Does a +1 shield allow me to add 3 to my Dex saves when using the second benefit of Shield Master?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
3
down vote

favorite












If I have a +1 shield and the Shield Master feat (PHB, p. 170), can I add 3 to my Dex saving throw when I use the second benefit of Shield Master?




If you aren’t incapacitated, you can add your shield’s AC bonus to any Dexterity saving throw you make against a spell or other harmful effect that targets only you.







dnd-5e magic-items feats







share|improve this question





























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    If I have a +1 shield and the Shield Master feat (PHB, p. 170), can I add 3 to my Dex saving throw when I use the second benefit of Shield Master?




    If you aren’t incapacitated, you can add your shield’s AC bonus to any Dexterity saving throw you make against a spell or other harmful effect that targets only you.







    dnd-5e magic-items feats







    share|improve this question

























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      If I have a +1 shield and the Shield Master feat (PHB, p. 170), can I add 3 to my Dex saving throw when I use the second benefit of Shield Master?




      If you aren’t incapacitated, you can add your shield’s AC bonus to any Dexterity saving throw you make against a spell or other harmful effect that targets only you.







      dnd-5e magic-items feats







      share|improve this question















      If I have a +1 shield and the Shield Master feat (PHB, p. 170), can I add 3 to my Dex saving throw when I use the second benefit of Shield Master?




      If you aren’t incapacitated, you can add your shield’s AC bonus to any Dexterity saving throw you make against a spell or other harmful effect that targets only you.







      dnd-5e magic-items feats




      dnd-5e magic-items feats






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 36 mins ago









      V2Blast

      15.3k235100




      15.3k235100










      asked 1 hour ago









      András

      23.2k886173




      23.2k886173




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Yes, it does



          No distinction is made between the normal bonus to AC and the bonus as a result of the magic item. They are simply bonuses to AC. Since both are part of your "shield's AC bonus", they are both included.



          Regular shield:




          A shield is made from wood or metal and is carried in one hand. Wielding a shield increases your Armor Class by 2. 




          Shield +1:




          While holding this shield, you have a +1 bonus to AC. This bonus is in addition to the shield's normal bonus to AC.




          Notice that neither of these bonuses are made distinct by a title like "shield bonus". They are just bonuses to AC that come from the shield.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1




            I think the hangup is "You have +1 bonus to AC..." So is the shield's AC bonus +3? or +2 and an extra +1 that doesn't apply to the feat. Not saying I disagree.
            – Jason_c_o
            45 mins ago










          • @Jason_c_o Oh I got it now. Didn't realize where the confusion was coming frkm
            – David Coffron
            38 mins ago

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          The +1 is part of the shield's AC bonus for this purpose



          Unlike in previous editions of D&D, 5e has very simplified shield rules:




          Wielding a shield increases your Armor Class by 2.




          Naturally, some shields are special; the +1 shield mentioned increases your AC by 3 instead. However, if "special" shields that give different AC bonuses aren't intended to affect the benefit of Shield Master, then Shield Master could simply be worded as "add 2" rather than "add your shield's AC bonus". Since the wording of the feat implies that some shields give a different bonus, and magic shields are the most common reason I know of that a shield would give a different bonus, I conclude that the different bonus from a magic shield is intended to apply.






          share|improve this answer




















          • While this is a potential cause for thr wording, it neglects the possibility that they were simply trying to future proof the feat. In fact the Players Handbook wad release before the Dungeon Master's Guide introduced magic shields. A non-magic shield with a particular quality could grant a default +3 bonus in a later book, and the feat would not have to be updated. In this way, your argument isn't entirely complete as it doesn't justify the placement of the +1 AC as part of the bonus referenced by the feat.
            – David Coffron
            30 mins ago











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "122"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f132477%2fdoes-a-1-shield-allow-me-to-add-3-to-my-dex-saves-when-using-the-second-benefit%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest

















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Yes, it does



          No distinction is made between the normal bonus to AC and the bonus as a result of the magic item. They are simply bonuses to AC. Since both are part of your "shield's AC bonus", they are both included.



