Mixing
Submitting a paper to a new journal with responses for the rejection to the first journal
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I submitted my paper in IEEE Transcations of XXX and got a rejection. But the comments were really helpful and has helped me a lot in improving the paper. But, unfortunately, I cannot resubmit that paper to this same journal again and now I am looking for another journal.
I am writing a proper response again every comment and thinking to submit the response letter as part of the submission to the new journal. The basic idea is to let the reviewers know that this paper has been reviewed (by reviewers of another journal) and improvements has been made. Will it somehow improve the chances of acceptance. (as I am in the final stages of my PhD now)
What does the community say?
journals peer-review paper-submission
asked 2 hours ago
Sjaffry
566214
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I submitted my paper in IEEE Transcations of XXX and got a rejection. But the comments were really helpful and has helped me a lot in improving the paper. But, unfortunately, I cannot resubmit that paper to this same journal again and now I am looking for another journal.
I am writing a proper response again every comment and thinking to submit the response letter as part of the submission to the new journal. The basic idea is to let the reviewers know that this paper has been reviewed (by reviewers of another journal) and improvements has been made. Will it somehow improve the chances of acceptance. (as I am in the final stages of my PhD now)
What does the community say?
journals peer-review paper-submission
asked 2 hours ago
Sjaffry
566214
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I submitted my paper in IEEE Transcations of XXX and got a rejection. But the comments were really helpful and has helped me a lot in improving the paper. But, unfortunately, I cannot resubmit that paper to this same journal again and now I am looking for another journal.
I am writing a proper response again every comment and thinking to submit the response letter as part of the submission to the new journal. The basic idea is to let the reviewers know that this paper has been reviewed (by reviewers of another journal) and improvements has been made. Will it somehow improve the chances of acceptance. (as I am in the final stages of my PhD now)
What does the community say?
journals peer-review paper-submission
asked 2 hours ago
Sjaffry
566214
I submitted my paper in IEEE Transcations of XXX and got a rejection. But the comments were really helpful and has helped me a lot in improving the paper. But, unfortunately, I cannot resubmit that paper to this same journal again and now I am looking for another journal.
I am writing a proper response again every comment and thinking to submit the response letter as part of the submission to the new journal. The basic idea is to let the reviewers know that this paper has been reviewed (by reviewers of another journal) and improvements has been made. Will it somehow improve the chances of acceptance. (as I am in the final stages of my PhD now)
What does the community say?
journals peer-review paper-submission
journals peer-review paper-submission
asked 2 hours ago
Sjaffry
566214
asked 2 hours ago
Sjaffry
566214
asked 2 hours ago
Sjaffry
566214
asked 2 hours ago
Sjaffry
566214
asked 2 hours ago
Sjaffry
566214
566214
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
I wouldn't do that, actually. Use the comments of the reviewers of the first journal to improve the paper as usual. Simply submit the revised paper to the other journal.
It is actually better that they look at it with a fresh viewpoint, rather than having their view possibly clouded by the opinions of others. Let your paper stand on its own.
You will get additional comments, of course. Hopefully they will also help you improve it further.
answered 2 hours ago
Buffy
23k671130
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Don't do this. What'd you actually highlight would be:
- Your paper has been rejected by another journal before (not a good sign; think of it as "if we publish it now, we're actually publishing another journal's rejects, and we're supposed to be a good journal!!")
- You're not acting professionally. It seems like you've simply taken your submission to another journal and submitted it to ours, without having edited it to fit our requirements. If e.g. your cover letter also says "to the editor of journal A" and we're not journal A, your submission would be in trouble.
- We can't use the original journal's reviewer comments & your responses. We don't know who the reviewers are. We can't tell if the reports are legitimate. We can't see if confidential comments were submitted.
Let your paper stand on itself, and don't send additional package with it.
answered 27 mins ago
Allure
19.6k1265109
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
I wouldn't do that, actually. Use the comments of the reviewers of the first journal to improve the paper as usual. Simply submit the revised paper to the other journal.
It is actually better that they look at it with a fresh viewpoint, rather than having their view possibly clouded by the opinions of others. Let your paper stand on its own.
You will get additional comments, of course. Hopefully they will also help you improve it further.
answered 2 hours ago
Buffy
23k671130
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
I wouldn't do that, actually. Use the comments of the reviewers of the first journal to improve the paper as usual. Simply submit the revised paper to the other journal.
