Mixing
2018 - Economical, quality home photo printer recommendations
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
So I have a similar question to this one, but it's about 5 years old now:
printer recommendations
Since printing technology is always developing, consider this the updated question for late 2018.
My parents do not have a lot of money but they want to be able to print a bunch of photos from home on occasion. Since they don't print very frequently, they often have the ink-drying-up problem that leads to clogs/poor print quality, which means more maintenance routines that use up even more ink and cost them a lot of money in the long run. So I'm planning on getting them a new printer for Christmas.
My question has two parts:
What would you get them today if these were your parents (presuming you love your parents)
In 2018, are toner photo prints usually good enough these days that they could be a good replacement for ink prints?
I was thinking about getting them a color laser printer + backup toner + laser photo paper bundle, but I'm hoping for some feedback on quality and models (or even feedback that suggests a better inkjet).
So far, I was looking at either a Canon imageClass MFC or a Samsung Xpress. The Xpress seems "simpler" which would be great for my parents and has cheaper toners but worse yield (roughly $0.044 per page vs imageClass's $0.038). However, I have no idea what the image quality for a printed photo is truly like on either of these, and I rarely print photos from my own color laser (a Brother MFC).
There's another part of me that whispers, "If you want good photo quality, laser can't compete with pigment ink..." so I've considered a printer that might be more geared specifically to simple printing of 4x6 photos, like the Canon SELPHY. While it sounds like the print quality is great, I assume (maybe incorrectly?) they would be susceptible to the same kind of ink-drying issues that my parents face on their current printer. Also, the cost per print is much higher (roughly $0.28), but if it doesn't dry out and clog like other inkjets do, maybe it's more feasible... (EDIT: One of the reviews for the SELPHY said the ink doesn't dry out like inkjets do)
So all that said, what would you guys suggest today (or if there's something new and better coming out between now and Christmas 2018) ?
printing ink-jet
asked 4 hours ago
jhilgeman
1063
New contributor
jhilgeman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
So I have a similar question to this one, but it's about 5 years old now:
printer recommendations
Since printing technology is always developing, consider this the updated question for late 2018.
My parents do not have a lot of money but they want to be able to print a bunch of photos from home on occasion. Since they don't print very frequently, they often have the ink-drying-up problem that leads to clogs/poor print quality, which means more maintenance routines that use up even more ink and cost them a lot of money in the long run. So I'm planning on getting them a new printer for Christmas.
My question has two parts:
What would you get them today if these were your parents (presuming you love your parents)
In 2018, are toner photo prints usually good enough these days that they could be a good replacement for ink prints?
I was thinking about getting them a color laser printer + backup toner + laser photo paper bundle, but I'm hoping for some feedback on quality and models (or even feedback that suggests a better inkjet).
So far, I was looking at either a Canon imageClass MFC or a Samsung Xpress. The Xpress seems "simpler" which would be great for my parents and has cheaper toners but worse yield (roughly $0.044 per page vs imageClass's $0.038). However, I have no idea what the image quality for a printed photo is truly like on either of these, and I rarely print photos from my own color laser (a Brother MFC).
There's another part of me that whispers, "If you want good photo quality, laser can't compete with pigment ink..." so I've considered a printer that might be more geared specifically to simple printing of 4x6 photos, like the Canon SELPHY. While it sounds like the print quality is great, I assume (maybe incorrectly?) they would be susceptible to the same kind of ink-drying issues that my parents face on their current printer. Also, the cost per print is much higher (roughly $0.28), but if it doesn't dry out and clog like other inkjets do, maybe it's more feasible... (EDIT: One of the reviews for the SELPHY said the ink doesn't dry out like inkjets do)
So all that said, what would you guys suggest today (or if there's something new and better coming out between now and Christmas 2018) ?
printing ink-jet
asked 4 hours ago
jhilgeman
1063
New contributor
jhilgeman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
Note that product recommendations are off-topic here, as they are on most Stack Exchange sites. See this blog post for more. And speculating on something new coming before Christmas is doubly so....
– mattdm
4 hours ago
I thought the concern was primarily about product recommendations due to the changing product market, which is why I tried to caveat this by specifying the time frame.
