Limit of quotient

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












I recently learned that when you are solving for the limit of a quotient, you have to divide everything by the highest number in the denominator, like this



$$ lim_x to infty fracsqrt4 x^2 - 4x+5 = lim_x to infty fracsqrt4 - frac4x^21 + frac5x = 2.$$



But I don't quite understand how when $x to - infty$ , the answer changes to $-2$, since when you divide everything by the highest power, it gives
$$fracsqrt4-frac4x^21+frac5x,$$ meaning that even if you put negative infinity in the place of $x$, it still only gives $0$ and leaves $2$ as the final answer.



Why does the answer change to $-2$? I understand that it must be $-2$ when I look at the graph, I just don't understand the algebra part of it.










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 2




    Please try to make the titles of your questions more informative. For example, Why does $a<b$ imply $a+c<b+c$? is much more useful for other users than A question about inequality. From How can I ask a good question?: Make your title as descriptive as possible. In many cases one can actually phrase the title as the question, at least in such a way so as to be comprehensible to an expert reader. You can find more tips for choosing a good title here.
    – Shaun
    1 hour ago














up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












I recently learned that when you are solving for the limit of a quotient, you have to divide everything by the highest number in the denominator, like this



$$ lim_x to infty fracsqrt4 x^2 - 4x+5 = lim_x to infty fracsqrt4 - frac4x^21 + frac5x = 2.$$



But I don't quite understand how when $x to - infty$ , the answer changes to $-2$, since when you divide everything by the highest power, it gives
$$fracsqrt4-frac4x^21+frac5x,$$ meaning that even if you put negative infinity in the place of $x$, it still only gives $0$ and leaves $2$ as the final answer.



Why does the answer change to $-2$? I understand that it must be $-2$ when I look at the graph, I just don't understand the algebra part of it.










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 2




    Please try to make the titles of your questions more informative. For example, Why does $a<b$ imply $a+c<b+c$? is much more useful for other users than A question about inequality. From How can I ask a good question?: Make your title as descriptive as possible. In many cases one can actually phrase the title as the question, at least in such a way so as to be comprehensible to an expert reader. You can find more tips for choosing a good title here.
    – Shaun
    1 hour ago












up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1






1





I recently learned that when you are solving for the limit of a quotient, you have to divide everything by the highest number in the denominator, like this



$$ lim_x to infty fracsqrt4 x^2 - 4x+5 = lim_x to infty fracsqrt4 - frac4x^21 + frac5x = 2.$$



But I don't quite understand how when $x to - infty$ , the answer changes to $-2$, since when you divide everything by the highest power, it gives
$$fracsqrt4-frac4x^21+frac5x,$$ meaning that even if you put negative infinity in the place of $x$, it still only gives $0$ and leaves $2$ as the final answer.



Why does the answer change to $-2$? I understand that it must be $-2$ when I look at the graph, I just don't understand the algebra part of it.










share|cite|improve this question















I recently learned that when you are solving for the limit of a quotient, you have to divide everything by the highest number in the denominator, like this



$$ lim_x to infty fracsqrt4 x^2 - 4x+5 = lim_x to infty fracsqrt4 - frac4x^21 + frac5x = 2.$$



But I don't quite understand how when $x to - infty$ , the answer changes to $-2$, since when you divide everything by the highest power, it gives
$$fracsqrt4-frac4x^21+frac5x,$$ meaning that even if you put negative infinity in the place of $x$, it still only gives $0$ and leaves $2$ as the final answer.



