Volume after transformation.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1













Consider $$ Omega: (x, y, z): x^2+y^2leq 1, 0leq zleq 2 $$ and the transform $$ T:(x, y, z)to(x, y+tan(alpha z), z) ,$$ where $ alphain (0, pi) $. What is the volume of $ T(Omega) $?




My attempt: I am trying to convert to the cylindrical coordinate system, but I can't find the region where I should integrate since it is transformed.






calculus integration multivariable-calculus







share|cite|improve this question



























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite
    1













    Consider $$ Omega: (x, y, z): x^2+y^2leq 1, 0leq zleq 2 $$ and the transform $$ T:(x, y, z)to(x, y+tan(alpha z), z) ,$$ where $ alphain (0, pi) $. What is the volume of $ T(Omega) $?




    My attempt: I am trying to convert to the cylindrical coordinate system, but I can't find the region where I should integrate since it is transformed.






    calculus integration multivariable-calculus







    share|cite|improve this question

























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1






      Consider $$ Omega: (x, y, z): x^2+y^2leq 1, 0leq zleq 2 $$ and the transform $$ T:(x, y, z)to(x, y+tan(alpha z), z) ,$$ where $ alphain (0, pi) $. What is the volume of $ T(Omega) $?




      My attempt: I am trying to convert to the cylindrical coordinate system, but I can't find the region where I should integrate since it is transformed.






      calculus integration multivariable-calculus







      share|cite|improve this question
















      Consider $$ Omega: (x, y, z): x^2+y^2leq 1, 0leq zleq 2 $$ and the transform $$ T:(x, y, z)to(x, y+tan(alpha z), z) ,$$ where $ alphain (0, pi) $. What is the volume of $ T(Omega) $?




      My attempt: I am trying to convert to the cylindrical coordinate system, but I can't find the region where I should integrate since it is transformed.






      calculus integration multivariable-calculus




      calculus integration multivariable-calculus






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago

























      asked 2 hours ago









      Yuchen

      874115




      874115




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Fix $z_0 in [0,2]$, and look at the section $Omega_z_0 = Omega cap z = z_0$. This section is mapped to
          $$
          T(Omega_z_0) = (x,y,z_0) : x^2 + (y - tan(alpha z_0))^2 leq 1
          $$
          which is a unit circle in the plane $z = z_0$, centered at $(0, tan (alpha z_0))$. Hence, by the Cavalieri Principle, $T(Omega)$ has the same volume as $Omega$.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Hi! Thank you for your nice answer! Could you revise the post? Since it is $ tan (alpha z_0) $ not $ z_0tanalpha $, I don't know why user 'amWhy' kept rejecting my attempt to revise your post.
            – Yuchen
            1 hour ago






          • 1




            Edited. The proof works in the same way, the discontinuty does not cause problems because a single plane has zero volume.
            – Hugo
            1 hour ago










          • Yup, I see. Thanks again!
            – Yuchen
            1 hour ago

















          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Since the Jacobian for the transformation is



          $$|J|=beginvmatrix1&0&0\0&1&0\0&fracalphacosalpha z&1endvmatrix=1$$



          for $alphaneq fracpi2$ we have have that



          $$V_T(Omega)=V_Omega=2pi$$






          share|cite|improve this answer


















          • 1




            The Jacobian is 1 means that the volume is preserved (multiplied by 1) when you perform the transformation (it's just a fancy nonlinear shearing of slices perpendicular to z, in the y direction). So the volume can be calculated in the original coordinates, where it's just a cylinder. No integration needed.
            – orion
            1 hour ago










          • @orion Yes of course, I clarify that!
            – gimusi
            1 hour ago










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2931723%2fvolume-after-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest

















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Fix $z_0 in [0,2]$, and look at the section $Omega_z_0 = Omega cap z = z_0$. This section is mapped to
          $$
          T(Omega_z_0) = (x,y,z_0) : x^2 + (y - tan(alpha z_0))^2 leq 1
          $$
          which is a unit circle in the plane $z = z_0$, centered at $(0, tan (alpha z_0))$. Hence, by the Cavalieri Principle, $T(Omega)$ has the same volume as $Omega$.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Hi! Thank you for your nice answer! Could you revise the post? Since it is $ tan (alpha z_0) $ not $ z_0tanalpha $, I don't know why user 'amWhy' kept rejecting my attempt to revise your post.
            – Yuchen
            1 hour ago






          • 1




            Edited. The proof works in the same way, the discontinuty does not cause problems because a single plane has zero volume.
            – Hugo
            1 hour ago










