Can I get fresh water from ocean fish flesh?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
6
down vote

favorite












Ocean water has about 35 Grams of salt per liter. For the human body salt content in body fluids is about 9 Grams per liter. See related question How much sea water can I safely drink?



While it is best that your fresh water only contain very trace amounts of salt, water that is equal or less than 9 grams of salt per liter can help maintain your hydration level (trying to simplify a complex concept)



Many desert animals get all most of their hydration from food



If stranded at sea, and I eat a lot of fish flesh. Will it have a low enough salt content to help keep me hydrated?










share|improve this question





















  • I think the real question is whether it will have a high enough water content.
    – Olin Lathrop
    4 hours ago










  • @OlinLathrop both fish and land animals are 70-75% water content in muscle (meat)
    – James Jenkins
    3 hours ago










  • Related outdoors.stackexchange.com/questions/20616/…
    – Charlie Brumbaugh
    1 hour ago














up vote
6
down vote

favorite












Ocean water has about 35 Grams of salt per liter. For the human body salt content in body fluids is about 9 Grams per liter. See related question How much sea water can I safely drink?



While it is best that your fresh water only contain very trace amounts of salt, water that is equal or less than 9 grams of salt per liter can help maintain your hydration level (trying to simplify a complex concept)



Many desert animals get all most of their hydration from food



If stranded at sea, and I eat a lot of fish flesh. Will it have a low enough salt content to help keep me hydrated?










share|improve this question





















  • I think the real question is whether it will have a high enough water content.
    – Olin Lathrop
    4 hours ago










  • @OlinLathrop both fish and land animals are 70-75% water content in muscle (meat)
    – James Jenkins
    3 hours ago










  • Related outdoors.stackexchange.com/questions/20616/…
    – Charlie Brumbaugh
    1 hour ago












up vote
6
down vote

favorite









up vote
6
down vote

favorite











Ocean water has about 35 Grams of salt per liter. For the human body salt content in body fluids is about 9 Grams per liter. See related question How much sea water can I safely drink?



While it is best that your fresh water only contain very trace amounts of salt, water that is equal or less than 9 grams of salt per liter can help maintain your hydration level (trying to simplify a complex concept)



Many desert animals get all most of their hydration from food



If stranded at sea, and I eat a lot of fish flesh. Will it have a low enough salt content to help keep me hydrated?










share|improve this question













Ocean water has about 35 Grams of salt per liter. For the human body salt content in body fluids is about 9 Grams per liter. See related question How much sea water can I safely drink?



While it is best that your fresh water only contain very trace amounts of salt, water that is equal or less than 9 grams of salt per liter can help maintain your hydration level (trying to simplify a complex concept)



Many desert animals get all most of their hydration from food



If stranded at sea, and I eat a lot of fish flesh. Will it have a low enough salt content to help keep me hydrated?







survival sea water






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 5 hours ago









James Jenkins

15.9k554147




15.9k554147











  • I think the real question is whether it will have a high enough water content.
    – Olin Lathrop
    4 hours ago










  • @OlinLathrop both fish and land animals are 70-75% water content in muscle (meat)
    – James Jenkins
    3 hours ago










  • Related outdoors.stackexchange.com/questions/20616/…
    – Charlie Brumbaugh
    1 hour ago
















  • I think the real question is whether it will have a high enough water content.
    – Olin Lathrop
    4 hours ago










  • @OlinLathrop both fish and land animals are 70-75% water content in muscle (meat)
    – James Jenkins
    3 hours ago










  • Related outdoors.stackexchange.com/questions/20616/…
    – Charlie Brumbaugh
    1 hour ago















I think the real question is whether it will have a high enough water content.
– Olin Lathrop
4 hours ago




I think the real question is whether it will have a high enough water content.
– Olin Lathrop
4 hours ago












@OlinLathrop both fish and land animals are 70-75% water content in muscle (meat)
– James Jenkins
3 hours ago




@OlinLathrop both fish and land animals are 70-75% water content in muscle (meat)
– James Jenkins
3 hours ago












Related outdoors.stackexchange.com/questions/20616/…
– Charlie Brumbaugh
1 hour ago




Related outdoors.stackexchange.com/questions/20616/…
– Charlie Brumbaugh
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote













Let's say you lose 2 liters of water per day. To replace 2 liters of water by eating fish, you need to eat, for example, 2,500 g of cooked Pacific cod, which, besides water, also contains 500 g of protein and 3.4 g of sodium.



