Graduate advisors: what are some qualities that make a graduate student difficult to supervise?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I am asking this question to seek some perspectives from graduate advisors.



My question is: what qualities of a student makes him or her difficult to supervise? It is all the more valuable if this is based on actual experience.



Note that "difficult" is open to interpretation. The student may not necessarily be a bad student or poor learner; after all, most of the people who are admitted to a graduate program has went through some rigorous examinations in their lives. Maybe a student is such a genius, that he/she won't listen to you, and hence that presents a difficulty.










share|improve this question







New contributor




The man of your dream is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • The challenge with this question is going to be that, aside from trivialities such as a student who does not have the necessary knowledge, my "difficult to supervise student" may be your "once in a lifetime awesome student". It will very much boil down to work mode preferences.
    – xLeitix
    1 hour ago














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I am asking this question to seek some perspectives from graduate advisors.



My question is: what qualities of a student makes him or her difficult to supervise? It is all the more valuable if this is based on actual experience.



Note that "difficult" is open to interpretation. The student may not necessarily be a bad student or poor learner; after all, most of the people who are admitted to a graduate program has went through some rigorous examinations in their lives. Maybe a student is such a genius, that he/she won't listen to you, and hence that presents a difficulty.










share|improve this question







New contributor




The man of your dream is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • The challenge with this question is going to be that, aside from trivialities such as a student who does not have the necessary knowledge, my "difficult to supervise student" may be your "once in a lifetime awesome student". It will very much boil down to work mode preferences.
    – xLeitix
    1 hour ago












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











I am asking this question to seek some perspectives from graduate advisors.



My question is: what qualities of a student makes him or her difficult to supervise? It is all the more valuable if this is based on actual experience.



Note that "difficult" is open to interpretation. The student may not necessarily be a bad student or poor learner; after all, most of the people who are admitted to a graduate program has went through some rigorous examinations in their lives. Maybe a student is such a genius, that he/she won't listen to you, and hence that presents a difficulty.










share|improve this question







New contributor




The man of your dream is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I am asking this question to seek some perspectives from graduate advisors.



My question is: what qualities of a student makes him or her difficult to supervise? It is all the more valuable if this is based on actual experience.



Note that "difficult" is open to interpretation. The student may not necessarily be a bad student or poor learner; after all, most of the people who are admitted to a graduate program has went through some rigorous examinations in their lives. Maybe a student is such a genius, that he/she won't listen to you, and hence that presents a difficulty.







graduate-school advisor research-undergraduate academic-life supervision






share|improve this question







New contributor




The man of your dream is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




The man of your dream is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




The man of your dream is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 4 hours ago









The man of your dream

18224




18224




New contributor




The man of your dream is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





The man of your dream is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






The man of your dream is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • The challenge with this question is going to be that, aside from trivialities such as a student who does not have the necessary knowledge, my "difficult to supervise student" may be your "once in a lifetime awesome student". It will very much boil down to work mode preferences.
    – xLeitix
    1 hour ago
















  • The challenge with this question is going to be that, aside from trivialities such as a student who does not have the necessary knowledge, my "difficult to supervise student" may be your "once in a lifetime awesome student". It will very much boil down to work mode preferences.
    – xLeitix
    1 hour ago















The challenge with this question is going to be that, aside from trivialities such as a student who does not have the necessary knowledge, my "difficult to supervise student" may be your "once in a lifetime awesome student". It will very much boil down to work mode preferences.
– xLeitix
1 hour ago




The challenge with this question is going to be that, aside from trivialities such as a student who does not have the necessary knowledge, my "difficult to supervise student" may be your "once in a lifetime awesome student". It will very much boil down to work mode preferences.
– xLeitix
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













Strange question, but here you go:



  1. Knowing better than the advisor (in reality or imagination) and hammering that point in to the advisor

  2. Being disorganised

  3. Having to be told to do the same thing repeatedly, without effect, without proposing an alternative, or without explicit (justified) refusal

  4. Being unable to write, even while having results

  5. Being a brilliant writer, making weak results look better than they are

  6. Being perfectionist to the point of ineffectiveness

  7. Being sloppy, so that everything that the student does needs to be double- and triple-checked for correctness; sometimes, reintroducing errors after they have been corrected already

