Why do my photographs taken with a film camera look so saturated?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I’m starting to shoot photographs using my Dad's old camera, an Olympus OM-4. I’ve noticed that in comparison with my friend's photographs mine are a lot more saturated. Why can it be?



Here's an example:



enter image description here






exposure film saturation







share|improve this question









New contributor




Diego Asterio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1




    What particular film were you using? What were your exposure settings (aperture and shutter time)?
    – Michael Clark
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    i think proper term would be "low contrast"
    – aaaaaa
    2 hours ago










  • This photograph looks way underexposed to me. Or else there is something wrong with the film - maybe long expired or heat/radiation damaged? I don't know off-hand if the OM4 has a built-in meter. Do you know the Sunny-16 rule? Are you sure the camera shutter/aperture are operating reliably? And, as mentioned, what are you using for film? Expiration date? Storage?
    – osullic
    19 mins ago















up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I’m starting to shoot photographs using my Dad's old camera, an Olympus OM-4. I’ve noticed that in comparison with my friend's photographs mine are a lot more saturated. Why can it be?



Here's an example:



enter image description here






exposure film saturation







share|improve this question









New contributor




Diego Asterio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1




    What particular film were you using? What were your exposure settings (aperture and shutter time)?
    – Michael Clark
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    i think proper term would be "low contrast"
    – aaaaaa
    2 hours ago










  • This photograph looks way underexposed to me. Or else there is something wrong with the film - maybe long expired or heat/radiation damaged? I don't know off-hand if the OM4 has a built-in meter. Do you know the Sunny-16 rule? Are you sure the camera shutter/aperture are operating reliably? And, as mentioned, what are you using for film? Expiration date? Storage?
    – osullic
    19 mins ago













up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











I’m starting to shoot photographs using my Dad's old camera, an Olympus OM-4. I’ve noticed that in comparison with my friend's photographs mine are a lot more saturated. Why can it be?



Here's an example:



enter image description here






exposure film saturation







share|improve this question









New contributor




Diego Asterio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I’m starting to shoot photographs using my Dad's old camera, an Olympus OM-4. I’ve noticed that in comparison with my friend's photographs mine are a lot more saturated. Why can it be?



Here's an example:



enter image description here






exposure film saturation




exposure film saturation






share|improve this question









New contributor




Diego Asterio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Diego Asterio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









scottbb

17.2k75084




17.2k75084






New contributor




Diego Asterio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 4 hours ago









Diego Asterio

162




162




New contributor




Diego Asterio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Diego Asterio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Diego Asterio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    What particular film were you using? What were your exposure settings (aperture and shutter time)?
    – Michael Clark
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    i think proper term would be "low contrast"
    – aaaaaa
    2 hours ago










  • This photograph looks way underexposed to me. Or else there is something wrong with the film - maybe long expired or heat/radiation damaged? I don't know off-hand if the OM4 has a built-in meter. Do you know the Sunny-16 rule? Are you sure the camera shutter/aperture are operating reliably? And, as mentioned, what are you using for film? Expiration date? Storage?
    – osullic
    19 mins ago













  • 1




    What particular film were you using? What were your exposure settings (aperture and shutter time)?
    – Michael Clark
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    i think proper term would be "low contrast"
    – aaaaaa
    2 hours ago










  • This photograph looks way underexposed to me. Or else there is something wrong with the film - maybe long expired or heat/radiation damaged? I don't know off-hand if the OM4 has a built-in meter. Do you know the Sunny-16 rule? Are you sure the camera shutter/aperture are operating reliably? And, as mentioned, what are you using for film? Expiration date? Storage?
    – osullic
    19 mins ago








1




1




What particular film were you using? What were your exposure settings (aperture and shutter time)?
– Michael Clark
2 hours ago




What particular film were you using? What were your exposure settings (aperture and shutter time)?
– Michael Clark
2 hours ago




1




1




i think proper term would be "low contrast"
– aaaaaa
2 hours ago




i think proper term would be "low contrast"
– aaaaaa
2 hours ago












This photograph looks way underexposed to me. Or else there is something wrong with the film - maybe long expired or heat/radiation damaged? I don't know off-hand if the OM4 has a built-in meter. Do you know the Sunny-16 rule? Are you sure the camera shutter/aperture are operating reliably? And, as mentioned, what are you using for film? Expiration date? Storage?
– osullic
19 mins ago





