Repeating “them” in “support them rather than abandon them”

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
1
down vote

favorite













Support them rather than abandon them




Is the above correct? Is the repeating of 'them' correct? Can we drop 'them' when we use it second time?






pronouns redundancy







share|improve this question





























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite













    Support them rather than abandon them




    Is the above correct? Is the repeating of 'them' correct? Can we drop 'them' when we use it second time?






    pronouns redundancy







    share|improve this question

























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite












      Support them rather than abandon them




      Is the above correct? Is the repeating of 'them' correct? Can we drop 'them' when we use it second time?






      pronouns redundancy







      share|improve this question
















      Support them rather than abandon them




      Is the above correct? Is the repeating of 'them' correct? Can we drop 'them' when we use it second time?






      pronouns redundancy




      pronouns redundancy






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago









      Em.♦

      35.3k10100120




      35.3k10100120










      asked 1 hour ago









      CuriousMind

      93




      93




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          Yes, it is correct.



          From the perspective of grammar, you can use them twice.



          As for using only a single them, only the first one can be removed without it becoming ungrammatical:




          ✘ Support them rather than abandon.

          ✔ Support rather than abandon them.







          share|improve this answer






















            Your Answer







            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "481"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f181907%2frepeating-them-in-support-them-rather-than-abandon-them%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest

















            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            3
            down vote













            Yes, it is correct.



            From the perspective of grammar, you can use them twice.



            As for using only a single them, only the first one can be removed without it becoming ungrammatical:




            ✘ Support them rather than abandon.

            ✔ Support rather than abandon them.







            share|improve this answer


























              up vote
              3
              down vote













              Yes, it is correct.



              From the perspective of grammar, you can use them twice.



              As for using only a single them, only the first one can be removed without it becoming ungrammatical:




              ✘ Support them rather than abandon.

              ✔ Support rather than abandon them.







              share|improve this answer
























                up vote
                3
                down vote










                up vote
                3
                down vote









                Yes, it is correct.



                From the perspective of grammar, you can use them twice.



                As for using only a single them, only the first one can be removed without it becoming ungrammatical:




                ✘ Support them rather than abandon.

                ✔ Support rather than abandon them.







                share|improve this answer














                Yes, it is correct.



                From the perspective of grammar, you can use them twice.



                As for using only a single them, only the first one can be removed without it becoming ungrammatical:




                ✘ Support them rather than abandon.

                ✔ Support rather than abandon them.








                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 59 mins ago

























                answered 1 hour ago









                Jason Bassford

                9,6451928




                9,6451928



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f181907%2frepeating-them-in-support-them-rather-than-abandon-them%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest
































































                    Comments

                    Post a Comment

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What does second last employer means? [closed]

                    Image
                    Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote -3 down vote favorite Say, for example I have worked in the following companies, Company A => 2010 - 2011 Company B => 2011 - 2012 Company C => 2012 - Till Date Company D => Have offer Now assume Company D is asking to submit documents from my second last employer. So from the list of companies given, which company would be qualified as second last employer? software-industry employer share | improve this question asked Aug 10 '14 at 5:16 Rajaprabhu Aravindasamy 559 1 6 13 closed as off-topic by Jim G., jmort253 ♦ Aug 11 '14 at 1:58 This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason: "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address...
                    Read more

                    List of Gilmore Girls characters

                    Image
                    The season three cast—(Back row): Lane, Michel, Paris, Emily, Richard, Sookie, Miss Patty, Kirk; Front row: Jess, Luke, Lorelai, Rory, Dean This is a list of characters for the comedy-drama television series Gilmore Girls . Contents 1 Main characters 1.1 Lorelai Gilmore 1.2 Rory Gilmore 1.3 Sookie St. James 1.4 Lane Kim 1.5 Michel Gerard 1.6 Luke Danes 1.7 Emily Gilmore 1.8 Richard Gilmore 1.9 Paris Geller 1.10 Dean Forester 1.11 Jess Mariano 1.12 Kirk Gleason 1.13 Jason Stiles 1.14 Logan Huntzberger 2 Major recurring characters 2.1 Christopher Hayden 2.2 Jackson Belleville 2.3 Mrs. Kim 2.4 Tristin DuGray 2.5 Max Medina 2.6 Taylor Doose 2.7 Dave Rygalski 2.8 Marty 3 Recurring characters 3.1 Stars Hollow 3.2 Chilton 3.3 Yale 3.4 Other 4 Notable guest stars 5 Unseen characters 6 Notes 7 References Main characters Actor Character Appearances Season 1 Season 2 Season 3 Season 4 Season 5 Season 6 Season 7 A Year in the Life Lauren Graham Lorelai Gilmore...
                    Read more

                    Confectionery

                    Image
                    Prepared foods made with a lot of sugar or other cabohydrates "Sweetmeat" redirects here. For the racehorse, see Sweetmeat (horse). Not to be confused with Sweetbread. This Kransekake is a traditional Scandinavian baker's confection. Confectionery is the art of making confections , which are food items that are rich in sugar and carbohydrates. Exact definitions are difficult. [1] In general, though, confectionery is divided into two broad and somewhat overlapping categories, bakers' confections and sugar confections. [2] Bakers' confectionery, also called flour confections , includes principally sweet pastries, cakes, and similar baked goods. Sugar confectionery includes candies ( sweets in British English), candied nuts, chocolates, chewing gum, bubble gum, pastillage, and other confections that are made primarily of sugar. In some cases, chocolate confections (confections made of chocolate) are treated as a separate category, as are sugar-free versions of ...
                    Read more