– jhilgeman
3 hours ago
3
The basic goal is to have timeless questions that will help people forever, or at least close to it. Having different questions for every year doesn't really help that. But I think more fundamentally, there's unlikely to be anyone who has really reviewed all the printer options out there; we're just going to get random personal experiences rather than comprehensive advice. Better to go to a printer review site — they do review lots and lots of models, and strive to keep up as things change.
– mattdm
3 hours ago
I've read through several printer review sites prior to posting, but those reviews tend to lean towards being generic to a wide audience and they often review each printer independently (so it's hard to get a thorough answer on toner vs. ink, for example, since they want to cover scanning capabilities). I understand the desire for timeless questions, but given that certain technologies adapt over time, it seems worthy to occasionally ask for new answers. I'm looking precisely for anecdotal, random experiences from people who are more likely to have a wide range of printing experiences.
– jhilgeman
2 hours ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
So I have a similar question to this one, but it's about 5 years old now:
printer recommendations
Since printing technology is always developing, consider this the updated question for late 2018.
My parents do not have a lot of money but they want to be able to print a bunch of photos from home on occasion. Since they don't print very frequently, they often have the ink-drying-up problem that leads to clogs/poor print quality, which means more maintenance routines that use up even more ink and cost them a lot of money in the long run. So I'm planning on getting them a new printer for Christmas.
My question has two parts:
What would you get them today if these were your parents (presuming you love your parents)
In 2018, are toner photo prints usually good enough these days that they could be a good replacement for ink prints?
I was thinking about getting them a color laser printer + backup toner + laser photo paper bundle, but I'm hoping for some feedback on quality and models (or even feedback that suggests a better inkjet).
So far, I was looking at either a Canon imageClass MFC or a Samsung Xpress. The Xpress seems "simpler" which would be great for my parents and has cheaper toners but worse yield (roughly $0.044 per page vs imageClass's $0.038). However, I have no idea what the image quality for a printed photo is truly like on either of these, and I rarely print photos from my own color laser (a Brother MFC).
There's another part of me that whispers, "If you want good photo quality, laser can't compete with pigment ink..." so I've considered a printer that might be more geared specifically to simple printing of 4x6 photos, like the Canon SELPHY. While it sounds like the print quality is great, I assume (maybe incorrectly?) they would be susceptible to the same kind of ink-drying issues that my parents face on their current printer. Also, the cost per print is much higher (roughly $0.28), but if it doesn't dry out and clog like other inkjets do, maybe it's more feasible... (EDIT: One of the reviews for the SELPHY said the ink doesn't dry out like inkjets do)
So all that said, what would you guys suggest today (or if there's something new and better coming out between now and Christmas 2018) ?
printing ink-jet
asked 4 hours ago
jhilgeman
1063
New contributor
jhilgeman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
So I have a similar question to this one, but it's about 5 years old now:
printer recommendations
Since printing technology is always developing, consider this the updated question for late 2018.
My parents do not have a lot of money but they want to be able to print a bunch of photos from home on occasion. Since they don't print very frequently, they often have the ink-drying-up problem that leads to clogs/poor print quality, which means more maintenance routines that use up even more ink and cost them a lot of money in the long run. So I'm planning on getting them a new printer for Christmas.
My question has two parts:
What would you get them today if these were your parents (presuming you love your parents)
In 2018, are toner photo prints usually good enough these days that they could be a good replacement for ink prints?
I was thinking about getting them a color laser printer + backup toner + laser photo paper bundle, but I'm hoping for some feedback on quality and models (or even feedback that suggests a better inkjet).
So far, I was looking at either a Canon imageClass MFC or a Samsung Xpress. The Xpress seems "simpler" which would be great for my parents and has cheaper toners but worse yield (roughly $0.044 per page vs imageClass's $0.038). However, I have no idea what the image quality for a printed photo is truly like on either of these, and I rarely print photos from my own color laser (a Brother MFC).
