The weird case of the unresponsive Earth - why does the Earth stop communicating with Mars?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Mars has been colonized, close to a million people are now living above (and below) the martian soil, every few months a ship from Earth arrives with more resource for expansion and more settlers, currently the travel is one way until the martian space elevator will be completed in the near future.



Everything is going well until one day the "blackout" happens, all communication to Earth & the sister colonies on the moon stopped, pointing what telescopes the Martian settlers did have to Earth show no signs of life - no lights in the dark sides of the planet, no signals of any kind in any of the electric spectrum that the settlers have equipment to measure and as the months pass no new ships arrive.



It's as if one day everybody on Earth and Earth orbit just vanished.



The Question



What caused the "blackout"?



  • The settlers don't know if anyone is alive, causes which would keep people alive on Earth yet unable to communicate with Mars or use anything that shows sign of life to settlers outside the planet is acceptable.

  • Ideally Earth should remain intact, I would prefer answers where the settlers are guessing but never know for sure what happened on Earth.

  • Tech level is near future - 100 years to the future is a good benchmark.

  • Whatever the "blackout" is it should have no affect on Mars.

  • I can handwave the lunar colonies using Earth to relay communication with Mars do to the small size of the lunar colony so it's possible the "blackout" to affect Earth only and not the moon - however satellites around the earth should still be affected as even automatic transmissions from them stopped.









share|improve this question





















  • Changed the locks after unwelcome boarders left... nothing to see here. Just pretend you're not at home if they come calling
    – nzaman
    3 hours ago











  • Is Mars continuously observing Earth? Or does it only look at Earth occasionally?
    – Jasper
    1 hour ago










  • The way I imagine it is that before the blackout there was non stop data transfer between Earth and mars, a million people sending messages to their loved ones, scientfic data, even new movies all flow from one planet to the other non stop... I assume that after the blackout happen there will be someone on mars trying non stop to reconnect back with earth on but it's possible that due to lack of resources there are time gaps where Mars can't observe Earth at all.
    – cypher
    1 hour ago










  • Does Earth still have to be alive?
    – SRM
    54 mins ago














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Mars has been colonized, close to a million people are now living above (and below) the martian soil, every few months a ship from Earth arrives with more resource for expansion and more settlers, currently the travel is one way until the martian space elevator will be completed in the near future.



Everything is going well until one day the "blackout" happens, all communication to Earth & the sister colonies on the moon stopped, pointing what telescopes the Martian settlers did have to Earth show no signs of life - no lights in the dark sides of the planet, no signals of any kind in any of the electric spectrum that the settlers have equipment to measure and as the months pass no new ships arrive.



It's as if one day everybody on Earth and Earth orbit just vanished.



The Question



What caused the "blackout"?



  • The settlers don't know if anyone is alive, causes which would keep people alive on Earth yet unable to communicate with Mars or use anything that shows sign of life to settlers outside the planet is acceptable.

  • Ideally Earth should remain intact, I would prefer answers where the settlers are guessing but never know for sure what happened on Earth.

  • Tech level is near future - 100 years to the future is a good benchmark.

  • Whatever the "blackout" is it should have no affect on Mars.

  • I can handwave the lunar colonies using Earth to relay communication with Mars do to the small size of the lunar colony so it's possible the "blackout" to affect Earth only and not the moon - however satellites around the earth should still be affected as even automatic transmissions from them stopped.









share|improve this question





















  • Changed the locks after unwelcome boarders left... nothing to see here. Just pretend you're not at home if they come calling
    – nzaman
    3 hours ago











  • Is Mars continuously observing Earth? Or does it only look at Earth occasionally?
    – Jasper
    1 hour ago










  • The way I imagine it is that before the blackout there was non stop data transfer between Earth and mars, a million people sending messages to their loved ones, scientfic data, even new movies all flow from one planet to the other non stop... I assume that after the blackout happen there will be someone on mars trying non stop to reconnect back with earth on but it's possible that due to lack of resources there are time gaps where Mars can't observe Earth at all.
    – cypher
    1 hour ago










  • Does Earth still have to be alive?
    – SRM
    54 mins ago












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











Mars has been colonized, close to a million people are now living above (and below) the martian soil, every few months a ship from Earth arrives with more resource for expansion and more settlers, currently the travel is one way until the martian space elevator will be completed in the near future.



