What are the reasons Soyuz lifespan on orbit is limited?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Following the recent Soyuz failure news I found out that currently docked Soyuz expires in the observable future leaving the crew with no means to return back to Earth.



I would like to know what are the reasons behind Soyuz having a limited lifespan on orbit? Does it mean it's not safe to flight it after expiration date or it's not possible at all?










share|improve this question

























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    Following the recent Soyuz failure news I found out that currently docked Soyuz expires in the observable future leaving the crew with no means to return back to Earth.



    I would like to know what are the reasons behind Soyuz having a limited lifespan on orbit? Does it mean it's not safe to flight it after expiration date or it's not possible at all?










    share|improve this question























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      Following the recent Soyuz failure news I found out that currently docked Soyuz expires in the observable future leaving the crew with no means to return back to Earth.



      I would like to know what are the reasons behind Soyuz having a limited lifespan on orbit? Does it mean it's not safe to flight it after expiration date or it's not possible at all?










      share|improve this question













      Following the recent Soyuz failure news I found out that currently docked Soyuz expires in the observable future leaving the crew with no means to return back to Earth.



      I would like to know what are the reasons behind Soyuz having a limited lifespan on orbit? Does it mean it's not safe to flight it after expiration date or it's not possible at all?







      iss crewed-spaceflight soyuz-spacecraft return






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 2 hours ago









      Denis Kulagin

      24927




      24927




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          Scott Manley answers this question here.



          Basically, it is due to the "shelf life" of the hydrogen peroxide propellant used by the attitude control thrusters of the Soyuz descent module. When hydrogen peroxide is passed over a heated catalyst, it decomposes to water and oxygen, and releases lots of energy, so the propellant goes from liquid to steam/gas, providing the thrust. But hydrogen peroxide will also slowly break down spontaneously, so the stored propellant will gradually lose its potency.



          The 200 day value is a threshold of safety: decomposition hasn't progressed too far to affect usability of the peroxide propellant to perform a controlled re-entry, landing within a targeted area.



          He also goes on to describe the consequences of an uncontrolled (ballistic) re-entry - not a disaster, but definitely undesirable because of G forces imposed on the crew and unpredictability of the actual landing point.






          share|improve this answer






















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "508"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31316%2fwhat-are-the-reasons-soyuz-lifespan-on-orbit-is-limited%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            3
            down vote













            Scott Manley answers this question here.



            Basically, it is due to the "shelf life" of the hydrogen peroxide propellant used by the attitude control thrusters of the Soyuz descent module. When hydrogen peroxide is passed over a heated catalyst, it decomposes to water and oxygen, and releases lots of energy, so the propellant goes from liquid to steam/gas, providing the thrust. But hydrogen peroxide will also slowly break down spontaneously, so the stored propellant will gradually lose its potency.



            The 200 day value is a threshold of safety: decomposition hasn't progressed too far to affect usability of the peroxide propellant to perform a controlled re-entry, landing within a targeted area.



            He also goes on to describe the consequences of an uncontrolled (ballistic) re-entry - not a disaster, but definitely undesirable because of G forces imposed on the crew and unpredictability of the actual landing point.






            share|improve this answer


























              up vote
              3
              down vote













              Scott Manley answers this question here.



              Basically, it is due to the "shelf life" of the hydrogen peroxide propellant used by the attitude control thrusters of the Soyuz descent module. When hydrogen peroxide is passed over a heated catalyst, it decomposes to water and oxygen, and releases lots of energy, so the propellant goes from liquid to steam/gas, providing the thrust. But hydrogen peroxide will also slowly break down spontaneously, so the stored propellant will gradually lose its potency.



              The 200 day value is a threshold of safety: decomposition hasn't progressed too far to affect usability of the peroxide propellant to perform a controlled re-entry, landing within a targeted area.



              He also goes on to describe the consequences of an uncontrolled (ballistic) re-entry - not a disaster, but definitely undesirable because of G forces imposed on the crew and unpredictability of the actual landing point.






              share|improve this answer
























                up vote
                3
                down vote










                up vote
                3
                down vote









                Scott Manley answers this question here.



                Basically, it is due to the "shelf life" of the hydrogen peroxide propellant used by the attitude control thrusters of the Soyuz descent module. When hydrogen peroxide is passed over a heated catalyst, it decomposes to water and oxygen, and releases lots of energy, so the propellant goes from liquid to steam/gas, providing the thrust. But hydrogen peroxide will also slowly break down spontaneously, so the stored propellant will gradually lose its potency.



                The 200 day value is a threshold of safety: decomposition hasn't progressed too far to affect usability of the peroxide propellant to perform a controlled re-entry, landing within a targeted area.



                He also goes on to describe the consequences of an uncontrolled (ballistic) re-entry - not a disaster, but definitely undesirable because of G forces imposed on the crew and unpredictability of the actual landing point.






                share|improve this answer














                Scott Manley answers this question here.



                Basically, it is due to the "shelf life" of the hydrogen peroxide propellant used by the attitude control thrusters of the Soyuz descent module. When hydrogen peroxide is passed over a heated catalyst, it decomposes to water and oxygen, and releases lots of energy, so the propellant goes from liquid to steam/gas, providing the thrust. But hydrogen peroxide will also slowly break down spontaneously, so the stored propellant will gradually lose its potency.



                The 200 day value is a threshold of safety: decomposition hasn't progressed too far to affect usability of the peroxide propellant to perform a controlled re-entry, landing within a targeted area.



                He also goes on to describe the consequences of an uncontrolled (ballistic) re-entry - not a disaster, but definitely undesirable because of G forces imposed on the crew and unpredictability of the actual landing point.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 1 hour ago

























                answered 1 hour ago









                Anthony X

                8,69413273




                8,69413273



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31316%2fwhat-are-the-reasons-soyuz-lifespan-on-orbit-is-limited%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

                    Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

                    Confectionery