This photograph looks way underexposed to me. Or else there is something wrong with the film - maybe long expired or heat/radiation damaged? I don't know off-hand if the OM4 has a built-in meter. Do you know the Sunny-16 rule? Are you sure the camera shutter/aperture are operating reliably? And, as mentioned, what are you using for film? Expiration date? Storage?
– osullic
19 mins ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote













I'd guess you're under-exposing a long way & the lab is having to push them really hard to get anything like an image out of them; hence the amount of noise in them & no real blacks anywhere - but I'll leave it to someone more versed in film photography to post a fuller answer.






share|improve this answer




















    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "61"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Diego Asterio is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f101574%2fwhy-do-my-photographs-taken-with-a-film-camera-look-so-saturated%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest

















    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    4
    down vote













    I'd guess you're under-exposing a long way & the lab is having to push them really hard to get anything like an image out of them; hence the amount of noise in them & no real blacks anywhere - but I'll leave it to someone more versed in film photography to post a fuller answer.






    share|improve this answer
























      up vote
      4
      down vote













      I'd guess you're under-exposing a long way & the lab is having to push them really hard to get anything like an image out of them; hence the amount of noise in them & no real blacks anywhere - but I'll leave it to someone more versed in film photography to post a fuller answer.






      share|improve this answer






















        up vote
        4
        down vote










        up vote
        4
        down vote









        I'd guess you're under-exposing a long way & the lab is having to push them really hard to get anything like an image out of them; hence the amount of noise in them & no real blacks anywhere - but I'll leave it to someone more versed in film photography to post a fuller answer.






        share|improve this answer












        I'd guess you're under-exposing a long way & the lab is having to push them really hard to get anything like an image out of them; hence the amount of noise in them & no real blacks anywhere - but I'll leave it to someone more versed in film photography to post a fuller answer.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 3 hours ago









        Tetsujin

        6,36221738




        6,36221738




















            Diego Asterio is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            Diego Asterio is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Diego Asterio is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Diego Asterio is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f101574%2fwhy-do-my-photographs-taken-with-a-film-camera-look-so-saturated%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest
































































            Comments

            Post a Comment

            Popular posts from this blog

            Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote 31 down vote favorite 4 I hold a PhD in mechanical engineering with a 7 year background in self-guided, self-paced research including 2 years as a graduate level course instructor and a subject matter expert for various engineering projects in a university setting in the United States. For the last 10-11 months, I am working in a research industry in France where my task is to debug C++ spaghetti code written over a period of several years by my current supervisor. It is a team of 2: just I and my supervisor. Diurnally, I am posed with a "bug of the day" to get out of this C++ code. My supervisor generally gives me about 15-30 minutes to solve it and then accosts me about whether or not the task is completed and then rinses and repeats this until the end of the day. Off-late, my supervisor has been holding 6-7 hour long "meetin
            Read more

            What does second last employer means? [closed]

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote -3 down vote favorite Say, for example I have worked in the following companies, Company A => 2010 - 2011 Company B => 2011 - 2012 Company C => 2012 - Till Date Company D => Have offer Now assume Company D is asking to submit documents from my second last employer. So from the list of companies given, which company would be qualified as second last employer? software-industry employer share | improve this question asked Aug 10 '14 at 5:16 Rajaprabhu Aravindasamy 559 1 6 13 closed as off-topic by Jim G., jmort253 ♦ Aug 11 '14 at 1:58 This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason: "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address only
            Read more

            One-line joke

            A one-liner is a joke that is delivered in a single line. A good one-liner is said to be pithy - concise and meaningful. [1] Comedians and actors use this comedic method as part of their act, e.g. Jimmy Carr, Tommy Cooper, Rodney Dangerfield, Norm Macdonald, Ken Dodd, Stewart Francis, Zach Galifianakis, Mitch Hedberg, Anthony Jeselnik, Milton Jones, Shappi Khorsandi, Jay London, Mark Linn-Baker, Demetri Martin, Groucho Marx, Dan Mintz, Emo Philips, Tim Vine, Steven Wright and Henny Youngman and Arnold Schwarzenegger. [ citation needed ] Many fictional characters are also known to deliver one-liners, including James Bond, who usually includes pithy and laconic quips after disposing of a villain. [ citation needed ] Examples "A baby seal walks into a club." "A dyslexic man walks into a bra." (Anonymous) "There are three types of people, those who can count and those who can't." "Venison's dear, isn't it?" (Jimmy Carr) "An escala
            Read more