Is there a 'dead zone' in meditation effort?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Is there a 'dead zone' in meditation and the effort applied? So to explain



  1. Going from no meditation at all to meditating even a bit (10 mins every few days) - benefits felt quickly


  2. Going up to intense meditation in a retreat situation (meditating many hours a day for several days to several weeks) - benefits felt and quite long lasting


  3. Meditating for an intermediate amount -(meditating 30 mins a day 5-7 days a week over months / years) - meditator plateaus and feels stuck. Little benefit felt


This is just my experience but I'm wondering is it a thing - has this been pointed out in any texts or by established teachers. Or is it just me?



Many Thanks










share|improve this question

























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    Is there a 'dead zone' in meditation and the effort applied? So to explain



    1. Going from no meditation at all to meditating even a bit (10 mins every few days) - benefits felt quickly


    2. Going up to intense meditation in a retreat situation (meditating many hours a day for several days to several weeks) - benefits felt and quite long lasting


    3. Meditating for an intermediate amount -(meditating 30 mins a day 5-7 days a week over months / years) - meditator plateaus and feels stuck. Little benefit felt


    This is just my experience but I'm wondering is it a thing - has this been pointed out in any texts or by established teachers. Or is it just me?



    Many Thanks










    share|improve this question























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      Is there a 'dead zone' in meditation and the effort applied? So to explain



      1. Going from no meditation at all to meditating even a bit (10 mins every few days) - benefits felt quickly


      2. Going up to intense meditation in a retreat situation (meditating many hours a day for several days to several weeks) - benefits felt and quite long lasting


      3. Meditating for an intermediate amount -(meditating 30 mins a day 5-7 days a week over months / years) - meditator plateaus and feels stuck. Little benefit felt


      This is just my experience but I'm wondering is it a thing - has this been pointed out in any texts or by established teachers. Or is it just me?



      Many Thanks










      share|improve this question













      Is there a 'dead zone' in meditation and the effort applied? So to explain



      1. Going from no meditation at all to meditating even a bit (10 mins every few days) - benefits felt quickly


      2. Going up to intense meditation in a retreat situation (meditating many hours a day for several days to several weeks) - benefits felt and quite long lasting


      3. Meditating for an intermediate amount -(meditating 30 mins a day 5-7 days a week over months / years) - meditator plateaus and feels stuck. Little benefit felt


      This is just my experience but I'm wondering is it a thing - has this been pointed out in any texts or by established teachers. Or is it just me?



      Many Thanks







      meditation-effects meditation-hindrances






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 5 hours ago









      Crab Bucket

      12.8k537116




      12.8k537116




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          The stream flowing to Nibbana is entered by letting go (vossagga), as written at the end of MN 118 and in SN 48.9 and SN 48.10.



          Most meditation taught (Visuddhimagga, Mahasi, Goenka, etc) are not based in letting go. Instead, they are "yogic techniques" based in mental manipulation.



          Because these yogic methods use thought, the mind remains coarse or gross. Bodily formations only calm to a certain degree without the mind calming enough to bring more refined progress. Thus meditation "plateaus" or progress becomes "dead".






          share|improve this answer



























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Yes, it has been pointed out in texts:




            During the K'ai Yuan era (713-741) an ascetic Mazu was dwelling in the Ch'uan Fa Temple. All day he sat meditating. Zen Master Huairang knew that he was a fitting vessel of teaching, and went to question him:



            “Great Worthy, what are you aiming at by sitting in meditation?”



            Mazu replied, "to become a Buddha."



            So Huairang leaned over and picked up two tiles off the floor and started rubbing them against each other.



            Mazu asked, "What are you doing?"



            Huairang replied, "Trying to make a mirror."



            Mazu asked, "How can you make a mirror by polishing a tile?"



            Huairang said, "How can you become a Buddha by sitting in meditation?"



            Mazu asked, "Then what shall I do?"