Why does the answer change to $-2$? I understand that it must be $-2$ when I look at the graph, I just don't understand the algebra part of it.







limits






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









Leucippus

18.9k92769




18.9k92769










asked 1 hour ago









nox15

334




334







  • 2




    Please try to make the titles of your questions more informative. For example, Why does $a<b$ imply $a+c<b+c$? is much more useful for other users than A question about inequality. From How can I ask a good question?: Make your title as descriptive as possible. In many cases one can actually phrase the title as the question, at least in such a way so as to be comprehensible to an expert reader. You can find more tips for choosing a good title here.
    – Shaun
    1 hour ago












  • 2




    Please try to make the titles of your questions more informative. For example, Why does $a<b$ imply $a+c<b+c$? is much more useful for other users than A question about inequality. From How can I ask a good question?: Make your title as descriptive as possible. In many cases one can actually phrase the title as the question, at least in such a way so as to be comprehensible to an expert reader. You can find more tips for choosing a good title here.
    – Shaun
    1 hour ago







2




2




Please try to make the titles of your questions more informative. For example, Why does $a<b$ imply $a+c<b+c$? is much more useful for other users than A question about inequality. From How can I ask a good question?: Make your title as descriptive as possible. In many cases one can actually phrase the title as the question, at least in such a way so as to be comprehensible to an expert reader. You can find more tips for choosing a good title here.
– Shaun
1 hour ago




Please try to make the titles of your questions more informative. For example, Why does $a<b$ imply $a+c<b+c$? is much more useful for other users than A question about inequality. From How can I ask a good question?: Make your title as descriptive as possible. In many cases one can actually phrase the title as the question, at least in such a way so as to be comprehensible to an expert reader. You can find more tips for choosing a good title here.
– Shaun
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










As @Martin Argerami said, $sqrtx^2 = |x|$, and not $x$. When you want to solve a limit which has square roots, you have to do the following:



$lim_xto infty fracsqrt4x^2-4x+5=sqrtlim_xtoinftyfrac4x^2-4(x+5)^2$



The reason we could do this, is that when $xto infty$ the denominator is positive, the numerator is positive, hence the whole answer is positive. Our answer is under a square root which means our answer is consistent. (the square root of a real number is non negative.) However, when $xto -infty$, you can say that the result is negative, since the numerator is positive and the denominator is negative. In other words: $x + 5 = - sqrt(x + 5)^2$, because $|x + 5| = -(x + 5)$. So:
$lim_xto -infty fracsqrt4x^2-4x+5=-sqrtlim_xto-inftyfrac4x^2-4(x+5)^2$




$ lim sqrtf(x)^2 = pm lim f(x)$






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • Thank you. But I understand how you can derive -2 from the equation √(4x^2-4)/(x+5). I also know that √x^2=absolute value of x. What I don't get is how the method of dividing everything by the highest power and getting √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x) does not work with negative infinity. Even if I plug in negative infinity into √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x), it only gives 2 as the answer. Does that mean I can't use this method with limits in which x approaches negative infinity?
    – nox15
    43 mins ago










  • It works, the only problem with square root is that the result is always positive. Essentially what I mean is that lets say you want to calculate $x$, and instead you calculate $sqrtx^2$. The latter is always positive, regardless of the sign of $x$. When you want to take everything under the square root, you first have to find the sign of the answer(in this case negative since $x+5$ is negative), then add a negative sign behind the square root to make the answer negative.
    – Soroush khoubyarian
    40 mins ago










  • I perfectly understand what you mean. The numerator cannot be negative so it all depends on the denominator, and when the x is bigger than 5, the denominator becomes 5, thus giving a negative number and -2 as the limit when x is approaching negative infinity. I understand why it's -2. What I don't get is why the shortcut doesn't work with negative infinity. I learned that the shortcut is to divide everything by the highest power. So I do that.
    – nox15
    29 mins ago










  • Then I get√(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x) When x is approaching infinity, I just plug in infinity and see that it becomes √(4+0)/(1+0). So the limit is 2. I try that with the x is approaching negative infinity by plugging in negative infinity into the equation, which again gives √(4+0)/(1+0), or 2, instead of - 2. I just don't get why the shortcut wouldn't give me the right answer.
    – nox15
    28 mins ago











  • The shortcut is ONLY AND ONLY true for rational functions. What you have is not rational, because the numerator is not a polynomial. What you have to do, is that you need to take the square root outside of the limit, then your limit ends up being a rational function. (Rational function is the division between two polynomials)
    – Soroush khoubyarian
    23 mins ago


















up vote
3
down vote













You are making a mistake that is incredibly common, because it is taught very very poorly in school. The "secret" is that
$$
sqrtx^2=|x|,
$$
and not $x$. When $xgeq0$ you get $x$, but when $x<0$ you get $-x$.



