Difference between RAW and RAW+JPEG option in Canon 77D?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












so since my camera saves my photos automatically in JPEG and since I wanted to have a RAW version of them I looked for some info about this topic and how it works on my DSLR, Canon 77D.
I stumbled upon an article where I found this little scheme, which confused me a lot cause I don't get why I can store more pictures saving both files instead of just the RAW files.
If someone can explain me this, I'd be very grateful!
enter image description here
Thanks in advance and have a good day :)






canon raw jpeg raw-vs-jpeg raw-plus-jpeg







share|improve this question

























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    so since my camera saves my photos automatically in JPEG and since I wanted to have a RAW version of them I looked for some info about this topic and how it works on my DSLR, Canon 77D.
    I stumbled upon an article where I found this little scheme, which confused me a lot cause I don't get why I can store more pictures saving both files instead of just the RAW files.
    If someone can explain me this, I'd be very grateful!
    enter image description here
    Thanks in advance and have a good day :)






    canon raw jpeg raw-vs-jpeg raw-plus-jpeg







    share|improve this question























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      so since my camera saves my photos automatically in JPEG and since I wanted to have a RAW version of them I looked for some info about this topic and how it works on my DSLR, Canon 77D.
      I stumbled upon an article where I found this little scheme, which confused me a lot cause I don't get why I can store more pictures saving both files instead of just the RAW files.
      If someone can explain me this, I'd be very grateful!
      enter image description here
      Thanks in advance and have a good day :)






      canon raw jpeg raw-vs-jpeg raw-plus-jpeg







      share|improve this question













      so since my camera saves my photos automatically in JPEG and since I wanted to have a RAW version of them I looked for some info about this topic and how it works on my DSLR, Canon 77D.
      I stumbled upon an article where I found this little scheme, which confused me a lot cause I don't get why I can store more pictures saving both files instead of just the RAW files.
      If someone can explain me this, I'd be very grateful!
      enter image description here
      Thanks in advance and have a good day :)






      canon raw jpeg raw-vs-jpeg raw-plus-jpeg




      canon raw jpeg raw-vs-jpeg raw-plus-jpeg






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 1 hour ago









      musicinmyheart

      961




      961




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          "Shots" in this case in perhaps a bit misleading; what it's saying is that you can save 170 RAW files, or (105 RAW files + 105 JPEG files) = 210 files. You could argue that's only 105 shots.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 3




            You mean 105+105?
            – Jim Garrison
            1 hour ago

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          It looks like the value for only RAW files should have been 270 instead of 170. Multiplying the average file size given by the corresponding shot count yields values between approximately 7GB and 8GB for all entries except RAW. 170 images at 29.4MB would be about 5GB, 270 images would be about 8GB. The file size given for RAW+JPEG is quite close to the sum of those for RAW and JPEG Large/Fine, so the file sizes can be assumed to be correct. So, seems like an actual error in the table.






          share|improve this answer






















            Your Answer







            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "61"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102226%2fdifference-between-raw-and-rawjpeg-option-in-canon-77d%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest

















            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            3
            down vote













            "Shots" in this case in perhaps a bit misleading; what it's saying is that you can save 170 RAW files, or (105 RAW files + 105 JPEG files) = 210 files. You could argue that's only 105 shots.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 3




              You mean 105+105?
              – Jim Garrison
              1 hour ago














            up vote
            3
            down vote













            "Shots" in this case in perhaps a bit misleading; what it's saying is that you can save 170 RAW files, or (105 RAW files + 105 JPEG files) = 210 files. You could argue that's only 105 shots.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 3




              You mean 105+105?
              – Jim Garrison
              1 hour ago












            up vote
            3
            down vote










            up vote
            3
            down vote









            "Shots" in this case in perhaps a bit misleading; what it's saying is that you can save 170 RAW files, or (105 RAW files + 105 JPEG files) = 210 files. You could argue that's only 105 shots.






