About the universal property of initial and final topologies

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
2












I have recently seen in my topology course that if $X$ is any set,



  1. Given a family of functions $f_i : X to Y_i_i in I$, with $(Y_i, tau_i)_i$ topological spaces, the initial topology on $X$ with respect to this family is the one generated by $f_i^-1(U_i) : i in I, U_i in tau_i $, which is the coarsest such that the functions $f_i$ are continuous, and verifies $h : Z to X$ continuous if and only if $f_ih$ is continuous for all $i$ in $I$.


  2. In a similar way, given a family $f_i : Y_i to X_i in I$, the final topology $tau$ in $X$ is defined by $U in tau $ if and only if $f_i^-1(U) in tau_i (forall i in I)$. This is the finest topology such that the family is countinuous, and $h : X to Z$ is continuous if and only if $hf_i$ is for all $i in I$.


It was also mentioned that the reciprocal of both statements is true, i.e. that if a topological space $(X, tau)$ verifies $h : Z to X$ (resp. $h:X to Z$) continuous if and only if $f_ih$ (resp. $hf_i$) continuous for all $i$, for all $h$, it has the initial (resp. final) topology with respect to the family $(f_i)_i$.



It is easy to see taking $h equiv id $ that the given topology $tau$ is finer/coarser than the initial/final topology, because all the functions $f_i$ are continuous.



Any hints on how to prove the other inclusion?










share|cite|improve this question























  • @celtschk I totally had a typo there, I've fixed it.
    – Guido A.
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    Ok, now it makes sense.
    – celtschk
    3 hours ago










  • "which is the coarser so that the functions" -- this seems like a typo?
    – Theoretical Economist
    3 hours ago










  • @TheoreticalEconomist gramatically or conceptually? I tried to say that this is the topology with 'less open sets' so that every function in the family is continuous.
    – Guido A.
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    Grammatically. I think you mean “which is the coarsest topology such that the functions”?
    – Theoretical Economist
    3 hours ago














up vote
3
down vote

favorite
2












I have recently seen in my topology course that if $X$ is any set,



  1. Given a family of functions $f_i : X to Y_i_i in I$, with $(Y_i, tau_i)_i$ topological spaces, the initial topology on $X$ with respect to this family is the one generated by $f_i^-1(U_i) : i in I, U_i in tau_i $, which is the coarsest such that the functions $f_i$ are continuous, and verifies $h : Z to X$ continuous if and only if $f_ih$ is continuous for all $i$ in $I$.


  2. In a similar way, given a family $f_i : Y_i to X_i in I$, the final topology $tau$ in $X$ is defined by $U in tau $ if and only if $f_i^-1(U) in tau_i (forall i in I)$. This is the finest topology such that the family is countinuous, and $h : X to Z$ is continuous if and only if $hf_i$ is for all $i in I$.


It was also mentioned that the reciprocal of both statements is true, i.e. that if a topological space $(X, tau)$ verifies $h : Z to X$ (resp. $h:X to Z$) continuous if and only if $f_ih$ (resp. $hf_i$) continuous for all $i$, for all $h$, it has the initial (resp. final) topology with respect to the family $(f_i)_i$.



It is easy to see taking $h equiv id $ that the given topology $tau$ is finer/coarser than the initial/final topology, because all the functions $f_i$ are continuous.



Any hints on how to prove the other inclusion?










share|cite|improve this question























  • @celtschk I totally had a typo there, I've fixed it.
    – Guido A.
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    Ok, now it makes sense.
    – celtschk
    3 hours ago










  • "which is the coarser so that the functions" -- this seems like a typo?
    – Theoretical Economist
    3 hours ago










  • @TheoreticalEconomist gramatically or conceptually? I tried to say that this is the topology with 'less open sets' so that every function in the family is continuous.
    – Guido A.
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    Grammatically. I think you mean “which is the coarsest topology such that the functions”?
    – Theoretical Economist
    3 hours ago












up vote
3
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
3
down vote

favorite
2






2





I have recently seen in my topology course that if $X$ is any set,



  1. Given a family of functions $f_i : X to Y_i_i in I$, with $(Y_i, tau_i)_i$ topological spaces, the initial topology on $X$ with respect to this family is the one generated by $f_i^-1(U_i) : i in I, U_i in tau_i $, which is the coarsest such that the functions $f_i$ are continuous, and verifies $h : Z to X$ continuous if and only if $f_ih$ is continuous for all $i$ in $I$.