            Huairang asked, "When an ox-carriage stops moving, do you hit the carriage or the ox?" Mazu had no reply. Huairang continued, "Are you practicing to sit in meditation, or practicing to sit like a Buddha? As to sitting in meditation, meditation is neither sitting nor lying. As to sitting like a Buddha, the Buddha has no fixed form. In the non-abiding Dharma, one should neither grasp nor reject. If you try to sit like a Buddha, you are just killing the Buddha. If you attach to the form of sitting, you will never realize the principle."



            Upon hearing this Mazu felt as if he had tasted ghee. He bowed and asked, "How should one's mind be so that it will accord with the formless samādhi?"



            Huairang said, "Your study of the teaching of the mind-ground is like planting a seed. My teaching of the essentials of the Dharma is like heaven bestowing rain. Because you have natural affinity, you will perceive the Way."



            Mazu also asked, "The Way is without form, how can it be perceived?"



            Huairang said, "The Dharma-eye of the mind-ground can perceive the Way. It is the same with the formless samādhi."



            Mazu asked, "Is that still subject to becoming and decay?"



            Huairang said, "If you see the Way through such concepts as becoming and decay, meeting and parting, then you do not truly see the Way. Listen to my verse:




            The mind ground contains various seeds,



            Which with rain will come to sprout.



            The flower of samādhi is formless,



            How can it decay or become?"




            Mazu was awakened and his mind became detached. He stayed to serve Huairang for ten years, gradually deepening his understanding of the profound mystery.




            Buddhist Enlightenment is not something that can be achieved through mechanical repetition or by waiting, like one would wait for a kettle to boil or for a train to arrive. Buddhist Enlightenment involves shedding layers of bullshit and meeting reality. This is a process that requires courage to go forward into the unknown without a map. Only then one's practice can become alive and one can meet the real dragon face to face.



            This includes meditation, that has to get less and less scripted and more and more an authentic presence and discovery with no preset agenda.






            share|improve this answer






















              Your Answer







              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "565"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: false,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbuddhism.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29299%2fis-there-a-dead-zone-in-meditation-effort%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest






























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              1
              down vote













              The stream flowing to Nibbana is entered by letting go (vossagga), as written at the end of MN 118 and in SN 48.9 and SN 48.10.



              Most meditation taught (Visuddhimagga, Mahasi, Goenka, etc) are not based in letting go. Instead, they are "yogic techniques" based in mental manipulation.



              Because these yogic methods use thought, the mind remains coarse or gross. Bodily formations only calm to a certain degree without the mind calming enough to bring more refined progress. Thus meditation "plateaus" or progress becomes "dead".






              share|improve this answer
























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                The stream flowing to Nibbana is entered by letting go (vossagga), as written at the end of MN 118 and in SN 48.9 and SN 48.10.



                Most meditation taught (Visuddhimagga, Mahasi, Goenka, etc) are not based in letting go. Instead, they are "yogic techniques" based in mental manipulation.



                Because these yogic methods use thought, the mind remains coarse or gross. Bodily formations only calm to a certain degree without the mind calming enough to bring more refined progress. Thus meditation "plateaus" or progress becomes "dead".






                share|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  The stream flowing to Nibbana is entered by letting go (vossagga), as written at the end of MN 118 and in SN 48.9 and SN 48.10.



                  Most meditation taught (Visuddhimagga, Mahasi, Goenka, etc) are not based in letting go. Instead, they are "yogic techniques" based in mental manipulation.



                  Because these yogic methods use thought, the mind remains coarse or gross. Bodily formations only calm to a certain degree without the mind calming enough to bring more refined progress. Thus meditation "plateaus" or progress becomes "dead".






                  share|improve this answer












                  The stream flowing to Nibbana is entered by letting go (vossagga), as written at the end of MN 118 and in SN 48.9 and SN 48.10.



                  Most meditation taught (Visuddhimagga, Mahasi, Goenka, etc) are not based in letting go. Instead, they are "yogic techniques" based in mental manipulation.



