






share|improve this answer












It seems reasonable to believe that the flat head (countersunk) screw would apply enough force to split the wood, hence the restriction.



If you use a flat head screw and the washer prevents the countersunk portion from exerting wedge-type force on the wood, you will have accomplished the objective.



Consider also that if you use a fender washer (large diameter), the compression force is going to be distributed over a wider area, providing more confidence in not damaging the wood brace.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









fred_dot_u

1,269114




1,269114











  • Hey, that is not wood, its actually metal, pretty hard one. Also, I was wondering why they do not even use washers in their example, even though its pan head, wouldn't that be better?
    – appwizcpl
    2 hours ago










  • I think using washers in the kit would be better, but for a manufacturer, it's an additional expense for product and handling. Even though the brace is metal, a countersunk head can distort the hole, resulting in a loose fastener over time. You'd have to check the tightness of each fastener at least once a year if you used countersunk screws.
    – fred_dot_u
    1 hour ago










  • ^this is the correct answer. A thick washer that will not distort under continuous tension like the thin metal of the bracket would) with a countersunk screw will work fine. A Pan head isn’t so hard to come by, however, so I’d just follow the guidelines, personally.
    – Jonathan R Swift
    1 hour ago
















  • Hey, that is not wood, its actually metal, pretty hard one. Also, I was wondering why they do not even use washers in their example, even though its pan head, wouldn't that be better?
    – appwizcpl
    2 hours ago










  • I think using washers in the kit would be better, but for a manufacturer, it's an additional expense for product and handling. Even though the brace is metal, a countersunk head can distort the hole, resulting in a loose fastener over time. You'd have to check the tightness of each fastener at least once a year if you used countersunk screws.
    – fred_dot_u
    1 hour ago










  • ^this is the correct answer. A thick washer that will not distort under continuous tension like the thin metal of the bracket would) with a countersunk screw will work fine. A Pan head isn’t so hard to come by, however, so I’d just follow the guidelines, personally.
    – Jonathan R Swift
    1 hour ago















Hey, that is not wood, its actually metal, pretty hard one. Also, I was wondering why they do not even use washers in their example, even though its pan head, wouldn't that be better?
– appwizcpl
2 hours ago




Hey, that is not wood, its actually metal, pretty hard one. Also, I was wondering why they do not even use washers in their example, even though its pan head, wouldn't that be better?
– appwizcpl
2 hours ago












I think using washers in the kit would be better, but for a manufacturer, it's an additional expense for product and handling. Even though the brace is metal, a countersunk head can distort the hole, resulting in a loose fastener over time. You'd have to check the tightness of each fastener at least once a year if you used countersunk screws.
– fred_dot_u
1 hour ago




I think using washers in the kit would be better, but for a manufacturer, it's an additional expense for product and handling. Even though the brace is metal, a countersunk head can distort the hole, resulting in a loose fastener over time. You'd have to check the tightness of each fastener at least once a year if you used countersunk screws.
– fred_dot_u
1 hour ago












^this is the correct answer. A thick washer that will not distort under continuous tension like the thin metal of the bracket would) with a countersunk screw will work fine. A Pan head isn’t so hard to come by, however, so I’d just follow the guidelines, personally.
– Jonathan R Swift
1 hour ago




^this is the correct answer. A thick washer that will not distort under continuous tension like the thin metal of the bracket would) with a countersunk screw will work fine. A Pan head isn’t so hard to come by, however, so I’d just follow the guidelines, personally.
– Jonathan R Swift
1 hour ago

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f24143%2fcan-i-use-a-wooden-flat-screw-head-with-a-washer-to-mimick-a-pan-head-screw%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What does second last employer means? [closed]

List of Gilmore Girls characters

Confectionery