A link between hooks and contents: Part II

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












This is a question in the spirit of an earlier problem.



Let $lambda$ be an integer partition: $lambda=(lambda_1geqlambda_2geqdotsgeq0)$.



Recall also the notation for the content of a cell $u=(i,j)$ in a partition: $c_u=j−i$. Further, let $h_u$ denote the hook-length of the cell $u$.



The below identity is rather cute for which I don't remember a reference or a proof, so here I ask.




Identity. Given a partition $lambdavdash n$, it holds that
$$sum_uinlambdah_u^2=n^2+sum_uinlambdac_u^2.$$




For example, if $lambda=(4,3,1)vdash 8$ then the hooks are $6,4,3,1,4,2,1,1$ and the contents are $0,1,2,3,-1,0,1,-2$. Hence
beginalign
LHS=6^2+4^2+3^2+1^2+4^2+2^2+1^2+1^2&=84 \
RHS=mathbf8^2+0^2+1^2+2^2+3^2+(-1)^2+0^2+1^2+(-2)^2&=84.
endalign










share|cite|improve this question



























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    This is a question in the spirit of an earlier problem.



    Let $lambda$ be an integer partition: $lambda=(lambda_1geqlambda_2geqdotsgeq0)$.



    Recall also the notation for the content of a cell $u=(i,j)$ in a partition: $c_u=j−i$. Further, let $h_u$ denote the hook-length of the cell $u$.



    The below identity is rather cute for which I don't remember a reference or a proof, so here I ask.




    Identity. Given a partition $lambdavdash n$, it holds that
    $$sum_uinlambdah_u^2=n^2+sum_uinlambdac_u^2.$$




    For example, if $lambda=(4,3,1)vdash 8$ then the hooks are $6,4,3,1,4,2,1,1$ and the contents are $0,1,2,3,-1,0,1,-2$. Hence
    beginalign
    LHS=6^2+4^2+3^2+1^2+4^2+2^2+1^2+1^2&=84 \
    RHS=mathbf8^2+0^2+1^2+2^2+3^2+(-1)^2+0^2+1^2+(-2)^2&=84.
    endalign










    share|cite|improve this question

























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      This is a question in the spirit of an earlier problem.



      Let $lambda$ be an integer partition: $lambda=(lambda_1geqlambda_2geqdotsgeq0)$.



      Recall also the notation for the content of a cell $u=(i,j)$ in a partition: $c_u=j−i$. Further, let $h_u$ denote the hook-length of the cell $u$.



      The below identity is rather cute for which I don't remember a reference or a proof, so here I ask.




      Identity. Given a partition $lambdavdash n$, it holds that
      $$sum_uinlambdah_u^2=n^2+sum_uinlambdac_u^2.$$




      For example, if $lambda=(4,3,1)vdash 8$ then the hooks are $6,4,3,1,4,2,1,1$ and the contents are $0,1,2,3,-1,0,1,-2$. Hence
      beginalign
      LHS=6^2+4^2+3^2+1^2+4^2+2^2+1^2+1^2&=84 \
      RHS=mathbf8^2+0^2+1^2+2^2+3^2+(-1)^2+0^2+1^2+(-2)^2&=84.
      endalign










      share|cite|improve this question















      This is a question in the spirit of an earlier problem.



      Let $lambda$ be an integer partition: $lambda=(lambda_1geqlambda_2geqdotsgeq0)$.



      Recall also the notation for the content of a cell $u=(i,j)$ in a partition: $c_u=j−i$. Further, let $h_u$ denote the hook-length of the cell $u$.



      The below identity is rather cute for which I don't remember a reference or a proof, so here I ask.