  8. Being afraid of success and/or one's own greatest enemy

One thing that does not constitute a difficult to supervise student is a genius who doesn't listen, but gets results and writes them up. It may give a dent to the ego of the adviser, but, like a dent in a Jeep, it's a dent worth having.






share|improve this answer




















  • It's a good list, but re (1) I love students who know more than me, and (5) can really be a skill of its own as long as they are still willing to improve results.
    – xLeitix
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    @xLeitix Note my "dent" comment. Point 1 is not about the student being better than you (I very much prefer them to be better than me than weaker ;-), but constantly harping about that. However, most of the time, when they do so, it's their imagination that they are better, because the really brilliant ones I found not to do it. But I know from colleagues that "genius" students let them know how much superior they were - and even iff (!) that were true, it is a pain to supervise them. Why didn't they pick a supervisor that matches their ever so superior skill? And to 5 (contd.)
    – Captain Emacs
    1 hour ago







  • 1




    ... to 5. the point is that they write so brilliantly that they are in danger of falling in love with their own results. In other words, it can become very difficult to convince them that their results are not as good as they look by virtue of their grandiloquence. Of course, if they are critical enough and do not fall for their own words, great writing skills are a gift.
    – Captain Emacs
    1 hour ago

















up vote
1
down vote













The amount and time spent on asking questions is one major point.

There are students who come to your office almost every day and want to have every little detail explained to them, and there are students who you don't see for months, and if they talked to you earlier you could have told them right away not to waste their time on X.



Both extremes are problematic, and student and advisor should aim to find a middle path, e.g. agree on a fixed meeting date/time once a week.






share|improve this answer




















    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "415"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    The man of your dream is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f118493%2fgraduate-advisors-what-are-some-qualities-that-make-a-graduate-student-difficul%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    3
    down vote













    Strange question, but here you go:



    1. Knowing better than the advisor (in reality or imagination) and hammering that point in to the advisor

    2. Being disorganised

    3. Having to be told to do the same thing repeatedly, without effect, without proposing an alternative, or without explicit (justified) refusal

    4. Being unable to write, even while having results

    5. Being a brilliant writer, making weak results look better than they are

    6. Being perfectionist to the point of ineffectiveness

    7. Being sloppy, so that everything that the student does needs to be double- and triple-checked for correctness; sometimes, reintroducing errors after they have been corrected already

    8. Being afraid of success and/or one's own greatest enemy

    One thing that does not constitute a difficult to supervise student is a genius who doesn't listen, but gets results and writes them up. It may give a dent to the ego of the adviser, but, like a dent in a Jeep, it's a dent worth having.






    share|improve this answer




















    • It's a good list, but re (1) I love students who know more than me, and (5) can really be a skill of its own as long as they are still willing to improve results.
      – xLeitix
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      @xLeitix Note my "dent" comment. Point 1 is not about the student being better than you (I very much prefer them to be better than me than weaker ;-), but constantly harping about that. However, most of the time, when they do so, it's their imagination that they are better, because the really brilliant ones I found not to do it. But I know from colleagues that "genius" students let them know how much superior they were - and even iff (!) that were true, it is a pain to supervise them. Why didn't they pick a supervisor that matches their ever so superior skill? And to 5 (contd.)
      – Captain Emacs
      1 hour ago







    • 1




      ... to 5. the point is that they write so brilliantly that they are in danger of falling in love with their own results. In other words, it can become very difficult to convince them that their results are not as good as they look by virtue of their grandiloquence. Of course, if they are critical enough and do not fall for their own words, great writing skills are a gift.
      – Captain Emacs
      1 hour ago














    up vote
    3
    down vote













    Strange question, but here you go:



    1. Knowing better than the advisor (in reality or imagination) and hammering that point in to the advisor

    2. Being disorganised

    3. Having to be told to do the same thing repeatedly, without effect, without proposing an alternative, or without explicit (justified) refusal

    4. Being unable to write, even while having results

    5. Being a brilliant writer, making weak results look better than they are

    6. Being perfectionist to the point of ineffectiveness

    7. Being sloppy, so that everything that the student does needs to be double- and triple-checked for correctness; sometimes, reintroducing errors after they have been corrected already

    8. Being afraid of success and/or one's own greatest enemy

    One thing that does not constitute a difficult to supervise student is a genius who doesn't listen, but gets results and writes them up. It may give a dent to the ego of the adviser, but, like a dent in a Jeep, it's a dent worth having.