          • Yup, I see. Thanks again!
            – Yuchen
            1 hour ago














          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Fix $z_0 in [0,2]$, and look at the section $Omega_z_0 = Omega cap z = z_0$. This section is mapped to
          $$
          T(Omega_z_0) = (x,y,z_0) : x^2 + (y - tan(alpha z_0))^2 leq 1
          $$
          which is a unit circle in the plane $z = z_0$, centered at $(0, tan (alpha z_0))$. Hence, by the Cavalieri Principle, $T(Omega)$ has the same volume as $Omega$.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Hi! Thank you for your nice answer! Could you revise the post? Since it is $ tan (alpha z_0) $ not $ z_0tanalpha $, I don't know why user 'amWhy' kept rejecting my attempt to revise your post.
            – Yuchen
            1 hour ago






          • 1




            Edited. The proof works in the same way, the discontinuty does not cause problems because a single plane has zero volume.
            – Hugo
            1 hour ago










          • Yup, I see. Thanks again!
            – Yuchen
            1 hour ago












          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          Fix $z_0 in [0,2]$, and look at the section $Omega_z_0 = Omega cap z = z_0$. This section is mapped to
          $$
          T(Omega_z_0) = (x,y,z_0) : x^2 + (y - tan(alpha z_0))^2 leq 1
          $$
          which is a unit circle in the plane $z = z_0$, centered at $(0, tan (alpha z_0))$. Hence, by the Cavalieri Principle, $T(Omega)$ has the same volume as $Omega$.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Fix $z_0 in [0,2]$, and look at the section $Omega_z_0 = Omega cap z = z_0$. This section is mapped to
          $$
          T(Omega_z_0) = (x,y,z_0) : x^2 + (y - tan(alpha z_0))^2 leq 1
          $$
          which is a unit circle in the plane $z = z_0$, centered at $(0, tan (alpha z_0))$. Hence, by the Cavalieri Principle, $T(Omega)$ has the same volume as $Omega$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 1 hour ago

























          answered 2 hours ago









          Hugo

          1064




          1064











          • Hi! Thank you for your nice answer! Could you revise the post? Since it is $ tan (alpha z_0) $ not $ z_0tanalpha $, I don't know why user 'amWhy' kept rejecting my attempt to revise your post.
            – Yuchen
            1 hour ago






          • 1




            Edited. The proof works in the same way, the discontinuty does not cause problems because a single plane has zero volume.
            – Hugo
            1 hour ago










          • Yup, I see. Thanks again!
            – Yuchen
            1 hour ago
















          • Hi! Thank you for your nice answer! Could you revise the post? Since it is $ tan (alpha z_0) $ not $ z_0tanalpha $, I don't know why user 'amWhy' kept rejecting my attempt to revise your post.
            – Yuchen
            1 hour ago






          • 1




            Edited. The proof works in the same way, the discontinuty does not cause problems because a single plane has zero volume.
            – Hugo
            1 hour ago










          • Yup, I see. Thanks again!
            – Yuchen
            1 hour ago















          Hi! Thank you for your nice answer! Could you revise the post? Since it is $ tan (alpha z_0) $ not $ z_0tanalpha $, I don't know why user 'amWhy' kept rejecting my attempt to revise your post.
          – Yuchen
          1 hour ago




          Hi! Thank you for your nice answer! Could you revise the post? Since it is $ tan (alpha z_0) $ not $ z_0tanalpha $, I don't know why user 'amWhy' kept rejecting my attempt to revise your post.
          – Yuchen
          1 hour ago




          1




          1




          Edited. The proof works in the same way, the discontinuty does not cause problems because a single plane has zero volume.
          – Hugo
          1 hour ago




          Edited. The proof works in the same way, the discontinuty does not cause problems because a single plane has zero volume.
          – Hugo
          1 hour ago












          Yup, I see. Thanks again!
          – Yuchen
          1 hour ago




          Yup, I see. Thanks again!
          – Yuchen
          1 hour ago










          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Since the Jacobian for the transformation is



          $$|J|=beginvmatrix1&0&0\0&1&0\0&fracalphacosalpha z&1endvmatrix=1$$



          for $alphaneq fracpi2$ we have have that



          $$V_T(Omega)=V_Omega=2pi$$






          share|cite|improve this answer


















          • 1




            The Jacobian is 1 means that the volume is preserved (multiplied by 1) when you perform the transformation (it's just a fancy nonlinear shearing of slices perpendicular to z, in the y direction). So the volume can be calculated in the original coordinates, where it's just a cylinder. No integration needed.
            – orion
            1 hour ago










          • @orion Yes of course, I clarify that!
            – gimusi
            1 hour ago














          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Since the Jacobian for the transformation is



          $$|J|=beginvmatrix1&0&0\0&1&0\0&fracalphacosalpha z&1endvmatrix=1$$



          for $alphaneq fracpi2$ we have have that



          $$V_T(Omega)=V_Omega=2pi$$






          share|cite|improve this answer


















          • 1




            The Jacobian is 1 means that the volume is preserved (multiplied by 1) when you perform the transformation (it's just a fancy nonlinear shearing of slices perpendicular to z, in the y direction). So the volume can be calculated in the original coordinates, where it's just a cylinder. No integration needed.
            – orion
            1 hour ago










