Why does the B-29 not have pilot-accessible thrust?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Watching this incredible B-29 Superfortress flight, I was amazed to see that it required a dedicated person to manage the 4 engines and their power levels.



Why was the throttle not placed between the two pilots, like the modern airliners of today?










share|improve this question























  • @Sanchises "Why was the throttle not placed between the two pilots, like the modern airliners of today?" I read this as asking why the pilots didn't have a common throttle lever set between their stations -- which I covered in my answer.
    – Zeiss Ikon
    2 hours ago










  • @ZeissIkon I see - interesting answer!
    – Sanchises
    1 hour ago














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Watching this incredible B-29 Superfortress flight, I was amazed to see that it required a dedicated person to manage the 4 engines and their power levels.



Why was the throttle not placed between the two pilots, like the modern airliners of today?










share|improve this question























  • @Sanchises "Why was the throttle not placed between the two pilots, like the modern airliners of today?" I read this as asking why the pilots didn't have a common throttle lever set between their stations -- which I covered in my answer.
    – Zeiss Ikon
    2 hours ago










  • @ZeissIkon I see - interesting answer!
    – Sanchises
    1 hour ago












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Watching this incredible B-29 Superfortress flight, I was amazed to see that it required a dedicated person to manage the 4 engines and their power levels.



Why was the throttle not placed between the two pilots, like the modern airliners of today?










share|improve this question















Watching this incredible B-29 Superfortress flight, I was amazed to see that it required a dedicated person to manage the 4 engines and their power levels.



Why was the throttle not placed between the two pilots, like the modern airliners of today?







throttle bomber






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago









Bentoy13

2815




2815










asked 4 hours ago









Cloud

2,08911234




2,08911234











  • @Sanchises "Why was the throttle not placed between the two pilots, like the modern airliners of today?" I read this as asking why the pilots didn't have a common throttle lever set between their stations -- which I covered in my answer.
    – Zeiss Ikon
    2 hours ago










  • @ZeissIkon I see - interesting answer!
    – Sanchises
    1 hour ago
















  • @Sanchises "Why was the throttle not placed between the two pilots, like the modern airliners of today?" I read this as asking why the pilots didn't have a common throttle lever set between their stations -- which I covered in my answer.
    – Zeiss Ikon
    2 hours ago










  • @ZeissIkon I see - interesting answer!
    – Sanchises
    1 hour ago















@Sanchises "Why was the throttle not placed between the two pilots, like the modern airliners of today?" I read this as asking why the pilots didn't have a common throttle lever set between their stations -- which I covered in my answer.
– Zeiss Ikon
2 hours ago




@Sanchises "Why was the throttle not placed between the two pilots, like the modern airliners of today?" I read this as asking why the pilots didn't have a common throttle lever set between their stations -- which I covered in my answer.
– Zeiss Ikon
2 hours ago












@ZeissIkon I see - interesting answer!
– Sanchises
1 hour ago




@ZeissIkon I see - interesting answer!
– Sanchises
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













This setup was actually pretty common for four-engine aircraft of the day. Look at the cockpits of airliners from DC-4 to Lockheed Constellation, and you'll always see a dedicated flight engineer station -- not always to the level of managing throttles (requiring a voice command from the PIC to change power setting), but to manage the relatively complex and failure-prone large radial engines. The flight engineer station persisted well into the jet era -- at least to the early versions of the 747, which first flew in 1968 or 1969.



However, if you look closely at a B-29 cockpit, you'll see each pilot has an individual throttle lever set -- they're not between the yokes because of the crawlway for the bombardier station. Rather, they're outboard of the seats, near the (presumably pitch) trim wheels. There were also propeller controls, though they're harder to identify in a cockpit photo. With constant speed propellers, the only control required on an immediate basis was throttle (the flight engineer managed synchronization), and both control seats had throttles, as well as the ability to feather a dead engine.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    The pilot had propeller controls as well. 4 toggle switches with a gang bar for simultaneous operation of the Curtis Electric propellers.
    – John K
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    Thanks, @JohnK -- edited.
    – Zeiss Ikon
    2 hours ago










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f56184%2fwhy-does-the-b-29-not-have-pilot-accessible-thrust%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote













This setup was actually pretty common for four-engine aircraft of the day. Look at the cockpits of airliners from DC-4 to Lockheed Constellation, and you'll always see a dedicated flight engineer station -- not always to the level of managing throttles (requiring a voice command from the PIC to change power setting), but to manage the relatively complex and failure-prone large radial engines. The flight engineer station persisted well into the jet era -- at least to the early versions of the 747, which first flew in 1968 or 1969.