There's another part of me that whispers, "If you want good photo quality, laser can't compete with pigment ink..." so I've considered a printer that might be more geared specifically to simple printing of 4x6 photos, like the Canon SELPHY. While it sounds like the print quality is great, I assume (maybe incorrectly?) they would be susceptible to the same kind of ink-drying issues that my parents face on their current printer. Also, the cost per print is much higher (roughly $0.28), but if it doesn't dry out and clog like other inkjets do, maybe it's more feasible... (EDIT: One of the reviews for the SELPHY said the ink doesn't dry out like inkjets do)
So all that said, what would you guys suggest today (or if there's something new and better coming out between now and Christmas 2018) ?
printing ink-jet
printing ink-jet
asked 4 hours ago
jhilgeman
1063
New contributor
jhilgeman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 4 hours ago
jhilgeman
1063
New contributor
jhilgeman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 4 hours ago
asked 4 hours ago
jhilgeman
1063
New contributor
jhilgeman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 4 hours ago
jhilgeman
1063
asked 4 hours ago
jhilgeman
1063
1063
New contributor
jhilgeman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
jhilgeman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
jhilgeman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
Note that product recommendations are off-topic here, as they are on most Stack Exchange sites. See this blog post for more. And speculating on something new coming before Christmas is doubly so....
– mattdm
4 hours ago
I thought the concern was primarily about product recommendations due to the changing product market, which is why I tried to caveat this by specifying the time frame.
– jhilgeman
3 hours ago
3
The basic goal is to have timeless questions that will help people forever, or at least close to it. Having different questions for every year doesn't really help that. But I think more fundamentally, there's unlikely to be anyone who has really reviewed all the printer options out there; we're just going to get random personal experiences rather than comprehensive advice. Better to go to a printer review site — they do review lots and lots of models, and strive to keep up as things change.
– mattdm
3 hours ago
I've read through several printer review sites prior to posting, but those reviews tend to lean towards being generic to a wide audience and they often review each printer independently (so it's hard to get a thorough answer on toner vs. ink, for example, since they want to cover scanning capabilities). I understand the desire for timeless questions, but given that certain technologies adapt over time, it seems worthy to occasionally ask for new answers. I'm looking precisely for anecdotal, random experiences from people who are more likely to have a wide range of printing experiences.
– jhilgeman
2 hours ago
add a comment |Â
2
Note that product recommendations are off-topic here, as they are on most Stack Exchange sites. See this blog post for more. And speculating on something new coming before Christmas is doubly so....
– mattdm
4 hours ago
I thought the concern was primarily about product recommendations due to the changing product market, which is why I tried to caveat this by specifying the time frame.
– jhilgeman
3 hours ago
3
The basic goal is to have timeless questions that will help people forever, or at least close to it. Having different questions for every year doesn't really help that. But I think more fundamentally, there's unlikely to be anyone who has really reviewed all the printer options out there; we're just going to get random personal experiences rather than comprehensive advice. Better to go to a printer review site — they do review lots and lots of models, and strive to keep up as things change.
– mattdm
3 hours ago
I've read through several printer review sites prior to posting, but those reviews tend to lean towards being generic to a wide audience and they often review each printer independently (so it's hard to get a thorough answer on toner vs. ink, for example, since they want to cover scanning capabilities). I understand the desire for timeless questions, but given that certain technologies adapt over time, it seems worthy to occasionally ask for new answers. I'm looking precisely for anecdotal, random experiences from people who are more likely to have a wide range of printing experiences.
– jhilgeman
2 hours ago
2
2
Note that product recommendations are off-topic here, as they are on most Stack Exchange sites. See this blog post for more. And speculating on something new coming before Christmas is doubly so....
– mattdm
4 hours ago
Note that product recommendations are off-topic here, as they are on most Stack Exchange sites. See this blog post for more. And speculating on something new coming before Christmas is doubly so....
– mattdm
4 hours ago
I thought the concern was primarily about product recommendations due to the changing product market, which is why I tried to caveat this by specifying the time frame.
– jhilgeman
3 hours ago
I thought the concern was primarily about product recommendations due to the changing product market, which is why I tried to caveat this by specifying the time frame.