Everything is going well until one day the "blackout" happens, all communication to Earth & the sister colonies on the moon stopped, pointing what telescopes the Martian settlers did have to Earth show no signs of life - no lights in the dark sides of the planet, no signals of any kind in any of the electric spectrum that the settlers have equipment to measure and as the months pass no new ships arrive.



It's as if one day everybody on Earth and Earth orbit just vanished.



The Question



What caused the "blackout"?



  • The settlers don't know if anyone is alive, causes which would keep people alive on Earth yet unable to communicate with Mars or use anything that shows sign of life to settlers outside the planet is acceptable.

  • Ideally Earth should remain intact, I would prefer answers where the settlers are guessing but never know for sure what happened on Earth.

  • Tech level is near future - 100 years to the future is a good benchmark.

  • Whatever the "blackout" is it should have no affect on Mars.

  • I can handwave the lunar colonies using Earth to relay communication with Mars do to the small size of the lunar colony so it's possible the "blackout" to affect Earth only and not the moon - however satellites around the earth should still be affected as even automatic transmissions from them stopped.









share|improve this question













Mars has been colonized, close to a million people are now living above (and below) the martian soil, every few months a ship from Earth arrives with more resource for expansion and more settlers, currently the travel is one way until the martian space elevator will be completed in the near future.



Everything is going well until one day the "blackout" happens, all communication to Earth & the sister colonies on the moon stopped, pointing what telescopes the Martian settlers did have to Earth show no signs of life - no lights in the dark sides of the planet, no signals of any kind in any of the electric spectrum that the settlers have equipment to measure and as the months pass no new ships arrive.



It's as if one day everybody on Earth and Earth orbit just vanished.



The Question



What caused the "blackout"?



  • The settlers don't know if anyone is alive, causes which would keep people alive on Earth yet unable to communicate with Mars or use anything that shows sign of life to settlers outside the planet is acceptable.

  • Ideally Earth should remain intact, I would prefer answers where the settlers are guessing but never know for sure what happened on Earth.

  • Tech level is near future - 100 years to the future is a good benchmark.

  • Whatever the "blackout" is it should have no affect on Mars.

  • I can handwave the lunar colonies using Earth to relay communication with Mars do to the small size of the lunar colony so it's possible the "blackout" to affect Earth only and not the moon - however satellites around the earth should still be affected as even automatic transmissions from them stopped.






science-based space-colonization extinction






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 3 hours ago









cypher

1,8311417




1,8311417











  • Changed the locks after unwelcome boarders left... nothing to see here. Just pretend you're not at home if they come calling
    – nzaman
    3 hours ago











  • Is Mars continuously observing Earth? Or does it only look at Earth occasionally?
    – Jasper
    1 hour ago










  • The way I imagine it is that before the blackout there was non stop data transfer between Earth and mars, a million people sending messages to their loved ones, scientfic data, even new movies all flow from one planet to the other non stop... I assume that after the blackout happen there will be someone on mars trying non stop to reconnect back with earth on but it's possible that due to lack of resources there are time gaps where Mars can't observe Earth at all.
    – cypher
    1 hour ago










  • Does Earth still have to be alive?
    – SRM
    54 mins ago
















  • Changed the locks after unwelcome boarders left... nothing to see here. Just pretend you're not at home if they come calling
    – nzaman
    3 hours ago











  • Is Mars continuously observing Earth? Or does it only look at Earth occasionally?
    – Jasper
    1 hour ago










  • The way I imagine it is that before the blackout there was non stop data transfer between Earth and mars, a million people sending messages to their loved ones, scientfic data, even new movies all flow from one planet to the other non stop... I assume that after the blackout happen there will be someone on mars trying non stop to reconnect back with earth on but it's possible that due to lack of resources there are time gaps where Mars can't observe Earth at all.
    – cypher
    1 hour ago










  • Does Earth still have to be alive?
    – SRM
    54 mins ago















Changed the locks after unwelcome boarders left... nothing to see here. Just pretend you're not at home if they come calling
– nzaman
3 hours ago





Changed the locks after unwelcome boarders left... nothing to see here. Just pretend you're not at home if they come calling
– nzaman
3 hours ago













Is Mars continuously observing Earth? Or does it only look at Earth occasionally?
– Jasper
1 hour ago




