First (very failed) attempt at infrared with Sigma SD14

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I'm very new to photography and got attracted to the infrared photos I keep seeing online.



I decided to try experimenting with something cheap to see if I have any hope in this hobby or not. I got an old Sigma SD14 because it doesn't require conversion, as the internal filter can be simply popped out. I also got a Hoya r72 filter. Using the kit lens, for the moment.



Now, for some reason, all my photos end up either horrendously overexposed but with at least some information in them, or total garbage with literally no information in the photo.



I've tried what I feel is every combination of ISO, F and shutter speed with different, but all equally terrible results. I know I can't expect too much from the cheap old camera I got, but it should be able to produce something usable, at least according to other experiences I find online.



I've uploaded a couple of RAW samples and would be endlessly grateful to anyone who'd be able to give me any pointer at all about what I am doing so deeply wrong. How come even on the best of my photos, if it's blueish - everything is equally blueish, or if it's redish - everything is redish (see the linked samples). On other photos I see, trees look e.g white or pinkish, but the buildings do not.



Could it be that I simply somehow damaged the sensor so everything appears too bright?



Terribly sorry for the broadness of my questions, but I still lack the vocabulary to express myself better. I'm learning, but need direction...










share|improve this question







New contributor




kaqqao is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I'm very new to photography and got attracted to the infrared photos I keep seeing online.



    I decided to try experimenting with something cheap to see if I have any hope in this hobby or not. I got an old Sigma SD14 because it doesn't require conversion, as the internal filter can be simply popped out. I also got a Hoya r72 filter. Using the kit lens, for the moment.



    Now, for some reason, all my photos end up either horrendously overexposed but with at least some information in them, or total garbage with literally no information in the photo.



    I've tried what I feel is every combination of ISO, F and shutter speed with different, but all equally terrible results. I know I can't expect too much from the cheap old camera I got, but it should be able to produce something usable, at least according to other experiences I find online.



    I've uploaded a couple of RAW samples and would be endlessly grateful to anyone who'd be able to give me any pointer at all about what I am doing so deeply wrong. How come even on the best of my photos, if it's blueish - everything is equally blueish, or if it's redish - everything is redish (see the linked samples). On other photos I see, trees look e.g white or pinkish, but the buildings do not.



    Could it be that I simply somehow damaged the sensor so everything appears too bright?



    Terribly sorry for the broadness of my questions, but I still lack the vocabulary to express myself better. I'm learning, but need direction...










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    kaqqao is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I'm very new to photography and got attracted to the infrared photos I keep seeing online.



      I decided to try experimenting with something cheap to see if I have any hope in this hobby or not. I got an old Sigma SD14 because it doesn't require conversion, as the internal filter can be simply popped out. I also got a Hoya r72 filter. Using the kit lens, for the moment.



      Now, for some reason, all my photos end up either horrendously overexposed but with at least some information in them, or total garbage with literally no information in the photo.



      I've tried what I feel is every combination of ISO, F and shutter speed with different, but all equally terrible results. I know I can't expect too much from the cheap old camera I got, but it should be able to produce something usable, at least according to other experiences I find online.



      I've uploaded a couple of RAW samples and would be endlessly grateful to anyone who'd be able to give me any pointer at all about what I am doing so deeply wrong. How come even on the best of my photos, if it's blueish - everything is equally blueish, or if it's redish - everything is redish (see the linked samples). On other photos I see, trees look e.g white or pinkish, but the buildings do not.



      Could it be that I simply somehow damaged the sensor so everything appears too bright?



      Terribly sorry for the broadness of my questions, but I still lack the vocabulary to express myself better. I'm learning, but need direction...










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      kaqqao is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      I'm very new to photography and got attracted to the infrared photos I keep seeing online.



      I decided to try experimenting with something cheap to see if I have any hope in this hobby or not. I got an old Sigma SD14 because it doesn't require conversion, as the internal filter can be simply popped out. I also got a Hoya r72 filter. Using the kit lens, for the moment.



