Do Arithmetic Mean and Geometric Mean of Prime Numbers converge?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
10
down vote

favorite
4












I was looking at a list of primes. I noticed that $ fracAM (p_1, p_2, ldots, p_n)p_n$ seemed to converge.



This led me to try $ fracGM (p_1, p_2, ldots, p_n)p_n$ which also seemed to converge.



I did a quick Excel graph and regression and found the former seemed to converge to $frac12$ and latter to $frac1e$. As with anything related to primes, no easy reasoning seemed to point to those results (however, for all natural numbers it was trivial to show that the former asymptotically tended to $frac12$).



Are these observations correct and are there any proofs towards:



$$

lim_ntoinfty left( fracAM (p_1, p_2, ldots, p_n)p_n right)
= frac12 tag1

$$



$$

lim_ntoinfty left( fracGM (p_1, p_2, ldots, p_n)p_n right)
= frac1e tag2

$$










share|cite|improve this question























  • Can we take $p_n = ncdot log(n)$ in these limits? (using the prime numbers theorem)
    – Yanko
    22 mins ago















up vote
10
down vote

favorite
4












I was looking at a list of primes. I noticed that $ fracAM (p_1, p_2, ldots, p_n)p_n$ seemed to converge.



This led me to try $ fracGM (p_1, p_2, ldots, p_n)p_n$ which also seemed to converge.



I did a quick Excel graph and regression and found the former seemed to converge to $frac12$ and latter to $frac1e$. As with anything related to primes, no easy reasoning seemed to point to those results (however, for all natural numbers it was trivial to show that the former asymptotically tended to $frac12$).



Are these observations correct and are there any proofs towards:



$$

lim_ntoinfty left( fracAM (p_1, p_2, ldots, p_n)p_n right)
= frac12 tag1

$$



$$

lim_ntoinfty left( fracGM (p_1, p_2, ldots, p_n)p_n right)
= frac1e tag2

$$










share|cite|improve this question























  • Can we take $p_n = ncdot log(n)$ in these limits? (using the prime numbers theorem)
    – Yanko
    22 mins ago













up vote
10
down vote

favorite
4









up vote
10
down vote

favorite
4






4





I was looking at a list of primes. I noticed that $ fracAM (p_1, p_2, ldots, p_n)p_n$ seemed to converge.



This led me to try $ fracGM (p_1, p_2, ldots, p_n)p_n$ which also seemed to converge.



I did a quick Excel graph and regression and found the former seemed to converge to $frac12$ and latter to $frac1e$. As with anything related to primes, no easy reasoning seemed to point to those results (however, for all natural numbers it was trivial to show that the former asymptotically tended to $frac12$).



Are these observations correct and are there any proofs towards:



$$

lim_ntoinfty left( fracAM (p_1, p_2, ldots, p_n)p_n right)
= frac12 tag1

$$



$$

lim_ntoinfty left( fracGM (p_1, p_2, ldots, p_n)p_n right)
= frac1e tag2

$$










share|cite|improve this question















I was looking at a list of primes. I noticed that $ fracAM (p_1, p_2, ldots, p_n)p_n$ seemed to converge.



This led me to try $ fracGM (p_1, p_2, ldots, p_n)p_n$ which also seemed to converge.



I did a quick Excel graph and regression and found the former seemed to converge to $frac12$ and latter to $frac1e$. As with anything related to primes, no easy reasoning seemed to point to those results (however, for all natural numbers it was trivial to show that the former asymptotically tended to $frac12$).



Are these observations correct and are there any proofs towards:



$$

lim_ntoinfty left( fracAM (p_1, p_2, ldots, p_n)p_n right)
= frac12 tag1

$$



$$

lim_ntoinfty left( fracGM (p_1, p_2, ldots, p_n)p_n right)
= frac1e tag2

$$







number-theory elementary-number-theory prime-numbers






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 36 mins ago









Théophile

17.2k12438




17.2k12438










asked 44 mins ago









Soham

1324




1324











  • Can we take $p_n = ncdot log(n)$ in these limits? (using the prime numbers theorem)
    – Yanko
    22 mins ago

















  • Can we take $p_n = ncdot log(n)$ in these limits? (using the prime numbers theorem)
    – Yanko
    22 mins ago
















Can we take $p_n = ncdot log(n)$ in these limits? (using the prime numbers theorem)
– Yanko
22 mins ago





Can we take $p_n = ncdot log(n)$ in these limits? (using the prime numbers theorem)
– Yanko
22 mins ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