    share|improve this answer




















    • It's a good list, but re (1) I love students who know more than me, and (5) can really be a skill of its own as long as they are still willing to improve results.
      – xLeitix
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      @xLeitix Note my "dent" comment. Point 1 is not about the student being better than you (I very much prefer them to be better than me than weaker ;-), but constantly harping about that. However, most of the time, when they do so, it's their imagination that they are better, because the really brilliant ones I found not to do it. But I know from colleagues that "genius" students let them know how much superior they were - and even iff (!) that were true, it is a pain to supervise them. Why didn't they pick a supervisor that matches their ever so superior skill? And to 5 (contd.)
      – Captain Emacs
      1 hour ago







    • 1




      ... to 5. the point is that they write so brilliantly that they are in danger of falling in love with their own results. In other words, it can become very difficult to convince them that their results are not as good as they look by virtue of their grandiloquence. Of course, if they are critical enough and do not fall for their own words, great writing skills are a gift.
      – Captain Emacs
      1 hour ago












    up vote
    3
    down vote










    up vote
    3
    down vote









    Strange question, but here you go:



    1. Knowing better than the advisor (in reality or imagination) and hammering that point in to the advisor

    2. Being disorganised

    3. Having to be told to do the same thing repeatedly, without effect, without proposing an alternative, or without explicit (justified) refusal

    4. Being unable to write, even while having results

    5. Being a brilliant writer, making weak results look better than they are

    6. Being perfectionist to the point of ineffectiveness

    7. Being sloppy, so that everything that the student does needs to be double- and triple-checked for correctness; sometimes, reintroducing errors after they have been corrected already

    8. Being afraid of success and/or one's own greatest enemy

    One thing that does not constitute a difficult to supervise student is a genius who doesn't listen, but gets results and writes them up. It may give a dent to the ego of the adviser, but, like a dent in a Jeep, it's a dent worth having.






    share|improve this answer












    Strange question, but here you go:



    1. Knowing better than the advisor (in reality or imagination) and hammering that point in to the advisor

    2. Being disorganised

    3. Having to be told to do the same thing repeatedly, without effect, without proposing an alternative, or without explicit (justified) refusal

    4. Being unable to write, even while having results

    5. Being a brilliant writer, making weak results look better than they are

    6. Being perfectionist to the point of ineffectiveness

    7. Being sloppy, so that everything that the student does needs to be double- and triple-checked for correctness; sometimes, reintroducing errors after they have been corrected already

    8. Being afraid of success and/or one's own greatest enemy

    One thing that does not constitute a difficult to supervise student is a genius who doesn't listen, but gets results and writes them up. It may give a dent to the ego of the adviser, but, like a dent in a Jeep, it's a dent worth having.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 1 hour ago









    Captain Emacs

    20.9k95171




    20.9k95171











    • It's a good list, but re (1) I love students who know more than me, and (5) can really be a skill of its own as long as they are still willing to improve results.
      – xLeitix
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      @xLeitix Note my "dent" comment. Point 1 is not about the student being better than you (I very much prefer them to be better than me than weaker ;-), but constantly harping about that. However, most of the time, when they do so, it's their imagination that they are better, because the really brilliant ones I found not to do it. But I know from colleagues that "genius" students let them know how much superior they were - and even iff (!) that were true, it is a pain to supervise them. Why didn't they pick a supervisor that matches their ever so superior skill? And to 5 (contd.)
      – Captain Emacs
      1 hour ago







    • 1




      ... to 5. the point is that they write so brilliantly that they are in danger of falling in love with their own results. In other words, it can become very difficult to convince them that their results are not as good as they look by virtue of their grandiloquence. Of course, if they are critical enough and do not fall for their own words, great writing skills are a gift.
      – Captain Emacs
      1 hour ago
















    • It's a good list, but re (1) I love students who know more than me, and (5) can really be a skill of its own as long as they are still willing to improve results.
      – xLeitix
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      @xLeitix Note my "dent" comment. Point 1 is not about the student being better than you (I very much prefer them to be better than me than weaker ;-), but constantly harping about that. However, most of the time, when they do so, it's their imagination that they are better, because the really brilliant ones I found not to do it. But I know from colleagues that "genius" students let them know how much superior they were - and even iff (!) that were true, it is a pain to supervise them. Why didn't they pick a supervisor that matches their ever so superior skill? And to 5 (contd.)
      – Captain Emacs
      1 hour ago