Is Mars continuously observing Earth? Or does it only look at Earth occasionally?
– Jasper
1 hour ago












The way I imagine it is that before the blackout there was non stop data transfer between Earth and mars, a million people sending messages to their loved ones, scientfic data, even new movies all flow from one planet to the other non stop... I assume that after the blackout happen there will be someone on mars trying non stop to reconnect back with earth on but it's possible that due to lack of resources there are time gaps where Mars can't observe Earth at all.
– cypher
1 hour ago




The way I imagine it is that before the blackout there was non stop data transfer between Earth and mars, a million people sending messages to their loved ones, scientfic data, even new movies all flow from one planet to the other non stop... I assume that after the blackout happen there will be someone on mars trying non stop to reconnect back with earth on but it's possible that due to lack of resources there are time gaps where Mars can't observe Earth at all.
– cypher
1 hour ago












Does Earth still have to be alive?
– SRM
54 mins ago




Does Earth still have to be alive?
– SRM
54 mins ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













It was the Singularity. The density of computer networks and AIs on Earth reached a critical point, and humanity and its machines abruptly ascended into something unknowable. See Vernor Vinge’s novel Marooned In Realtime for a version of this idea where the separation is in time rather than in space.






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Supermassive blackholes, such as those found at the center of galaxies, produce relativistic jets of particles from their poles. ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrophysical_jet ). Such jets can exceed millions of parsecs in length. Because the cone of these jets is so narrow, it is kind of like a laser fired across space. But the radiation in these is lethal. If one of these jets from some other galaxy happened by random chance to sweep through, it could pick off one side of solar orbit without affecting the other side. There would be little hint that Sol was about to cross such a stream (just as you cannot see a laser until it hits something). The crossing could happen quite quickly if we went through the edge of a jet. If Mars was on opposite side of Sol while Earth gets cooked, Mars wouldn’t see the cooking. When the planets came back on the same side, Earth, and other planets that were over there, would just be an irradiated mess. Silent and black, including satellites.






    share|improve this answer




















    • That would cook one side of the Earth, but the other side would be shielded by thousands of miles of rock and metal.
      – Mike Scott
      32 mins ago










    • No. It would encompass the planet by combination of atmospheric scattering and solar reflection. @MikeScott
      – SRM
      27 mins ago











    • And that’s if the beam came straight in on our pole. If it came in at all at an angle, Earth’s rotation would cook all sides evenly.
      – SRM
      25 mins ago










    • It wouldn’t cook the Earth fast enough to prevent the news from getting to Mars. There’s non-stop data transfer between Earth and Mars, so whatever happens has to affect the whole Earth simultaneously.
      – Mike Scott
      1 min ago


















    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Look for "The Locusts" by Larry Niven and Steven Barnes. First published in Analog in 1979.
    http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?49922
    Colonists land on foreign planet (in story, around a new star). They settle in and eventually start having kids. But the kids are a bit, well, stupid. And the second generation isn’t really sentient. The grandparents are in full scale panic. Why? Well turns out, humans are like locusts... when our numbers swell, our genome metastasizes to create a massive brain which causes us to be spacefaring, but having completed our spawning, we revert to feral form for another few thousand years.



    That was 1979. Since then, we’ve discovered many species where even adult members of the population shift body types, even gender, in response to environment concerns such as population pressure. As soon as humanity “spawns” onto another world, there’s a global collective sigh of relief that all our eggs aren’t in one basket. Earth is a paradise of resources without environmental threat to the species, and we’ve just solved our last species-wide biological mandate. That tension release triggers hormones and unwinds our intelligence. Mars colonists ate unaffected because they’re still experiencing the survival stress of a new world.



    Doesn’t solve the satellite problem unless, as intellect declines, someone does something stupid, like turn them off or crash a couple into each other and create a cascade crash.






    share|improve this answer




















    • By the OP, about one million people has left Earth. This effect could affect the people on Mars, but not the several billions still on Earth.
      – SJuan76
      7 mins ago

















    up vote
    0
    down vote













    A massive solar flare was emitted by the sun and engulfed both earth and the moon but mars was no-where near that part of the solar system. The flare was extremely powerful, far more so than any on record, and basically destroyed all electronic devices. Those people who survived the immediate aftermath as everything moving crashed and all life support, navigation, communications etc fried in an instant are too busy with rescue and recovery efforts to even think about mars.