– jhilgeman
3 hours ago
3
3
The basic goal is to have timeless questions that will help people forever, or at least close to it. Having different questions for every year doesn't really help that. But I think more fundamentally, there's unlikely to be anyone who has really reviewed all the printer options out there; we're just going to get random personal experiences rather than comprehensive advice. Better to go to a printer review site — they do review lots and lots of models, and strive to keep up as things change.
– mattdm
3 hours ago
The basic goal is to have timeless questions that will help people forever, or at least close to it. Having different questions for every year doesn't really help that. But I think more fundamentally, there's unlikely to be anyone who has really reviewed all the printer options out there; we're just going to get random personal experiences rather than comprehensive advice. Better to go to a printer review site — they do review lots and lots of models, and strive to keep up as things change.
– mattdm
3 hours ago
I've read through several printer review sites prior to posting, but those reviews tend to lean towards being generic to a wide audience and they often review each printer independently (so it's hard to get a thorough answer on toner vs. ink, for example, since they want to cover scanning capabilities). I understand the desire for timeless questions, but given that certain technologies adapt over time, it seems worthy to occasionally ask for new answers. I'm looking precisely for anecdotal, random experiences from people who are more likely to have a wide range of printing experiences.
– jhilgeman
2 hours ago
I've read through several printer review sites prior to posting, but those reviews tend to lean towards being generic to a wide audience and they often review each printer independently (so it's hard to get a thorough answer on toner vs. ink, for example, since they want to cover scanning capabilities). I understand the desire for timeless questions, but given that certain technologies adapt over time, it seems worthy to occasionally ask for new answers. I'm looking precisely for anecdotal, random experiences from people who are more likely to have a wide range of printing experiences.
– jhilgeman
2 hours ago
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
Since they don't print very frequently, they often have the ink-drying-up problem that leads to clogs/poor print quality, which means more maintenance routines that use up even more ink and cost them a lot of money in the long run. So I'm planning on getting them a new printer for Christmas.
Given this, I'd suggest a gift card to an online printing service. The cost of a decent printer will instead go a long, long way towards just getting results without the hassle of printer maintenance.
Note that the cost per page for the non-dedicated printers you are looking at assumes an average cost for general-purpose documents on non-photo paper. If you are doing full-page (or even quarter-page!) prints on photo paper, your cost per page will be much, much higher. That puts online services into a competitive range, and with no initial outlay or ongoing work.
answered 4 hours ago
mattdm
117k37343633
That sounds like two different recommendations. If the cost of a decent printer will go a long, long way, wouldn't that be the better choice?
– jhilgeman
4 hours ago
No, I mean exactly the opposite. :) Rephrased.
– mattdm
4 hours ago
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
Since they don't print very frequently, they often have the ink-drying-up problem that leads to clogs/poor print quality, which means more maintenance routines that use up even more ink and cost them a lot of money in the long run. So I'm planning on getting them a new printer for Christmas.
Given this, I'd suggest a gift card to an online printing service. The cost of a decent printer will instead go a long, long way towards just getting results without the hassle of printer maintenance.
Note that the cost per page for the non-dedicated printers you are looking at assumes an average cost for general-purpose documents on non-photo paper. If you are doing full-page (or even quarter-page!) prints on photo paper, your cost per page will be much, much higher. That puts online services into a competitive range, and with no initial outlay or ongoing work.
answered 4 hours ago
mattdm
117k37343633
That sounds like two different recommendations. If the cost of a decent printer will go a long, long way, wouldn't that be the better choice?
– jhilgeman
4 hours ago
No, I mean exactly the opposite. :) Rephrased.
– mattdm
4 hours ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
Since they don't print very frequently, they often have the ink-drying-up problem that leads to clogs/poor print quality, which means more maintenance routines that use up even more ink and cost them a lot of money in the long run. So I'm planning on getting them a new printer for Christmas.
Given this, I'd suggest a gift card to an online printing service. The cost of a decent printer will instead go a long, long way towards just getting results without the hassle of printer maintenance.
Note that the cost per page for the non-dedicated printers you are looking at assumes an average cost for general-purpose documents on non-photo paper. If you are doing full-page (or even quarter-page!) prints on photo paper, your cost per page will be much, much higher. That puts online services into a competitive range, and with no initial outlay or ongoing work.
answered 4 hours ago
mattdm
117k37343633
That sounds like two different recommendations. If the cost of a decent printer will go a long, long way, wouldn't that be the better choice?