  2. In a similar way, given a family $f_i : Y_i to X_i in I$, the final topology $tau$ in $X$ is defined by $U in tau $ if and only if $f_i^-1(U) in tau_i (forall i in I)$. This is the finest topology such that the family is countinuous, and $h : X to Z$ is continuous if and only if $hf_i$ is for all $i in I$.


It was also mentioned that the reciprocal of both statements is true, i.e. that if a topological space $(X, tau)$ verifies $h : Z to X$ (resp. $h:X to Z$) continuous if and only if $f_ih$ (resp. $hf_i$) continuous for all $i$, for all $h$, it has the initial (resp. final) topology with respect to the family $(f_i)_i$.



It is easy to see taking $h equiv id $ that the given topology $tau$ is finer/coarser than the initial/final topology, because all the functions $f_i$ are continuous.



Any hints on how to prove the other inclusion?










share|cite|improve this question















I have recently seen in my topology course that if $X$ is any set,



  1. Given a family of functions $f_i : X to Y_i_i in I$, with $(Y_i, tau_i)_i$ topological spaces, the initial topology on $X$ with respect to this family is the one generated by $f_i^-1(U_i) : i in I, U_i in tau_i $, which is the coarsest such that the functions $f_i$ are continuous, and verifies $h : Z to X$ continuous if and only if $f_ih$ is continuous for all $i$ in $I$.


  2. In a similar way, given a family $f_i : Y_i to X_i in I$, the final topology $tau$ in $X$ is defined by $U in tau $ if and only if $f_i^-1(U) in tau_i (forall i in I)$. This is the finest topology such that the family is countinuous, and $h : X to Z$ is continuous if and only if $hf_i$ is for all $i in I$.


It was also mentioned that the reciprocal of both statements is true, i.e. that if a topological space $(X, tau)$ verifies $h : Z to X$ (resp. $h:X to Z$) continuous if and only if $f_ih$ (resp. $hf_i$) continuous for all $i$, for all $h$, it has the initial (resp. final) topology with respect to the family $(f_i)_i$.



It is easy to see taking $h equiv id $ that the given topology $tau$ is finer/coarser than the initial/final topology, because all the functions $f_i$ are continuous.



Any hints on how to prove the other inclusion?







general-topology






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago

























asked 4 hours ago









Guido A.

4,708727




4,708727











  • @celtschk I totally had a typo there, I've fixed it.
    – Guido A.
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    Ok, now it makes sense.
    – celtschk
    3 hours ago










  • "which is the coarser so that the functions" -- this seems like a typo?
    – Theoretical Economist
    3 hours ago










  • @TheoreticalEconomist gramatically or conceptually? I tried to say that this is the topology with 'less open sets' so that every function in the family is continuous.
    – Guido A.
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    Grammatically. I think you mean “which is the coarsest topology such that the functions”?
    – Theoretical Economist
    3 hours ago
















  • @celtschk I totally had a typo there, I've fixed it.
    – Guido A.
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    Ok, now it makes sense.
    – celtschk
    3 hours ago










  • "which is the coarser so that the functions" -- this seems like a typo?
    – Theoretical Economist
    3 hours ago










  • @TheoreticalEconomist gramatically or conceptually? I tried to say that this is the topology with 'less open sets' so that every function in the family is continuous.
    – Guido A.
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    Grammatically. I think you mean “which is the coarsest topology such that the functions”?
    – Theoretical Economist
    3 hours ago