In your manipulations, you wrote $$ fracsqrt4 x^2 - 4x+5 = fracsqrt4 - frac4x^21 + frac5x .$$ Try that "equality" with $x=-10$, for instance.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • I don't quite understand. Could you elaborate on it?
    – nox15
    1 hour ago










  • I'm sure you think that $sqrtx^2=x$. Try it with $x=-5$.
    – Martin Argerami
    1 hour ago







  • 1




    What is being said is, for example $x = pm a$, leads to $x^2 = a^2$. When taking a square root, as in $sqrtx^2 = sqrta^2 = sqrt = |a|$, then signs must be considered. If $x geq 0$ then $x = +a$ and if $x leq 0$ then $x = - a$.
    – Leucippus
    1 hour ago











  • I think I haven't made myself clear. I understand how you can derive -2 from the equation √(4x^2-4)/(x+5). I also know that √x^2=absolute value of x. What I don't get is how the method of dividing everything by the highest power and getting √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x) does not work with negative infinity. Even if I plug in negative infinity into √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x), it only gives 2 as the answer. Does that mean I can't use this method with limits in which x approaches negative infinity?
    – nox15
    45 mins ago











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2918223%2flimit-of-quotient%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










As @Martin Argerami said, $sqrtx^2 = |x|$, and not $x$. When you want to solve a limit which has square roots, you have to do the following:



$lim_xto infty fracsqrt4x^2-4x+5=sqrtlim_xtoinftyfrac4x^2-4(x+5)^2$



The reason we could do this, is that when $xto infty$ the denominator is positive, the numerator is positive, hence the whole answer is positive. Our answer is under a square root which means our answer is consistent. (the square root of a real number is non negative.) However, when $xto -infty$, you can say that the result is negative, since the numerator is positive and the denominator is negative. In other words: $x + 5 = - sqrt(x + 5)^2$, because $|x + 5| = -(x + 5)$. So:
$lim_xto -infty fracsqrt4x^2-4x+5=-sqrtlim_xto-inftyfrac4x^2-4(x+5)^2$




$ lim sqrtf(x)^2 = pm lim f(x)$






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • Thank you. But I understand how you can derive -2 from the equation √(4x^2-4)/(x+5). I also know that √x^2=absolute value of x. What I don't get is how the method of dividing everything by the highest power and getting √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x) does not work with negative infinity. Even if I plug in negative infinity into √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x), it only gives 2 as the answer. Does that mean I can't use this method with limits in which x approaches negative infinity?
    – nox15
    43 mins ago










  • It works, the only problem with square root is that the result is always positive. Essentially what I mean is that lets say you want to calculate $x$, and instead you calculate $sqrtx^2$. The latter is always positive, regardless of the sign of $x$. When you want to take everything under the square root, you first have to find the sign of the answer(in this case negative since $x+5$ is negative), then add a negative sign behind the square root to make the answer negative.
    – Soroush khoubyarian
    40 mins ago










  • I perfectly understand what you mean. The numerator cannot be negative so it all depends on the denominator, and when the x is bigger than 5, the denominator becomes 5, thus giving a negative number and -2 as the limit when x is approaching negative infinity. I understand why it's -2. What I don't get is why the shortcut doesn't work with negative infinity. I learned that the shortcut is to divide everything by the highest power. So I do that.
    – nox15
    29 mins ago










  • Then I get√(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x) When x is approaching infinity, I just plug in infinity and see that it becomes √(4+0)/(1+0). So the limit is 2. I try that with the x is approaching negative infinity by plugging in negative infinity into the equation, which again gives √(4+0)/(1+0), or 2, instead of - 2. I just don't get why the shortcut wouldn't give me the right answer.
    – nox15
    28 mins ago