3.4 g of sodium is not that much; many people consume this amount every day and I assume this does not result in significantly increased water loss through the kidneys (diuresis).



The bigger concern is protein, which is broken down into urea, which is excreted through the kidneys and drags some water with it in a similar way as sodium does.



1 gram of protein yields the amount of urea that needs 8 mL of urine to be excreted (see the source below). Consuming 500 g of protein from fish would therefore result in 4 liters of urine. With consuming only 2 liters of water by fish, this leaves you with 2 liters of negative water balance solely due to urea.



So, if my calculation is correct, you can't maintain good hydration by eating only fish.



Source: NAP.edu




Urea, a major end product of metabolism of dietary proteins and amino
acids, requires water for excretion by the kidneys. Renal excretion of
1 g of urea nitrogen (2.2 g of urea) requires 40 to 60 mL of water.
Thus, if a person consumes 63 g of protein the volume of water
required increases by 0.4 to 0.6 L/day above the basal osmolar
excretory requirement of 0.5 and 0.75 L/day in younger and older
individuals, respectively.







share|improve this answer






















  • +1 I like your answer, and it seems reasonable. But this article about dolphins focus on salt as an issue not urea so I wonder if people have just been overlooking urea excretion in relatship to dehydration?
    – James Jenkins
    2 hours ago










  • If someone consumes about 60 grams of protein per day (the amount mentioned in the quoted part of my answer) he/she will excrete about 500 mL of urine as a result. We always consume some protein, so we are used to that and no one makes a problem from urea. But when you switch from 60 to 500 g of protein per day (in a fish-only-eating scenario), the amount of urea and hence urine greatly increases.
    – Jan
    2 hours ago







  • 1




    About salt: there is much lower amount of salt in fish than in seawater and it's comparable to other foods. With other words: neither the amount of salt and protein we usually consume result in dehydration, because we usually regularly consume some water as well.
    – Jan
    2 hours ago











Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "395"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2foutdoors.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f20613%2fcan-i-get-fresh-water-from-ocean-fish-flesh%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
5
down vote













Let's say you lose 2 liters of water per day. To replace 2 liters of water by eating fish, you need to eat, for example, 2,500 g of cooked Pacific cod, which, besides water, also contains 500 g of protein and 3.4 g of sodium.



3.4 g of sodium is not that much; many people consume this amount every day and I assume this does not result in significantly increased water loss through the kidneys (diuresis).



The bigger concern is protein, which is broken down into urea, which is excreted through the kidneys and drags some water with it in a similar way as sodium does.



1 gram of protein yields the amount of urea that needs 8 mL of urine to be excreted (see the source below). Consuming 500 g of protein from fish would therefore result in 4 liters of urine. With consuming only 2 liters of water by fish, this leaves you with 2 liters of negative water balance solely due to urea.



So, if my calculation is correct, you can't maintain good hydration by eating only fish.



Source: NAP.edu




Urea, a major end product of metabolism of dietary proteins and amino
acids, requires water for excretion by the kidneys. Renal excretion of
1 g of urea nitrogen (2.2 g of urea) requires 40 to 60 mL of water.
Thus, if a person consumes 63 g of protein the volume of water
required increases by 0.4 to 0.6 L/day above the basal osmolar
excretory requirement of 0.5 and 0.75 L/day in younger and older
individuals, respectively.







share|improve this answer






















  • +1 I like your answer, and it seems reasonable. But this article about dolphins focus on salt as an issue not urea so I wonder if people have just been overlooking urea excretion in relatship to dehydration?
    – James Jenkins
    2 hours ago










  • If someone consumes about 60 grams of protein per day (the amount mentioned in the quoted part of my answer) he/she will excrete about 500 mL of urine as a result. We always consume some protein, so we are used to that and no one makes a problem from urea. But when you switch from 60 to 500 g of protein per day (in a fish-only-eating scenario), the amount of urea and hence urine greatly increases.
    – Jan
    2 hours ago







  • 1




    About salt: there is much lower amount of salt in fish than in seawater and it's comparable to other foods. With other words: neither the amount of salt and protein we usually consume result in dehydration, because we usually regularly consume some water as well.
    – Jan
    2 hours ago















up vote
5
down vote













Let's say you lose 2 liters of water per day. To replace 2 liters of water by eating fish, you need to eat, for example, 2,500 g of cooked Pacific cod, which, besides water, also contains 500 g of protein and 3.4 g of sodium.



