What is this effect and how can I remove it?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












As you have deduced from the title, there's a strange ghosting effect in this photo (actually quite a few of my recent photos), when I used built-in camera flash.
Is it caused just by a slow shutter speed?



EXIF: f/5.6, ISO 400 and 1/60 sec.



enter image description here






effect







share|improve this question

























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    As you have deduced from the title, there's a strange ghosting effect in this photo (actually quite a few of my recent photos), when I used built-in camera flash.
    Is it caused just by a slow shutter speed?



    EXIF: f/5.6, ISO 400 and 1/60 sec.



    enter image description here






    effect







    share|improve this question























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      As you have deduced from the title, there's a strange ghosting effect in this photo (actually quite a few of my recent photos), when I used built-in camera flash.
      Is it caused just by a slow shutter speed?



      EXIF: f/5.6, ISO 400 and 1/60 sec.



      enter image description here






      effect







      share|improve this question













      As you have deduced from the title, there's a strange ghosting effect in this photo (actually quite a few of my recent photos), when I used built-in camera flash.
      Is it caused just by a slow shutter speed?



      EXIF: f/5.6, ISO 400 and 1/60 sec.



      enter image description here






      effect




      effect






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 1 hour ago









      bearmohawk

      378117




      378117




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          For me this is motion blur. And because is the same on all the objects edges it is caused by slow shutter speed. Try to use 1/100, 1/160.



          Also you should know internal flash usually have very limited power and range. So the other advice I can give you (if you often take photos in low light) is to invest in external flashlight.






          share|improve this answer
















          • 1




            thanks! I thought that was it.
            – bearmohawk
            1 hour ago

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          To be a bit more specific, this is the superposition of



          • a very short exposure with flash, the clear sharp part

          • overlaid by an underexposed long exposure shot (the blurry part)

          However, the amount of motion blur for a 1/60 shot is unusually large, so you likely took the picture from far away. This would also explain why the blurred part is so visible, your flash was too far from the subject and didn't make much difference with the ambient light.






          share|improve this answer




















            Your Answer







            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "61"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102155%2fwhat-is-this-effect-and-how-can-i-remove-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest

















            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted










            For me this is motion blur. And because is the same on all the objects edges it is caused by slow shutter speed. Try to use 1/100, 1/160.



            Also you should know internal flash usually have very limited power and range. So the other advice I can give you (if you often take photos in low light) is to invest in external flashlight.






            share|improve this answer
















            • 1




              thanks! I thought that was it.
              – bearmohawk
              1 hour ago














            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted










            For me this is motion blur. And because is the same on all the objects edges it is caused by slow shutter speed. Try to use 1/100, 1/160.



            Also you should know internal flash usually have very limited power and range. So the other advice I can give you (if you often take photos in low light) is to invest in external flashlight.






            share|improve this answer
















            • 1




              thanks! I thought that was it.
              – bearmohawk
              1 hour ago












            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted






            For me this is motion blur. And because is the same on all the objects edges it is caused by slow shutter speed. Try to use 1/100, 1/160.



            Also you should know internal flash usually have very limited power and range. So the other advice I can give you (if you often take photos in low light) is to invest in external flashlight.






            share|improve this answer












            For me this is motion blur. And because is the same on all the objects edges it is caused by slow shutter speed. Try to use 1/100, 1/160.



            Also you should know internal flash usually have very limited power and range. So the other advice I can give you (if you often take photos in low light) is to invest in external flashlight.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 1 hour ago









            Romeo Ninov

            2,85521123




            2,85521123







            • 1




              thanks! I thought that was it.
              – bearmohawk
              1 hour ago












            • 1




              thanks! I thought that was it.
              – bearmohawk
              1 hour ago







            1




            1




            thanks! I thought that was it.
            – bearmohawk
            1 hour ago




            thanks! I thought that was it.
            – bearmohawk
            1 hour ago












            up vote
            2
            down vote













            To be a bit more specific, this is the superposition of



            • a very short exposure with flash, the clear sharp part

            • overlaid by an underexposed long exposure shot (the blurry part)