– jhilgeman
4 hours ago
No, I mean exactly the opposite. :) Rephrased.
– mattdm
4 hours ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
Since they don't print very frequently, they often have the ink-drying-up problem that leads to clogs/poor print quality, which means more maintenance routines that use up even more ink and cost them a lot of money in the long run. So I'm planning on getting them a new printer for Christmas.
Given this, I'd suggest a gift card to an online printing service. The cost of a decent printer will instead go a long, long way towards just getting results without the hassle of printer maintenance.
Note that the cost per page for the non-dedicated printers you are looking at assumes an average cost for general-purpose documents on non-photo paper. If you are doing full-page (or even quarter-page!) prints on photo paper, your cost per page will be much, much higher. That puts online services into a competitive range, and with no initial outlay or ongoing work.
answered 4 hours ago
mattdm
117k37343633
Since they don't print very frequently, they often have the ink-drying-up problem that leads to clogs/poor print quality, which means more maintenance routines that use up even more ink and cost them a lot of money in the long run. So I'm planning on getting them a new printer for Christmas.
Given this, I'd suggest a gift card to an online printing service. The cost of a decent printer will instead go a long, long way towards just getting results without the hassle of printer maintenance.
Note that the cost per page for the non-dedicated printers you are looking at assumes an average cost for general-purpose documents on non-photo paper. If you are doing full-page (or even quarter-page!) prints on photo paper, your cost per page will be much, much higher. That puts online services into a competitive range, and with no initial outlay or ongoing work.
answered 4 hours ago
mattdm
117k37343633
edited 3 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
mattdm
117k37343633
answered 4 hours ago
mattdm
117k37343633
answered 4 hours ago
mattdm
117k37343633
117k37343633
That sounds like two different recommendations. If the cost of a decent printer will go a long, long way, wouldn't that be the better choice?
– jhilgeman
4 hours ago
No, I mean exactly the opposite. :) Rephrased.
– mattdm
4 hours ago
add a comment |Â
That sounds like two different recommendations. If the cost of a decent printer will go a long, long way, wouldn't that be the better choice?
– jhilgeman
4 hours ago
No, I mean exactly the opposite. :) Rephrased.
– mattdm
4 hours ago
That sounds like two different recommendations. If the cost of a decent printer will go a long, long way, wouldn't that be the better choice?
– jhilgeman
4 hours ago
That sounds like two different recommendations. If the cost of a decent printer will go a long, long way, wouldn't that be the better choice?
– jhilgeman
4 hours ago
No, I mean exactly the opposite. :) Rephrased.
– mattdm
4 hours ago
No, I mean exactly the opposite. :) Rephrased.
– mattdm
4 hours ago
add a comment |Â
jhilgeman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
jhilgeman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
jhilgeman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
jhilgeman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102262%2f2018-economical-quality-home-photo-printer-recommendations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
2
Note that product recommendations are off-topic here, as they are on most Stack Exchange sites. See this blog post for more. And speculating on something new coming before Christmas is doubly so....
– mattdm
4 hours ago
I thought the concern was primarily about product recommendations due to the changing product market, which is why I tried to caveat this by specifying the time frame.
– jhilgeman
3 hours ago
3
The basic goal is to have timeless questions that will help people forever, or at least close to it. Having different questions for every year doesn't really help that. But I think more fundamentally, there's unlikely to be anyone who has really reviewed all the printer options out there; we're just going to get random personal experiences rather than comprehensive advice. Better to go to a printer review site — they do review lots and lots of models, and strive to keep up as things change.
– mattdm
3 hours ago
I've read through several printer review sites prior to posting, but those reviews tend to lean towards being generic to a wide audience and they often review each printer independently (so it's hard to get a thorough answer on toner vs. ink, for example, since they want to cover scanning capabilities). I understand the desire for timeless questions, but given that certain technologies adapt over time, it seems worthy to occasionally ask for new answers. I'm looking precisely for anecdotal, random experiences from people who are more likely to have a wide range of printing experiences.
– jhilgeman
2 hours ago