                  Because these yogic methods use thought, the mind remains coarse or gross. Bodily formations only calm to a certain degree without the mind calming enough to bring more refined progress. Thus meditation "plateaus" or progress becomes "dead".







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 4 hours ago









                  Dhammadhatu

                  23.3k11042




                  23.3k11042




















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      Yes, it has been pointed out in texts:




                      During the K'ai Yuan era (713-741) an ascetic Mazu was dwelling in the Ch'uan Fa Temple. All day he sat meditating. Zen Master Huairang knew that he was a fitting vessel of teaching, and went to question him:



                      “Great Worthy, what are you aiming at by sitting in meditation?”



                      Mazu replied, "to become a Buddha."



                      So Huairang leaned over and picked up two tiles off the floor and started rubbing them against each other.



                      Mazu asked, "What are you doing?"



                      Huairang replied, "Trying to make a mirror."



                      Mazu asked, "How can you make a mirror by polishing a tile?"



                      Huairang said, "How can you become a Buddha by sitting in meditation?"



                      Mazu asked, "Then what shall I do?"



                      Huairang asked, "When an ox-carriage stops moving, do you hit the carriage or the ox?" Mazu had no reply. Huairang continued, "Are you practicing to sit in meditation, or practicing to sit like a Buddha? As to sitting in meditation, meditation is neither sitting nor lying. As to sitting like a Buddha, the Buddha has no fixed form. In the non-abiding Dharma, one should neither grasp nor reject. If you try to sit like a Buddha, you are just killing the Buddha. If you attach to the form of sitting, you will never realize the principle."



                      Upon hearing this Mazu felt as if he had tasted ghee. He bowed and asked, "How should one's mind be so that it will accord with the formless samādhi?"



                      Huairang said, "Your study of the teaching of the mind-ground is like planting a seed. My teaching of the essentials of the Dharma is like heaven bestowing rain. Because you have natural affinity, you will perceive the Way."



                      Mazu also asked, "The Way is without form, how can it be perceived?"



                      Huairang said, "The Dharma-eye of the mind-ground can perceive the Way. It is the same with the formless samādhi."



                      Mazu asked, "Is that still subject to becoming and decay?"



                      Huairang said, "If you see the Way through such concepts as becoming and decay, meeting and parting, then you do not truly see the Way. Listen to my verse:




                      The mind ground contains various seeds,



                      Which with rain will come to sprout.



                      The flower of samādhi is formless,



                      How can it decay or become?"




                      Mazu was awakened and his mind became detached. He stayed to serve Huairang for ten years, gradually deepening his understanding of the profound mystery.




                      Buddhist Enlightenment is not something that can be achieved through mechanical repetition or by waiting, like one would wait for a kettle to boil or for a train to arrive. Buddhist Enlightenment involves shedding layers of bullshit and meeting reality. This is a process that requires courage to go forward into the unknown without a map. Only then one's practice can become alive and one can meet the real dragon face to face.



                      This includes meditation, that has to get less and less scripted and more and more an authentic presence and discovery with no preset agenda.






                      share|improve this answer


























                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        Yes, it has been pointed out in texts:




                        During the K'ai Yuan era (713-741) an ascetic Mazu was dwelling in the Ch'uan Fa Temple. All day he sat meditating. Zen Master Huairang knew that he was a fitting vessel of teaching, and went to question him:



                        “Great Worthy, what are you aiming at by sitting in meditation?”



                        Mazu replied, "to become a Buddha."



                        So Huairang leaned over and picked up two tiles off the floor and started rubbing them against each other.



                        Mazu asked, "What are you doing?"



                        Huairang replied, "Trying to make a mirror."



                        Mazu asked, "How can you make a mirror by polishing a tile?"



                        Huairang said, "How can you become a Buddha by sitting in meditation?"



                        Mazu asked, "Then what shall I do?"