      Now, for some reason, all my photos end up either horrendously overexposed but with at least some information in them, or total garbage with literally no information in the photo.



      I've tried what I feel is every combination of ISO, F and shutter speed with different, but all equally terrible results. I know I can't expect too much from the cheap old camera I got, but it should be able to produce something usable, at least according to other experiences I find online.



      I've uploaded a couple of RAW samples and would be endlessly grateful to anyone who'd be able to give me any pointer at all about what I am doing so deeply wrong. How come even on the best of my photos, if it's blueish - everything is equally blueish, or if it's redish - everything is redish (see the linked samples). On other photos I see, trees look e.g white or pinkish, but the buildings do not.



      Could it be that I simply somehow damaged the sensor so everything appears too bright?



      Terribly sorry for the broadness of my questions, but I still lack the vocabulary to express myself better. I'm learning, but need direction...







      infrared






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      kaqqao is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      kaqqao is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      kaqqao is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 4 hours ago









      kaqqao

      1062




      1062




      New contributor




      kaqqao is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      kaqqao is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      kaqqao is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote













          This is standard for digital IR photography.



          You will get better results if you set the camera to a B&W mode (if there's such an option on your camera) or if you manually convert your images to B&W and adjust in post-production just like you would any other image from a digital camera.



          This is a necessary post-production process for digital IR photography.



          You can also do color manipulations (See: https://petapixel.com/2016/10/27/introduction-digital-infrared-photography/)



          B&W Conversion






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Leon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.

















          • Hey, thanks for the answer and the great work you've done with the photo! Much appreciated! But... how do people get the beautiful pink and yellow foliage in their photos? Perhaps different filters?
            – kaqqao
            3 hours ago







          • 2




            There is IR with different spectrums - 750nm, 850nm, which produce slightly different looks. but ultimately all of that is done in post-production. One technique is called "channel swapping" (slrlounge.com/…)
            – Leon
            3 hours ago











          • Ah, the photo in the article you linked looks absolutely dreamy 😍That's what I'm ultimately after.
            – kaqqao
            3 hours ago










          Your Answer







          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "61"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          kaqqao is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f101721%2ffirst-very-failed-attempt-at-infrared-with-sigma-sd14%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          4
          down vote













          This is standard for digital IR photography.



          You will get better results if you set the camera to a B&W mode (if there's such an option on your camera) or if you manually convert your images to B&W and adjust in post-production just like you would any other image from a digital camera.



          This is a necessary post-production process for digital IR photography.



          You can also do color manipulations (See: https://petapixel.com/2016/10/27/introduction-digital-infrared-photography/)



          B&W Conversion






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Leon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.

















          • Hey, thanks for the answer and the great work you've done with the photo! Much appreciated! But... how do people get the beautiful pink and yellow foliage in their photos? Perhaps different filters?
            – kaqqao
            3 hours ago







          • 2




            There is IR with different spectrums - 750nm, 850nm, which produce slightly different looks. but ultimately all of that is done in post-production. One technique is called "channel swapping" (slrlounge.com/…)
            – Leon
            3 hours ago











          • Ah, the photo in the article you linked looks absolutely dreamy 😍That's what I'm ultimately after.
            – kaqqao
            3 hours ago














          up vote
          4
          down vote













          This is standard for digital IR photography.



          You will get better results if you set the camera to a B&W mode (if there's such an option on your camera) or if you manually convert your images to B&W and adjust in post-production just like you would any other image from a digital camera.



          This is a necessary post-production process for digital IR photography.



          You can also do color manipulations (See: https://petapixel.com/2016/10/27/introduction-digital-infrared-photography/)



          B&W Conversion






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Leon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.

















