Why my group photos get blurry around the edges?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












ISO:100

APERTURE: f/5.0

Shutter Speed: 1/60

Lens: Tamron 18-200mm non VC



enter image description here






troubleshooting







share|improve this question









New contributor




Itmam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Is this a problem with just this one shot or does this happen more often?
    – Hueco
    1 hour ago














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












ISO:100

APERTURE: f/5.0

Shutter Speed: 1/60

Lens: Tamron 18-200mm non VC



enter image description here






troubleshooting







share|improve this question









New contributor




Itmam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Is this a problem with just this one shot or does this happen more often?
    – Hueco
    1 hour ago












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











ISO:100

APERTURE: f/5.0

Shutter Speed: 1/60

Lens: Tamron 18-200mm non VC



enter image description here






troubleshooting







share|improve this question









New contributor




Itmam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











ISO:100

APERTURE: f/5.0

Shutter Speed: 1/60

Lens: Tamron 18-200mm non VC



enter image description here






troubleshooting




troubleshooting






share|improve this question









New contributor




Itmam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Itmam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









Tetsujin

6,87821741




6,87821741






New contributor




Itmam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 3 hours ago









Itmam

111




111




New contributor




Itmam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Itmam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Itmam is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • Is this a problem with just this one shot or does this happen more often?
    – Hueco
    1 hour ago
















  • Is this a problem with just this one shot or does this happen more often?
    – Hueco
    1 hour ago















Is this a problem with just this one shot or does this happen more often?
– Hueco
1 hour ago




Is this a problem with just this one shot or does this happen more often?
– Hueco
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













I'm going to take a wild swing at this, based on gut feel more than anything else.



I think there are two factors.



The first being that the difference in distance between the camera & the nearest people in the front centre of the picture is sufficient that those at the extreme edges are going to be already slightly out of focus.



I think, however, that the main issue is that the camera moved.

My best guess is that the move was a slightly twisting motion, the right side moving more than the left, but roughly around left-centre of the frame. That may account for the fact that the woman in brown/beige off-centre left is the most in focus & the vertical blurring is most easily seen in the pillar on the right.



I might suggest that's because of the relatively slow shutter speed, but also that the shutter release was "more push than squeeze" & that some practise may be required to prevent that motion.






share|improve this answer





























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    And to add to other answer this Tamron lens is quite soft in the corners. You can check on Bryan Carnathan's web site and decide for self.



    And I can't see anyone's face on focus. Which IMHO add additional blur to entire image.






    share|improve this answer






















      Your Answer







      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "61"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      Itmam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102098%2fwhy-my-group-photos-get-blurry-around-the-edges%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest

















      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      1
      down vote













      I'm going to take a wild swing at this, based on gut feel more than anything else.



      I think there are two factors.



      The first being that the difference in distance between the camera & the nearest people in the front centre of the picture is sufficient that those at the extreme edges are going to be already slightly out of focus.



      I think, however, that the main issue is that the camera moved.

      My best guess is that the move was a slightly twisting motion, the right side moving more than the left, but roughly around left-centre of the frame. That may account for the fact that the woman in brown/beige off-centre left is the most in focus & the vertical blurring is most easily seen in the pillar on the right.



      I might suggest that's because of the relatively slow shutter speed, but also that the shutter release was "more push than squeeze" & that some practise may be required to prevent that motion.






      share|improve this answer


























        up vote
        1
        down vote













        I'm going to take a wild swing at this, based on gut feel more than anything else.



        I think there are two factors.



        The first being that the difference in distance between the camera & the nearest people in the front centre of the picture is sufficient that those at the extreme edges are going to be already slightly out of focus.



        I think, however, that the main issue is that the camera moved.

        My best guess is that the move was a slightly twisting motion, the right side moving more than the left, but roughly around left-centre of the frame. That may account for the fact that the woman in brown/beige off-centre left is the most in focus & the vertical blurring is most easily seen in the pillar on the right.



        I might suggest that's because of the relatively slow shutter speed, but also that the shutter release was "more push than squeeze" & that some practise may be required to prevent that motion.






        share|improve this answer
























          up vote
          1
          down vote










          up vote
          1
          down vote









          I'm going to take a wild swing at this, based on gut feel more than anything else.



          I think there are two factors.



          The first being that the difference in distance between the camera & the nearest people in the front centre of the picture is sufficient that those at the extreme edges are going to be already slightly out of focus.



          I think, however, that the main issue is that the camera moved.

