Mixing
Why does my superzoom lens sometimes miss focus?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I've got a Nikon D7500 with the AF-S DX 18-300mm zoom, a combination I love. I do a lot of outdoor photography and find myself switching between wide angle and telephoto repeatedly as different shots present themselves; for a while I switched lenses when this happened but switching lenses in the outdoors is a bit risky/dirty.
The problem that I'm having, is that my eye's auto-focus isn't working, so I rely heavily on the camera's auto-focus, and it's not really 100%. Both the lens and the body are set to auto-focus, and I can clearly see in the lens the rectangles as it decides which objects in the shot it's going to focus on, and I can hear the motors working, and see the focus shifting, and in the viewfinder it looks like it's dead on - but then in the resulting picture the focus is just a tiny bit off in about 1/3 of the shots. The problem is the most noticeable when at full telephoto (300 mm).
Am I expecting too much? Is auto-focus just not going to work well with this lens at full extension? Or is this something I should take the camera/lens into the shop for a tuneup?
autofocus zoom superzoom
edited 1 hour ago
scottbb
18.2k75388
asked 3 hours ago
Betty Crokker
1363
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I've got a Nikon D7500 with the AF-S DX 18-300mm zoom, a combination I love. I do a lot of outdoor photography and find myself switching between wide angle and telephoto repeatedly as different shots present themselves; for a while I switched lenses when this happened but switching lenses in the outdoors is a bit risky/dirty.
The problem that I'm having, is that my eye's auto-focus isn't working, so I rely heavily on the camera's auto-focus, and it's not really 100%. Both the lens and the body are set to auto-focus, and I can clearly see in the lens the rectangles as it decides which objects in the shot it's going to focus on, and I can hear the motors working, and see the focus shifting, and in the viewfinder it looks like it's dead on - but then in the resulting picture the focus is just a tiny bit off in about 1/3 of the shots. The problem is the most noticeable when at full telephoto (300 mm).
Am I expecting too much? Is auto-focus just not going to work well with this lens at full extension? Or is this something I should take the camera/lens into the shop for a tuneup?
autofocus zoom superzoom
edited 1 hour ago
scottbb
18.2k75388
asked 3 hours ago
Betty Crokker
1363
1
Possible duplicate of How do I diagnose the source of focus problem in a camera?
– mattdm
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I've got a Nikon D7500 with the AF-S DX 18-300mm zoom, a combination I love. I do a lot of outdoor photography and find myself switching between wide angle and telephoto repeatedly as different shots present themselves; for a while I switched lenses when this happened but switching lenses in the outdoors is a bit risky/dirty.
The problem that I'm having, is that my eye's auto-focus isn't working, so I rely heavily on the camera's auto-focus, and it's not really 100%. Both the lens and the body are set to auto-focus, and I can clearly see in the lens the rectangles as it decides which objects in the shot it's going to focus on, and I can hear the motors working, and see the focus shifting, and in the viewfinder it looks like it's dead on - but then in the resulting picture the focus is just a tiny bit off in about 1/3 of the shots. The problem is the most noticeable when at full telephoto (300 mm).
Am I expecting too much? Is auto-focus just not going to work well with this lens at full extension? Or is this something I should take the camera/lens into the shop for a tuneup?
autofocus zoom superzoom
edited 1 hour ago
scottbb
18.2k75388
asked 3 hours ago
Betty Crokker
1363
I've got a Nikon D7500 with the AF-S DX 18-300mm zoom, a combination I love. I do a lot of outdoor photography and find myself switching between wide angle and telephoto repeatedly as different shots present themselves; for a while I switched lenses when this happened but switching lenses in the outdoors is a bit risky/dirty.
The problem that I'm having, is that my eye's auto-focus isn't working, so I rely heavily on the camera's auto-focus, and it's not really 100%. Both the lens and the body are set to auto-focus, and I can clearly see in the lens the rectangles as it decides which objects in the shot it's going to focus on, and I can hear the motors working, and see the focus shifting, and in the viewfinder it looks like it's dead on - but then in the resulting picture the focus is just a tiny bit off in about 1/3 of the shots. The problem is the most noticeable when at full telephoto (300 mm).
Am I expecting too much? Is auto-focus just not going to work well with this lens at full extension? Or is this something I should take the camera/lens into the shop for a tuneup?
autofocus zoom superzoom
autofocus zoom superzoom
edited 1 hour ago
scottbb
18.2k75388
asked 3 hours ago
Betty Crokker
1363
edited 1 hour ago
scottbb
18.2k75388
asked 3 hours ago
Betty Crokker
1363
edited 1 hour ago
scottbb
18.2k75388
edited 1 hour ago
scottbb
18.2k75388
edited 1 hour ago
scottbb
18.2k75388
18.2k75388
asked 3 hours ago
Betty Crokker
1363
asked 3 hours ago
Betty Crokker
1363
asked 3 hours ago
Betty Crokker
1363
1363
1
Possible duplicate of How do I diagnose the source of focus problem in a camera?
