Searching with mandatory filters
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm having trouble designing a search box with two mandatory filters/categories before the user hit the "go" button.
So far, the best solution I could come up with was this one:
I've presented the following solution to my client, but they insist it's not ideal once the user would have to open up the split button and change the axis of their cursor and all of that, but I don't really see how this can be a heavy impact on the navigation. If it was all up to me, I would go along with this one, but they insist it's not the format they want, so forget about it.
Well... any ideas?
search filter
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm having trouble designing a search box with two mandatory filters/categories before the user hit the "go" button.
So far, the best solution I could come up with was this one:
I've presented the following solution to my client, but they insist it's not ideal once the user would have to open up the split button and change the axis of their cursor and all of that, but I don't really see how this can be a heavy impact on the navigation. If it was all up to me, I would go along with this one, but they insist it's not the format they want, so forget about it.
Well... any ideas?
search filter
Are these the only two categories users would search?
â DarrylGodden
45 mins ago
yes, there are only these two filters available
â feelerino
13 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm having trouble designing a search box with two mandatory filters/categories before the user hit the "go" button.
So far, the best solution I could come up with was this one:
I've presented the following solution to my client, but they insist it's not ideal once the user would have to open up the split button and change the axis of their cursor and all of that, but I don't really see how this can be a heavy impact on the navigation. If it was all up to me, I would go along with this one, but they insist it's not the format they want, so forget about it.
Well... any ideas?
search filter
I'm having trouble designing a search box with two mandatory filters/categories before the user hit the "go" button.
So far, the best solution I could come up with was this one:
I've presented the following solution to my client, but they insist it's not ideal once the user would have to open up the split button and change the axis of their cursor and all of that, but I don't really see how this can be a heavy impact on the navigation. If it was all up to me, I would go along with this one, but they insist it's not the format they want, so forget about it.
Well... any ideas?
search filter
search filter
edited 1 hour ago
asked 1 hour ago
feelerino
163
163
Are these the only two categories users would search?
â DarrylGodden
45 mins ago
yes, there are only these two filters available
â feelerino
13 mins ago
add a comment |Â
Are these the only two categories users would search?
â DarrylGodden
45 mins ago
yes, there are only these two filters available
â feelerino
13 mins ago
Are these the only two categories users would search?
â DarrylGodden
45 mins ago
Are these the only two categories users would search?
â DarrylGodden
45 mins ago
yes, there are only these two filters available
â feelerino
13 mins ago
yes, there are only these two filters available
â feelerino
13 mins ago
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
Since this is a mandatory tasks before interacting with search, consider search like the Call to action like save or submit. Before you can accomplish these actions you must fill out a form.
In this case your form is a radial group and a text input field.
I've offered this option too, but client argued the filters "are too important" to go out of the reading flux. I mean, the thing is right by the search field, right?
â feelerino
1 min ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
If these are the only two options and are likely to remain so, I would go with something like this:
download bmml source â Wireframes created with Balsamiq Mockups
this is actually a good option, but the problem is that apparently the user would search for very long terms, like this is a page that's gonna be used by engineers and people looking for some very particular content about energy, power plants and the likes. The client himself commented about this solution, even saying they used it in a previous project, but that it wouldn't really work for this current one.
â feelerino
8 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
If the filter is mandatory, choose the most frequent search as the default.
You can try a scoped search dropdown before the search input field. This way the search button is Active from the beginning.
Lead with what your metrics show that the majority of users will want to search by, and don't make them pause to choose a filter.
The tradeoff
If you have some metrics that make the case for the most likely search, users who don't see the filter, and just search will be rewarded.
Those who would search 'Fragments' (let's say it's the lesser of the searches), might not see the dropdown, and search immediately.
this is a very good solution, even Amazon use this logic and I don't see a good reason for not using it. I may suggest the client that they leave the user search for whatever they want, and then when the results come in, they can filter it by tabs just above the results list. That could be more effective. I don't know.