          • Hey, thanks for the answer and the great work you've done with the photo! Much appreciated! But... how do people get the beautiful pink and yellow foliage in their photos? Perhaps different filters?
            – kaqqao
            3 hours ago







          • 2




            There is IR with different spectrums - 750nm, 850nm, which produce slightly different looks. but ultimately all of that is done in post-production. One technique is called "channel swapping" (slrlounge.com/…)
            – Leon
            3 hours ago











          • Ah, the photo in the article you linked looks absolutely dreamy 😍That's what I'm ultimately after.
            – kaqqao
            3 hours ago












          up vote
          4
          down vote










          up vote
          4
          down vote









          This is standard for digital IR photography.



          You will get better results if you set the camera to a B&W mode (if there's such an option on your camera) or if you manually convert your images to B&W and adjust in post-production just like you would any other image from a digital camera.



          This is a necessary post-production process for digital IR photography.



          You can also do color manipulations (See: https://petapixel.com/2016/10/27/introduction-digital-infrared-photography/)



          B&W Conversion






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Leon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          This is standard for digital IR photography.



          You will get better results if you set the camera to a B&W mode (if there's such an option on your camera) or if you manually convert your images to B&W and adjust in post-production just like you would any other image from a digital camera.



          This is a necessary post-production process for digital IR photography.



          You can also do color manipulations (See: https://petapixel.com/2016/10/27/introduction-digital-infrared-photography/)



          B&W Conversion







          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Leon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer






          New contributor




          Leon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered 3 hours ago









          Leon

          1412




          1412




          New contributor




          Leon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          Leon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          Leon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.











          • Hey, thanks for the answer and the great work you've done with the photo! Much appreciated! But... how do people get the beautiful pink and yellow foliage in their photos? Perhaps different filters?
            – kaqqao
            3 hours ago







          • 2




            There is IR with different spectrums - 750nm, 850nm, which produce slightly different looks. but ultimately all of that is done in post-production. One technique is called "channel swapping" (slrlounge.com/…)
            – Leon
            3 hours ago











          • Ah, the photo in the article you linked looks absolutely dreamy 😍That's what I'm ultimately after.
            – kaqqao
            3 hours ago
















          • Hey, thanks for the answer and the great work you've done with the photo! Much appreciated! But... how do people get the beautiful pink and yellow foliage in their photos? Perhaps different filters?
            – kaqqao
            3 hours ago







          • 2




            There is IR with different spectrums - 750nm, 850nm, which produce slightly different looks. but ultimately all of that is done in post-production. One technique is called "channel swapping" (slrlounge.com/…)
            – Leon
            3 hours ago











          • Ah, the photo in the article you linked looks absolutely dreamy 😍That's what I'm ultimately after.
            – kaqqao
            3 hours ago















          Hey, thanks for the answer and the great work you've done with the photo! Much appreciated! But... how do people get the beautiful pink and yellow foliage in their photos? Perhaps different filters?
          – kaqqao
          3 hours ago





          Hey, thanks for the answer and the great work you've done with the photo! Much appreciated! But... how do people get the beautiful pink and yellow foliage in their photos? Perhaps different filters?
          – kaqqao
          3 hours ago





          2




          2




          There is IR with different spectrums - 750nm, 850nm, which produce slightly different looks. but ultimately all of that is done in post-production. One technique is called "channel swapping" (slrlounge.com/…)
          – Leon
          3 hours ago





          There is IR with different spectrums - 750nm, 850nm, which produce slightly different looks. but ultimately all of that is done in post-production. One technique is called "channel swapping" (slrlounge.com/…)
          – Leon
          3 hours ago













          Ah, the photo in the article you linked looks absolutely dreamy 😍That's what I'm ultimately after.
          – kaqqao
          3 hours ago




          Ah, the photo in the article you linked looks absolutely dreamy 😍That's what I'm ultimately after.
          – kaqqao
          3 hours ago










          kaqqao is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          kaqqao is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          kaqqao is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          kaqqao is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f101721%2ffirst-very-failed-attempt-at-infrared-with-sigma-sd14%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

          Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

          Confectionery