It is actually better that they look at it with a fresh viewpoint, rather than having their view possibly clouded by the opinions of others. Let your paper stand on its own.
You will get additional comments, of course. Hopefully they will also help you improve it further.
answered 2 hours ago
Buffy
23k671130
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
I wouldn't do that, actually. Use the comments of the reviewers of the first journal to improve the paper as usual. Simply submit the revised paper to the other journal.
It is actually better that they look at it with a fresh viewpoint, rather than having their view possibly clouded by the opinions of others. Let your paper stand on its own.
You will get additional comments, of course. Hopefully they will also help you improve it further.
answered 2 hours ago
Buffy
23k671130
I wouldn't do that, actually. Use the comments of the reviewers of the first journal to improve the paper as usual. Simply submit the revised paper to the other journal.
It is actually better that they look at it with a fresh viewpoint, rather than having their view possibly clouded by the opinions of others. Let your paper stand on its own.
You will get additional comments, of course. Hopefully they will also help you improve it further.
answered 2 hours ago
Buffy
23k671130
answered 2 hours ago
Buffy
23k671130
answered 2 hours ago
Buffy
23k671130
answered 2 hours ago
Buffy
23k671130
23k671130
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Don't do this. What'd you actually highlight would be:
- Your paper has been rejected by another journal before (not a good sign; think of it as "if we publish it now, we're actually publishing another journal's rejects, and we're supposed to be a good journal!!")
- You're not acting professionally. It seems like you've simply taken your submission to another journal and submitted it to ours, without having edited it to fit our requirements. If e.g. your cover letter also says "to the editor of journal A" and we're not journal A, your submission would be in trouble.
- We can't use the original journal's reviewer comments & your responses. We don't know who the reviewers are. We can't tell if the reports are legitimate. We can't see if confidential comments were submitted.
Let your paper stand on itself, and don't send additional package with it.
answered 27 mins ago
Allure
19.6k1265109
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Don't do this. What'd you actually highlight would be:
- Your paper has been rejected by another journal before (not a good sign; think of it as "if we publish it now, we're actually publishing another journal's rejects, and we're supposed to be a good journal!!")
- You're not acting professionally. It seems like you've simply taken your submission to another journal and submitted it to ours, without having edited it to fit our requirements. If e.g. your cover letter also says "to the editor of journal A" and we're not journal A, your submission would be in trouble.
- We can't use the original journal's reviewer comments & your responses. We don't know who the reviewers are. We can't tell if the reports are legitimate. We can't see if confidential comments were submitted.
Let your paper stand on itself, and don't send additional package with it.
answered 27 mins ago
Allure
19.6k1265109
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Don't do this. What'd you actually highlight would be:
- Your paper has been rejected by another journal before (not a good sign; think of it as "if we publish it now, we're actually publishing another journal's rejects, and we're supposed to be a good journal!!")
- You're not acting professionally. It seems like you've simply taken your submission to another journal and submitted it to ours, without having edited it to fit our requirements. If e.g. your cover letter also says "to the editor of journal A" and we're not journal A, your submission would be in trouble.
- We can't use the original journal's reviewer comments & your responses. We don't know who the reviewers are. We can't tell if the reports are legitimate. We can't see if confidential comments were submitted.
Let your paper stand on itself, and don't send additional package with it.
answered 27 mins ago
Allure
19.6k1265109
Don't do this. What'd you actually highlight would be:
- Your paper has been rejected by another journal before (not a good sign; think of it as "if we publish it now, we're actually publishing another journal's rejects, and we're supposed to be a good journal!!")
- You're not acting professionally. It seems like you've simply taken your submission to another journal and submitted it to ours, without having edited it to fit our requirements. If e.g. your cover letter also says "to the editor of journal A" and we're not journal A, your submission would be in trouble.
- We can't use the original journal's reviewer comments & your responses. We don't know who the reviewers are. We can't tell if the reports are legitimate. We can't see if confidential comments were submitted.
Let your paper stand on itself, and don't send additional package with it.
answered 27 mins ago
Allure
19.6k1265109
answered 27 mins ago
Allure
19.6k1265109
answered 27 mins ago
Allure
19.6k1265109
answered 27 mins ago
Allure
19.6k1265109
19.6k1265109
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f118541%2fsubmitting-a-paper-to-a-new-journal-with-responses-for-the-rejection-to-the-firs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