            share|improve this answer














            "Shots" in this case in perhaps a bit misleading; what it's saying is that you can save 170 RAW files, or (105 RAW files + 105 JPEG files) = 210 files. You could argue that's only 105 shots.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 46 mins ago









            mattdm

            117k37341633




            117k37341633










            answered 1 hour ago









            Philip Kendall

            16.3k44881




            16.3k44881







            • 3




              You mean 105+105?
              – Jim Garrison
              1 hour ago












            • 3




              You mean 105+105?
              – Jim Garrison
              1 hour ago







            3




            3




            You mean 105+105?
            – Jim Garrison
            1 hour ago




            You mean 105+105?
            – Jim Garrison
            1 hour ago












            up vote
            1
            down vote













            It looks like the value for only RAW files should have been 270 instead of 170. Multiplying the average file size given by the corresponding shot count yields values between approximately 7GB and 8GB for all entries except RAW. 170 images at 29.4MB would be about 5GB, 270 images would be about 8GB. The file size given for RAW+JPEG is quite close to the sum of those for RAW and JPEG Large/Fine, so the file sizes can be assumed to be correct. So, seems like an actual error in the table.






            share|improve this answer


























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              It looks like the value for only RAW files should have been 270 instead of 170. Multiplying the average file size given by the corresponding shot count yields values between approximately 7GB and 8GB for all entries except RAW. 170 images at 29.4MB would be about 5GB, 270 images would be about 8GB. The file size given for RAW+JPEG is quite close to the sum of those for RAW and JPEG Large/Fine, so the file sizes can be assumed to be correct. So, seems like an actual error in the table.






              share|improve this answer
























                up vote
                1
                down vote










                up vote
                1
                down vote









                It looks like the value for only RAW files should have been 270 instead of 170. Multiplying the average file size given by the corresponding shot count yields values between approximately 7GB and 8GB for all entries except RAW. 170 images at 29.4MB would be about 5GB, 270 images would be about 8GB. The file size given for RAW+JPEG is quite close to the sum of those for RAW and JPEG Large/Fine, so the file sizes can be assumed to be correct. So, seems like an actual error in the table.






                share|improve this answer














                It looks like the value for only RAW files should have been 270 instead of 170. Multiplying the average file size given by the corresponding shot count yields values between approximately 7GB and 8GB for all entries except RAW. 170 images at 29.4MB would be about 5GB, 270 images would be about 8GB. The file size given for RAW+JPEG is quite close to the sum of those for RAW and JPEG Large/Fine, so the file sizes can be assumed to be correct. So, seems like an actual error in the table.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 13 mins ago

























                answered 22 mins ago









                ad42

                17114




                17114



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102226%2fdifference-between-raw-and-rawjpeg-option-in-canon-77d%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest
































































                    Comments

                    Post a Comment

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

                    Image
                    Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote 31 down vote favorite 4 I hold a PhD in mechanical engineering with a 7 year background in self-guided, self-paced research including 2 years as a graduate level course instructor and a subject matter expert for various engineering projects in a university setting in the United States. For the last 10-11 months, I am working in a research industry in France where my task is to debug C++ spaghetti code written over a period of several years by my current supervisor. It is a team of 2: just I and my supervisor. Diurnally, I am posed with a "bug of the day" to get out of this C++ code. My supervisor generally gives me about 15-30 minutes to solve it and then accosts me about whether or not the task is completed and then rinses and repeats this until the end of the day. Off-late, my supervisor has been holding 6-7 hour long "meetin
                    Read more

                    Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

                    Image
                    Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite Many fantasy worlds have multiple humanoid species (elves, orcs, humans, etc) living in the same world, in addition to that, they often have the ability to interbreed. And I can't help but question their believability... fantasy-races reproduction interspecies-relations share | improve this question edited Aug 9 at 14:46 Michael Kjörling ♦ 21.1k 10 85 161 asked Aug 9 at 13:13 Chlodio 118 6 closed as unclear what you're asking by MichaelK, Gryphon, John, Vincent, Frostfyre Aug 9 at 15:25 Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question. 3 Stack Exchange exist to
                    Read more

                    Confectionery

                    Image
                    Prepared foods made with a lot of sugar or other cabohydrates "Sweetmeat" redirects here. For the racehorse, see Sweetmeat (horse). Not to be confused with Sweetbread. This Kransekake is a traditional Scandinavian baker's confection. Confectionery is the art of making confections , which are food items that are rich in sugar and carbohydrates. Exact definitions are difficult. [1] In general, though, confectionery is divided into two broad and somewhat overlapping categories, bakers' confections and sugar confections. [2] Bakers' confectionery, also called flour confections , includes principally sweet pastries, cakes, and similar baked goods. Sugar confectionery includes candies ( sweets in British English), candied nuts, chocolates, chewing gum, bubble gum, pastillage, and other confections that are made primarily of sugar. In some cases, chocolate confections (confections made of chocolate) are treated as a separate category, as are sugar-free versions of
                    Read more