@celtschk I totally had a typo there, I've fixed it.
– Guido A.
3 hours ago




@celtschk I totally had a typo there, I've fixed it.
– Guido A.
3 hours ago




1




1




Ok, now it makes sense.
– celtschk
3 hours ago




Ok, now it makes sense.
– celtschk
3 hours ago












"which is the coarser so that the functions" -- this seems like a typo?
– Theoretical Economist
3 hours ago




"which is the coarser so that the functions" -- this seems like a typo?
– Theoretical Economist
3 hours ago












@TheoreticalEconomist gramatically or conceptually? I tried to say that this is the topology with 'less open sets' so that every function in the family is continuous.
– Guido A.
3 hours ago




@TheoreticalEconomist gramatically or conceptually? I tried to say that this is the topology with 'less open sets' so that every function in the family is continuous.
– Guido A.
3 hours ago




1




1




Grammatically. I think you mean “which is the coarsest topology such that the functions”?
– Theoretical Economist
3 hours ago




Grammatically. I think you mean “which is the coarsest topology such that the functions”?
– Theoretical Economist
3 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Let it be that $tau$ is the topology on $X$ initialized by the $f_i$ in the sense that a function $h:Zto X$ is continuous iff $f_ih:Zto X_i$ for every $iin I$.



Further let it be that $tau'$ is the topology generated by the collection $mathcal V=f_i^-1(U_i)mid iin I, U_iintau_i$.



Then for every space $(Z,tau_Z)$ and every function $h:Zto X$ the following statements are equivalent:



  • $h:(Z,tau_Z)to (X,tau')$ is continuous

  • $h^-1(f_i^-1(U_i))subseteqtau_Z$ for every $iin I$ and every $U_iintau_i$

  • $f_ih:(Z,tau_Z)to (X,tau_i)$ is continuous for every $iin I$


  • $h:(Z,tau_Z)to (X,tau)$ is continuous.


Applying this on $mathsfid:(X,tau)to(X,tau')$ and $mathsfid:(X,tau')to(X,tau)$ we find that $tau=tau'$






share|cite|improve this answer



























    up vote
    3
    down vote













    As referenced by Theoretical Economist, an answer by Henno Brandsma indicates that the other inclusion can be proved by considering the identity as well, but changing the topologies in the domain/codomain.



    In the case of $tau$ being the initial topology, let $tau'$ be a topology so that for any function $h$ we have that $h$ continuous if and only if $f_ih$ is continuous for all $i$. As I stated in the post it is easy to see that any other topology satisfying this is finer than the initial topology: the identity on $(X, tau')$ makes $f_i : (X,tau') rightarrow Y_i$ continuous for all $i$ and so $tau'$ contains the inital topology, generated by preimages of open sets of the $Y_i$ via $f_i_i$. To see that $tau' subseteq tau$, it is equivalent to prove that $(X,tau) xrightarrowid (X,tau')$ is continuous. Equivalently, we can see that each composition



    $$
    (X,tau) xrightarrowid (X,tau') xrightarrowf_i Y_i
    $$



    is continuous, but these are the mappings $f_i : (X,tau) rightarrow Y_i$ which by definition of $tau$ ought to be continuous, thus proving the original claim.



    The case for the final topology follows likewise.






    share|cite|improve this answer




















      Your Answer




      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2917657%2fabout-the-universal-property-of-initial-and-final-topologies%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      2
      down vote



      accepted










      Let it be that $tau$ is the topology on $X$ initialized by the $f_i$ in the sense that a function $h:Zto X$ is continuous iff $f_ih:Zto X_i$ for every $iin I$.



      Further let it be that $tau'$ is the topology generated by the collection $mathcal V=f_i^-1(U_i)mid iin I, U_iintau_i$.



      Then for every space $(Z,tau_Z)$ and every function $h:Zto X$ the following statements are equivalent:



      • $h:(Z,tau_Z)to (X,tau')$ is continuous

      • $h^-1(f_i^-1(U_i))subseteqtau_Z$ for every $iin I$ and every $U_iintau_i$

      • $f_ih:(Z,tau_Z)to (X,tau_i)$ is continuous for every $iin I$


      • $h:(Z,tau_Z)to (X,tau)$ is continuous.


