splitfrac producing extra '1' characters

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I am having the exact same problem as this (closed) question - but I have ideas as to what might be causing the problem in my case



documentclass[12pt,a4paper]article
usepackagemathtools

begindocument
beginalign
mathcalB_x=fracsplitfracomega_x+delta=1, tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^mPrleft(tau_inotin[x, x+delta)splitfracomega_x+delta=0, tau_inotin [x-delta, x))^momega_x+delta=0, tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^k-m-1
endalign
enddocument


When I run the code as it is above, I get my desired output:
enter image description here



However, when I run it with the entire preamble that I am using for a longer document, I get extra "1" characters



documentclass[12pt,a4paper]article
usepackageamsmath,amsthm,amssymb,apacite,graphicx, verbatim,upref,paralist,indentfirst
usepackagesetspace
usepackagebreqn
allowdisplaybreaks
usepackagegraphicx
usepackagemathrsfs
usepackagemathtools
usepackageenumerate
graphicspath ./images/ 
onehalfspacing
usepackagefloat
setlengthparskip2pt%

begindocument
beginalign
mathcalB_x=fracsplitfracomega_x+delta=1, tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^mPrleft(tau_inotin[x, x+delta)splitfracomega_x+delta=0, tau_inotin [x-delta, x))^momega_x+delta=0, tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^k-m-1
endalign
enddocument


enter image description here



I am suspecting that there is some "contamination" from other packages in the preamble that are producing these unwanted "1" characters. Is there anything I can do to remove these unwanted "1"s? Is there a way I can do this without removing other packages from the preamble, as this may affect other formulae that I have in the document.



Edit:
I suspect it is this line in the preamble that is causing the "1" to appear:



 usepackagebreqn


When I remove it from the preamble, the 1's disappear. Is there a way to remove the 1's without removing this line from the preamble?






mathtools







share|improve this question









New contributor




Elke is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Related: How can I split and align this series of equations?
    – Werner
    3 hours ago














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I am having the exact same problem as this (closed) question - but I have ideas as to what might be causing the problem in my case



documentclass[12pt,a4paper]article
usepackagemathtools

begindocument
beginalign
mathcalB_x=fracsplitfracomega_x+delta=1, tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^mPrleft(tau_inotin[x, x+delta)splitfracomega_x+delta=0, tau_inotin [x-delta, x))^momega_x+delta=0, tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^k-m-1
endalign
enddocument


When I run the code as it is above, I get my desired output:
enter image description here



However, when I run it with the entire preamble that I am using for a longer document, I get extra "1" characters



documentclass[12pt,a4paper]article
usepackageamsmath,amsthm,amssymb,apacite,graphicx, verbatim,upref,paralist,indentfirst
usepackagesetspace
usepackagebreqn
allowdisplaybreaks
usepackagegraphicx
usepackagemathrsfs
usepackagemathtools
usepackageenumerate
graphicspath ./images/ 
onehalfspacing
usepackagefloat
setlengthparskip2pt%

begindocument
beginalign
mathcalB_x=fracsplitfracomega_x+delta=1, tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^mPrleft(tau_inotin[x, x+delta)splitfracomega_x+delta=0, tau_inotin [x-delta, x))^momega_x+delta=0, tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^k-m-1
endalign
enddocument


enter image description here



I am suspecting that there is some "contamination" from other packages in the preamble that are producing these unwanted "1" characters. Is there anything I can do to remove these unwanted "1"s? Is there a way I can do this without removing other packages from the preamble, as this may affect other formulae that I have in the document.



Edit:
I suspect it is this line in the preamble that is causing the "1" to appear:



 usepackagebreqn


When I remove it from the preamble, the 1's disappear. Is there a way to remove the 1's without removing this line from the preamble?






mathtools







share|improve this question









New contributor




Elke is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Related: How can I split and align this series of equations?
    – Werner
    3 hours ago












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











I am having the exact same problem as this (closed) question - but I have ideas as to what might be causing the problem in my case



documentclass[12pt,a4paper]article
usepackagemathtools

begindocument
beginalign
mathcalB_x=fracsplitfracomega_x+delta=1, tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^mPrleft(tau_inotin[x, x+delta)splitfracomega_x+delta=0, tau_inotin [x-delta, x))^momega_x+delta=0, tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^k-m-1
endalign
enddocument