          • @orion Yes of course, I clarify that!
            – gimusi
            1 hour ago












          up vote
          4
          down vote










          up vote
          4
          down vote









          Since the Jacobian for the transformation is



          $$|J|=beginvmatrix1&0&0\0&1&0\0&fracalphacosalpha z&1endvmatrix=1$$



          for $alphaneq fracpi2$ we have have that



          $$V_T(Omega)=V_Omega=2pi$$






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Since the Jacobian for the transformation is



          $$|J|=beginvmatrix1&0&0\0&1&0\0&fracalphacosalpha z&1endvmatrix=1$$



          for $alphaneq fracpi2$ we have have that



          $$V_T(Omega)=V_Omega=2pi$$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 1 hour ago

























          answered 2 hours ago









          gimusi

          75.4k73889




          75.4k73889







          • 1




            The Jacobian is 1 means that the volume is preserved (multiplied by 1) when you perform the transformation (it's just a fancy nonlinear shearing of slices perpendicular to z, in the y direction). So the volume can be calculated in the original coordinates, where it's just a cylinder. No integration needed.
            – orion
            1 hour ago










          • @orion Yes of course, I clarify that!
            – gimusi
            1 hour ago












          • 1




            The Jacobian is 1 means that the volume is preserved (multiplied by 1) when you perform the transformation (it's just a fancy nonlinear shearing of slices perpendicular to z, in the y direction). So the volume can be calculated in the original coordinates, where it's just a cylinder. No integration needed.
            – orion
            1 hour ago










          • @orion Yes of course, I clarify that!
            – gimusi
            1 hour ago







          1




          1




          The Jacobian is 1 means that the volume is preserved (multiplied by 1) when you perform the transformation (it's just a fancy nonlinear shearing of slices perpendicular to z, in the y direction). So the volume can be calculated in the original coordinates, where it's just a cylinder. No integration needed.
          – orion
          1 hour ago




          The Jacobian is 1 means that the volume is preserved (multiplied by 1) when you perform the transformation (it's just a fancy nonlinear shearing of slices perpendicular to z, in the y direction). So the volume can be calculated in the original coordinates, where it's just a cylinder. No integration needed.
          – orion
          1 hour ago












          @orion Yes of course, I clarify that!
          – gimusi
          1 hour ago




          @orion Yes of course, I clarify that!
          – gimusi
          1 hour ago

















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2931723%2fvolume-after-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest
































































          Comments

          Post a Comment

          Popular posts from this blog

          Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote 31 down vote favorite 4 I hold a PhD in mechanical engineering with a 7 year background in self-guided, self-paced research including 2 years as a graduate level course instructor and a subject matter expert for various engineering projects in a university setting in the United States. For the last 10-11 months, I am working in a research industry in France where my task is to debug C++ spaghetti code written over a period of several years by my current supervisor. It is a team of 2: just I and my supervisor. Diurnally, I am posed with a "bug of the day" to get out of this C++ code. My supervisor generally gives me about 15-30 minutes to solve it and then accosts me about whether or not the task is completed and then rinses and repeats this until the end of the day. Off-late, my supervisor has been holding 6-7 hour long "meetin
          Read more

          Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite Many fantasy worlds have multiple humanoid species (elves, orcs, humans, etc) living in the same world, in addition to that, they often have the ability to interbreed. And I can't help but question their believability... fantasy-races reproduction interspecies-relations share | improve this question edited Aug 9 at 14:46 Michael Kjörling ♦ 21.1k 10 85 161 asked Aug 9 at 13:13 Chlodio 118 6 closed as unclear what you're asking by MichaelK, Gryphon, John, Vincent, Frostfyre Aug 9 at 15:25 Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question. 3 Stack Exchange exist to
          Read more

          Confectionery

          Image
          Prepared foods made with a lot of sugar or other cabohydrates "Sweetmeat" redirects here. For the racehorse, see Sweetmeat (horse). Not to be confused with Sweetbread. This Kransekake is a traditional Scandinavian baker's confection. Confectionery is the art of making confections , which are food items that are rich in sugar and carbohydrates. Exact definitions are difficult. [1] In general, though, confectionery is divided into two broad and somewhat overlapping categories, bakers' confections and sugar confections. [2] Bakers' confectionery, also called flour confections , includes principally sweet pastries, cakes, and similar baked goods. Sugar confectionery includes candies ( sweets in British English), candied nuts, chocolates, chewing gum, bubble gum, pastillage, and other confections that are made primarily of sugar. In some cases, chocolate confections (confections made of chocolate) are treated as a separate category, as are sugar-free versions of
          Read more