3.4 g of sodium is not that much; many people consume this amount every day and I assume this does not result in significantly increased water loss through the kidneys (diuresis).



The bigger concern is protein, which is broken down into urea, which is excreted through the kidneys and drags some water with it in a similar way as sodium does.



1 gram of protein yields the amount of urea that needs 8 mL of urine to be excreted (see the source below). Consuming 500 g of protein from fish would therefore result in 4 liters of urine. With consuming only 2 liters of water by fish, this leaves you with 2 liters of negative water balance solely due to urea.



So, if my calculation is correct, you can't maintain good hydration by eating only fish.



Source: NAP.edu




Urea, a major end product of metabolism of dietary proteins and amino
acids, requires water for excretion by the kidneys. Renal excretion of
1 g of urea nitrogen (2.2 g of urea) requires 40 to 60 mL of water.
Thus, if a person consumes 63 g of protein the volume of water
required increases by 0.4 to 0.6 L/day above the basal osmolar
excretory requirement of 0.5 and 0.75 L/day in younger and older
individuals, respectively.







share|improve this answer






















  • +1 I like your answer, and it seems reasonable. But this article about dolphins focus on salt as an issue not urea so I wonder if people have just been overlooking urea excretion in relatship to dehydration?
    – James Jenkins
    2 hours ago










  • If someone consumes about 60 grams of protein per day (the amount mentioned in the quoted part of my answer) he/she will excrete about 500 mL of urine as a result. We always consume some protein, so we are used to that and no one makes a problem from urea. But when you switch from 60 to 500 g of protein per day (in a fish-only-eating scenario), the amount of urea and hence urine greatly increases.
    – Jan
    2 hours ago







  • 1




    About salt: there is much lower amount of salt in fish than in seawater and it's comparable to other foods. With other words: neither the amount of salt and protein we usually consume result in dehydration, because we usually regularly consume some water as well.
    – Jan
    2 hours ago













up vote
5
down vote










up vote
5
down vote









Let's say you lose 2 liters of water per day. To replace 2 liters of water by eating fish, you need to eat, for example, 2,500 g of cooked Pacific cod, which, besides water, also contains 500 g of protein and 3.4 g of sodium.



3.4 g of sodium is not that much; many people consume this amount every day and I assume this does not result in significantly increased water loss through the kidneys (diuresis).



The bigger concern is protein, which is broken down into urea, which is excreted through the kidneys and drags some water with it in a similar way as sodium does.



1 gram of protein yields the amount of urea that needs 8 mL of urine to be excreted (see the source below). Consuming 500 g of protein from fish would therefore result in 4 liters of urine. With consuming only 2 liters of water by fish, this leaves you with 2 liters of negative water balance solely due to urea.



So, if my calculation is correct, you can't maintain good hydration by eating only fish.



Source: NAP.edu




Urea, a major end product of metabolism of dietary proteins and amino
acids, requires water for excretion by the kidneys. Renal excretion of
1 g of urea nitrogen (2.2 g of urea) requires 40 to 60 mL of water.
Thus, if a person consumes 63 g of protein the volume of water
required increases by 0.4 to 0.6 L/day above the basal osmolar
excretory requirement of 0.5 and 0.75 L/day in younger and older
individuals, respectively.







share|improve this answer














Let's say you lose 2 liters of water per day. To replace 2 liters of water by eating fish, you need to eat, for example, 2,500 g of cooked Pacific cod, which, besides water, also contains 500 g of protein and 3.4 g of sodium.



3.4 g of sodium is not that much; many people consume this amount every day and I assume this does not result in significantly increased water loss through the kidneys (diuresis).



The bigger concern is protein, which is broken down into urea, which is excreted through the kidneys and drags some water with it in a similar way as sodium does.