When I run the code as it is above, I get my desired output:
enter image description here



However, when I run it with the entire preamble that I am using for a longer document, I get extra "1" characters



documentclass[12pt,a4paper]article
usepackageamsmath,amsthm,amssymb,apacite,graphicx, verbatim,upref,paralist,indentfirst
usepackagesetspace
usepackagebreqn
allowdisplaybreaks
usepackagegraphicx
usepackagemathrsfs
usepackagemathtools
usepackageenumerate
graphicspath ./images/ 
onehalfspacing
usepackagefloat
setlengthparskip2pt%

begindocument
beginalign
mathcalB_x=fracsplitfracomega_x+delta=1, tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^mPrleft(tau_inotin[x, x+delta)splitfracomega_x+delta=0, tau_inotin [x-delta, x))^momega_x+delta=0, tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^k-m-1
endalign
enddocument


enter image description here



I am suspecting that there is some "contamination" from other packages in the preamble that are producing these unwanted "1" characters. Is there anything I can do to remove these unwanted "1"s? Is there a way I can do this without removing other packages from the preamble, as this may affect other formulae that I have in the document.



Edit:
I suspect it is this line in the preamble that is causing the "1" to appear:



 usepackagebreqn


When I remove it from the preamble, the 1's disappear. Is there a way to remove the 1's without removing this line from the preamble?






mathtools







share|improve this question









New contributor




Elke is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I am having the exact same problem as this (closed) question - but I have ideas as to what might be causing the problem in my case



documentclass[12pt,a4paper]article
usepackagemathtools

begindocument
beginalign
mathcalB_x=fracsplitfracomega_x+delta=1, tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^mPrleft(tau_inotin[x, x+delta)splitfracomega_x+delta=0, tau_inotin [x-delta, x))^momega_x+delta=0, tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^k-m-1
endalign
enddocument


When I run the code as it is above, I get my desired output:
enter image description here



However, when I run it with the entire preamble that I am using for a longer document, I get extra "1" characters



documentclass[12pt,a4paper]article
usepackageamsmath,amsthm,amssymb,apacite,graphicx, verbatim,upref,paralist,indentfirst
usepackagesetspace
usepackagebreqn
allowdisplaybreaks
usepackagegraphicx
usepackagemathrsfs
usepackagemathtools
usepackageenumerate
graphicspath ./images/ 
onehalfspacing
usepackagefloat
setlengthparskip2pt%

begindocument
beginalign
mathcalB_x=fracsplitfracomega_x+delta=1, tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^mPrleft(tau_inotin[x, x+delta)splitfracomega_x+delta=0, tau_inotin [x-delta, x))^momega_x+delta=0, tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^k-m-1
endalign
enddocument


enter image description here



I am suspecting that there is some "contamination" from other packages in the preamble that are producing these unwanted "1" characters. Is there anything I can do to remove these unwanted "1"s? Is there a way I can do this without removing other packages from the preamble, as this may affect other formulae that I have in the document.



Edit:
I suspect it is this line in the preamble that is causing the "1" to appear:



 usepackagebreqn


When I remove it from the preamble, the 1's disappear. Is there a way to remove the 1's without removing this line from the preamble?






mathtools




mathtools






share|improve this question









New contributor




Elke is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Elke is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 15 mins ago





















New contributor




Elke is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 3 hours ago









Elke

133




133




New contributor




Elke is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Elke is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Elke is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • Related: How can I split and align this series of equations?
    – Werner
    3 hours ago
















  • Related: How can I split and align this series of equations?
    – Werner
    3 hours ago















Related: How can I split and align this series of equations?
– Werner
3 hours ago




Related: How can I split and align this series of equations?
– Werner
3 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










A really minimal example is



documentclassarticle
usepackagebreqn

begindocument
[
genfrac0pt1AB
]
enddocument


that typesets



enter image description here



whereas it typesets as expected if breqn is changed into amsmath. Note that splitfrac is just a thin layer around genfrac.



