Difference between RAW and RAW+JPEG option in Canon 77D?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
so since my camera saves my photos automatically in JPEG and since I wanted to have a RAW version of them I looked for some info about this topic and how it works on my DSLR, Canon 77D.
I stumbled upon an article where I found this little scheme, which confused me a lot cause I don't get why I can store more pictures saving both files instead of just the RAW files.
If someone can explain me this, I'd be very grateful!
Thanks in advance and have a good day :)
canon raw jpeg raw-vs-jpeg raw-plus-jpeg
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
so since my camera saves my photos automatically in JPEG and since I wanted to have a RAW version of them I looked for some info about this topic and how it works on my DSLR, Canon 77D.
I stumbled upon an article where I found this little scheme, which confused me a lot cause I don't get why I can store more pictures saving both files instead of just the RAW files.
If someone can explain me this, I'd be very grateful!
Thanks in advance and have a good day :)
canon raw jpeg raw-vs-jpeg raw-plus-jpeg
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
so since my camera saves my photos automatically in JPEG and since I wanted to have a RAW version of them I looked for some info about this topic and how it works on my DSLR, Canon 77D.
I stumbled upon an article where I found this little scheme, which confused me a lot cause I don't get why I can store more pictures saving both files instead of just the RAW files.
If someone can explain me this, I'd be very grateful!
Thanks in advance and have a good day :)
canon raw jpeg raw-vs-jpeg raw-plus-jpeg
so since my camera saves my photos automatically in JPEG and since I wanted to have a RAW version of them I looked for some info about this topic and how it works on my DSLR, Canon 77D.
I stumbled upon an article where I found this little scheme, which confused me a lot cause I don't get why I can store more pictures saving both files instead of just the RAW files.
If someone can explain me this, I'd be very grateful!
Thanks in advance and have a good day :)
canon raw jpeg raw-vs-jpeg raw-plus-jpeg
canon raw jpeg raw-vs-jpeg raw-plus-jpeg
asked 1 hour ago
musicinmyheart
961
961
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
"Shots" in this case in perhaps a bit misleading; what it's saying is that you can save 170 RAW files, or (105 RAW files + 105 JPEG files) = 210 files. You could argue that's only 105 shots.
3
You mean 105+105?
â Jim Garrison
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
It looks like the value for only RAW files should have been 270 instead of 170. Multiplying the average file size given by the corresponding shot count yields values between approximately 7GB and 8GB for all entries except RAW. 170 images at 29.4MB would be about 5GB, 270 images would be about 8GB. The file size given for RAW+JPEG is quite close to the sum of those for RAW and JPEG Large/Fine, so the file sizes can be assumed to be correct. So, seems like an actual error in the table.
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
"Shots" in this case in perhaps a bit misleading; what it's saying is that you can save 170 RAW files, or (105 RAW files + 105 JPEG files) = 210 files. You could argue that's only 105 shots.
3
You mean 105+105?
â Jim Garrison
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
"Shots" in this case in perhaps a bit misleading; what it's saying is that you can save 170 RAW files, or (105 RAW files + 105 JPEG files) = 210 files. You could argue that's only 105 shots.
3
You mean 105+105?
â Jim Garrison
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
"Shots" in this case in perhaps a bit misleading; what it's saying is that you can save 170 RAW files, or (105 RAW files + 105 JPEG files) = 210 files. You could argue that's only 105 shots.
"Shots" in this case in perhaps a bit misleading; what it's saying is that you can save 170 RAW files, or (105 RAW files + 105 JPEG files) = 210 files. You could argue that's only 105 shots.
edited 46 mins ago
mattdm
117k37341633
117k37341633
answered 1 hour ago
Philip Kendall
16.3k44881
16.3k44881
3
You mean 105+105?
â Jim Garrison
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
3
You mean 105+105?
â Jim Garrison
1 hour ago
3
3
You mean 105+105?
â Jim Garrison
1 hour ago
You mean 105+105?
â Jim Garrison
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
It looks like the value for only RAW files should have been 270 instead of 170. Multiplying the average file size given by the corresponding shot count yields values between approximately 7GB and 8GB for all entries except RAW. 170 images at 29.4MB would be about 5GB, 270 images would be about 8GB. The file size given for RAW+JPEG is quite close to the sum of those for RAW and JPEG Large/Fine, so the file sizes can be assumed to be correct. So, seems like an actual error in the table.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
It looks like the value for only RAW files should have been 270 instead of 170. Multiplying the average file size given by the corresponding shot count yields values between approximately 7GB and 8GB for all entries except RAW. 170 images at 29.4MB would be about 5GB, 270 images would be about 8GB. The file size given for RAW+JPEG is quite close to the sum of those for RAW and JPEG Large/Fine, so the file sizes can be assumed to be correct. So, seems like an actual error in the table.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
It looks like the value for only RAW files should have been 270 instead of 170. Multiplying the average file size given by the corresponding shot count yields values between approximately 7GB and 8GB for all entries except RAW. 170 images at 29.4MB would be about 5GB, 270 images would be about 8GB. The file size given for RAW+JPEG is quite close to the sum of those for RAW and JPEG Large/Fine, so the file sizes can be assumed to be correct. So, seems like an actual error in the table.
It looks like the value for only RAW files should have been 270 instead of 170. Multiplying the average file size given by the corresponding shot count yields values between approximately 7GB and 8GB for all entries except RAW. 170 images at 29.4MB would be about 5GB, 270 images would be about 8GB. The file size given for RAW+JPEG is quite close to the sum of those for RAW and JPEG Large/Fine, so the file sizes can be assumed to be correct. So, seems like an actual error in the table.
edited 13 mins ago
answered 22 mins ago
ad42
17114
17114
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102226%2fdifference-between-raw-and-rawjpeg-option-in-canon-77d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password