    Anyone in space is most likely dying of radiation poisoning even if their life support systems can be recovered (although more heavily shielded areas may offer some protection).



    https://gizmodo.com/what-would-happen-if-a-massive-solar-storm-hit-the-eart-1724650105





    share




















      Your Answer




      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "579"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127453%2fthe-weird-case-of-the-unresponsive-earth-why-does-the-earth-stop-communicating%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      3
      down vote













      It was the Singularity. The density of computer networks and AIs on Earth reached a critical point, and humanity and its machines abruptly ascended into something unknowable. See Vernor Vinge’s novel Marooned In Realtime for a version of this idea where the separation is in time rather than in space.






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        3
        down vote













        It was the Singularity. The density of computer networks and AIs on Earth reached a critical point, and humanity and its machines abruptly ascended into something unknowable. See Vernor Vinge’s novel Marooned In Realtime for a version of this idea where the separation is in time rather than in space.






        share|improve this answer






















          up vote
          3
          down vote










          up vote
          3
          down vote









          It was the Singularity. The density of computer networks and AIs on Earth reached a critical point, and humanity and its machines abruptly ascended into something unknowable. See Vernor Vinge’s novel Marooned In Realtime for a version of this idea where the separation is in time rather than in space.






          share|improve this answer












          It was the Singularity. The density of computer networks and AIs on Earth reached a critical point, and humanity and its machines abruptly ascended into something unknowable. See Vernor Vinge’s novel Marooned In Realtime for a version of this idea where the separation is in time rather than in space.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 hours ago









          Mike Scott

          9,85131943




          9,85131943




















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Supermassive blackholes, such as those found at the center of galaxies, produce relativistic jets of particles from their poles. ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrophysical_jet ). Such jets can exceed millions of parsecs in length. Because the cone of these jets is so narrow, it is kind of like a laser fired across space. But the radiation in these is lethal. If one of these jets from some other galaxy happened by random chance to sweep through, it could pick off one side of solar orbit without affecting the other side. There would be little hint that Sol was about to cross such a stream (just as you cannot see a laser until it hits something). The crossing could happen quite quickly if we went through the edge of a jet. If Mars was on opposite side of Sol while Earth gets cooked, Mars wouldn’t see the cooking. When the planets came back on the same side, Earth, and other planets that were over there, would just be an irradiated mess. Silent and black, including satellites.






              share|improve this answer




















              • That would cook one side of the Earth, but the other side would be shielded by thousands of miles of rock and metal.
                – Mike Scott
                32 mins ago










              • No. It would encompass the planet by combination of atmospheric scattering and solar reflection. @MikeScott
                – SRM
                27 mins ago











              • And that’s if the beam came straight in on our pole. If it came in at all at an angle, Earth’s rotation would cook all sides evenly.
                – SRM
                25 mins ago










              • It wouldn’t cook the Earth fast enough to prevent the news from getting to Mars. There’s non-stop data transfer between Earth and Mars, so whatever happens has to affect the whole Earth simultaneously.
                – Mike Scott
                1 min ago















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Supermassive blackholes, such as those found at the center of galaxies, produce relativistic jets of particles from their poles. ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrophysical_jet ). Such jets can exceed millions of parsecs in length. Because the cone of these jets is so narrow, it is kind of like a laser fired across space. But the radiation in these is lethal. If one of these jets from some other galaxy happened by random chance to sweep through, it could pick off one side of solar orbit without affecting the other side. There would be little hint that Sol was about to cross such a stream (just as you cannot see a laser until it hits something). The crossing could happen quite quickly if we went through the edge of a jet. If Mars was on opposite side of Sol while Earth gets cooked, Mars wouldn’t see the cooking. When the planets came back on the same side, Earth, and other planets that were over there, would just be an irradiated mess. Silent and black, including satellites.






              share|improve this answer




















              • That would cook one side of the Earth, but the other side would be shielded by thousands of miles of rock and metal.
                – Mike Scott
                32 mins ago










              • No. It would encompass the planet by combination of atmospheric scattering and solar reflection. @MikeScott
                – SRM
                27 mins ago











              • And that’s if the beam came straight in on our pole. If it came in at all at an angle, Earth’s rotation would cook all sides evenly.
                – SRM
                25 mins ago