Oh, wait! How does the minimal example compile? Isn't genfrac defined by amsmath that isn't loaded? Yes, that's true. Besides other damages, breqn seizes the initiative to define (or redefine) genfrac. But it does it wrong. The definition is in mathstyle.sty



 145 │ DeclareRobustCommandgenfrac[6]%
 146 │ #1fracstyle
 147 │ begingroup #5endgroup
 148 │ csname @@ifxmaxdimen#4maxdimen overelse abovefi
 149 │ if @#2@else withdelimsfiendcsname #2#3#4relax
 150 │ #6%
 151 │ %
 152 │


and #2#3#4relax should be #2#3relax. The modified macro gives the expected result:



documentclassarticle
usepackagebreqn
usepackageregexpatch

makeatletter
xpatchcmdgenfrac#4relaxrelax
makeatother

begindocument
[
genfrac0pt1AB
]
enddocument


Without regexpatch, your document should look as follows:



documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackagebreqn

makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommandgenfrac[6]%
 #1fracstyle
 begingroup #5endgroup
 csname @@ifxmaxdimen#4maxdimen overelse abovefi
 if @#2@else withdelimsfiendcsname #2#3relax
 #6%
 %

makeatother

begindocument

beginequation
mathcalB_x=
 frac
 splitfracomega_x+delta=1,
 tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^m
 omega_x+delta=1,
 tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^k-m-1
 
 
 splitfracomega_x+delta=0,
 tau_inotin [x-delta, x))^m
 
 Prleft(tau_inotin[x, x+delta)
 
endequation

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer




















  • Bug report filed: github.com/wspr/breqn/issues/25
    – egreg
    42 mins ago










Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Elke is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f456197%2fsplitfrac-producing-extra-1-characters%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










A really minimal example is



documentclassarticle
usepackagebreqn

begindocument
[
genfrac0pt1AB
]
enddocument


that typesets



enter image description here



whereas it typesets as expected if breqn is changed into amsmath. Note that splitfrac is just a thin layer around genfrac.



Oh, wait! How does the minimal example compile? Isn't genfrac defined by amsmath that isn't loaded? Yes, that's true. Besides other damages, breqn seizes the initiative to define (or redefine) genfrac. But it does it wrong. The definition is in mathstyle.sty



 145 │ DeclareRobustCommandgenfrac[6]%
 146 │ #1fracstyle
 147 │ begingroup #5endgroup
 148 │ csname @@ifxmaxdimen#4maxdimen overelse abovefi
 149 │ if @#2@else withdelimsfiendcsname #2#3#4relax
 150 │ #6%
 151 │ %
 152 │


and #2#3#4relax should be #2#3relax. The modified macro gives the expected result:



documentclassarticle
usepackagebreqn
usepackageregexpatch

makeatletter
xpatchcmdgenfrac#4relaxrelax
makeatother

begindocument
[
genfrac0pt1AB
]
enddocument


Without regexpatch, your document should look as follows:



documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackagebreqn

makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommandgenfrac[6]%
 #1fracstyle
 begingroup #5endgroup
 csname @@ifxmaxdimen#4maxdimen overelse abovefi
 if @#2@else withdelimsfiendcsname #2#3relax
 #6%
 %

makeatother

begindocument

beginequation
mathcalB_x=
 frac
 splitfracomega_x+delta=1,
 tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^m
 omega_x+delta=1,
 tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^k-m-1
 
 
 splitfracomega_x+delta=0,
 tau_inotin [x-delta, x))^m
 
 Prleft(tau_inotin[x, x+delta)
 
endequation

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer




















  • Bug report filed: github.com/wspr/breqn/issues/25
    – egreg
    42 mins ago














up vote
2
down vote



accepted










A really minimal example is



documentclassarticle
usepackagebreqn

begindocument
[
genfrac0pt1AB
]
enddocument


that typesets



enter image description here



whereas it typesets as expected if breqn is changed into amsmath. Note that splitfrac is just a thin layer around genfrac.