          Regular shield:




          A shield is made from wood or metal and is carried in one hand. Wielding a shield increases your Armor Class by 2. 




          Shield +1:




          While holding this shield, you have a +1 bonus to AC. This bonus is in addition to the shield's normal bonus to AC.




          Notice that neither of these bonuses are made distinct by a title like "shield bonus". They are just bonuses to AC that come from the shield.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1




            I think the hangup is "You have +1 bonus to AC..." So is the shield's AC bonus +3? or +2 and an extra +1 that doesn't apply to the feat. Not saying I disagree.
            – Jason_c_o
            45 mins ago










          • @Jason_c_o Oh I got it now. Didn't realize where the confusion was coming frkm
            – David Coffron
            38 mins ago














          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Yes, it does



          No distinction is made between the normal bonus to AC and the bonus as a result of the magic item. They are simply bonuses to AC. Since both are part of your "shield's AC bonus", they are both included.



          Regular shield:




          A shield is made from wood or metal and is carried in one hand. Wielding a shield increases your Armor Class by 2. 




          Shield +1:




          While holding this shield, you have a +1 bonus to AC. This bonus is in addition to the shield's normal bonus to AC.




          Notice that neither of these bonuses are made distinct by a title like "shield bonus". They are just bonuses to AC that come from the shield.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1




            I think the hangup is "You have +1 bonus to AC..." So is the shield's AC bonus +3? or +2 and an extra +1 that doesn't apply to the feat. Not saying I disagree.
            – Jason_c_o
            45 mins ago










          • @Jason_c_o Oh I got it now. Didn't realize where the confusion was coming frkm
            – David Coffron
            38 mins ago












          up vote
          4
          down vote










          up vote
          4
          down vote









          Yes, it does



          No distinction is made between the normal bonus to AC and the bonus as a result of the magic item. They are simply bonuses to AC. Since both are part of your "shield's AC bonus", they are both included.



          Regular shield:




          A shield is made from wood or metal and is carried in one hand. Wielding a shield increases your Armor Class by 2. 




          Shield +1:




          While holding this shield, you have a +1 bonus to AC. This bonus is in addition to the shield's normal bonus to AC.




          Notice that neither of these bonuses are made distinct by a title like "shield bonus". They are just bonuses to AC that come from the shield.






          share|improve this answer














          Yes, it does



          No distinction is made between the normal bonus to AC and the bonus as a result of the magic item. They are simply bonuses to AC. Since both are part of your "shield's AC bonus", they are both included.



          Regular shield:




          A shield is made from wood or metal and is carried in one hand. Wielding a shield increases your Armor Class by 2. 




          Shield +1:




          While holding this shield, you have a +1 bonus to AC. This bonus is in addition to the shield's normal bonus to AC.




          Notice that neither of these bonuses are made distinct by a title like "shield bonus". They are just bonuses to AC that come from the shield.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 34 mins ago

























          answered 49 mins ago









          David Coffron

          26.3k290181




          26.3k290181







          • 1




            I think the hangup is "You have +1 bonus to AC..." So is the shield's AC bonus +3? or +2 and an extra +1 that doesn't apply to the feat. Not saying I disagree.
            – Jason_c_o
            45 mins ago










          • @Jason_c_o Oh I got it now. Didn't realize where the confusion was coming frkm
            – David Coffron
            38 mins ago












          • 1




            I think the hangup is "You have +1 bonus to AC..." So is the shield's AC bonus +3? or +2 and an extra +1 that doesn't apply to the feat. Not saying I disagree.
            – Jason_c_o
            45 mins ago










          • @Jason_c_o Oh I got it now. Didn't realize where the confusion was coming frkm
            – David Coffron
            38 mins ago







          1




          1




          I think the hangup is "You have +1 bonus to AC..." So is the shield's AC bonus +3? or +2 and an extra +1 that doesn't apply to the feat. Not saying I disagree.
          – Jason_c_o
          45 mins ago




          I think the hangup is "You have +1 bonus to AC..." So is the shield's AC bonus +3? or +2 and an extra +1 that doesn't apply to the feat. Not saying I disagree.
          – Jason_c_o
          45 mins ago












          @Jason_c_o Oh I got it now. Didn't realize where the confusion was coming frkm
          – David Coffron
          38 mins ago




          @Jason_c_o Oh I got it now. Didn't realize where the confusion was coming frkm
          – David Coffron
          38 mins ago












          up vote
          2
          down vote













          The +1 is part of the shield's AC bonus for this purpose



          Unlike in previous editions of D&D, 5e has very simplified shield rules:




          Wielding a shield increases your Armor Class by 2.