      Applying this on $mathsfid:(X,tau)to(X,tau')$ and $mathsfid:(X,tau')to(X,tau)$ we find that $tau=tau'$






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted










        Let it be that $tau$ is the topology on $X$ initialized by the $f_i$ in the sense that a function $h:Zto X$ is continuous iff $f_ih:Zto X_i$ for every $iin I$.



        Further let it be that $tau'$ is the topology generated by the collection $mathcal V=f_i^-1(U_i)mid iin I, U_iintau_i$.



        Then for every space $(Z,tau_Z)$ and every function $h:Zto X$ the following statements are equivalent:



        • $h:(Z,tau_Z)to (X,tau')$ is continuous

        • $h^-1(f_i^-1(U_i))subseteqtau_Z$ for every $iin I$ and every $U_iintau_i$

        • $f_ih:(Z,tau_Z)to (X,tau_i)$ is continuous for every $iin I$


        • $h:(Z,tau_Z)to (X,tau)$ is continuous.


        Applying this on $mathsfid:(X,tau)to(X,tau')$ and $mathsfid:(X,tau')to(X,tau)$ we find that $tau=tau'$






        share|cite|improve this answer






















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          Let it be that $tau$ is the topology on $X$ initialized by the $f_i$ in the sense that a function $h:Zto X$ is continuous iff $f_ih:Zto X_i$ for every $iin I$.



          Further let it be that $tau'$ is the topology generated by the collection $mathcal V=f_i^-1(U_i)mid iin I, U_iintau_i$.



          Then for every space $(Z,tau_Z)$ and every function $h:Zto X$ the following statements are equivalent:



          • $h:(Z,tau_Z)to (X,tau')$ is continuous

          • $h^-1(f_i^-1(U_i))subseteqtau_Z$ for every $iin I$ and every $U_iintau_i$

          • $f_ih:(Z,tau_Z)to (X,tau_i)$ is continuous for every $iin I$


          • $h:(Z,tau_Z)to (X,tau)$ is continuous.


          Applying this on $mathsfid:(X,tau)to(X,tau')$ and $mathsfid:(X,tau')to(X,tau)$ we find that $tau=tau'$






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Let it be that $tau$ is the topology on $X$ initialized by the $f_i$ in the sense that a function $h:Zto X$ is continuous iff $f_ih:Zto X_i$ for every $iin I$.



          Further let it be that $tau'$ is the topology generated by the collection $mathcal V=f_i^-1(U_i)mid iin I, U_iintau_i$.



          Then for every space $(Z,tau_Z)$ and every function $h:Zto X$ the following statements are equivalent:



          • $h:(Z,tau_Z)to (X,tau')$ is continuous

          • $h^-1(f_i^-1(U_i))subseteqtau_Z$ for every $iin I$ and every $U_iintau_i$

          • $f_ih:(Z,tau_Z)to (X,tau_i)$ is continuous for every $iin I$


          • $h:(Z,tau_Z)to (X,tau)$ is continuous.


          Applying this on $mathsfid:(X,tau)to(X,tau')$ and $mathsfid:(X,tau')to(X,tau)$ we find that $tau=tau'$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 2 hours ago









          drhab

          88.9k541122




          88.9k541122




















              up vote
              3
              down vote













              As referenced by Theoretical Economist, an answer by Henno Brandsma indicates that the other inclusion can be proved by considering the identity as well, but changing the topologies in the domain/codomain.



              In the case of $tau$ being the initial topology, let $tau'$ be a topology so that for any function $h$ we have that $h$ continuous if and only if $f_ih$ is continuous for all $i$. As I stated in the post it is easy to see that any other topology satisfying this is finer than the initial topology: the identity on $(X, tau')$ makes $f_i : (X,tau') rightarrow Y_i$ continuous for all $i$ and so $tau'$ contains the inital topology, generated by preimages of open sets of the $Y_i$ via $f_i_i$. To see that $tau' subseteq tau$, it is equivalent to prove that $(X,tau) xrightarrowid (X,tau')$ is continuous. Equivalently, we can see that each composition



              $$
              (X,tau) xrightarrowid (X,tau') xrightarrowf_i Y_i
              $$



              is continuous, but these are the mappings $f_i : (X,tau) rightarrow Y_i$ which by definition of $tau$ ought to be continuous, thus proving the original claim.