Oh, wait! How does the minimal example compile? Isn't genfrac defined by amsmath that isn't loaded? Yes, that's true. Besides other damages, breqn seizes the initiative to define (or redefine) genfrac. But it does it wrong. The definition is in mathstyle.sty



 145 │ DeclareRobustCommandgenfrac[6]%
 146 │ #1fracstyle
 147 │ begingroup #5endgroup
 148 │ csname @@ifxmaxdimen#4maxdimen overelse abovefi
 149 │ if @#2@else withdelimsfiendcsname #2#3#4relax
 150 │ #6%
 151 │ %
 152 │


and #2#3#4relax should be #2#3relax. The modified macro gives the expected result:



documentclassarticle
usepackagebreqn
usepackageregexpatch

makeatletter
xpatchcmdgenfrac#4relaxrelax
makeatother

begindocument
[
genfrac0pt1AB
]
enddocument


Without regexpatch, your document should look as follows:



documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackagebreqn

makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommandgenfrac[6]%
 #1fracstyle
 begingroup #5endgroup
 csname @@ifxmaxdimen#4maxdimen overelse abovefi
 if @#2@else withdelimsfiendcsname #2#3relax
 #6%
 %

makeatother

begindocument

beginequation
mathcalB_x=
 frac
 splitfracomega_x+delta=1,
 tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^m
 omega_x+delta=1,
 tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^k-m-1
 
 
 splitfracomega_x+delta=0,
 tau_inotin [x-delta, x))^m
 
 Prleft(tau_inotin[x, x+delta)
 
endequation

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer




















  • Bug report filed: github.com/wspr/breqn/issues/25
    – egreg
    42 mins ago












up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






A really minimal example is



documentclassarticle
usepackagebreqn

begindocument
[
genfrac0pt1AB
]
enddocument


that typesets



enter image description here



whereas it typesets as expected if breqn is changed into amsmath. Note that splitfrac is just a thin layer around genfrac.



Oh, wait! How does the minimal example compile? Isn't genfrac defined by amsmath that isn't loaded? Yes, that's true. Besides other damages, breqn seizes the initiative to define (or redefine) genfrac. But it does it wrong. The definition is in mathstyle.sty



 145 │ DeclareRobustCommandgenfrac[6]%
 146 │ #1fracstyle
 147 │ begingroup #5endgroup
 148 │ csname @@ifxmaxdimen#4maxdimen overelse abovefi
 149 │ if @#2@else withdelimsfiendcsname #2#3#4relax
 150 │ #6%
 151 │ %
 152 │


and #2#3#4relax should be #2#3relax. The modified macro gives the expected result:



documentclassarticle
usepackagebreqn
usepackageregexpatch

makeatletter
xpatchcmdgenfrac#4relaxrelax
makeatother

begindocument
[
genfrac0pt1AB
]
enddocument


Without regexpatch, your document should look as follows:



documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackagebreqn

makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommandgenfrac[6]%
 #1fracstyle
 begingroup #5endgroup
 csname @@ifxmaxdimen#4maxdimen overelse abovefi
 if @#2@else withdelimsfiendcsname #2#3relax
 #6%
 %

makeatother

begindocument

beginequation
mathcalB_x=
 frac
 splitfracomega_x+delta=1,
 tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^m
 omega_x+delta=1,
 tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^k-m-1
 
 
 splitfracomega_x+delta=0,
 tau_inotin [x-delta, x))^m
 
 Prleft(tau_inotin[x, x+delta)
 
endequation

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer












A really minimal example is



documentclassarticle
usepackagebreqn

begindocument
[
genfrac0pt1AB
]
enddocument


that typesets



enter image description here



whereas it typesets as expected if breqn is changed into amsmath. Note that splitfrac is just a thin layer around genfrac.



Oh, wait! How does the minimal example compile? Isn't genfrac defined by amsmath that isn't loaded? Yes, that's true. Besides other damages, breqn seizes the initiative to define (or redefine) genfrac. But it does it wrong. The definition is in mathstyle.sty