1 gram of protein yields the amount of urea that needs 8 mL of urine to be excreted (see the source below). Consuming 500 g of protein from fish would therefore result in 4 liters of urine. With consuming only 2 liters of water by fish, this leaves you with 2 liters of negative water balance solely due to urea.



So, if my calculation is correct, you can't maintain good hydration by eating only fish.



Source: NAP.edu




Urea, a major end product of metabolism of dietary proteins and amino
acids, requires water for excretion by the kidneys. Renal excretion of
1 g of urea nitrogen (2.2 g of urea) requires 40 to 60 mL of water.
Thus, if a person consumes 63 g of protein the volume of water
required increases by 0.4 to 0.6 L/day above the basal osmolar
excretory requirement of 0.5 and 0.75 L/day in younger and older
individuals, respectively.








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 3 hours ago

























answered 4 hours ago









Jan

50937




50937











  • +1 I like your answer, and it seems reasonable. But this article about dolphins focus on salt as an issue not urea so I wonder if people have just been overlooking urea excretion in relatship to dehydration?
    – James Jenkins
    2 hours ago










  • If someone consumes about 60 grams of protein per day (the amount mentioned in the quoted part of my answer) he/she will excrete about 500 mL of urine as a result. We always consume some protein, so we are used to that and no one makes a problem from urea. But when you switch from 60 to 500 g of protein per day (in a fish-only-eating scenario), the amount of urea and hence urine greatly increases.
    – Jan
    2 hours ago







  • 1




    About salt: there is much lower amount of salt in fish than in seawater and it's comparable to other foods. With other words: neither the amount of salt and protein we usually consume result in dehydration, because we usually regularly consume some water as well.
    – Jan
    2 hours ago

















  • +1 I like your answer, and it seems reasonable. But this article about dolphins focus on salt as an issue not urea so I wonder if people have just been overlooking urea excretion in relatship to dehydration?
    – James Jenkins
    2 hours ago










  • If someone consumes about 60 grams of protein per day (the amount mentioned in the quoted part of my answer) he/she will excrete about 500 mL of urine as a result. We always consume some protein, so we are used to that and no one makes a problem from urea. But when you switch from 60 to 500 g of protein per day (in a fish-only-eating scenario), the amount of urea and hence urine greatly increases.
    – Jan
    2 hours ago







  • 1




    About salt: there is much lower amount of salt in fish than in seawater and it's comparable to other foods. With other words: neither the amount of salt and protein we usually consume result in dehydration, because we usually regularly consume some water as well.
    – Jan
    2 hours ago
















+1 I like your answer, and it seems reasonable. But this article about dolphins focus on salt as an issue not urea so I wonder if people have just been overlooking urea excretion in relatship to dehydration?
– James Jenkins
2 hours ago




+1 I like your answer, and it seems reasonable. But this article about dolphins focus on salt as an issue not urea so I wonder if people have just been overlooking urea excretion in relatship to dehydration?
– James Jenkins
2 hours ago












If someone consumes about 60 grams of protein per day (the amount mentioned in the quoted part of my answer) he/she will excrete about 500 mL of urine as a result. We always consume some protein, so we are used to that and no one makes a problem from urea. But when you switch from 60 to 500 g of protein per day (in a fish-only-eating scenario), the amount of urea and hence urine greatly increases.
– Jan
2 hours ago





If someone consumes about 60 grams of protein per day (the amount mentioned in the quoted part of my answer) he/she will excrete about 500 mL of urine as a result. We always consume some protein, so we are used to that and no one makes a problem from urea. But when you switch from 60 to 500 g of protein per day (in a fish-only-eating scenario), the amount of urea and hence urine greatly increases.
– Jan
2 hours ago





1




1




About salt: there is much lower amount of salt in fish than in seawater and it's comparable to other foods. With other words: neither the amount of salt and protein we usually consume result in dehydration, because we usually regularly consume some water as well.
– Jan
2 hours ago





About salt: there is much lower amount of salt in fish than in seawater and it's comparable to other foods. With other words: neither the amount of salt and protein we usually consume result in dehydration, because we usually regularly consume some water as well.
– Jan
2 hours ago


















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2foutdoors.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f20613%2fcan-i-get-fresh-water-from-ocean-fish-flesh%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

Confectionery