                        Huairang asked, "When an ox-carriage stops moving, do you hit the carriage or the ox?" Mazu had no reply. Huairang continued, "Are you practicing to sit in meditation, or practicing to sit like a Buddha? As to sitting in meditation, meditation is neither sitting nor lying. As to sitting like a Buddha, the Buddha has no fixed form. In the non-abiding Dharma, one should neither grasp nor reject. If you try to sit like a Buddha, you are just killing the Buddha. If you attach to the form of sitting, you will never realize the principle."



                        Upon hearing this Mazu felt as if he had tasted ghee. He bowed and asked, "How should one's mind be so that it will accord with the formless samādhi?"



                        Huairang said, "Your study of the teaching of the mind-ground is like planting a seed. My teaching of the essentials of the Dharma is like heaven bestowing rain. Because you have natural affinity, you will perceive the Way."



                        Mazu also asked, "The Way is without form, how can it be perceived?"



                        Huairang said, "The Dharma-eye of the mind-ground can perceive the Way. It is the same with the formless samādhi."



                        Mazu asked, "Is that still subject to becoming and decay?"



                        Huairang said, "If you see the Way through such concepts as becoming and decay, meeting and parting, then you do not truly see the Way. Listen to my verse:




                        The mind ground contains various seeds,



                        Which with rain will come to sprout.



                        The flower of samādhi is formless,



                        How can it decay or become?"




                        Mazu was awakened and his mind became detached. He stayed to serve Huairang for ten years, gradually deepening his understanding of the profound mystery.




                        Buddhist Enlightenment is not something that can be achieved through mechanical repetition or by waiting, like one would wait for a kettle to boil or for a train to arrive. Buddhist Enlightenment involves shedding layers of bullshit and meeting reality. This is a process that requires courage to go forward into the unknown without a map. Only then one's practice can become alive and one can meet the real dragon face to face.



                        This includes meditation, that has to get less and less scripted and more and more an authentic presence and discovery with no preset agenda.






                        share|improve this answer
























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote









                          Yes, it has been pointed out in texts:




                          During the K'ai Yuan era (713-741) an ascetic Mazu was dwelling in the Ch'uan Fa Temple. All day he sat meditating. Zen Master Huairang knew that he was a fitting vessel of teaching, and went to question him:



                          “Great Worthy, what are you aiming at by sitting in meditation?”



                          Mazu replied, "to become a Buddha."



                          So Huairang leaned over and picked up two tiles off the floor and started rubbing them against each other.



                          Mazu asked, "What are you doing?"



                          Huairang replied, "Trying to make a mirror."



                          Mazu asked, "How can you make a mirror by polishing a tile?"



                          Huairang said, "How can you become a Buddha by sitting in meditation?"



                          Mazu asked, "Then what shall I do?"



                          Huairang asked, "When an ox-carriage stops moving, do you hit the carriage or the ox?" Mazu had no reply. Huairang continued, "Are you practicing to sit in meditation, or practicing to sit like a Buddha? As to sitting in meditation, meditation is neither sitting nor lying. As to sitting like a Buddha, the Buddha has no fixed form. In the non-abiding Dharma, one should neither grasp nor reject. If you try to sit like a Buddha, you are just killing the Buddha. If you attach to the form of sitting, you will never realize the principle."



                          Upon hearing this Mazu felt as if he had tasted ghee. He bowed and asked, "How should one's mind be so that it will accord with the formless samādhi?"



                          Huairang said, "Your study of the teaching of the mind-ground is like planting a seed. My teaching of the essentials of the Dharma is like heaven bestowing rain. Because you have natural affinity, you will perceive the Way."



                          Mazu also asked, "The Way is without form, how can it be perceived?"



                          Huairang said, "The Dharma-eye of the mind-ground can perceive the Way. It is the same with the formless samādhi."



                          Mazu asked, "Is that still subject to becoming and decay?"