â feelerino
5 mins ago
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
Since this is a mandatory tasks before interacting with search, consider search like the Call to action like save or submit. Before you can accomplish these actions you must fill out a form.
In this case your form is a radial group and a text input field.
I've offered this option too, but client argued the filters "are too important" to go out of the reading flux. I mean, the thing is right by the search field, right?
â feelerino
1 min ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Since this is a mandatory tasks before interacting with search, consider search like the Call to action like save or submit. Before you can accomplish these actions you must fill out a form.
In this case your form is a radial group and a text input field.
I've offered this option too, but client argued the filters "are too important" to go out of the reading flux. I mean, the thing is right by the search field, right?
â feelerino
1 min ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Since this is a mandatory tasks before interacting with search, consider search like the Call to action like save or submit. Before you can accomplish these actions you must fill out a form.
In this case your form is a radial group and a text input field.
Since this is a mandatory tasks before interacting with search, consider search like the Call to action like save or submit. Before you can accomplish these actions you must fill out a form.
In this case your form is a radial group and a text input field.
answered 44 mins ago
Bromox
32518
32518
I've offered this option too, but client argued the filters "are too important" to go out of the reading flux. I mean, the thing is right by the search field, right?
â feelerino
1 min ago
add a comment |Â
I've offered this option too, but client argued the filters "are too important" to go out of the reading flux. I mean, the thing is right by the search field, right?
â feelerino
1 min ago
I've offered this option too, but client argued the filters "are too important" to go out of the reading flux. I mean, the thing is right by the search field, right?
â feelerino
1 min ago
I've offered this option too, but client argued the filters "are too important" to go out of the reading flux. I mean, the thing is right by the search field, right?
â feelerino
1 min ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
If these are the only two options and are likely to remain so, I would go with something like this:
download bmml source â Wireframes created with Balsamiq Mockups
this is actually a good option, but the problem is that apparently the user would search for very long terms, like this is a page that's gonna be used by engineers and people looking for some very particular content about energy, power plants and the likes. The client himself commented about this solution, even saying they used it in a previous project, but that it wouldn't really work for this current one.
â feelerino
8 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
If these are the only two options and are likely to remain so, I would go with something like this:
download bmml source â Wireframes created with Balsamiq Mockups
this is actually a good option, but the problem is that apparently the user would search for very long terms, like this is a page that's gonna be used by engineers and people looking for some very particular content about energy, power plants and the likes. The client himself commented about this solution, even saying they used it in a previous project, but that it wouldn't really work for this current one.
â feelerino
8 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
If these are the only two options and are likely to remain so, I would go with something like this:
download bmml source â Wireframes created with Balsamiq Mockups
If these are the only two options and are likely to remain so, I would go with something like this:
download bmml source â Wireframes created with Balsamiq Mockups
answered 38 mins ago
DarrylGodden
4,821930
4,821930
this is actually a good option, but the problem is that apparently the user would search for very long terms, like this is a page that's gonna be used by engineers and people looking for some very particular content about energy, power plants and the likes. The client himself commented about this solution, even saying they used it in a previous project, but that it wouldn't really work for this current one.
â feelerino
8 mins ago
add a comment |Â
this is actually a good option, but the problem is that apparently the user would search for very long terms, like this is a page that's gonna be used by engineers and people looking for some very particular content about energy, power plants and the likes. The client himself commented about this solution, even saying they used it in a previous project, but that it wouldn't really work for this current one.
â feelerino
8 mins ago
this is actually a good option, but the problem is that apparently the user would search for very long terms, like this is a page that's gonna be used by engineers and people looking for some very particular content about energy, power plants and the likes. The client himself commented about this solution, even saying they used it in a previous project, but that it wouldn't really work for this current one.
