Can I translate App under GPLv3 into Swift without using GLPv3?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Can I translate an App from Android using GPLv3 into Swift? Because actually I don't use any source code. Do I need to keep it under GPLv3 and open source? Is there any method to avoid infection if it must under GPLv3?










share|improve this question







New contributor




F.Jiang is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    Can I translate an App from Android using GPLv3 into Swift? Because actually I don't use any source code. Do I need to keep it under GPLv3 and open source? Is there any method to avoid infection if it must under GPLv3?










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    F.Jiang is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      Can I translate an App from Android using GPLv3 into Swift? Because actually I don't use any source code. Do I need to keep it under GPLv3 and open source? Is there any method to avoid infection if it must under GPLv3?










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      F.Jiang is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      Can I translate an App from Android using GPLv3 into Swift? Because actually I don't use any source code. Do I need to keep it under GPLv3 and open source? Is there any method to avoid infection if it must under GPLv3?







      gpl-3






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      F.Jiang is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      F.Jiang is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      F.Jiang is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 1 hour ago









      F.Jiang

      61




      61




      New contributor




      F.Jiang is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      F.Jiang is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      F.Jiang is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          The GPLv3 licence of the original requires that, if you create a work which is (in copyright terms) a derivative of the original, and you distribute your derivative, you must do so under GPLv3.



          It's not clear to me in what sense you're using translate. If you mean it in the linguistic sense, translating from one human language to another, then I can't see any way not to create a derivative.



          If you're using it to mean converting an application from one programming language to another, this is normally referred to as porting. It is possible to do this in a way that doesn't create a derivative work, but it requires two people, and is known as a clean-room reimplementation. To do this, one person must take the current work apart, and express exactly what it does in a document called a functional specification. The other person then, without ever seeing the original work or directly communicating with the first person, implements the functional specification in the new computer language. This is an enormous amount of work. If you decide to do the port by yourself it is very likely that the work you create would be regarded as a derivative of the original work.






          share|improve this answer




















            Your Answer







            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "619"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );






            F.Jiang is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fopensource.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f7464%2fcan-i-translate-app-under-gplv3-into-swift-without-using-glpv3%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote













            The GPLv3 licence of the original requires that, if you create a work which is (in copyright terms) a derivative of the original, and you distribute your derivative, you must do so under GPLv3.



            It's not clear to me in what sense you're using translate. If you mean it in the linguistic sense, translating from one human language to another, then I can't see any way not to create a derivative.



            If you're using it to mean converting an application from one programming language to another, this is normally referred to as porting. It is possible to do this in a way that doesn't create a derivative work, but it requires two people, and is known as a clean-room reimplementation. To do this, one person must take the current work apart, and express exactly what it does in a document called a functional specification. The other person then, without ever seeing the original work or directly communicating with the first person, implements the functional specification in the new computer language. This is an enormous amount of work. If you decide to do the port by yourself it is very likely that the work you create would be regarded as a derivative of the original work.






            share|improve this answer
























              up vote
              2
              down vote













              The GPLv3 licence of the original requires that, if you create a work which is (in copyright terms) a derivative of the original, and you distribute your derivative, you must do so under GPLv3.



              It's not clear to me in what sense you're using translate. If you mean it in the linguistic sense, translating from one human language to another, then I can't see any way not to create a derivative.



              If you're using it to mean converting an application from one programming language to another, this is normally referred to as porting. It is possible to do this in a way that doesn't create a derivative work, but it requires two people, and is known as a clean-room reimplementation. To do this, one person must take the current work apart, and express exactly what it does in a document called a functional specification. The other person then, without ever seeing the original work or directly communicating with the first person, implements the functional specification in the new computer language. This is an enormous amount of work. If you decide to do the port by yourself it is very likely that the work you create would be regarded as a derivative of the original work.






              share|improve this answer






















                up vote
                2
                down vote










                up vote
                2
                down vote









                The GPLv3 licence of the original requires that, if you create a work which is (in copyright terms) a derivative of the original, and you distribute your derivative, you must do so under GPLv3.



                It's not clear to me in what sense you're using translate. If you mean it in the linguistic sense, translating from one human language to another, then I can't see any way not to create a derivative.



                If you're using it to mean converting an application from one programming language to another, this is normally referred to as porting. It is possible to do this in a way that doesn't create a derivative work, but it requires two people, and is known as a clean-room reimplementation. To do this, one person must take the current work apart, and express exactly what it does in a document called a functional specification. The other person then, without ever seeing the original work or directly communicating with the first person, implements the functional specification in the new computer language. This is an enormous amount of work. If you decide to do the port by yourself it is very likely that the work you create would be regarded as a derivative of the original work.






                share|improve this answer












                The GPLv3 licence of the original requires that, if you create a work which is (in copyright terms) a derivative of the original, and you distribute your derivative, you must do so under GPLv3.



                It's not clear to me in what sense you're using translate. If you mean it in the linguistic sense, translating from one human language to another, then I can't see any way not to create a derivative.



                If you're using it to mean converting an application from one programming language to another, this is normally referred to as porting. It is possible to do this in a way that doesn't create a derivative work, but it requires two people, and is known as a clean-room reimplementation. To do this, one person must take the current work apart, and express exactly what it does in a document called a functional specification. The other person then, without ever seeing the original work or directly communicating with the first person, implements the functional specification in the new computer language. This is an enormous amount of work. If you decide to do the port by yourself it is very likely that the work you create would be regarded as a derivative of the original work.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 1 hour ago









                MadHatter

                7,0691533




                7,0691533




















                    F.Jiang is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


















                    F.Jiang is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    F.Jiang is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                    F.Jiang is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fopensource.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f7464%2fcan-i-translate-app-under-gplv3-into-swift-without-using-glpv3%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

                    Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

                    Confectionery