  • The shortcut is ONLY AND ONLY true for rational functions. What you have is not rational, because the numerator is not a polynomial. What you have to do, is that you need to take the square root outside of the limit, then your limit ends up being a rational function. (Rational function is the division between two polynomials)
    – Soroush khoubyarian
    23 mins ago















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










As @Martin Argerami said, $sqrtx^2 = |x|$, and not $x$. When you want to solve a limit which has square roots, you have to do the following:



$lim_xto infty fracsqrt4x^2-4x+5=sqrtlim_xtoinftyfrac4x^2-4(x+5)^2$



The reason we could do this, is that when $xto infty$ the denominator is positive, the numerator is positive, hence the whole answer is positive. Our answer is under a square root which means our answer is consistent. (the square root of a real number is non negative.) However, when $xto -infty$, you can say that the result is negative, since the numerator is positive and the denominator is negative. In other words: $x + 5 = - sqrt(x + 5)^2$, because $|x + 5| = -(x + 5)$. So:
$lim_xto -infty fracsqrt4x^2-4x+5=-sqrtlim_xto-inftyfrac4x^2-4(x+5)^2$




$ lim sqrtf(x)^2 = pm lim f(x)$






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • Thank you. But I understand how you can derive -2 from the equation √(4x^2-4)/(x+5). I also know that √x^2=absolute value of x. What I don't get is how the method of dividing everything by the highest power and getting √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x) does not work with negative infinity. Even if I plug in negative infinity into √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x), it only gives 2 as the answer. Does that mean I can't use this method with limits in which x approaches negative infinity?
    – nox15
    43 mins ago










  • It works, the only problem with square root is that the result is always positive. Essentially what I mean is that lets say you want to calculate $x$, and instead you calculate $sqrtx^2$. The latter is always positive, regardless of the sign of $x$. When you want to take everything under the square root, you first have to find the sign of the answer(in this case negative since $x+5$ is negative), then add a negative sign behind the square root to make the answer negative.
    – Soroush khoubyarian
    40 mins ago










  • I perfectly understand what you mean. The numerator cannot be negative so it all depends on the denominator, and when the x is bigger than 5, the denominator becomes 5, thus giving a negative number and -2 as the limit when x is approaching negative infinity. I understand why it's -2. What I don't get is why the shortcut doesn't work with negative infinity. I learned that the shortcut is to divide everything by the highest power. So I do that.
    – nox15
    29 mins ago










  • Then I get√(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x) When x is approaching infinity, I just plug in infinity and see that it becomes √(4+0)/(1+0). So the limit is 2. I try that with the x is approaching negative infinity by plugging in negative infinity into the equation, which again gives √(4+0)/(1+0), or 2, instead of - 2. I just don't get why the shortcut wouldn't give me the right answer.
    – nox15
    28 mins ago











  • The shortcut is ONLY AND ONLY true for rational functions. What you have is not rational, because the numerator is not a polynomial. What you have to do, is that you need to take the square root outside of the limit, then your limit ends up being a rational function. (Rational function is the division between two polynomials)
    – Soroush khoubyarian
    23 mins ago













up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






As @Martin Argerami said, $sqrtx^2 = |x|$, and not $x$. When you want to solve a limit which has square roots, you have to do the following:



$lim_xto infty fracsqrt4x^2-4x+5=sqrtlim_xtoinftyfrac4x^2-4(x+5)^2$



The reason we could do this, is that when $xto infty$ the denominator is positive, the numerator is positive, hence the whole answer is positive. Our answer is under a square root which means our answer is consistent. (the square root of a real number is non negative.) However, when $xto -infty$, you can say that the result is negative, since the numerator is positive and the denominator is negative. In other words: $x + 5 = - sqrt(x + 5)^2$, because $|x + 5| = -(x + 5)$. So:
$lim_xto -infty fracsqrt4x^2-4x+5=-sqrtlim_xto-inftyfrac4x^2-4(x+5)^2$




$ lim sqrtf(x)^2 = pm lim f(x)$






share|cite|improve this answer














As @Martin Argerami said, $sqrtx^2 = |x|$, and not $x$. When you want to solve a limit which has square roots, you have to do the following:



