Volume after transformation.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1













Consider $$ Omega: (x, y, z): x^2+y^2leq 1, 0leq zleq 2 $$ and the transform $$ T:(x, y, z)to(x, y+tan(alpha z), z) ,$$ where $ alphain (0, pi) $. What is the volume of $ T(Omega) $?




My attempt: I am trying to convert to the cylindrical coordinate system, but I can't find the region where I should integrate since it is transformed.










share|cite|improve this question



























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite
    1













    Consider $$ Omega: (x, y, z): x^2+y^2leq 1, 0leq zleq 2 $$ and the transform $$ T:(x, y, z)to(x, y+tan(alpha z), z) ,$$ where $ alphain (0, pi) $. What is the volume of $ T(Omega) $?




    My attempt: I am trying to convert to the cylindrical coordinate system, but I can't find the region where I should integrate since it is transformed.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1






      Consider $$ Omega: (x, y, z): x^2+y^2leq 1, 0leq zleq 2 $$ and the transform $$ T:(x, y, z)to(x, y+tan(alpha z), z) ,$$ where $ alphain (0, pi) $. What is the volume of $ T(Omega) $?




      My attempt: I am trying to convert to the cylindrical coordinate system, but I can't find the region where I should integrate since it is transformed.










      share|cite|improve this question
















      Consider $$ Omega: (x, y, z): x^2+y^2leq 1, 0leq zleq 2 $$ and the transform $$ T:(x, y, z)to(x, y+tan(alpha z), z) ,$$ where $ alphain (0, pi) $. What is the volume of $ T(Omega) $?




      My attempt: I am trying to convert to the cylindrical coordinate system, but I can't find the region where I should integrate since it is transformed.







      calculus integration multivariable-calculus






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago

























      asked 2 hours ago









      Yuchen

      874115




      874115




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Fix $z_0 in [0,2]$, and look at the section $Omega_z_0 = Omega cap z = z_0$. This section is mapped to
          $$
          T(Omega_z_0) = (x,y,z_0) : x^2 + (y - tan(alpha z_0))^2 leq 1
          $$

          which is a unit circle in the plane $z = z_0$, centered at $(0, tan (alpha z_0))$. Hence, by the Cavalieri Principle, $T(Omega)$ has the same volume as $Omega$.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Hi! Thank you for your nice answer! Could you revise the post? Since it is $ tan (alpha z_0) $ not $ z_0tanalpha $, I don't know why user 'amWhy' kept rejecting my attempt to revise your post.
            – Yuchen
            1 hour ago






          • 1




            Edited. The proof works in the same way, the discontinuty does not cause problems because a single plane has zero volume.
            – Hugo
            1 hour ago










          • Yup, I see. Thanks again!
            – Yuchen
            1 hour ago

















          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Since the Jacobian for the transformation is



          $$|J|=beginvmatrix1&0&0\0&1&0\0&fracalphacosalpha z&1endvmatrix=1$$



          for $alphaneq fracpi2$ we have have that



          $$V_T(Omega)=V_Omega=2pi$$






          share|cite|improve this answer


















          • 1




            The Jacobian is 1 means that the volume is preserved (multiplied by 1) when you perform the transformation (it's just a fancy nonlinear shearing of slices perpendicular to z, in the y direction). So the volume can be calculated in the original coordinates, where it's just a cylinder. No integration needed.
            – orion
            1 hour ago










          • @orion Yes of course, I clarify that!
            – gimusi
            1 hour ago










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2931723%2fvolume-after-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Fix $z_0 in [0,2]$, and look at the section $Omega_z_0 = Omega cap z = z_0$. This section is mapped to
          $$
          T(Omega_z_0) = (x,y,z_0) : x^2 + (y - tan(alpha z_0))^2 leq 1
          $$

          which is a unit circle in the plane $z = z_0$, centered at $(0, tan (alpha z_0))$. Hence, by the Cavalieri Principle, $T(Omega)$ has the same volume as $Omega$.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Hi! Thank you for your nice answer! Could you revise the post? Since it is $ tan (alpha z_0) $ not $ z_0tanalpha $, I don't know why user 'amWhy' kept rejecting my attempt to revise your post.
            – Yuchen
            1 hour ago