However, if you look closely at a B-29 cockpit, you'll see each pilot has an individual throttle lever set -- they're not between the yokes because of the crawlway for the bombardier station. Rather, they're outboard of the seats, near the (presumably pitch) trim wheels. There were also propeller controls, though they're harder to identify in a cockpit photo. With constant speed propellers, the only control required on an immediate basis was throttle (the flight engineer managed synchronization), and both control seats had throttles, as well as the ability to feather a dead engine.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    The pilot had propeller controls as well. 4 toggle switches with a gang bar for simultaneous operation of the Curtis Electric propellers.
    – John K
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    Thanks, @JohnK -- edited.
    – Zeiss Ikon
    2 hours ago














up vote
3
down vote













This setup was actually pretty common for four-engine aircraft of the day. Look at the cockpits of airliners from DC-4 to Lockheed Constellation, and you'll always see a dedicated flight engineer station -- not always to the level of managing throttles (requiring a voice command from the PIC to change power setting), but to manage the relatively complex and failure-prone large radial engines. The flight engineer station persisted well into the jet era -- at least to the early versions of the 747, which first flew in 1968 or 1969.



However, if you look closely at a B-29 cockpit, you'll see each pilot has an individual throttle lever set -- they're not between the yokes because of the crawlway for the bombardier station. Rather, they're outboard of the seats, near the (presumably pitch) trim wheels. There were also propeller controls, though they're harder to identify in a cockpit photo. With constant speed propellers, the only control required on an immediate basis was throttle (the flight engineer managed synchronization), and both control seats had throttles, as well as the ability to feather a dead engine.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    The pilot had propeller controls as well. 4 toggle switches with a gang bar for simultaneous operation of the Curtis Electric propellers.
    – John K
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    Thanks, @JohnK -- edited.
    – Zeiss Ikon
    2 hours ago












up vote
3
down vote










up vote
3
down vote









This setup was actually pretty common for four-engine aircraft of the day. Look at the cockpits of airliners from DC-4 to Lockheed Constellation, and you'll always see a dedicated flight engineer station -- not always to the level of managing throttles (requiring a voice command from the PIC to change power setting), but to manage the relatively complex and failure-prone large radial engines. The flight engineer station persisted well into the jet era -- at least to the early versions of the 747, which first flew in 1968 or 1969.



However, if you look closely at a B-29 cockpit, you'll see each pilot has an individual throttle lever set -- they're not between the yokes because of the crawlway for the bombardier station. Rather, they're outboard of the seats, near the (presumably pitch) trim wheels. There were also propeller controls, though they're harder to identify in a cockpit photo. With constant speed propellers, the only control required on an immediate basis was throttle (the flight engineer managed synchronization), and both control seats had throttles, as well as the ability to feather a dead engine.






share|improve this answer














This setup was actually pretty common for four-engine aircraft of the day. Look at the cockpits of airliners from DC-4 to Lockheed Constellation, and you'll always see a dedicated flight engineer station -- not always to the level of managing throttles (requiring a voice command from the PIC to change power setting), but to manage the relatively complex and failure-prone large radial engines. The flight engineer station persisted well into the jet era -- at least to the early versions of the 747, which first flew in 1968 or 1969.



However, if you look closely at a B-29 cockpit, you'll see each pilot has an individual throttle lever set -- they're not between the yokes because of the crawlway for the bombardier station. Rather, they're outboard of the seats, near the (presumably pitch) trim wheels. There were also propeller controls, though they're harder to identify in a cockpit photo. With constant speed propellers, the only control required on an immediate basis was throttle (the flight engineer managed synchronization), and both control seats had throttles, as well as the ability to feather a dead engine.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 hours ago

























answered 3 hours ago









Zeiss Ikon

2,100113




2,100113







  • 1




    The pilot had propeller controls as well. 4 toggle switches with a gang bar for simultaneous operation of the Curtis Electric propellers.
    – John K
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    Thanks, @JohnK -- edited.
    – Zeiss Ikon
    2 hours ago












  • 1




    The pilot had propeller controls as well. 4 toggle switches with a gang bar for simultaneous operation of the Curtis Electric propellers.
    – John K
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    Thanks, @JohnK -- edited.
    – Zeiss Ikon
    2 hours ago







1




1




The pilot had propeller controls as well. 4 toggle switches with a gang bar for simultaneous operation of the Curtis Electric propellers.
– John K
2 hours ago




The pilot had propeller controls as well. 4 toggle switches with a gang bar for simultaneous operation of the Curtis Electric propellers.
– John K
2 hours ago




1




1




Thanks, @JohnK -- edited.
– Zeiss Ikon
2 hours ago




Thanks, @JohnK -- edited.
– Zeiss Ikon
2 hours ago

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f56184%2fwhy-does-the-b-29-not-have-pilot-accessible-thrust%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

Confectionery