          My best guess is that the move was a slightly twisting motion, the right side moving more than the left, but roughly around left-centre of the frame. That may account for the fact that the woman in brown/beige off-centre left is the most in focus & the vertical blurring is most easily seen in the pillar on the right.



          I might suggest that's because of the relatively slow shutter speed, but also that the shutter release was "more push than squeeze" & that some practise may be required to prevent that motion.






          share|improve this answer














          I'm going to take a wild swing at this, based on gut feel more than anything else.



          I think there are two factors.



          The first being that the difference in distance between the camera & the nearest people in the front centre of the picture is sufficient that those at the extreme edges are going to be already slightly out of focus.



          I think, however, that the main issue is that the camera moved.

          My best guess is that the move was a slightly twisting motion, the right side moving more than the left, but roughly around left-centre of the frame. That may account for the fact that the woman in brown/beige off-centre left is the most in focus & the vertical blurring is most easily seen in the pillar on the right.



          I might suggest that's because of the relatively slow shutter speed, but also that the shutter release was "more push than squeeze" & that some practise may be required to prevent that motion.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 1 hour ago

























          answered 2 hours ago









          Tetsujin

          6,87821741




          6,87821741






















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              And to add to other answer this Tamron lens is quite soft in the corners. You can check on Bryan Carnathan's web site and decide for self.



              And I can't see anyone's face on focus. Which IMHO add additional blur to entire image.






              share|improve this answer


























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                And to add to other answer this Tamron lens is quite soft in the corners. You can check on Bryan Carnathan's web site and decide for self.



                And I can't see anyone's face on focus. Which IMHO add additional blur to entire image.






                share|improve this answer
























                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  And to add to other answer this Tamron lens is quite soft in the corners. You can check on Bryan Carnathan's web site and decide for self.



                  And I can't see anyone's face on focus. Which IMHO add additional blur to entire image.






                  share|improve this answer














                  And to add to other answer this Tamron lens is quite soft in the corners. You can check on Bryan Carnathan's web site and decide for self.



                  And I can't see anyone's face on focus. Which IMHO add additional blur to entire image.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 1 hour ago

























                  answered 1 hour ago









                  Romeo Ninov

                  2,75521123




                  2,75521123




















                      Itmam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded


















                      Itmam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Itmam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      Itmam is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102098%2fwhy-my-group-photos-get-blurry-around-the-edges%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest
































































                      Comments

                      Post a Comment

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

                      Image
                      Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote 31 down vote favorite 4 I hold a PhD in mechanical engineering with a 7 year background in self-guided, self-paced research including 2 years as a graduate level course instructor and a subject matter expert for various engineering projects in a university setting in the United States. For the last 10-11 months, I am working in a research industry in France where my task is to debug C++ spaghetti code written over a period of several years by my current supervisor. It is a team of 2: just I and my supervisor. Diurnally, I am posed with a "bug of the day" to get out of this C++ code. My supervisor generally gives me about 15-30 minutes to solve it and then accosts me about whether or not the task is completed and then rinses and repeats this until the end of the day. Off-late, my supervisor has been holding 6-7 hour long "meetin
                      Read more

                      Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

                      Image
                      Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite Many fantasy worlds have multiple humanoid species (elves, orcs, humans, etc) living in the same world, in addition to that, they often have the ability to interbreed. And I can't help but question their believability... fantasy-races reproduction interspecies-relations share | improve this question edited Aug 9 at 14:46 Michael Kjörling ♦ 21.1k 10 85 161 asked Aug 9 at 13:13 Chlodio 118 6 closed as unclear what you're asking by MichaelK, Gryphon, John, Vincent, Frostfyre Aug 9 at 15:25 Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question. 3 Stack Exchange exist to
                      Read more

                      Confectionery

                      Image
                      Prepared foods made with a lot of sugar or other cabohydrates "Sweetmeat" redirects here. For the racehorse, see Sweetmeat (horse). Not to be confused with Sweetbread. This Kransekake is a traditional Scandinavian baker's confection. Confectionery is the art of making confections , which are food items that are rich in sugar and carbohydrates. Exact definitions are difficult. [1] In general, though, confectionery is divided into two broad and somewhat overlapping categories, bakers' confections and sugar confections. [2] Bakers' confectionery, also called flour confections , includes principally sweet pastries, cakes, and similar baked goods. Sugar confectionery includes candies ( sweets in British English), candied nuts, chocolates, chewing gum, bubble gum, pastillage, and other confections that are made primarily of sugar. In some cases, chocolate confections (confections made of chocolate) are treated as a separate category, as are sugar-free versions of
                      Read more