$lim_xto infty fracsqrt4x^2-4x+5=sqrtlim_xtoinftyfrac4x^2-4(x+5)^2$



The reason we could do this, is that when $xto infty$ the denominator is positive, the numerator is positive, hence the whole answer is positive. Our answer is under a square root which means our answer is consistent. (the square root of a real number is non negative.) However, when $xto -infty$, you can say that the result is negative, since the numerator is positive and the denominator is negative. In other words: $x + 5 = - sqrt(x + 5)^2$, because $|x + 5| = -(x + 5)$. So:
$lim_xto -infty fracsqrt4x^2-4x+5=-sqrtlim_xto-inftyfrac4x^2-4(x+5)^2$




$ lim sqrtf(x)^2 = pm lim f(x)$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 16 mins ago

























answered 58 mins ago









Soroush khoubyarian

588212




588212











  • Thank you. But I understand how you can derive -2 from the equation √(4x^2-4)/(x+5). I also know that √x^2=absolute value of x. What I don't get is how the method of dividing everything by the highest power and getting √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x) does not work with negative infinity. Even if I plug in negative infinity into √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x), it only gives 2 as the answer. Does that mean I can't use this method with limits in which x approaches negative infinity?
    – nox15
    43 mins ago










  • It works, the only problem with square root is that the result is always positive. Essentially what I mean is that lets say you want to calculate $x$, and instead you calculate $sqrtx^2$. The latter is always positive, regardless of the sign of $x$. When you want to take everything under the square root, you first have to find the sign of the answer(in this case negative since $x+5$ is negative), then add a negative sign behind the square root to make the answer negative.
    – Soroush khoubyarian
    40 mins ago










  • I perfectly understand what you mean. The numerator cannot be negative so it all depends on the denominator, and when the x is bigger than 5, the denominator becomes 5, thus giving a negative number and -2 as the limit when x is approaching negative infinity. I understand why it's -2. What I don't get is why the shortcut doesn't work with negative infinity. I learned that the shortcut is to divide everything by the highest power. So I do that.
    – nox15
    29 mins ago










  • Then I get√(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x) When x is approaching infinity, I just plug in infinity and see that it becomes √(4+0)/(1+0). So the limit is 2. I try that with the x is approaching negative infinity by plugging in negative infinity into the equation, which again gives √(4+0)/(1+0), or 2, instead of - 2. I just don't get why the shortcut wouldn't give me the right answer.
    – nox15
    28 mins ago











  • The shortcut is ONLY AND ONLY true for rational functions. What you have is not rational, because the numerator is not a polynomial. What you have to do, is that you need to take the square root outside of the limit, then your limit ends up being a rational function. (Rational function is the division between two polynomials)
    – Soroush khoubyarian
    23 mins ago

















  • Thank you. But I understand how you can derive -2 from the equation √(4x^2-4)/(x+5). I also know that √x^2=absolute value of x. What I don't get is how the method of dividing everything by the highest power and getting √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x) does not work with negative infinity. Even if I plug in negative infinity into √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x), it only gives 2 as the answer. Does that mean I can't use this method with limits in which x approaches negative infinity?
    – nox15
    43 mins ago










  • It works, the only problem with square root is that the result is always positive. Essentially what I mean is that lets say you want to calculate $x$, and instead you calculate $sqrtx^2$. The latter is always positive, regardless of the sign of $x$. When you want to take everything under the square root, you first have to find the sign of the answer(in this case negative since $x+5$ is negative), then add a negative sign behind the square root to make the answer negative.
    – Soroush khoubyarian
    40 mins ago










  • I perfectly understand what you mean. The numerator cannot be negative so it all depends on the denominator, and when the x is bigger than 5, the denominator becomes 5, thus giving a negative number and -2 as the limit when x is approaching negative infinity. I understand why it's -2. What I don't get is why the shortcut doesn't work with negative infinity. I learned that the shortcut is to divide everything by the highest power. So I do that.
    – nox15
    29 mins ago