    • 1




      ... to 5. the point is that they write so brilliantly that they are in danger of falling in love with their own results. In other words, it can become very difficult to convince them that their results are not as good as they look by virtue of their grandiloquence. Of course, if they are critical enough and do not fall for their own words, great writing skills are a gift.
      – Captain Emacs
      1 hour ago















    It's a good list, but re (1) I love students who know more than me, and (5) can really be a skill of its own as long as they are still willing to improve results.
    – xLeitix
    1 hour ago




    It's a good list, but re (1) I love students who know more than me, and (5) can really be a skill of its own as long as they are still willing to improve results.
    – xLeitix
    1 hour ago




    1




    1




    @xLeitix Note my "dent" comment. Point 1 is not about the student being better than you (I very much prefer them to be better than me than weaker ;-), but constantly harping about that. However, most of the time, when they do so, it's their imagination that they are better, because the really brilliant ones I found not to do it. But I know from colleagues that "genius" students let them know how much superior they were - and even iff (!) that were true, it is a pain to supervise them. Why didn't they pick a supervisor that matches their ever so superior skill? And to 5 (contd.)
    – Captain Emacs
    1 hour ago





    @xLeitix Note my "dent" comment. Point 1 is not about the student being better than you (I very much prefer them to be better than me than weaker ;-), but constantly harping about that. However, most of the time, when they do so, it's their imagination that they are better, because the really brilliant ones I found not to do it. But I know from colleagues that "genius" students let them know how much superior they were - and even iff (!) that were true, it is a pain to supervise them. Why didn't they pick a supervisor that matches their ever so superior skill? And to 5 (contd.)
    – Captain Emacs
    1 hour ago





    1




    1




    ... to 5. the point is that they write so brilliantly that they are in danger of falling in love with their own results. In other words, it can become very difficult to convince them that their results are not as good as they look by virtue of their grandiloquence. Of course, if they are critical enough and do not fall for their own words, great writing skills are a gift.
    – Captain Emacs
    1 hour ago




    ... to 5. the point is that they write so brilliantly that they are in danger of falling in love with their own results. In other words, it can become very difficult to convince them that their results are not as good as they look by virtue of their grandiloquence. Of course, if they are critical enough and do not fall for their own words, great writing skills are a gift.
    – Captain Emacs
    1 hour ago










    up vote
    1
    down vote













    The amount and time spent on asking questions is one major point.

    There are students who come to your office almost every day and want to have every little detail explained to them, and there are students who you don't see for months, and if they talked to you earlier you could have told them right away not to waste their time on X.



    Both extremes are problematic, and student and advisor should aim to find a middle path, e.g. agree on a fixed meeting date/time once a week.






    share|improve this answer
























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      The amount and time spent on asking questions is one major point.

      There are students who come to your office almost every day and want to have every little detail explained to them, and there are students who you don't see for months, and if they talked to you earlier you could have told them right away not to waste their time on X.



      Both extremes are problematic, and student and advisor should aim to find a middle path, e.g. agree on a fixed meeting date/time once a week.






      share|improve this answer






















        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        The amount and time spent on asking questions is one major point.

        There are students who come to your office almost every day and want to have every little detail explained to them, and there are students who you don't see for months, and if they talked to you earlier you could have told them right away not to waste their time on X.



        Both extremes are problematic, and student and advisor should aim to find a middle path, e.g. agree on a fixed meeting date/time once a week.






        share|improve this answer












        The amount and time spent on asking questions is one major point.

        There are students who come to your office almost every day and want to have every little detail explained to them, and there are students who you don't see for months, and if they talked to you earlier you could have told them right away not to waste their time on X.



        Both extremes are problematic, and student and advisor should aim to find a middle path, e.g. agree on a fixed meeting date/time once a week.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        Dirk Liebhold

        6,0931726




        6,0931726




















            The man of your dream is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            The man of your dream is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            The man of your dream is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            The man of your dream is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f118493%2fgraduate-advisors-what-are-some-qualities-that-make-a-graduate-student-difficul%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What does second last employer means? [closed]

            List of Gilmore Girls characters

            Confectionery