          Naturally, some shields are special; the +1 shield mentioned increases your AC by 3 instead. However, if "special" shields that give different AC bonuses aren't intended to affect the benefit of Shield Master, then Shield Master could simply be worded as "add 2" rather than "add your shield's AC bonus". Since the wording of the feat implies that some shields give a different bonus, and magic shields are the most common reason I know of that a shield would give a different bonus, I conclude that the different bonus from a magic shield is intended to apply.






          share|improve this answer




















          • While this is a potential cause for thr wording, it neglects the possibility that they were simply trying to future proof the feat. In fact the Players Handbook wad release before the Dungeon Master's Guide introduced magic shields. A non-magic shield with a particular quality could grant a default +3 bonus in a later book, and the feat would not have to be updated. In this way, your argument isn't entirely complete as it doesn't justify the placement of the +1 AC as part of the bonus referenced by the feat.
            – David Coffron
            30 mins ago















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          The +1 is part of the shield's AC bonus for this purpose



          Unlike in previous editions of D&D, 5e has very simplified shield rules:




          Wielding a shield increases your Armor Class by 2.




          Naturally, some shields are special; the +1 shield mentioned increases your AC by 3 instead. However, if "special" shields that give different AC bonuses aren't intended to affect the benefit of Shield Master, then Shield Master could simply be worded as "add 2" rather than "add your shield's AC bonus". Since the wording of the feat implies that some shields give a different bonus, and magic shields are the most common reason I know of that a shield would give a different bonus, I conclude that the different bonus from a magic shield is intended to apply.






          share|improve this answer




















          • While this is a potential cause for thr wording, it neglects the possibility that they were simply trying to future proof the feat. In fact the Players Handbook wad release before the Dungeon Master's Guide introduced magic shields. A non-magic shield with a particular quality could grant a default +3 bonus in a later book, and the feat would not have to be updated. In this way, your argument isn't entirely complete as it doesn't justify the placement of the +1 AC as part of the bonus referenced by the feat.
            – David Coffron
            30 mins ago













          up vote
          2
          down vote










          up vote
          2
          down vote









          The +1 is part of the shield's AC bonus for this purpose



          Unlike in previous editions of D&D, 5e has very simplified shield rules:




          Wielding a shield increases your Armor Class by 2.




          Naturally, some shields are special; the +1 shield mentioned increases your AC by 3 instead. However, if "special" shields that give different AC bonuses aren't intended to affect the benefit of Shield Master, then Shield Master could simply be worded as "add 2" rather than "add your shield's AC bonus". Since the wording of the feat implies that some shields give a different bonus, and magic shields are the most common reason I know of that a shield would give a different bonus, I conclude that the different bonus from a magic shield is intended to apply.






          share|improve this answer












          The +1 is part of the shield's AC bonus for this purpose



          Unlike in previous editions of D&D, 5e has very simplified shield rules:




          Wielding a shield increases your Armor Class by 2.




          Naturally, some shields are special; the +1 shield mentioned increases your AC by 3 instead. However, if "special" shields that give different AC bonuses aren't intended to affect the benefit of Shield Master, then Shield Master could simply be worded as "add 2" rather than "add your shield's AC bonus". Since the wording of the feat implies that some shields give a different bonus, and magic shields are the most common reason I know of that a shield would give a different bonus, I conclude that the different bonus from a magic shield is intended to apply.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 36 mins ago









          Kamil Drakari

          1,930527




          1,930527











          • While this is a potential cause for thr wording, it neglects the possibility that they were simply trying to future proof the feat. In fact the Players Handbook wad release before the Dungeon Master's Guide introduced magic shields. A non-magic shield with a particular quality could grant a default +3 bonus in a later book, and the feat would not have to be updated. In this way, your argument isn't entirely complete as it doesn't justify the placement of the +1 AC as part of the bonus referenced by the feat.
            – David Coffron
            30 mins ago

