We can use the simple version of the prime counting function
$$p_n approx n log n$$ and plug it into your expressions. For the arithmetic one, this becomes $$lim_n to infty frac sum_i=1^n p_inp_n=lim_n to inftyfrac log(H(n))n^2log(n)$$
Where $H(n)$ is the hyperfactorial function. We can use the expansion given on the Mathworld page to get
$$log H(n)approx log A -frac n^24+left(frac n(n+1)2+frac 112right)log (n)$$
and the limit is duly $frac 12$



I didn't find a nice expression for the product of the primes.






share|cite|improve this answer



























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Your conjecture for GM was proved in 2011 in the short paper On a limit involving the product of prime numbers by József Sándor and Antoine Verroken.




    Abstract. Let $p_k$ denote the $k$th prime number. The aim of this note is to prove that the limit of the sequence $(p_n / sqrt[n]p_1 cdots p_n)$ is $e$.




    The authors obtain the result based on the prime number theorem, i.e.,
    $$p approx n log n quad textrmas n to infty$$
    as well as an inequality with Chebyshev's function $$theta(x) = sum_p le xlog p$$
    where $p$ are primes less than $x$.






    share|cite|improve this answer






















    • That contradicts my numerical observations. Could you please point out where I've gone wrong?
      – TheSimpliFire
      9 mins ago










    • @TheSimpliFire I think we simply can't conclude that the sequence is strictly decreasing based on the first $15$ values. In a paper from 2016 on the same topic, the author points out that the sequence converges slowly.
      – Théophile
      6 mins ago











    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2917887%2fdo-arithmetic-mean-and-geometric-mean-of-prime-numbers-converge%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    3
    down vote













    We can use the simple version of the prime counting function
    $$p_n approx n log n$$ and plug it into your expressions. For the arithmetic one, this becomes $$lim_n to infty frac sum_i=1^n p_inp_n=lim_n to inftyfrac log(H(n))n^2log(n)$$
    Where $H(n)$ is the hyperfactorial function. We can use the expansion given on the Mathworld page to get
    $$log H(n)approx log A -frac n^24+left(frac n(n+1)2+frac 112right)log (n)$$
    and the limit is duly $frac 12$



    I didn't find a nice expression for the product of the primes.






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      3
      down vote













      We can use the simple version of the prime counting function
      $$p_n approx n log n$$ and plug it into your expressions. For the arithmetic one, this becomes $$lim_n to infty frac sum_i=1^n p_inp_n=lim_n to inftyfrac log(H(n))n^2log(n)$$
      Where $H(n)$ is the hyperfactorial function. We can use the expansion given on the Mathworld page to get
      $$log H(n)approx log A -frac n^24+left(frac n(n+1)2+frac 112right)log (n)$$
      and the limit is duly $frac 12$



      I didn't find a nice expression for the product of the primes.






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        3
        down vote










        up vote
        3
        down vote









        We can use the simple version of the prime counting function
        $$p_n approx n log n$$ and plug it into your expressions. For the arithmetic one, this becomes $$lim_n to infty frac sum_i=1^n p_inp_n=lim_n to inftyfrac log(H(n))n^2log(n)$$
        Where $H(n)$ is the hyperfactorial function. We can use the expansion given on the Mathworld page to get
        $$log H(n)approx log A -frac n^24+left(frac n(n+1)2+frac 112right)log (n)$$
        and the limit is duly $frac 12$



        I didn't find a nice expression for the product of the primes.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        We can use the simple version of the prime counting function
        $$p_n approx n log n$$ and plug it into your expressions. For the arithmetic one, this becomes $$lim_n to infty frac sum_i=1^n p_inp_n=lim_n to inftyfrac log(H(n))n^2log(n)$$
        Where $H(n)$ is the hyperfactorial function. We can use the expansion given on the Mathworld page to get
        $$log H(n)approx log A -frac n^24+left(frac n(n+1)2+frac 112right)log (n)$$
        and the limit is duly $frac 12$



        I didn't find a nice expression for the product of the primes.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 10 mins ago









        Ross Millikan

        280k23189356




        280k23189356




















            up vote
            2
            down vote













            Your conjecture for GM was proved in 2011 in the short paper On a limit involving the product of prime numbers by József Sándor and Antoine Verroken.




            Abstract. Let $p_k$ denote the $k$th prime number. The aim of this note is to prove that the limit of the sequence $(p_n / sqrt[n]p_1 cdots p_n)$ is $e$.