            However, the amount of motion blur for a 1/60 shot is unusually large, so you likely took the picture from far away. This would also explain why the blurred part is so visible, your flash was too far from the subject and didn't make much difference with the ambient light.






            share|improve this answer
























              up vote
              2
              down vote













              To be a bit more specific, this is the superposition of



              • a very short exposure with flash, the clear sharp part

              • overlaid by an underexposed long exposure shot (the blurry part)

              However, the amount of motion blur for a 1/60 shot is unusually large, so you likely took the picture from far away. This would also explain why the blurred part is so visible, your flash was too far from the subject and didn't make much difference with the ambient light.






              share|improve this answer






















                up vote
                2
                down vote










                up vote
                2
                down vote









                To be a bit more specific, this is the superposition of



                • a very short exposure with flash, the clear sharp part

                • overlaid by an underexposed long exposure shot (the blurry part)

                However, the amount of motion blur for a 1/60 shot is unusually large, so you likely took the picture from far away. This would also explain why the blurred part is so visible, your flash was too far from the subject and didn't make much difference with the ambient light.






                share|improve this answer












                To be a bit more specific, this is the superposition of



                • a very short exposure with flash, the clear sharp part

                • overlaid by an underexposed long exposure shot (the blurry part)

                However, the amount of motion blur for a 1/60 shot is unusually large, so you likely took the picture from far away. This would also explain why the blurred part is so visible, your flash was too far from the subject and didn't make much difference with the ambient light.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 45 mins ago









                xenoid

                1,705311




                1,705311



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102155%2fwhat-is-this-effect-and-how-can-i-remove-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest
































































                    Comments

                    Post a Comment

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

                    Image
                    Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote 31 down vote favorite 4 I hold a PhD in mechanical engineering with a 7 year background in self-guided, self-paced research including 2 years as a graduate level course instructor and a subject matter expert for various engineering projects in a university setting in the United States. For the last 10-11 months, I am working in a research industry in France where my task is to debug C++ spaghetti code written over a period of several years by my current supervisor. It is a team of 2: just I and my supervisor. Diurnally, I am posed with a "bug of the day" to get out of this C++ code. My supervisor generally gives me about 15-30 minutes to solve it and then accosts me about whether or not the task is completed and then rinses and repeats this until the end of the day. Off-late, my supervisor has been holding 6-7 hour long "meetin
                    Read more

                    Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

                    Image
                    Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite Many fantasy worlds have multiple humanoid species (elves, orcs, humans, etc) living in the same world, in addition to that, they often have the ability to interbreed. And I can't help but question their believability... fantasy-races reproduction interspecies-relations share | improve this question edited Aug 9 at 14:46 Michael Kjörling ♦ 21.1k 10 85 161 asked Aug 9 at 13:13 Chlodio 118 6 closed as unclear what you're asking by MichaelK, Gryphon, John, Vincent, Frostfyre Aug 9 at 15:25 Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question. 3 Stack Exchange exist to
                    Read more

                    Confectionery

                    Image
                    Prepared foods made with a lot of sugar or other cabohydrates "Sweetmeat" redirects here. For the racehorse, see Sweetmeat (horse). Not to be confused with Sweetbread. This Kransekake is a traditional Scandinavian baker's confection. Confectionery is the art of making confections , which are food items that are rich in sugar and carbohydrates. Exact definitions are difficult. [1] In general, though, confectionery is divided into two broad and somewhat overlapping categories, bakers' confections and sugar confections. [2] Bakers' confectionery, also called flour confections , includes principally sweet pastries, cakes, and similar baked goods. Sugar confectionery includes candies ( sweets in British English), candied nuts, chocolates, chewing gum, bubble gum, pastillage, and other confections that are made primarily of sugar. In some cases, chocolate confections (confections made of chocolate) are treated as a separate category, as are sugar-free versions of
                    Read more