      Identity. Given a partition $lambdavdash n$, it holds that
      $$sum_uinlambdah_u^2=n^2+sum_uinlambdac_u^2.$$




      For example, if $lambda=(4,3,1)vdash 8$ then the hooks are $6,4,3,1,4,2,1,1$ and the contents are $0,1,2,3,-1,0,1,-2$. Hence
      beginalign
      LHS=6^2+4^2+3^2+1^2+4^2+2^2+1^2+1^2&=84 \
      RHS=mathbf8^2+0^2+1^2+2^2+3^2+(-1)^2+0^2+1^2+(-2)^2&=84.
      endalign







      reference-request co.combinatorics combinatorial-identities elementary-proofs






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago

























      asked 1 hour ago









      T. Amdeberhan

      16.4k228122




      16.4k228122




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          You can also prove this inductively by adding boxes to outside corners of $lambda$.



          Suppose the results is true for $lambdavdash n$ and then we add a new box $(i,j)$ in an outside corner.



          The RHS increases by $(n+1)^2-n^2 + (i-j)^2=2n+1+(i-j)^2$



          How much does the LHS increase by? Let me use $h_u$ for the hook length of $u$ in $lambda$ (as opposed to the hook length in $lambda + (i,j)$.)



          We increase the hook length by one for every $u$ in the same row or same column as $(i,j)$. So for each of these boxes $u$ we increase the squared hook length by $2h_u+1$.



          Note that
          $$ sum_substacku textrm in same row \textrmor column as $(i,j)$h_u = n-(i-1)times(j-1) +(0+1+...+i-2)+(0+1+...+j-2)$$
          because every box not in the $(i-1)times(j-1)$ northwest rectangle of $lambda$ is covered exactly once by the hooks in this row or column, except that the boxes in this row or column are covered many extra times as accounted for by those arithmetic progressions.



          Thus the LHS increases by
          $$ 2(n-(i-1)(j-1)+(i-1)(i-2)/2+(j-1)(j-2)/2)+(i-1)+(j-1)+1$$
          (where that last $+1$ is for the hook length of $(i,j)$), and this indeed equals
          $2n+1+(i-j)^2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "504"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f312771%2fa-link-between-hooks-and-contents-part-ii%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            3
            down vote













            You can also prove this inductively by adding boxes to outside corners of $lambda$.



            Suppose the results is true for $lambdavdash n$ and then we add a new box $(i,j)$ in an outside corner.



            The RHS increases by $(n+1)^2-n^2 + (i-j)^2=2n+1+(i-j)^2$



            How much does the LHS increase by? Let me use $h_u$ for the hook length of $u$ in $lambda$ (as opposed to the hook length in $lambda + (i,j)$.)



            We increase the hook length by one for every $u$ in the same row or same column as $(i,j)$. So for each of these boxes $u$ we increase the squared hook length by $2h_u+1$.



            Note that
            $$ sum_substacku textrm in same row \textrmor column as $(i,j)$h_u = n-(i-1)times(j-1) +(0+1+...+i-2)+(0+1+...+j-2)$$
            because every box not in the $(i-1)times(j-1)$ northwest rectangle of $lambda$ is covered exactly once by the hooks in this row or column, except that the boxes in this row or column are covered many extra times as accounted for by those arithmetic progressions.



            Thus the LHS increases by
            $$ 2(n-(i-1)(j-1)+(i-1)(i-2)/2+(j-1)(j-2)/2)+(i-1)+(j-1)+1$$
            (where that last $+1$ is for the hook length of $(i,j)$), and this indeed equals
            $2n+1+(i-j)^2$.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              up vote
              3
              down vote













              You can also prove this inductively by adding boxes to outside corners of $lambda$.



              Suppose the results is true for $lambdavdash n$ and then we add a new box $(i,j)$ in an outside corner.



              The RHS increases by $(n+1)^2-n^2 + (i-j)^2=2n+1+(i-j)^2$



              How much does the LHS increase by? Let me use $h_u$ for the hook length of $u$ in $lambda$ (as opposed to the hook length in $lambda + (i,j)$.)