            The authors obtain the result based on the prime number theorem, i.e.,
            $$p approx n log n quad textrmas n to infty$$
            as well as an inequality with Chebyshev's function $$theta(x) = sum_p le xlog p$$
            where $p$ are primes less than $x$.






            share|cite|improve this answer






















            • That contradicts my numerical observations. Could you please point out where I've gone wrong?
              – TheSimpliFire
              9 mins ago










            • @TheSimpliFire I think we simply can't conclude that the sequence is strictly decreasing based on the first $15$ values. In a paper from 2016 on the same topic, the author points out that the sequence converges slowly.
              – Théophile
              6 mins ago















            up vote
            2
            down vote













            Your conjecture for GM was proved in 2011 in the short paper On a limit involving the product of prime numbers by József Sándor and Antoine Verroken.




            Abstract. Let $p_k$ denote the $k$th prime number. The aim of this note is to prove that the limit of the sequence $(p_n / sqrt[n]p_1 cdots p_n)$ is $e$.




            The authors obtain the result based on the prime number theorem, i.e.,
            $$p approx n log n quad textrmas n to infty$$
            as well as an inequality with Chebyshev's function $$theta(x) = sum_p le xlog p$$
            where $p$ are primes less than $x$.






            share|cite|improve this answer






















            • That contradicts my numerical observations. Could you please point out where I've gone wrong?
              – TheSimpliFire
              9 mins ago










            • @TheSimpliFire I think we simply can't conclude that the sequence is strictly decreasing based on the first $15$ values. In a paper from 2016 on the same topic, the author points out that the sequence converges slowly.
              – Théophile
              6 mins ago













            up vote
            2
            down vote










            up vote
            2
            down vote









            Your conjecture for GM was proved in 2011 in the short paper On a limit involving the product of prime numbers by József Sándor and Antoine Verroken.




            Abstract. Let $p_k$ denote the $k$th prime number. The aim of this note is to prove that the limit of the sequence $(p_n / sqrt[n]p_1 cdots p_n)$ is $e$.




            The authors obtain the result based on the prime number theorem, i.e.,
            $$p approx n log n quad textrmas n to infty$$
            as well as an inequality with Chebyshev's function $$theta(x) = sum_p le xlog p$$
            where $p$ are primes less than $x$.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            Your conjecture for GM was proved in 2011 in the short paper On a limit involving the product of prime numbers by József Sándor and Antoine Verroken.




            Abstract. Let $p_k$ denote the $k$th prime number. The aim of this note is to prove that the limit of the sequence $(p_n / sqrt[n]p_1 cdots p_n)$ is $e$.




            The authors obtain the result based on the prime number theorem, i.e.,
            $$p approx n log n quad textrmas n to infty$$
            as well as an inequality with Chebyshev's function $$theta(x) = sum_p le xlog p$$
            where $p$ are primes less than $x$.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 1 min ago

























            answered 12 mins ago









            Théophile

            17.2k12438




            17.2k12438











            • That contradicts my numerical observations. Could you please point out where I've gone wrong?
              – TheSimpliFire
              9 mins ago










            • @TheSimpliFire I think we simply can't conclude that the sequence is strictly decreasing based on the first $15$ values. In a paper from 2016 on the same topic, the author points out that the sequence converges slowly.
              – Théophile
              6 mins ago

















            • That contradicts my numerical observations. Could you please point out where I've gone wrong?
              – TheSimpliFire
              9 mins ago










            • @TheSimpliFire I think we simply can't conclude that the sequence is strictly decreasing based on the first $15$ values. In a paper from 2016 on the same topic, the author points out that the sequence converges slowly.
              – Théophile
              6 mins ago
















            That contradicts my numerical observations. Could you please point out where I've gone wrong?
            – TheSimpliFire
            9 mins ago




            That contradicts my numerical observations. Could you please point out where I've gone wrong?
            – TheSimpliFire
            9 mins ago












            @TheSimpliFire I think we simply can't conclude that the sequence is strictly decreasing based on the first $15$ values. In a paper from 2016 on the same topic, the author points out that the sequence converges slowly.
            – Théophile
            6 mins ago





            @TheSimpliFire I think we simply can't conclude that the sequence is strictly decreasing based on the first $15$ values. In a paper from 2016 on the same topic, the author points out that the sequence converges slowly.
            – Théophile
            6 mins ago


















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2917887%2fdo-arithmetic-mean-and-geometric-mean-of-prime-numbers-converge%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

            Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

            Confectionery