Does Neuton framework offer better ML algorithms than the ones currently known to the public?

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;

up vote
1
down vote

favorite

I came across an article about new proprietary 'Neuton' framework.

I can't find educated opinions from professionals in the field. What the framework promises feels 'too good to be true'. Is it?

machine-learning neural-networks

share|cite|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Sven Hohenstein

4,74762333

asked 4 hours ago

neutonquestiononetimeuser

61

New contributor

neutonquestiononetimeuser is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

add a comment | 

up vote
1
down vote

favorite

I came across an article about new proprietary 'Neuton' framework.

I can't find educated opinions from professionals in the field. What the framework promises feels 'too good to be true'. Is it?

machine-learning neural-networks

share|cite|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Sven Hohenstein

4,74762333

asked 4 hours ago

neutonquestiononetimeuser

61

New contributor

neutonquestiononetimeuser is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

add a comment | 

up vote
1
down vote

favorite

up vote
1
down vote

favorite

I came across an article about new proprietary 'Neuton' framework.

I can't find educated opinions from professionals in the field. What the framework promises feels 'too good to be true'. Is it?

machine-learning neural-networks

share|cite|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Sven Hohenstein

4,74762333

asked 4 hours ago

neutonquestiononetimeuser

61

New contributor

neutonquestiononetimeuser is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

I came across an article about new proprietary 'Neuton' framework.

I can't find educated opinions from professionals in the field. What the framework promises feels 'too good to be true'. Is it?

machine-learning neural-networks

machine-learning neural-networks

share|cite|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Sven Hohenstein

4,74762333

asked 4 hours ago

neutonquestiononetimeuser

61

New contributor

neutonquestiononetimeuser is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|cite|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Sven Hohenstein

4,74762333

asked 4 hours ago

neutonquestiononetimeuser

61

New contributor

neutonquestiononetimeuser is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|cite|improve this question

share|cite|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

Sven Hohenstein

4,74762333

edited 4 hours ago

Sven Hohenstein

4,74762333

edited 4 hours ago

Sven Hohenstein

4,74762333

4,74762333

asked 4 hours ago

neutonquestiononetimeuser

61

New contributor

neutonquestiononetimeuser is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 4 hours ago

neutonquestiononetimeuser

61

asked 4 hours ago

neutonquestiononetimeuser

61

61

New contributor

neutonquestiononetimeuser is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

New contributor

neutonquestiononetimeuser is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

neutonquestiononetimeuser is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

add a comment | 

add a comment | 

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

up vote
2
down vote

There is not enough information freely available to make an intelligent discussion on the topic.

That said, do not take any benchmarks seriously unless coming from an independent and authoritative source. For example, on Neuton's homepage benchmarks, XGBoost is always better than Catboost; but if we check Yandex's arXiv paper on Catboost, Catboost is always better than XGBoost. Clearly, these two scenarios are contradictory on face value! While I do not believe anyone intentionally obscures the truth, reality might be a bit too complex to justify statements like: "in the vast majority of cases, (algorithm X) achieves a higher level of accuracy than algorithms traditionally used for regression and classification problems." The marketing department might had a say there too... ;)

Don't stop studying ML just yet.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 36 mins ago

usεr11852

17k13670

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  (For the record I have voted this question to close as primarily opinion-based.)
  – usεr11852
  31 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "65"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

neutonquestiononetimeuser is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

 

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f371676%2fdoes-neuton-framework-offer-better-ml-algorithms-than-the-ones-currently-known-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name Email

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

active

oldest

votes

active

oldest

votes

up vote
2
down vote

There is not enough information freely available to make an intelligent discussion on the topic.

That said, do not take any benchmarks seriously unless coming from an independent and authoritative source. For example, on Neuton's homepage benchmarks, XGBoost is always better than Catboost; but if we check Yandex's arXiv paper on Catboost, Catboost is always better than XGBoost. Clearly, these two scenarios are contradictory on face value! While I do not believe anyone intentionally obscures the truth, reality might be a bit too complex to justify statements like: "in the vast majority of cases, (algorithm X) achieves a higher level of accuracy than algorithms traditionally used for regression and classification problems." The marketing department might had a say there too... ;)

Don't stop studying ML just yet.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 36 mins ago

usεr11852

17k13670

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  (For the record I have voted this question to close as primarily opinion-based.)
  – usεr11852
  31 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

up vote
2
down vote

There is not enough information freely available to make an intelligent discussion on the topic.

That said, do not take any benchmarks seriously unless coming from an independent and authoritative source. For example, on Neuton's homepage benchmarks, XGBoost is always better than Catboost; but if we check Yandex's arXiv paper on Catboost, Catboost is always better than XGBoost. Clearly, these two scenarios are contradictory on face value! While I do not believe anyone intentionally obscures the truth, reality might be a bit too complex to justify statements like: "in the vast majority of cases, (algorithm X) achieves a higher level of accuracy than algorithms traditionally used for regression and classification problems." The marketing department might had a say there too... ;)

Don't stop studying ML just yet.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 36 mins ago

usεr11852

17k13670

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  (For the record I have voted this question to close as primarily opinion-based.)
  – usεr11852
  31 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

up vote
2
down vote

up vote
2
down vote

There is not enough information freely available to make an intelligent discussion on the topic.

That said, do not take any benchmarks seriously unless coming from an independent and authoritative source. For example, on Neuton's homepage benchmarks, XGBoost is always better than Catboost; but if we check Yandex's arXiv paper on Catboost, Catboost is always better than XGBoost. Clearly, these two scenarios are contradictory on face value! While I do not believe anyone intentionally obscures the truth, reality might be a bit too complex to justify statements like: "in the vast majority of cases, (algorithm X) achieves a higher level of accuracy than algorithms traditionally used for regression and classification problems." The marketing department might had a say there too... ;)

Don't stop studying ML just yet.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 36 mins ago

usεr11852

17k13670

There is not enough information freely available to make an intelligent discussion on the topic.

That said, do not take any benchmarks seriously unless coming from an independent and authoritative source. For example, on Neuton's homepage benchmarks, XGBoost is always better than Catboost; but if we check Yandex's arXiv paper on Catboost, Catboost is always better than XGBoost. Clearly, these two scenarios are contradictory on face value! While I do not believe anyone intentionally obscures the truth, reality might be a bit too complex to justify statements like: "in the vast majority of cases, (algorithm X) achieves a higher level of accuracy than algorithms traditionally used for regression and classification problems." The marketing department might had a say there too... ;)

Don't stop studying ML just yet.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 36 mins ago

usεr11852

17k13670

share|cite|improve this answer

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 36 mins ago

usεr11852

17k13670

answered 36 mins ago

usεr11852

17k13670

answered 36 mins ago

usεr11852

17k13670

17k13670

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  (For the record I have voted this question to close as primarily opinion-based.)
  – usεr11852
  31 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  (For the record I have voted this question to close as primarily opinion-based.)
  – usεr11852
  31 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

(For the record I have voted this question to close as primarily opinion-based.)
– usεr11852
31 mins ago

(For the record I have voted this question to close as primarily opinion-based.)
– usεr11852
31 mins ago

add a comment | 

neutonquestiononetimeuser is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

 

draft saved

draft discarded

neutonquestiononetimeuser is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

neutonquestiononetimeuser is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

neutonquestiononetimeuser is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

 

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f371676%2fdoes-neuton-framework-offer-better-ml-algorithms-than-the-ones-currently-known-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name Email

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

Name Email

Name

Email

Name Email

Name

Email