              The case for the final topology follows likewise.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                3
                down vote













                As referenced by Theoretical Economist, an answer by Henno Brandsma indicates that the other inclusion can be proved by considering the identity as well, but changing the topologies in the domain/codomain.



                In the case of $tau$ being the initial topology, let $tau'$ be a topology so that for any function $h$ we have that $h$ continuous if and only if $f_ih$ is continuous for all $i$. As I stated in the post it is easy to see that any other topology satisfying this is finer than the initial topology: the identity on $(X, tau')$ makes $f_i : (X,tau') rightarrow Y_i$ continuous for all $i$ and so $tau'$ contains the inital topology, generated by preimages of open sets of the $Y_i$ via $f_i_i$. To see that $tau' subseteq tau$, it is equivalent to prove that $(X,tau) xrightarrowid (X,tau')$ is continuous. Equivalently, we can see that each composition



                $$
                (X,tau) xrightarrowid (X,tau') xrightarrowf_i Y_i
                $$



                is continuous, but these are the mappings $f_i : (X,tau) rightarrow Y_i$ which by definition of $tau$ ought to be continuous, thus proving the original claim.



                The case for the final topology follows likewise.






                share|cite|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote









                  As referenced by Theoretical Economist, an answer by Henno Brandsma indicates that the other inclusion can be proved by considering the identity as well, but changing the topologies in the domain/codomain.



                  In the case of $tau$ being the initial topology, let $tau'$ be a topology so that for any function $h$ we have that $h$ continuous if and only if $f_ih$ is continuous for all $i$. As I stated in the post it is easy to see that any other topology satisfying this is finer than the initial topology: the identity on $(X, tau')$ makes $f_i : (X,tau') rightarrow Y_i$ continuous for all $i$ and so $tau'$ contains the inital topology, generated by preimages of open sets of the $Y_i$ via $f_i_i$. To see that $tau' subseteq tau$, it is equivalent to prove that $(X,tau) xrightarrowid (X,tau')$ is continuous. Equivalently, we can see that each composition



                  $$
                  (X,tau) xrightarrowid (X,tau') xrightarrowf_i Y_i
                  $$



                  is continuous, but these are the mappings $f_i : (X,tau) rightarrow Y_i$ which by definition of $tau$ ought to be continuous, thus proving the original claim.



                  The case for the final topology follows likewise.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  As referenced by Theoretical Economist, an answer by Henno Brandsma indicates that the other inclusion can be proved by considering the identity as well, but changing the topologies in the domain/codomain.



                  In the case of $tau$ being the initial topology, let $tau'$ be a topology so that for any function $h$ we have that $h$ continuous if and only if $f_ih$ is continuous for all $i$. As I stated in the post it is easy to see that any other topology satisfying this is finer than the initial topology: the identity on $(X, tau')$ makes $f_i : (X,tau') rightarrow Y_i$ continuous for all $i$ and so $tau'$ contains the inital topology, generated by preimages of open sets of the $Y_i$ via $f_i_i$. To see that $tau' subseteq tau$, it is equivalent to prove that $(X,tau) xrightarrowid (X,tau')$ is continuous. Equivalently, we can see that each composition



                  $$
                  (X,tau) xrightarrowid (X,tau') xrightarrowf_i Y_i
                  $$



                  is continuous, but these are the mappings $f_i : (X,tau) rightarrow Y_i$ which by definition of $tau$ ought to be continuous, thus proving the original claim.



                  The case for the final topology follows likewise.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 2 hours ago









                  Guido A.

                  4,708727




                  4,708727



























                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2917657%2fabout-the-universal-property-of-initial-and-final-topologies%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      Comments

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

                      Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

                      Confectionery