          • 1




            Edited. The proof works in the same way, the discontinuty does not cause problems because a single plane has zero volume.
            – Hugo
            1 hour ago










          • Yup, I see. Thanks again!
            – Yuchen
            1 hour ago














          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Fix $z_0 in [0,2]$, and look at the section $Omega_z_0 = Omega cap z = z_0$. This section is mapped to
          $$
          T(Omega_z_0) = (x,y,z_0) : x^2 + (y - tan(alpha z_0))^2 leq 1
          $$

          which is a unit circle in the plane $z = z_0$, centered at $(0, tan (alpha z_0))$. Hence, by the Cavalieri Principle, $T(Omega)$ has the same volume as $Omega$.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Hi! Thank you for your nice answer! Could you revise the post? Since it is $ tan (alpha z_0) $ not $ z_0tanalpha $, I don't know why user 'amWhy' kept rejecting my attempt to revise your post.
            – Yuchen
            1 hour ago






          • 1




            Edited. The proof works in the same way, the discontinuty does not cause problems because a single plane has zero volume.
            – Hugo
            1 hour ago










          • Yup, I see. Thanks again!
            – Yuchen
            1 hour ago












          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          Fix $z_0 in [0,2]$, and look at the section $Omega_z_0 = Omega cap z = z_0$. This section is mapped to
          $$
          T(Omega_z_0) = (x,y,z_0) : x^2 + (y - tan(alpha z_0))^2 leq 1
          $$

          which is a unit circle in the plane $z = z_0$, centered at $(0, tan (alpha z_0))$. Hence, by the Cavalieri Principle, $T(Omega)$ has the same volume as $Omega$.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Fix $z_0 in [0,2]$, and look at the section $Omega_z_0 = Omega cap z = z_0$. This section is mapped to
          $$
          T(Omega_z_0) = (x,y,z_0) : x^2 + (y - tan(alpha z_0))^2 leq 1
          $$

          which is a unit circle in the plane $z = z_0$, centered at $(0, tan (alpha z_0))$. Hence, by the Cavalieri Principle, $T(Omega)$ has the same volume as $Omega$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 1 hour ago

























          answered 2 hours ago









          Hugo

          1064




          1064











          • Hi! Thank you for your nice answer! Could you revise the post? Since it is $ tan (alpha z_0) $ not $ z_0tanalpha $, I don't know why user 'amWhy' kept rejecting my attempt to revise your post.
            – Yuchen
            1 hour ago






          • 1




            Edited. The proof works in the same way, the discontinuty does not cause problems because a single plane has zero volume.
            – Hugo
            1 hour ago










          • Yup, I see. Thanks again!
            – Yuchen
            1 hour ago
















          • Hi! Thank you for your nice answer! Could you revise the post? Since it is $ tan (alpha z_0) $ not $ z_0tanalpha $, I don't know why user 'amWhy' kept rejecting my attempt to revise your post.
            – Yuchen
            1 hour ago






          • 1




            Edited. The proof works in the same way, the discontinuty does not cause problems because a single plane has zero volume.
            – Hugo
            1 hour ago










          • Yup, I see. Thanks again!
            – Yuchen
            1 hour ago















          Hi! Thank you for your nice answer! Could you revise the post? Since it is $ tan (alpha z_0) $ not $ z_0tanalpha $, I don't know why user 'amWhy' kept rejecting my attempt to revise your post.
          – Yuchen
          1 hour ago




          Hi! Thank you for your nice answer! Could you revise the post? Since it is $ tan (alpha z_0) $ not $ z_0tanalpha $, I don't know why user 'amWhy' kept rejecting my attempt to revise your post.
          – Yuchen
          1 hour ago




          1




          1




          Edited. The proof works in the same way, the discontinuty does not cause problems because a single plane has zero volume.
          – Hugo
          1 hour ago




