Sparsest similar matrix

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












Given a square matrix A (say with complex entries), which is the sparsest matrix which is similar to A?



I guess it has to be its Jordan normal form but I am not sure.



Remarks:



  • A matrix is sparser than other if it has less nonzero entries.


  • Two square $n times n$ matrices $A,C$ are similar if there exists and invertible matrix $P$ such that $A = P^-1CP$










share|cite|improve this question





















  • If the matrix is diagonalisable, clearly its Jordan form is the sparsest one in its similarity class because you cannot get fewer than $operatornamerank(A)$ entries.
    – user1551
    2 hours ago










  • My intuition says the same, but apart from trivial cases ($A$ is diagonaliseable) I do not see an immediate proof of that.
    – TZakrevskiy
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    Simulposted to MO, mathoverflow.net/questions/313224/sparsest-similar-matrix DON'T DO THAT!
    – Gerry Myerson
    1 hour ago














up vote
4
down vote

favorite












Given a square matrix A (say with complex entries), which is the sparsest matrix which is similar to A?



I guess it has to be its Jordan normal form but I am not sure.



Remarks:



  • A matrix is sparser than other if it has less nonzero entries.


  • Two square $n times n$ matrices $A,C$ are similar if there exists and invertible matrix $P$ such that $A = P^-1CP$










share|cite|improve this question





















  • If the matrix is diagonalisable, clearly its Jordan form is the sparsest one in its similarity class because you cannot get fewer than $operatornamerank(A)$ entries.
    – user1551
    2 hours ago










  • My intuition says the same, but apart from trivial cases ($A$ is diagonaliseable) I do not see an immediate proof of that.
    – TZakrevskiy
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    Simulposted to MO, mathoverflow.net/questions/313224/sparsest-similar-matrix DON'T DO THAT!
    – Gerry Myerson
    1 hour ago












up vote
4
down vote

favorite









up vote
4
down vote

favorite











Given a square matrix A (say with complex entries), which is the sparsest matrix which is similar to A?



I guess it has to be its Jordan normal form but I am not sure.



Remarks:



  • A matrix is sparser than other if it has less nonzero entries.


  • Two square $n times n$ matrices $A,C$ are similar if there exists and invertible matrix $P$ such that $A = P^-1CP$










share|cite|improve this question













Given a square matrix A (say with complex entries), which is the sparsest matrix which is similar to A?



I guess it has to be its Jordan normal form but I am not sure.



Remarks:



  • A matrix is sparser than other if it has less nonzero entries.


  • Two square $n times n$ matrices $A,C$ are similar if there exists and invertible matrix $P$ such that $A = P^-1CP$







linear-algebra matrices sparse-matrices






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









Nacho Garcia Marco

263




263











  • If the matrix is diagonalisable, clearly its Jordan form is the sparsest one in its similarity class because you cannot get fewer than $operatornamerank(A)$ entries.
    – user1551
    2 hours ago










  • My intuition says the same, but apart from trivial cases ($A$ is diagonaliseable) I do not see an immediate proof of that.
    – TZakrevskiy
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    Simulposted to MO, mathoverflow.net/questions/313224/sparsest-similar-matrix DON'T DO THAT!
    – Gerry Myerson
    1 hour ago
















  • If the matrix is diagonalisable, clearly its Jordan form is the sparsest one in its similarity class because you cannot get fewer than $operatornamerank(A)$ entries.
    – user1551
    2 hours ago










  • My intuition says the same, but apart from trivial cases ($A$ is diagonaliseable) I do not see an immediate proof of that.
    – TZakrevskiy
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    Simulposted to MO, mathoverflow.net/questions/313224/sparsest-similar-matrix DON'T DO THAT!
    – Gerry Myerson
    1 hour ago















If the matrix is diagonalisable, clearly its Jordan form is the sparsest one in its similarity class because you cannot get fewer than $operatornamerank(A)$ entries.
– user1551
2 hours ago