 145 │ DeclareRobustCommandgenfrac[6]%
 146 │ #1fracstyle
 147 │ begingroup #5endgroup
 148 │ csname @@ifxmaxdimen#4maxdimen overelse abovefi
 149 │ if @#2@else withdelimsfiendcsname #2#3#4relax
 150 │ #6%
 151 │ %
 152 │


and #2#3#4relax should be #2#3relax. The modified macro gives the expected result:



documentclassarticle
usepackagebreqn
usepackageregexpatch

makeatletter
xpatchcmdgenfrac#4relaxrelax
makeatother

begindocument
[
genfrac0pt1AB
]
enddocument


Without regexpatch, your document should look as follows:



documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackagebreqn

makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommandgenfrac[6]%
 #1fracstyle
 begingroup #5endgroup
 csname @@ifxmaxdimen#4maxdimen overelse abovefi
 if @#2@else withdelimsfiendcsname #2#3relax
 #6%
 %

makeatother

begindocument

beginequation
mathcalB_x=
 frac
 splitfracomega_x+delta=1,
 tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^m
 omega_x+delta=1,
 tau_inotin [x-delta, x)right)^k-m-1
 
 
 splitfracomega_x+delta=0,
 tau_inotin [x-delta, x))^m
 
 Prleft(tau_inotin[x, x+delta)
 
endequation

enddocument


enter image description here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 45 mins ago









egreg

691k8518383086




691k8518383086











  • Bug report filed: github.com/wspr/breqn/issues/25
    – egreg
    42 mins ago
















  • Bug report filed: github.com/wspr/breqn/issues/25
    – egreg
    42 mins ago















Bug report filed: github.com/wspr/breqn/issues/25
– egreg
42 mins ago




Bug report filed: github.com/wspr/breqn/issues/25
– egreg
42 mins ago










Elke is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















Elke is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Elke is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Elke is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f456197%2fsplitfrac-producing-extra-1-characters%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest
































































Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What does second last employer means? [closed]

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote -3 down vote favorite Say, for example I have worked in the following companies, Company A => 2010 - 2011 Company B => 2011 - 2012 Company C => 2012 - Till Date Company D => Have offer Now assume Company D is asking to submit documents from my second last employer. So from the list of companies given, which company would be qualified as second last employer? software-industry employer share | improve this question asked Aug 10 '14 at 5:16 Rajaprabhu Aravindasamy 559 1 6 13 closed as off-topic by Jim G., jmort253 ♦ Aug 11 '14 at 1:58 This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason: "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address...
Read more

List of Gilmore Girls characters

Image
The season three cast—(Back row): Lane, Michel, Paris, Emily, Richard, Sookie, Miss Patty, Kirk; Front row: Jess, Luke, Lorelai, Rory, Dean This is a list of characters for the comedy-drama television series Gilmore Girls . Contents 1 Main characters 1.1 Lorelai Gilmore 1.2 Rory Gilmore 1.3 Sookie St. James 1.4 Lane Kim 1.5 Michel Gerard 1.6 Luke Danes 1.7 Emily Gilmore 1.8 Richard Gilmore 1.9 Paris Geller 1.10 Dean Forester 1.11 Jess Mariano 1.12 Kirk Gleason 1.13 Jason Stiles 1.14 Logan Huntzberger 2 Major recurring characters 2.1 Christopher Hayden 2.2 Jackson Belleville 2.3 Mrs. Kim 2.4 Tristin DuGray 2.5 Max Medina 2.6 Taylor Doose 2.7 Dave Rygalski 2.8 Marty 3 Recurring characters 3.1 Stars Hollow 3.2 Chilton 3.3 Yale 3.4 Other 4 Notable guest stars 5 Unseen characters 6 Notes 7 References Main characters Actor Character Appearances Season 1 Season 2 Season 3 Season 4 Season 5 Season 6 Season 7 A Year in the Life Lauren Graham Lorelai Gilmore...
Read more

Confectionery

Image
Prepared foods made with a lot of sugar or other cabohydrates "Sweetmeat" redirects here. For the racehorse, see Sweetmeat (horse). Not to be confused with Sweetbread. This Kransekake is a traditional Scandinavian baker's confection. Confectionery is the art of making confections , which are food items that are rich in sugar and carbohydrates. Exact definitions are difficult. [1] In general, though, confectionery is divided into two broad and somewhat overlapping categories, bakers' confections and sugar confections. [2] Bakers' confectionery, also called flour confections , includes principally sweet pastries, cakes, and similar baked goods. Sugar confectionery includes candies ( sweets in British English), candied nuts, chocolates, chewing gum, bubble gum, pastillage, and other confections that are made primarily of sugar. In some cases, chocolate confections (confections made of chocolate) are treated as a separate category, as are sugar-free versions of ...
Read more