  • Then I get√(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x) When x is approaching infinity, I just plug in infinity and see that it becomes √(4+0)/(1+0). So the limit is 2. I try that with the x is approaching negative infinity by plugging in negative infinity into the equation, which again gives √(4+0)/(1+0), or 2, instead of - 2. I just don't get why the shortcut wouldn't give me the right answer.
    – nox15
    28 mins ago











  • The shortcut is ONLY AND ONLY true for rational functions. What you have is not rational, because the numerator is not a polynomial. What you have to do, is that you need to take the square root outside of the limit, then your limit ends up being a rational function. (Rational function is the division between two polynomials)
    – Soroush khoubyarian
    23 mins ago
















Thank you. But I understand how you can derive -2 from the equation √(4x^2-4)/(x+5). I also know that √x^2=absolute value of x. What I don't get is how the method of dividing everything by the highest power and getting √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x) does not work with negative infinity. Even if I plug in negative infinity into √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x), it only gives 2 as the answer. Does that mean I can't use this method with limits in which x approaches negative infinity?
– nox15
43 mins ago




Thank you. But I understand how you can derive -2 from the equation √(4x^2-4)/(x+5). I also know that √x^2=absolute value of x. What I don't get is how the method of dividing everything by the highest power and getting √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x) does not work with negative infinity. Even if I plug in negative infinity into √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x), it only gives 2 as the answer. Does that mean I can't use this method with limits in which x approaches negative infinity?
– nox15
43 mins ago












It works, the only problem with square root is that the result is always positive. Essentially what I mean is that lets say you want to calculate $x$, and instead you calculate $sqrtx^2$. The latter is always positive, regardless of the sign of $x$. When you want to take everything under the square root, you first have to find the sign of the answer(in this case negative since $x+5$ is negative), then add a negative sign behind the square root to make the answer negative.
– Soroush khoubyarian
40 mins ago




It works, the only problem with square root is that the result is always positive. Essentially what I mean is that lets say you want to calculate $x$, and instead you calculate $sqrtx^2$. The latter is always positive, regardless of the sign of $x$. When you want to take everything under the square root, you first have to find the sign of the answer(in this case negative since $x+5$ is negative), then add a negative sign behind the square root to make the answer negative.
– Soroush khoubyarian
40 mins ago












I perfectly understand what you mean. The numerator cannot be negative so it all depends on the denominator, and when the x is bigger than 5, the denominator becomes 5, thus giving a negative number and -2 as the limit when x is approaching negative infinity. I understand why it's -2. What I don't get is why the shortcut doesn't work with negative infinity. I learned that the shortcut is to divide everything by the highest power. So I do that.
– nox15
29 mins ago




I perfectly understand what you mean. The numerator cannot be negative so it all depends on the denominator, and when the x is bigger than 5, the denominator becomes 5, thus giving a negative number and -2 as the limit when x is approaching negative infinity. I understand why it's -2. What I don't get is why the shortcut doesn't work with negative infinity. I learned that the shortcut is to divide everything by the highest power. So I do that.
– nox15
29 mins ago












Then I get√(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x) When x is approaching infinity, I just plug in infinity and see that it becomes √(4+0)/(1+0). So the limit is 2. I try that with the x is approaching negative infinity by plugging in negative infinity into the equation, which again gives √(4+0)/(1+0), or 2, instead of - 2. I just don't get why the shortcut wouldn't give me the right answer.
– nox15
28 mins ago





Then I get√(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x) When x is approaching infinity, I just plug in infinity and see that it becomes √(4+0)/(1+0). So the limit is 2. I try that with the x is approaching negative infinity by plugging in negative infinity into the equation, which again gives √(4+0)/(1+0), or 2, instead of - 2. I just don't get why the shortcut wouldn't give me the right answer.
– nox15
28 mins ago













The shortcut is ONLY AND ONLY true for rational functions. What you have is not rational, because the numerator is not a polynomial. What you have to do, is that you need to take the square root outside of the limit, then your limit ends up being a rational function. (Rational function is the division between two polynomials)
– Soroush khoubyarian
23 mins ago





The shortcut is ONLY AND ONLY true for rational functions. What you have is not rational, because the numerator is not a polynomial. What you have to do, is that you need to take the square root outside of the limit, then your limit ends up being a rational function. (Rational function is the division between two polynomials)
– Soroush khoubyarian
23 mins ago











up vote
3
down vote













You are making a mistake that is incredibly common, because it is taught very very poorly in school. The "secret" is that
$$
sqrtx^2=|x|,
$$
and not $x$. When $xgeq0$ you get $x$, but when $x<0$ you get $-x$.



