Has vs had (past tense)

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Which one is grammatically correct?




It was not until grade 2 when I discovered the 'earth' has a name.




Or




It was not until grade 2 when I discovered the 'earth' had a name.











share|improve this question



























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    Which one is grammatically correct?




    It was not until grade 2 when I discovered the 'earth' has a name.




    Or




    It was not until grade 2 when I discovered the 'earth' had a name.











    share|improve this question























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      Which one is grammatically correct?




      It was not until grade 2 when I discovered the 'earth' has a name.




      Or




      It was not until grade 2 when I discovered the 'earth' had a name.











      share|improve this question













      Which one is grammatically correct?




      It was not until grade 2 when I discovered the 'earth' has a name.




      Or




      It was not until grade 2 when I discovered the 'earth' had a name.








      prepositions






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 4 hours ago









      QuestionEverything

      754




      754




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          Either. Normally we back=shift, so with a past-tense matrix verb ('discovered') we use a past-tense verb in the embedded clause.



          But when the embedded clause denotes a state which continues to the present, we can use the present instead.



          To my ear, the past sounds more natural: if you use the present, you are emphasising that the state still exists.






          share|improve this answer




















            Your Answer







            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "481"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f180882%2fhas-vs-had-past-tense%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            3
            down vote













            Either. Normally we back=shift, so with a past-tense matrix verb ('discovered') we use a past-tense verb in the embedded clause.



            But when the embedded clause denotes a state which continues to the present, we can use the present instead.



            To my ear, the past sounds more natural: if you use the present, you are emphasising that the state still exists.






            share|improve this answer
























              up vote
              3
              down vote













              Either. Normally we back=shift, so with a past-tense matrix verb ('discovered') we use a past-tense verb in the embedded clause.



              But when the embedded clause denotes a state which continues to the present, we can use the present instead.



              To my ear, the past sounds more natural: if you use the present, you are emphasising that the state still exists.






              share|improve this answer






















                up vote
                3
                down vote










                up vote
                3
                down vote









                Either. Normally we back=shift, so with a past-tense matrix verb ('discovered') we use a past-tense verb in the embedded clause.



                But when the embedded clause denotes a state which continues to the present, we can use the present instead.



                To my ear, the past sounds more natural: if you use the present, you are emphasising that the state still exists.






                share|improve this answer












                Either. Normally we back=shift, so with a past-tense matrix verb ('discovered') we use a past-tense verb in the embedded clause.



                But when the embedded clause denotes a state which continues to the present, we can use the present instead.



                To my ear, the past sounds more natural: if you use the present, you are emphasising that the state still exists.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 3 hours ago









                Colin Fine

                25.3k13648




                25.3k13648



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f180882%2fhas-vs-had-past-tense%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

                    Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

                    Confectionery