Mixing
![How to ask for a raise when I feel underpaid after the company grew [duplicate]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgjbpfN9tAutmK93bJRC3ZoROZzi2TJDms5n8_qJuhgE0a9b52OOHayv3NGT8igAdFL7byXNst-_1DZK5SjrIJ28_6RQPUpBROqMs5s6jo-ZsjX8kjDwfxJufIitH3TaQRXWaGSQKRQib-f/s72-c/1.jpg)
How to become more receptive to ideas as member of a mob programming team without going against my values
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
At the company I work for we have just started mob programming, where the team of three that I am a part of all write the code for our project together at one keyboard, and we only proceed if we all agree on the path forward.
It has been commented that we always take my path, and not a path put forward by anyone else and I agree, I think we do. This is something I want to change but I also don't want to put code that I think is bad into production, so I don't just want to concede when I'm not convinced the other person is correct.
For example someone might say:
let's make a method that does A and B, and I might say: Why don't we make a method that does A and a method that makes B? That way each method does only one thing, which is often considered better.
and usually everyone will agree and we will take that approach. The problem is that while we all agree the code is now better we have once again gone down my suggestion and I have 'shot down' someone else's suggestion. This is leading to some resentment from the other members of the team as even my manager has commented that some have said we always do it 'my way'.
Is there some approach I can take where I can guide the team towards a better solution without it looking like it's all my ideas and none of theirs, without sacrificing code quality?
teamwork pair-programming
asked 3 mins ago
Jamie Twells
1011
New contributor
Jamie Twells is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
At the company I work for we have just started mob programming, where the team of three that I am a part of all write the code for our project together at one keyboard, and we only proceed if we all agree on the path forward.
It has been commented that we always take my path, and not a path put forward by anyone else and I agree, I think we do. This is something I want to change but I also don't want to put code that I think is bad into production, so I don't just want to concede when I'm not convinced the other person is correct.
For example someone might say:
let's make a method that does A and B, and I might say: Why don't we make a method that does A and a method that makes B? That way each method does only one thing, which is often considered better.
and usually everyone will agree and we will take that approach. The problem is that while we all agree the code is now better we have once again gone down my suggestion and I have 'shot down' someone else's suggestion. This is leading to some resentment from the other members of the team as even my manager has commented that some have said we always do it 'my way'.
Is there some approach I can take where I can guide the team towards a better solution without it looking like it's all my ideas and none of theirs, without sacrificing code quality?
teamwork pair-programming
asked 3 mins ago
Jamie Twells
1011
New contributor
Jamie Twells is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I'm new to Workplace so please also help me improve my question if you have suggestions. Feedback welcome, thanks.
– Jamie Twells
15 secs ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
At the company I work for we have just started mob programming, where the team of three that I am a part of all write the code for our project together at one keyboard, and we only proceed if we all agree on the path forward.
It has been commented that we always take my path, and not a path put forward by anyone else and I agree, I think we do. This is something I want to change but I also don't want to put code that I think is bad into production, so I don't just want to concede when I'm not convinced the other person is correct.
For example someone might say:
let's make a method that does A and B, and I might say: Why don't we make a method that does A and a method that makes B? That way each method does only one thing, which is often considered better.
and usually everyone will agree and we will take that approach. The problem is that while we all agree the code is now better we have once again gone down my suggestion and I have 'shot down' someone else's suggestion. This is leading to some resentment from the other members of the team as even my manager has commented that some have said we always do it 'my way'.
Is there some approach I can take where I can guide the team towards a better solution without it looking like it's all my ideas and none of theirs, without sacrificing code quality?
teamwork pair-programming
asked 3 mins ago
Jamie Twells
1011
New contributor
Jamie Twells is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
At the company I work for we have just started mob programming, where the team of three that I am a part of all write the code for our project together at one keyboard, and we only proceed if we all agree on the path forward.
It has been commented that we always take my path, and not a path put forward by anyone else and I agree, I think we do. This is something I want to change but I also don't want to put code that I think is bad into production, so I don't just want to concede when I'm not convinced the other person is correct.
For example someone might say:
let's make a method that does A and B, and I might say: Why don't we make a method that does A and a method that makes B? That way each method does only one thing, which is often considered better.
and usually everyone will agree and we will take that approach. The problem is that while we all agree the code is now better we have once again gone down my suggestion and I have 'shot down' someone else's suggestion. This is leading to some resentment from the other members of the team as even my manager has commented that some have said we always do it 'my way'.
Is there some approach I can take where I can guide the team towards a better solution without it looking like it's all my ideas and none of theirs, without sacrificing code quality?
teamwork pair-programming
teamwork pair-programming
asked 3 mins ago
Jamie Twells
1011
New contributor
Jamie Twells is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 mins ago
Jamie Twells
1011
New contributor
Jamie Twells is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 mins ago
Jamie Twells
1011
New contributor
Jamie Twells is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 mins ago
Jamie Twells
1011
asked 3 mins ago
Jamie Twells
1011
1011
New contributor
Jamie Twells is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Jamie Twells is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Jamie Twells is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I'm new to Workplace so please also help me improve my question if you have suggestions. Feedback welcome, thanks.
– Jamie Twells
15 secs ago
add a comment |Â
I'm new to Workplace so please also help me improve my question if you have suggestions. Feedback welcome, thanks.
– Jamie Twells
15 secs ago
I'm new to Workplace so please also help me improve my question if you have suggestions. Feedback welcome, thanks.
– Jamie Twells
15 secs ago
I'm new to Workplace so please also help me improve my question if you have suggestions. Feedback welcome, thanks.
– Jamie Twells
15 secs ago
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Jamie Twells is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jamie Twells is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jamie Twells is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jamie Twells is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f121706%2fhow-to-become-more-receptive-to-ideas-as-member-of-a-mob-programming-team-withou%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
I'm new to Workplace so please also help me improve my question if you have suggestions. Feedback welcome, thanks.
– Jamie Twells
15 secs ago