                          Huairang said, "If you see the Way through such concepts as becoming and decay, meeting and parting, then you do not truly see the Way. Listen to my verse:




                          The mind ground contains various seeds,



                          Which with rain will come to sprout.



                          The flower of samādhi is formless,



                          How can it decay or become?"




                          Mazu was awakened and his mind became detached. He stayed to serve Huairang for ten years, gradually deepening his understanding of the profound mystery.




                          Buddhist Enlightenment is not something that can be achieved through mechanical repetition or by waiting, like one would wait for a kettle to boil or for a train to arrive. Buddhist Enlightenment involves shedding layers of bullshit and meeting reality. This is a process that requires courage to go forward into the unknown without a map. Only then one's practice can become alive and one can meet the real dragon face to face.



                          This includes meditation, that has to get less and less scripted and more and more an authentic presence and discovery with no preset agenda.






                          share|improve this answer














                          Yes, it has been pointed out in texts:




                          During the K'ai Yuan era (713-741) an ascetic Mazu was dwelling in the Ch'uan Fa Temple. All day he sat meditating. Zen Master Huairang knew that he was a fitting vessel of teaching, and went to question him:



                          “Great Worthy, what are you aiming at by sitting in meditation?”



                          Mazu replied, "to become a Buddha."



                          So Huairang leaned over and picked up two tiles off the floor and started rubbing them against each other.



                          Mazu asked, "What are you doing?"



                          Huairang replied, "Trying to make a mirror."



                          Mazu asked, "How can you make a mirror by polishing a tile?"



                          Huairang said, "How can you become a Buddha by sitting in meditation?"



                          Mazu asked, "Then what shall I do?"



                          Huairang asked, "When an ox-carriage stops moving, do you hit the carriage or the ox?" Mazu had no reply. Huairang continued, "Are you practicing to sit in meditation, or practicing to sit like a Buddha? As to sitting in meditation, meditation is neither sitting nor lying. As to sitting like a Buddha, the Buddha has no fixed form. In the non-abiding Dharma, one should neither grasp nor reject. If you try to sit like a Buddha, you are just killing the Buddha. If you attach to the form of sitting, you will never realize the principle."



                          Upon hearing this Mazu felt as if he had tasted ghee. He bowed and asked, "How should one's mind be so that it will accord with the formless samādhi?"



                          Huairang said, "Your study of the teaching of the mind-ground is like planting a seed. My teaching of the essentials of the Dharma is like heaven bestowing rain. Because you have natural affinity, you will perceive the Way."



                          Mazu also asked, "The Way is without form, how can it be perceived?"



                          Huairang said, "The Dharma-eye of the mind-ground can perceive the Way. It is the same with the formless samādhi."



                          Mazu asked, "Is that still subject to becoming and decay?"



                          Huairang said, "If you see the Way through such concepts as becoming and decay, meeting and parting, then you do not truly see the Way. Listen to my verse:




                          The mind ground contains various seeds,



                          Which with rain will come to sprout.



                          The flower of samādhi is formless,



                          How can it decay or become?"




                          Mazu was awakened and his mind became detached. He stayed to serve Huairang for ten years, gradually deepening his understanding of the profound mystery.




                          Buddhist Enlightenment is not something that can be achieved through mechanical repetition or by waiting, like one would wait for a kettle to boil or for a train to arrive. Buddhist Enlightenment involves shedding layers of bullshit and meeting reality. This is a process that requires courage to go forward into the unknown without a map. Only then one's practice can become alive and one can meet the real dragon face to face.



                          This includes meditation, that has to get less and less scripted and more and more an authentic presence and discovery with no preset agenda.







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited 3 hours ago

























                          answered 4 hours ago









                          Andrei Volkov♦

                          35.4k229103




                          35.4k229103



























                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded















































                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbuddhism.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29299%2fis-there-a-dead-zone-in-meditation-effort%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest













































































                              Comments

                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

                              Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

                              Confectionery