â feelerino
8 mins ago
this is actually a good option, but the problem is that apparently the user would search for very long terms, like this is a page that's gonna be used by engineers and people looking for some very particular content about energy, power plants and the likes. The client himself commented about this solution, even saying they used it in a previous project, but that it wouldn't really work for this current one.
â feelerino
8 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
If the filter is mandatory, choose the most frequent search as the default.
You can try a scoped search dropdown before the search input field. This way the search button is Active from the beginning.
Lead with what your metrics show that the majority of users will want to search by, and don't make them pause to choose a filter.
The tradeoff
If you have some metrics that make the case for the most likely search, users who don't see the filter, and just search will be rewarded.
Those who would search 'Fragments' (let's say it's the lesser of the searches), might not see the dropdown, and search immediately.
this is a very good solution, even Amazon use this logic and I don't see a good reason for not using it. I may suggest the client that they leave the user search for whatever they want, and then when the results come in, they can filter it by tabs just above the results list. That could be more effective. I don't know.
â feelerino
5 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
If the filter is mandatory, choose the most frequent search as the default.
You can try a scoped search dropdown before the search input field. This way the search button is Active from the beginning.
Lead with what your metrics show that the majority of users will want to search by, and don't make them pause to choose a filter.
The tradeoff
If you have some metrics that make the case for the most likely search, users who don't see the filter, and just search will be rewarded.
Those who would search 'Fragments' (let's say it's the lesser of the searches), might not see the dropdown, and search immediately.
this is a very good solution, even Amazon use this logic and I don't see a good reason for not using it. I may suggest the client that they leave the user search for whatever they want, and then when the results come in, they can filter it by tabs just above the results list. That could be more effective. I don't know.
â feelerino
5 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
If the filter is mandatory, choose the most frequent search as the default.
You can try a scoped search dropdown before the search input field. This way the search button is Active from the beginning.
Lead with what your metrics show that the majority of users will want to search by, and don't make them pause to choose a filter.
The tradeoff
If you have some metrics that make the case for the most likely search, users who don't see the filter, and just search will be rewarded.
Those who would search 'Fragments' (let's say it's the lesser of the searches), might not see the dropdown, and search immediately.
If the filter is mandatory, choose the most frequent search as the default.
You can try a scoped search dropdown before the search input field. This way the search button is Active from the beginning.
Lead with what your metrics show that the majority of users will want to search by, and don't make them pause to choose a filter.
The tradeoff
If you have some metrics that make the case for the most likely search, users who don't see the filter, and just search will be rewarded.
Those who would search 'Fragments' (let's say it's the lesser of the searches), might not see the dropdown, and search immediately.
edited 15 mins ago
answered 21 mins ago
Mike M
7,12111522
7,12111522
this is a very good solution, even Amazon use this logic and I don't see a good reason for not using it. I may suggest the client that they leave the user search for whatever they want, and then when the results come in, they can filter it by tabs just above the results list. That could be more effective. I don't know.
â feelerino
5 mins ago
add a comment |Â
this is a very good solution, even Amazon use this logic and I don't see a good reason for not using it. I may suggest the client that they leave the user search for whatever they want, and then when the results come in, they can filter it by tabs just above the results list. That could be more effective. I don't know.
â feelerino
5 mins ago
this is a very good solution, even Amazon use this logic and I don't see a good reason for not using it. I may suggest the client that they leave the user search for whatever they want, and then when the results come in, they can filter it by tabs just above the results list. That could be more effective. I don't know.
â feelerino
5 mins ago
this is a very good solution, even Amazon use this logic and I don't see a good reason for not using it. I may suggest the client that they leave the user search for whatever they want, and then when the results come in, they can filter it by tabs just above the results list. That could be more effective. I don't know.
â feelerino
5 mins ago
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fux.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f121691%2fsearching-with-mandatory-filters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Are these the only two categories users would search?
â DarrylGodden
45 mins ago
yes, there are only these two filters available
â feelerino
13 mins ago