              • It wouldn’t cook the Earth fast enough to prevent the news from getting to Mars. There’s non-stop data transfer between Earth and Mars, so whatever happens has to affect the whole Earth simultaneously.
                – Mike Scott
                1 min ago













              up vote
              0
              down vote










              up vote
              0
              down vote









              Supermassive blackholes, such as those found at the center of galaxies, produce relativistic jets of particles from their poles. ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrophysical_jet ). Such jets can exceed millions of parsecs in length. Because the cone of these jets is so narrow, it is kind of like a laser fired across space. But the radiation in these is lethal. If one of these jets from some other galaxy happened by random chance to sweep through, it could pick off one side of solar orbit without affecting the other side. There would be little hint that Sol was about to cross such a stream (just as you cannot see a laser until it hits something). The crossing could happen quite quickly if we went through the edge of a jet. If Mars was on opposite side of Sol while Earth gets cooked, Mars wouldn’t see the cooking. When the planets came back on the same side, Earth, and other planets that were over there, would just be an irradiated mess. Silent and black, including satellites.






              share|improve this answer












              Supermassive blackholes, such as those found at the center of galaxies, produce relativistic jets of particles from their poles. ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrophysical_jet ). Such jets can exceed millions of parsecs in length. Because the cone of these jets is so narrow, it is kind of like a laser fired across space. But the radiation in these is lethal. If one of these jets from some other galaxy happened by random chance to sweep through, it could pick off one side of solar orbit without affecting the other side. There would be little hint that Sol was about to cross such a stream (just as you cannot see a laser until it hits something). The crossing could happen quite quickly if we went through the edge of a jet. If Mars was on opposite side of Sol while Earth gets cooked, Mars wouldn’t see the cooking. When the planets came back on the same side, Earth, and other planets that were over there, would just be an irradiated mess. Silent and black, including satellites.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 45 mins ago









              SRM

              14k32675




              14k32675











              • That would cook one side of the Earth, but the other side would be shielded by thousands of miles of rock and metal.
                – Mike Scott
                32 mins ago










              • No. It would encompass the planet by combination of atmospheric scattering and solar reflection. @MikeScott
                – SRM
                27 mins ago











              • And that’s if the beam came straight in on our pole. If it came in at all at an angle, Earth’s rotation would cook all sides evenly.
                – SRM
                25 mins ago










              • It wouldn’t cook the Earth fast enough to prevent the news from getting to Mars. There’s non-stop data transfer between Earth and Mars, so whatever happens has to affect the whole Earth simultaneously.
                – Mike Scott
                1 min ago

















              • That would cook one side of the Earth, but the other side would be shielded by thousands of miles of rock and metal.
                – Mike Scott
                32 mins ago










              • No. It would encompass the planet by combination of atmospheric scattering and solar reflection. @MikeScott
                – SRM
                27 mins ago











              • And that’s if the beam came straight in on our pole. If it came in at all at an angle, Earth’s rotation would cook all sides evenly.
                – SRM
                25 mins ago










              • It wouldn’t cook the Earth fast enough to prevent the news from getting to Mars. There’s non-stop data transfer between Earth and Mars, so whatever happens has to affect the whole Earth simultaneously.
                – Mike Scott
                1 min ago
















              That would cook one side of the Earth, but the other side would be shielded by thousands of miles of rock and metal.
              – Mike Scott
              32 mins ago




              That would cook one side of the Earth, but the other side would be shielded by thousands of miles of rock and metal.
              – Mike Scott
              32 mins ago












              No. It would encompass the planet by combination of atmospheric scattering and solar reflection. @MikeScott
              – SRM
              27 mins ago





              No. It would encompass the planet by combination of atmospheric scattering and solar reflection. @MikeScott
              – SRM
              27 mins ago













              And that’s if the beam came straight in on our pole. If it came in at all at an angle, Earth’s rotation would cook all sides evenly.
              – SRM
              25 mins ago




              And that’s if the beam came straight in on our pole. If it came in at all at an angle, Earth’s rotation would cook all sides evenly.
              – SRM
              25 mins ago












              It wouldn’t cook the Earth fast enough to prevent the news from getting to Mars. There’s non-stop data transfer between Earth and Mars, so whatever happens has to affect the whole Earth simultaneously.
              – Mike Scott
              1 min ago