If the matrix is diagonalisable, clearly its Jordan form is the sparsest one in its similarity class because you cannot get fewer than $operatornamerank(A)$ entries.
– user1551
2 hours ago












My intuition says the same, but apart from trivial cases ($A$ is diagonaliseable) I do not see an immediate proof of that.
– TZakrevskiy
2 hours ago




My intuition says the same, but apart from trivial cases ($A$ is diagonaliseable) I do not see an immediate proof of that.
– TZakrevskiy
2 hours ago




2




2




Simulposted to MO, mathoverflow.net/questions/313224/sparsest-similar-matrix DON'T DO THAT!
– Gerry Myerson
1 hour ago




Simulposted to MO, mathoverflow.net/questions/313224/sparsest-similar-matrix DON'T DO THAT!
– Gerry Myerson
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote













The companion matrix to the polynomial $(x^2-1)^2=1-2x^2+x^4$ is $$pmatrix0&0&0&-1cr1&0&0&0cr0&1&0&2cr0&0&1&0cr$$ which has Jordan form $$pmatrix1&1&0&0cr0&1&0&0cr0&0&-1&1cr0&0&0&-1cr$$ which has more nonzero entries.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • The following paper claims that the companion matrix is the sparsest in a certain sense: doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2012.08.017
    – Julian Kuelshammer
    34 mins ago










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2961899%2fsparsest-similar-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
5
down vote













The companion matrix to the polynomial $(x^2-1)^2=1-2x^2+x^4$ is $$pmatrix0&0&0&-1cr1&0&0&0cr0&1&0&2cr0&0&1&0cr$$ which has Jordan form $$pmatrix1&1&0&0cr0&1&0&0cr0&0&-1&1cr0&0&0&-1cr$$ which has more nonzero entries.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • The following paper claims that the companion matrix is the sparsest in a certain sense: doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2012.08.017
    – Julian Kuelshammer
    34 mins ago














up vote
5
down vote













The companion matrix to the polynomial $(x^2-1)^2=1-2x^2+x^4$ is $$pmatrix0&0&0&-1cr1&0&0&0cr0&1&0&2cr0&0&1&0cr$$ which has Jordan form $$pmatrix1&1&0&0cr0&1&0&0cr0&0&-1&1cr0&0&0&-1cr$$ which has more nonzero entries.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • The following paper claims that the companion matrix is the sparsest in a certain sense: doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2012.08.017
    – Julian Kuelshammer
    34 mins ago












up vote
5
down vote










up vote
5
down vote









The companion matrix to the polynomial $(x^2-1)^2=1-2x^2+x^4$ is $$pmatrix0&0&0&-1cr1&0&0&0cr0&1&0&2cr0&0&1&0cr$$ which has Jordan form $$pmatrix1&1&0&0cr0&1&0&0cr0&0&-1&1cr0&0&0&-1cr$$ which has more nonzero entries.






share|cite|improve this answer












The companion matrix to the polynomial $(x^2-1)^2=1-2x^2+x^4$ is $$pmatrix0&0&0&-1cr1&0&0&0cr0&1&0&2cr0&0&1&0cr$$ which has Jordan form $$pmatrix1&1&0&0cr0&1&0&0cr0&0&-1&1cr0&0&0&-1cr$$ which has more nonzero entries.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 1 hour ago









Gerry Myerson

145k8145296




145k8145296











  • The following paper claims that the companion matrix is the sparsest in a certain sense: doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2012.08.017
    – Julian Kuelshammer
    34 mins ago
















  • The following paper claims that the companion matrix is the sparsest in a certain sense: doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2012.08.017
    – Julian Kuelshammer
    34 mins ago















The following paper claims that the companion matrix is the sparsest in a certain sense: doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2012.08.017
– Julian Kuelshammer
34 mins ago




The following paper claims that the companion matrix is the sparsest in a certain sense: doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2012.08.017
– Julian Kuelshammer
34 mins ago

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2961899%2fsparsest-similar-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

Confectionery