              We increase the hook length by one for every $u$ in the same row or same column as $(i,j)$. So for each of these boxes $u$ we increase the squared hook length by $2h_u+1$.



              Note that
              $$ sum_substacku textrm in same row \textrmor column as $(i,j)$h_u = n-(i-1)times(j-1) +(0+1+...+i-2)+(0+1+...+j-2)$$
              because every box not in the $(i-1)times(j-1)$ northwest rectangle of $lambda$ is covered exactly once by the hooks in this row or column, except that the boxes in this row or column are covered many extra times as accounted for by those arithmetic progressions.



              Thus the LHS increases by
              $$ 2(n-(i-1)(j-1)+(i-1)(i-2)/2+(j-1)(j-2)/2)+(i-1)+(j-1)+1$$
              (where that last $+1$ is for the hook length of $(i,j)$), and this indeed equals
              $2n+1+(i-j)^2$.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                3
                down vote










                up vote
                3
                down vote









                You can also prove this inductively by adding boxes to outside corners of $lambda$.



                Suppose the results is true for $lambdavdash n$ and then we add a new box $(i,j)$ in an outside corner.



                The RHS increases by $(n+1)^2-n^2 + (i-j)^2=2n+1+(i-j)^2$



                How much does the LHS increase by? Let me use $h_u$ for the hook length of $u$ in $lambda$ (as opposed to the hook length in $lambda + (i,j)$.)



                We increase the hook length by one for every $u$ in the same row or same column as $(i,j)$. So for each of these boxes $u$ we increase the squared hook length by $2h_u+1$.



                Note that
                $$ sum_substacku textrm in same row \textrmor column as $(i,j)$h_u = n-(i-1)times(j-1) +(0+1+...+i-2)+(0+1+...+j-2)$$
                because every box not in the $(i-1)times(j-1)$ northwest rectangle of $lambda$ is covered exactly once by the hooks in this row or column, except that the boxes in this row or column are covered many extra times as accounted for by those arithmetic progressions.



                Thus the LHS increases by
                $$ 2(n-(i-1)(j-1)+(i-1)(i-2)/2+(j-1)(j-2)/2)+(i-1)+(j-1)+1$$
                (where that last $+1$ is for the hook length of $(i,j)$), and this indeed equals
                $2n+1+(i-j)^2$.






                share|cite|improve this answer














                You can also prove this inductively by adding boxes to outside corners of $lambda$.



                Suppose the results is true for $lambdavdash n$ and then we add a new box $(i,j)$ in an outside corner.



                The RHS increases by $(n+1)^2-n^2 + (i-j)^2=2n+1+(i-j)^2$



                How much does the LHS increase by? Let me use $h_u$ for the hook length of $u$ in $lambda$ (as opposed to the hook length in $lambda + (i,j)$.)



                We increase the hook length by one for every $u$ in the same row or same column as $(i,j)$. So for each of these boxes $u$ we increase the squared hook length by $2h_u+1$.



                Note that
                $$ sum_substacku textrm in same row \textrmor column as $(i,j)$h_u = n-(i-1)times(j-1) +(0+1+...+i-2)+(0+1+...+j-2)$$
                because every box not in the $(i-1)times(j-1)$ northwest rectangle of $lambda$ is covered exactly once by the hooks in this row or column, except that the boxes in this row or column are covered many extra times as accounted for by those arithmetic progressions.



                Thus the LHS increases by
                $$ 2(n-(i-1)(j-1)+(i-1)(i-2)/2+(j-1)(j-2)/2)+(i-1)+(j-1)+1$$
                (where that last $+1$ is for the hook length of $(i,j)$), and this indeed equals
                $2n+1+(i-j)^2$.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 53 mins ago

























                answered 1 hour ago









                Sam Hopkins

                4,02312348




                4,02312348



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f312771%2fa-link-between-hooks-and-contents-part-ii%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

                    Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

                    Confectionery