          Edited. The proof works in the same way, the discontinuty does not cause problems because a single plane has zero volume.
          – Hugo
          1 hour ago












          Yup, I see. Thanks again!
          – Yuchen
          1 hour ago




          Yup, I see. Thanks again!
          – Yuchen
          1 hour ago










          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Since the Jacobian for the transformation is



          $$|J|=beginvmatrix1&0&0\0&1&0\0&fracalphacosalpha z&1endvmatrix=1$$



          for $alphaneq fracpi2$ we have have that



          $$V_T(Omega)=V_Omega=2pi$$






          share|cite|improve this answer


















          • 1




            The Jacobian is 1 means that the volume is preserved (multiplied by 1) when you perform the transformation (it's just a fancy nonlinear shearing of slices perpendicular to z, in the y direction). So the volume can be calculated in the original coordinates, where it's just a cylinder. No integration needed.
            – orion
            1 hour ago










          • @orion Yes of course, I clarify that!
            – gimusi
            1 hour ago














          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Since the Jacobian for the transformation is



          $$|J|=beginvmatrix1&0&0\0&1&0\0&fracalphacosalpha z&1endvmatrix=1$$



          for $alphaneq fracpi2$ we have have that



          $$V_T(Omega)=V_Omega=2pi$$






          share|cite|improve this answer


















          • 1




            The Jacobian is 1 means that the volume is preserved (multiplied by 1) when you perform the transformation (it's just a fancy nonlinear shearing of slices perpendicular to z, in the y direction). So the volume can be calculated in the original coordinates, where it's just a cylinder. No integration needed.
            – orion
            1 hour ago










          • @orion Yes of course, I clarify that!
            – gimusi
            1 hour ago












          up vote
          4
          down vote










          up vote
          4
          down vote









          Since the Jacobian for the transformation is



          $$|J|=beginvmatrix1&0&0\0&1&0\0&fracalphacosalpha z&1endvmatrix=1$$



          for $alphaneq fracpi2$ we have have that



          $$V_T(Omega)=V_Omega=2pi$$






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Since the Jacobian for the transformation is



          $$|J|=beginvmatrix1&0&0\0&1&0\0&fracalphacosalpha z&1endvmatrix=1$$



          for $alphaneq fracpi2$ we have have that



          $$V_T(Omega)=V_Omega=2pi$$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 1 hour ago

























          answered 2 hours ago









          gimusi

          75.4k73889




          75.4k73889







          • 1




            The Jacobian is 1 means that the volume is preserved (multiplied by 1) when you perform the transformation (it's just a fancy nonlinear shearing of slices perpendicular to z, in the y direction). So the volume can be calculated in the original coordinates, where it's just a cylinder. No integration needed.
            – orion
            1 hour ago










          • @orion Yes of course, I clarify that!
            – gimusi
            1 hour ago












          • 1




            The Jacobian is 1 means that the volume is preserved (multiplied by 1) when you perform the transformation (it's just a fancy nonlinear shearing of slices perpendicular to z, in the y direction). So the volume can be calculated in the original coordinates, where it's just a cylinder. No integration needed.
            – orion
            1 hour ago










          • @orion Yes of course, I clarify that!
            – gimusi
            1 hour ago







          1




          1




          The Jacobian is 1 means that the volume is preserved (multiplied by 1) when you perform the transformation (it's just a fancy nonlinear shearing of slices perpendicular to z, in the y direction). So the volume can be calculated in the original coordinates, where it's just a cylinder. No integration needed.
          – orion
          1 hour ago




          The Jacobian is 1 means that the volume is preserved (multiplied by 1) when you perform the transformation (it's just a fancy nonlinear shearing of slices perpendicular to z, in the y direction). So the volume can be calculated in the original coordinates, where it's just a cylinder. No integration needed.
          – orion
          1 hour ago












          @orion Yes of course, I clarify that!
          – gimusi
          1 hour ago




          @orion Yes of course, I clarify that!
          – gimusi
          1 hour ago

















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2931723%2fvolume-after-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

          What does second last employer means? [closed]

          One-line joke