In your manipulations, you wrote $$ fracsqrt4 x^2 - 4x+5 = fracsqrt4 - frac4x^21 + frac5x .$$ Try that "equality" with $x=-10$, for instance.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • I don't quite understand. Could you elaborate on it?
    – nox15
    1 hour ago










  • I'm sure you think that $sqrtx^2=x$. Try it with $x=-5$.
    – Martin Argerami
    1 hour ago







  • 1




    What is being said is, for example $x = pm a$, leads to $x^2 = a^2$. When taking a square root, as in $sqrtx^2 = sqrta^2 = sqrt = |a|$, then signs must be considered. If $x geq 0$ then $x = +a$ and if $x leq 0$ then $x = - a$.
    – Leucippus
    1 hour ago











  • I think I haven't made myself clear. I understand how you can derive -2 from the equation √(4x^2-4)/(x+5). I also know that √x^2=absolute value of x. What I don't get is how the method of dividing everything by the highest power and getting √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x) does not work with negative infinity. Even if I plug in negative infinity into √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x), it only gives 2 as the answer. Does that mean I can't use this method with limits in which x approaches negative infinity?
    – nox15
    45 mins ago















up vote
3
down vote













You are making a mistake that is incredibly common, because it is taught very very poorly in school. The "secret" is that
$$
sqrtx^2=|x|,
$$
and not $x$. When $xgeq0$ you get $x$, but when $x<0$ you get $-x$.



In your manipulations, you wrote $$ fracsqrt4 x^2 - 4x+5 = fracsqrt4 - frac4x^21 + frac5x .$$ Try that "equality" with $x=-10$, for instance.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • I don't quite understand. Could you elaborate on it?
    – nox15
    1 hour ago










  • I'm sure you think that $sqrtx^2=x$. Try it with $x=-5$.
    – Martin Argerami
    1 hour ago







  • 1




    What is being said is, for example $x = pm a$, leads to $x^2 = a^2$. When taking a square root, as in $sqrtx^2 = sqrta^2 = sqrt = |a|$, then signs must be considered. If $x geq 0$ then $x = +a$ and if $x leq 0$ then $x = - a$.
    – Leucippus
    1 hour ago











  • I think I haven't made myself clear. I understand how you can derive -2 from the equation √(4x^2-4)/(x+5). I also know that √x^2=absolute value of x. What I don't get is how the method of dividing everything by the highest power and getting √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x) does not work with negative infinity. Even if I plug in negative infinity into √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x), it only gives 2 as the answer. Does that mean I can't use this method with limits in which x approaches negative infinity?
    – nox15
    45 mins ago













up vote
3
down vote










up vote
3
down vote









You are making a mistake that is incredibly common, because it is taught very very poorly in school. The "secret" is that
$$
sqrtx^2=|x|,
$$
and not $x$. When $xgeq0$ you get $x$, but when $x<0$ you get $-x$.



In your manipulations, you wrote $$ fracsqrt4 x^2 - 4x+5 = fracsqrt4 - frac4x^21 + frac5x .$$ Try that "equality" with $x=-10$, for instance.






share|cite|improve this answer














You are making a mistake that is incredibly common, because it is taught very very poorly in school. The "secret" is that
$$
sqrtx^2=|x|,
$$
and not $x$. When $xgeq0$ you get $x$, but when $x<0$ you get $-x$.