              It wouldn’t cook the Earth fast enough to prevent the news from getting to Mars. There’s non-stop data transfer between Earth and Mars, so whatever happens has to affect the whole Earth simultaneously.
              – Mike Scott
              1 min ago











              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Look for "The Locusts" by Larry Niven and Steven Barnes. First published in Analog in 1979.
              http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?49922
              Colonists land on foreign planet (in story, around a new star). They settle in and eventually start having kids. But the kids are a bit, well, stupid. And the second generation isn’t really sentient. The grandparents are in full scale panic. Why? Well turns out, humans are like locusts... when our numbers swell, our genome metastasizes to create a massive brain which causes us to be spacefaring, but having completed our spawning, we revert to feral form for another few thousand years.



              That was 1979. Since then, we’ve discovered many species where even adult members of the population shift body types, even gender, in response to environment concerns such as population pressure. As soon as humanity “spawns” onto another world, there’s a global collective sigh of relief that all our eggs aren’t in one basket. Earth is a paradise of resources without environmental threat to the species, and we’ve just solved our last species-wide biological mandate. That tension release triggers hormones and unwinds our intelligence. Mars colonists ate unaffected because they’re still experiencing the survival stress of a new world.



              Doesn’t solve the satellite problem unless, as intellect declines, someone does something stupid, like turn them off or crash a couple into each other and create a cascade crash.






              share|improve this answer




















              • By the OP, about one million people has left Earth. This effect could affect the people on Mars, but not the several billions still on Earth.
                – SJuan76
                7 mins ago














              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Look for "The Locusts" by Larry Niven and Steven Barnes. First published in Analog in 1979.
              http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?49922
              Colonists land on foreign planet (in story, around a new star). They settle in and eventually start having kids. But the kids are a bit, well, stupid. And the second generation isn’t really sentient. The grandparents are in full scale panic. Why? Well turns out, humans are like locusts... when our numbers swell, our genome metastasizes to create a massive brain which causes us to be spacefaring, but having completed our spawning, we revert to feral form for another few thousand years.



              That was 1979. Since then, we’ve discovered many species where even adult members of the population shift body types, even gender, in response to environment concerns such as population pressure. As soon as humanity “spawns” onto another world, there’s a global collective sigh of relief that all our eggs aren’t in one basket. Earth is a paradise of resources without environmental threat to the species, and we’ve just solved our last species-wide biological mandate. That tension release triggers hormones and unwinds our intelligence. Mars colonists ate unaffected because they’re still experiencing the survival stress of a new world.



              Doesn’t solve the satellite problem unless, as intellect declines, someone does something stupid, like turn them off or crash a couple into each other and create a cascade crash.






              share|improve this answer




















              • By the OP, about one million people has left Earth. This effect could affect the people on Mars, but not the several billions still on Earth.
                – SJuan76
                7 mins ago












              up vote
              0
              down vote










              up vote
              0
              down vote









              Look for "The Locusts" by Larry Niven and Steven Barnes. First published in Analog in 1979.
              http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?49922
              Colonists land on foreign planet (in story, around a new star). They settle in and eventually start having kids. But the kids are a bit, well, stupid. And the second generation isn’t really sentient. The grandparents are in full scale panic. Why? Well turns out, humans are like locusts... when our numbers swell, our genome metastasizes to create a massive brain which causes us to be spacefaring, but having completed our spawning, we revert to feral form for another few thousand years.



              That was 1979. Since then, we’ve discovered many species where even adult members of the population shift body types, even gender, in response to environment concerns such as population pressure. As soon as humanity “spawns” onto another world, there’s a global collective sigh of relief that all our eggs aren’t in one basket. Earth is a paradise of resources without environmental threat to the species, and we’ve just solved our last species-wide biological mandate. That tension release triggers hormones and unwinds our intelligence. Mars colonists ate unaffected because they’re still experiencing the survival stress of a new world.



              Doesn’t solve the satellite problem unless, as intellect declines, someone does something stupid, like turn them off or crash a couple into each other and create a cascade crash.






              share|improve this answer












              Look for "The Locusts" by Larry Niven and Steven Barnes. First published in Analog in 1979.
              http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?49922
              Colonists land on foreign planet (in story, around a new star). They settle in and eventually start having kids. But the kids are a bit, well, stupid. And the second generation isn’t really sentient. The grandparents are in full scale panic. Why? Well turns out, humans are like locusts... when our numbers swell, our genome metastasizes to create a massive brain which causes us to be spacefaring, but having completed our spawning, we revert to feral form for another few thousand years.