– mattdm
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
1
Possible duplicate of How do I diagnose the source of focus problem in a camera?
– mattdm
1 hour ago
1
1
Possible duplicate of How do I diagnose the source of focus problem in a camera?
– mattdm
1 hour ago
Possible duplicate of How do I diagnose the source of focus problem in a camera?
– mattdm
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
You're probably expecting too much for a superzoom lens. They tend to exhibit more autofocusing inaccuracy at the long end of the zoom range. Additionally, because of some of the design tradeoffs required to achieve such a large focal length range, the optical performance tends to suffer at one end or the other (usually at the long end).
Regarding autofocus accuracy, quoting from Nasim Mansurov's review of the 18-300mm at Photographylife.com,
As you zoom in, however, autofocus accuracy is inconsistent and can be all over the place – with plenty of hits and misses. Anything above 105mm tends to miss focus and it gets worse at 200mm and 300mm. With such a complex lens design, I can see why it is so weak on the telephoto side. [...] Well, that’s what you get with a superzoom. Focus tracking in OK in continuous mode, again only at short focal lengths. When the lens cannot autofocus and starts to hunt, the autofocus performance gets to a crawling speed. I was able to get a couple of sharp shots at 300mm, but it was not easy. I had to constantly refocus and take pictures and eventually got a couple of keepers.
Later in the review, commenting on the Imatest sharpness scores (MTF performance) at 300mm,
At 300mm we get the worst sharpness – image quality suffers pretty badly and the resolving power of the lens is greatly diminished. These results are pretty typical for a superzoom though.
DPReview.com reached similar conclusions:
Our biggest concern about the 18-300mm, though, is its performance at the telephoto end. In practical use, chances are you'll be shooting at maximum aperture much of the time, and relying on the lens's VR system to keep things steady. But image quality at telephoto isn't great especially wide open, and this is compounded by a VR system that we've found to fail consistently across a specific shutter speed range (approx 1/125 - 1/40 sec). The D3200 we used for testing also frequently misfocused slightly when shooting at telephoto. This means that we often found real-world results at to be disappointing in the telephoto range - and especially at 300mm.
answered 1 hour ago
scottbb
18.2k75388
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
You're probably expecting too much for a superzoom lens. They tend to exhibit more autofocusing inaccuracy at the long end of the zoom range. Additionally, because of some of the design tradeoffs required to achieve such a large focal length range, the optical performance tends to suffer at one end or the other (usually at the long end).
Regarding autofocus accuracy, quoting from Nasim Mansurov's review of the 18-300mm at Photographylife.com,
As you zoom in, however, autofocus accuracy is inconsistent and can be all over the place – with plenty of hits and misses. Anything above 105mm tends to miss focus and it gets worse at 200mm and 300mm. With such a complex lens design, I can see why it is so weak on the telephoto side. [...] Well, that’s what you get with a superzoom. Focus tracking in OK in continuous mode, again only at short focal lengths. When the lens cannot autofocus and starts to hunt, the autofocus performance gets to a crawling speed. I was able to get a couple of sharp shots at 300mm, but it was not easy. I had to constantly refocus and take pictures and eventually got a couple of keepers.
Later in the review, commenting on the Imatest sharpness scores (MTF performance) at 300mm,
At 300mm we get the worst sharpness – image quality suffers pretty badly and the resolving power of the lens is greatly diminished. These results are pretty typical for a superzoom though.
DPReview.com reached similar conclusions:
Our biggest concern about the 18-300mm, though, is its performance at the telephoto end. In practical use, chances are you'll be shooting at maximum aperture much of the time, and relying on the lens's VR system to keep things steady. But image quality at telephoto isn't great especially wide open, and this is compounded by a VR system that we've found to fail consistently across a specific shutter speed range (approx 1/125 - 1/40 sec). The D3200 we used for testing also frequently misfocused slightly when shooting at telephoto. This means that we often found real-world results at to be disappointing in the telephoto range - and especially at 300mm.
answered 1 hour ago
scottbb
18.2k75388
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
You're probably expecting too much for a superzoom lens. They tend to exhibit more autofocusing inaccuracy at the long end of the zoom range. Additionally, because of some of the design tradeoffs required to achieve such a large focal length range, the optical performance tends to suffer at one end or the other (usually at the long end).
Regarding autofocus accuracy, quoting from Nasim Mansurov's review of the 18-300mm at Photographylife.com,
As you zoom in, however, autofocus accuracy is inconsistent and can be all over the place – with plenty of hits and misses. Anything above 105mm tends to miss focus and it gets worse at 200mm and 300mm. With such a complex lens design, I can see why it is so weak on the telephoto side. [...] Well, that’s what you get with a superzoom. Focus tracking in OK in continuous mode, again only at short focal lengths. When the lens cannot autofocus and starts to hunt, the autofocus performance gets to a crawling speed. I was able to get a couple of sharp shots at 300mm, but it was not easy. I had to constantly refocus and take pictures and eventually got a couple of keepers.