In your manipulations, you wrote $$ fracsqrt4 x^2 - 4x+5 = fracsqrt4 - frac4x^21 + frac5x .$$ Try that "equality" with $x=-10$, for instance.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered 1 hour ago









Martin Argerami

117k1071165




117k1071165











  • I don't quite understand. Could you elaborate on it?
    – nox15
    1 hour ago










  • I'm sure you think that $sqrtx^2=x$. Try it with $x=-5$.
    – Martin Argerami
    1 hour ago







  • 1




    What is being said is, for example $x = pm a$, leads to $x^2 = a^2$. When taking a square root, as in $sqrtx^2 = sqrta^2 = sqrt = |a|$, then signs must be considered. If $x geq 0$ then $x = +a$ and if $x leq 0$ then $x = - a$.
    – Leucippus
    1 hour ago











  • I think I haven't made myself clear. I understand how you can derive -2 from the equation √(4x^2-4)/(x+5). I also know that √x^2=absolute value of x. What I don't get is how the method of dividing everything by the highest power and getting √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x) does not work with negative infinity. Even if I plug in negative infinity into √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x), it only gives 2 as the answer. Does that mean I can't use this method with limits in which x approaches negative infinity?
    – nox15
    45 mins ago

















  • I don't quite understand. Could you elaborate on it?
    – nox15
    1 hour ago










  • I'm sure you think that $sqrtx^2=x$. Try it with $x=-5$.
    – Martin Argerami
    1 hour ago







  • 1




    What is being said is, for example $x = pm a$, leads to $x^2 = a^2$. When taking a square root, as in $sqrtx^2 = sqrta^2 = sqrt = |a|$, then signs must be considered. If $x geq 0$ then $x = +a$ and if $x leq 0$ then $x = - a$.
    – Leucippus
    1 hour ago











  • I think I haven't made myself clear. I understand how you can derive -2 from the equation √(4x^2-4)/(x+5). I also know that √x^2=absolute value of x. What I don't get is how the method of dividing everything by the highest power and getting √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x) does not work with negative infinity. Even if I plug in negative infinity into √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x), it only gives 2 as the answer. Does that mean I can't use this method with limits in which x approaches negative infinity?
    – nox15
    45 mins ago
















I don't quite understand. Could you elaborate on it?
– nox15
1 hour ago




I don't quite understand. Could you elaborate on it?
– nox15
1 hour ago












I'm sure you think that $sqrtx^2=x$. Try it with $x=-5$.
– Martin Argerami
1 hour ago





I'm sure you think that $sqrtx^2=x$. Try it with $x=-5$.
– Martin Argerami
1 hour ago





1




1




What is being said is, for example $x = pm a$, leads to $x^2 = a^2$. When taking a square root, as in $sqrtx^2 = sqrta^2 = sqrt = |a|$, then signs must be considered. If $x geq 0$ then $x = +a$ and if $x leq 0$ then $x = - a$.
– Leucippus
1 hour ago





What is being said is, for example $x = pm a$, leads to $x^2 = a^2$. When taking a square root, as in $sqrtx^2 = sqrta^2 = sqrt = |a|$, then signs must be considered. If $x geq 0$ then $x = +a$ and if $x leq 0$ then $x = - a$.
– Leucippus
1 hour ago













I think I haven't made myself clear. I understand how you can derive -2 from the equation √(4x^2-4)/(x+5). I also know that √x^2=absolute value of x. What I don't get is how the method of dividing everything by the highest power and getting √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x) does not work with negative infinity. Even if I plug in negative infinity into √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x), it only gives 2 as the answer. Does that mean I can't use this method with limits in which x approaches negative infinity?
– nox15
45 mins ago





I think I haven't made myself clear. I understand how you can derive -2 from the equation √(4x^2-4)/(x+5). I also know that √x^2=absolute value of x. What I don't get is how the method of dividing everything by the highest power and getting √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x) does not work with negative infinity. Even if I plug in negative infinity into √(4-4/x^2)/(1+5/x), it only gives 2 as the answer. Does that mean I can't use this method with limits in which x approaches negative infinity?
– nox15
45 mins ago


















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2918223%2flimit-of-quotient%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

Confectionery