              That was 1979. Since then, we’ve discovered many species where even adult members of the population shift body types, even gender, in response to environment concerns such as population pressure. As soon as humanity “spawns” onto another world, there’s a global collective sigh of relief that all our eggs aren’t in one basket. Earth is a paradise of resources without environmental threat to the species, and we’ve just solved our last species-wide biological mandate. That tension release triggers hormones and unwinds our intelligence. Mars colonists ate unaffected because they’re still experiencing the survival stress of a new world.



              Doesn’t solve the satellite problem unless, as intellect declines, someone does something stupid, like turn them off or crash a couple into each other and create a cascade crash.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 29 mins ago









              SRM

              14k32675




              14k32675











              • By the OP, about one million people has left Earth. This effect could affect the people on Mars, but not the several billions still on Earth.
                – SJuan76
                7 mins ago
















              • By the OP, about one million people has left Earth. This effect could affect the people on Mars, but not the several billions still on Earth.
                – SJuan76
                7 mins ago















              By the OP, about one million people has left Earth. This effect could affect the people on Mars, but not the several billions still on Earth.
              – SJuan76
              7 mins ago




              By the OP, about one million people has left Earth. This effect could affect the people on Mars, but not the several billions still on Earth.
              – SJuan76
              7 mins ago










              up vote
              0
              down vote













              A massive solar flare was emitted by the sun and engulfed both earth and the moon but mars was no-where near that part of the solar system. The flare was extremely powerful, far more so than any on record, and basically destroyed all electronic devices. Those people who survived the immediate aftermath as everything moving crashed and all life support, navigation, communications etc fried in an instant are too busy with rescue and recovery efforts to even think about mars.



              Anyone in space is most likely dying of radiation poisoning even if their life support systems can be recovered (although more heavily shielded areas may offer some protection).



              https://gizmodo.com/what-would-happen-if-a-massive-solar-storm-hit-the-eart-1724650105





              share
























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                A massive solar flare was emitted by the sun and engulfed both earth and the moon but mars was no-where near that part of the solar system. The flare was extremely powerful, far more so than any on record, and basically destroyed all electronic devices. Those people who survived the immediate aftermath as everything moving crashed and all life support, navigation, communications etc fried in an instant are too busy with rescue and recovery efforts to even think about mars.



                Anyone in space is most likely dying of radiation poisoning even if their life support systems can be recovered (although more heavily shielded areas may offer some protection).



                https://gizmodo.com/what-would-happen-if-a-massive-solar-storm-hit-the-eart-1724650105





                share






















                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  A massive solar flare was emitted by the sun and engulfed both earth and the moon but mars was no-where near that part of the solar system. The flare was extremely powerful, far more so than any on record, and basically destroyed all electronic devices. Those people who survived the immediate aftermath as everything moving crashed and all life support, navigation, communications etc fried in an instant are too busy with rescue and recovery efforts to even think about mars.



                  Anyone in space is most likely dying of radiation poisoning even if their life support systems can be recovered (although more heavily shielded areas may offer some protection).



                  https://gizmodo.com/what-would-happen-if-a-massive-solar-storm-hit-the-eart-1724650105





                  share












                  A massive solar flare was emitted by the sun and engulfed both earth and the moon but mars was no-where near that part of the solar system. The flare was extremely powerful, far more so than any on record, and basically destroyed all electronic devices. Those people who survived the immediate aftermath as everything moving crashed and all life support, navigation, communications etc fried in an instant are too busy with rescue and recovery efforts to even think about mars.



                  Anyone in space is most likely dying of radiation poisoning even if their life support systems can be recovered (although more heavily shielded areas may offer some protection).



                  https://gizmodo.com/what-would-happen-if-a-massive-solar-storm-hit-the-eart-1724650105






                  share











                  share


                  share










                  answered 7 mins ago









                  Tim B♦

                  55.6k22155272




                  55.6k22155272



























                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127453%2fthe-weird-case-of-the-unresponsive-earth-why-does-the-earth-stop-communicating%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      Comments

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What does second last employer means? [closed]

                      Installing NextGIS Connect into QGIS 3?

                      One-line joke