          • While this is a potential cause for thr wording, it neglects the possibility that they were simply trying to future proof the feat. In fact the Players Handbook wad release before the Dungeon Master's Guide introduced magic shields. A non-magic shield with a particular quality could grant a default +3 bonus in a later book, and the feat would not have to be updated. In this way, your argument isn't entirely complete as it doesn't justify the placement of the +1 AC as part of the bonus referenced by the feat.
            – David Coffron
            30 mins ago
















          While this is a potential cause for thr wording, it neglects the possibility that they were simply trying to future proof the feat. In fact the Players Handbook wad release before the Dungeon Master's Guide introduced magic shields. A non-magic shield with a particular quality could grant a default +3 bonus in a later book, and the feat would not have to be updated. In this way, your argument isn't entirely complete as it doesn't justify the placement of the +1 AC as part of the bonus referenced by the feat.
          – David Coffron
          30 mins ago





          While this is a potential cause for thr wording, it neglects the possibility that they were simply trying to future proof the feat. In fact the Players Handbook wad release before the Dungeon Master's Guide introduced magic shields. A non-magic shield with a particular quality could grant a default +3 bonus in a later book, and the feat would not have to be updated. In this way, your argument isn't entirely complete as it doesn't justify the placement of the +1 AC as part of the bonus referenced by the feat.
          – David Coffron
          30 mins ago


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f132477%2fdoes-a-1-shield-allow-me-to-add-3-to-my-dex-saves-when-using-the-second-benefit%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest
































































          Comments

          Post a Comment

          Popular posts from this blog

          What does second last employer means? [closed]

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote -3 down vote favorite Say, for example I have worked in the following companies, Company A => 2010 - 2011 Company B => 2011 - 2012 Company C => 2012 - Till Date Company D => Have offer Now assume Company D is asking to submit documents from my second last employer. So from the list of companies given, which company would be qualified as second last employer? software-industry employer share | improve this question asked Aug 10 '14 at 5:16 Rajaprabhu Aravindasamy 559 1 6 13 closed as off-topic by Jim G., jmort253 ♦ Aug 11 '14 at 1:58 This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason: "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address...
          Read more

          Installing NextGIS Connect into QGIS 3?

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote 1 down vote favorite Just acquired free version of NEXTGIS and trying to install the plugin for QGIS. It tells me it was not designed for version 3 of QGIS. How do I set up the QGIS-NEXTGIS interface then? qgis qgis-plugins nextgis share | improve this question edited 3 hours ago PolyGeo ♦ 51.9k 17 77 233 asked 4 hours ago IanGS 16 4 New contributor IanGS is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct. add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite Just acquired free version of NEXTGIS and trying to install the plugin for QGIS. It tells me it was not designed for version 3 of QGIS. How do I set up the QGIS-NEXTGIS interface then? qgis qgis-plugin...
          Read more

          One-line joke

          A one-liner is a joke that is delivered in a single line. A good one-liner is said to be pithy - concise and meaningful. [1] Comedians and actors use this comedic method as part of their act, e.g. Jimmy Carr, Tommy Cooper, Rodney Dangerfield, Norm Macdonald, Ken Dodd, Stewart Francis, Zach Galifianakis, Mitch Hedberg, Anthony Jeselnik, Milton Jones, Shappi Khorsandi, Jay London, Mark Linn-Baker, Demetri Martin, Groucho Marx, Dan Mintz, Emo Philips, Tim Vine, Steven Wright and Henny Youngman and Arnold Schwarzenegger. [ citation needed ] Many fictional characters are also known to deliver one-liners, including James Bond, who usually includes pithy and laconic quips after disposing of a villain. [ citation needed ] Examples "A baby seal walks into a club." "A dyslexic man walks into a bra." (Anonymous) "There are three types of people, those who can count and those who can't." "Venison's dear, isn't it?" (Jimmy Carr) "An escala...
          Read more