Later in the review, commenting on the Imatest sharpness scores (MTF performance) at 300mm,
At 300mm we get the worst sharpness – image quality suffers pretty badly and the resolving power of the lens is greatly diminished. These results are pretty typical for a superzoom though.
DPReview.com reached similar conclusions:
Our biggest concern about the 18-300mm, though, is its performance at the telephoto end. In practical use, chances are you'll be shooting at maximum aperture much of the time, and relying on the lens's VR system to keep things steady. But image quality at telephoto isn't great especially wide open, and this is compounded by a VR system that we've found to fail consistently across a specific shutter speed range (approx 1/125 - 1/40 sec). The D3200 we used for testing also frequently misfocused slightly when shooting at telephoto. This means that we often found real-world results at to be disappointing in the telephoto range - and especially at 300mm.
answered 1 hour ago
scottbb
18.2k75388
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
You're probably expecting too much for a superzoom lens. They tend to exhibit more autofocusing inaccuracy at the long end of the zoom range. Additionally, because of some of the design tradeoffs required to achieve such a large focal length range, the optical performance tends to suffer at one end or the other (usually at the long end).
Regarding autofocus accuracy, quoting from Nasim Mansurov's review of the 18-300mm at Photographylife.com,
As you zoom in, however, autofocus accuracy is inconsistent and can be all over the place – with plenty of hits and misses. Anything above 105mm tends to miss focus and it gets worse at 200mm and 300mm. With such a complex lens design, I can see why it is so weak on the telephoto side. [...] Well, that’s what you get with a superzoom. Focus tracking in OK in continuous mode, again only at short focal lengths. When the lens cannot autofocus and starts to hunt, the autofocus performance gets to a crawling speed. I was able to get a couple of sharp shots at 300mm, but it was not easy. I had to constantly refocus and take pictures and eventually got a couple of keepers.
Later in the review, commenting on the Imatest sharpness scores (MTF performance) at 300mm,
At 300mm we get the worst sharpness – image quality suffers pretty badly and the resolving power of the lens is greatly diminished. These results are pretty typical for a superzoom though.
DPReview.com reached similar conclusions:
Our biggest concern about the 18-300mm, though, is its performance at the telephoto end. In practical use, chances are you'll be shooting at maximum aperture much of the time, and relying on the lens's VR system to keep things steady. But image quality at telephoto isn't great especially wide open, and this is compounded by a VR system that we've found to fail consistently across a specific shutter speed range (approx 1/125 - 1/40 sec). The D3200 we used for testing also frequently misfocused slightly when shooting at telephoto. This means that we often found real-world results at to be disappointing in the telephoto range - and especially at 300mm.
answered 1 hour ago
scottbb
18.2k75388
You're probably expecting too much for a superzoom lens. They tend to exhibit more autofocusing inaccuracy at the long end of the zoom range. Additionally, because of some of the design tradeoffs required to achieve such a large focal length range, the optical performance tends to suffer at one end or the other (usually at the long end).
Regarding autofocus accuracy, quoting from Nasim Mansurov's review of the 18-300mm at Photographylife.com,
As you zoom in, however, autofocus accuracy is inconsistent and can be all over the place – with plenty of hits and misses. Anything above 105mm tends to miss focus and it gets worse at 200mm and 300mm. With such a complex lens design, I can see why it is so weak on the telephoto side. [...] Well, that’s what you get with a superzoom. Focus tracking in OK in continuous mode, again only at short focal lengths. When the lens cannot autofocus and starts to hunt, the autofocus performance gets to a crawling speed. I was able to get a couple of sharp shots at 300mm, but it was not easy. I had to constantly refocus and take pictures and eventually got a couple of keepers.
Later in the review, commenting on the Imatest sharpness scores (MTF performance) at 300mm,
At 300mm we get the worst sharpness – image quality suffers pretty badly and the resolving power of the lens is greatly diminished. These results are pretty typical for a superzoom though.
DPReview.com reached similar conclusions:
Our biggest concern about the 18-300mm, though, is its performance at the telephoto end. In practical use, chances are you'll be shooting at maximum aperture much of the time, and relying on the lens's VR system to keep things steady. But image quality at telephoto isn't great especially wide open, and this is compounded by a VR system that we've found to fail consistently across a specific shutter speed range (approx 1/125 - 1/40 sec). The D3200 we used for testing also frequently misfocused slightly when shooting at telephoto. This means that we often found real-world results at to be disappointing in the telephoto range - and especially at 300mm.
answered 1 hour ago
scottbb
18.2k75388
answered 1 hour ago
scottbb
18.2k75388
answered 1 hour ago
scottbb
18.2k75388
answered 1 hour ago
scottbb
18.2k75388
18.2k75388
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102260%2fwhy-does-my-superzoom-lens-sometimes-miss-focus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
Possible duplicate of How do I diagnose the source of focus problem in a camera?
– mattdm
1 hour ago