Mixing
Citing a paper whose title has received errata
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I recently stumbled upon a published article entitled "ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies," which has an errata stating the following:
The publisher regrets that in the above-mentioned article the title was changed without the author's approval. The correct title should read:
“ANCOVA versus change from baseline: More power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studiesâ€Â
If I am to cite the paper, should I refer to it by its published title (as I did in the reference list below) or by its corrected title?
References
Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (2006). ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(9): 920-925
Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (2006). Erratum to “ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studiesâ€Â. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(12): 1334
citations errors-erratum
edited 1 hour ago
user2768
6,66112035
asked 3 hours ago
Phil
261
New contributor
Phil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I recently stumbled upon a published article entitled "ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies," which has an errata stating the following:
The publisher regrets that in the above-mentioned article the title was changed without the author's approval. The correct title should read:
“ANCOVA versus change from baseline: More power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studiesâ€Â
If I am to cite the paper, should I refer to it by its published title (as I did in the reference list below) or by its corrected title?
References
Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (2006). ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(9): 920-925
Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (2006). Erratum to “ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studiesâ€Â. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(12): 1334
citations errors-erratum
edited 1 hour ago
user2768
6,66112035
asked 3 hours ago
Phil
261
New contributor
Phil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
I don't understand why the publisher didn't fix the published title and add a note that "The publisher regrets that this article previous appeared under the title 'ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies' without the author's approval."
– user2768
1 hour ago
If the paper has a DOI, the problem is practically insignificant and amounts to a question about formalities.
– henning
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I recently stumbled upon a published article entitled "ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies," which has an errata stating the following:
The publisher regrets that in the above-mentioned article the title was changed without the author's approval. The correct title should read:
“ANCOVA versus change from baseline: More power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studiesâ€Â
If I am to cite the paper, should I refer to it by its published title (as I did in the reference list below) or by its corrected title?
References
Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (2006). ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(9): 920-925
Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (2006). Erratum to “ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studiesâ€Â. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(12): 1334
citations errors-erratum
edited 1 hour ago
user2768
6,66112035
asked 3 hours ago
Phil
261
New contributor
Phil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I recently stumbled upon a published article entitled "ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies," which has an errata stating the following:
The publisher regrets that in the above-mentioned article the title was changed without the author's approval. The correct title should read:
“ANCOVA versus change from baseline: More power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studiesâ€Â
If I am to cite the paper, should I refer to it by its published title (as I did in the reference list below) or by its corrected title?
References
Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (2006). ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(9): 920-925
Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (2006). Erratum to “ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studiesâ€Â. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(12): 1334
citations errors-erratum
citations errors-erratum
edited 1 hour ago
user2768
6,66112035
asked 3 hours ago
Phil
261
New contributor
Phil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 1 hour ago
user2768
6,66112035
asked 3 hours ago
Phil
261
New contributor
Phil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 1 hour ago
user2768
6,66112035
edited 1 hour ago
user2768
6,66112035
edited 1 hour ago
user2768
6,66112035
6,66112035
asked 3 hours ago
Phil
261
New contributor
Phil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago
Phil
261
asked 3 hours ago
Phil
261
261
New contributor
Phil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Phil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Phil is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
I don't understand why the publisher didn't fix the published title and add a note that "The publisher regrets that this article previous appeared under the title 'ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies' without the author's approval."
– user2768
1 hour ago
If the paper has a DOI, the problem is practically insignificant and amounts to a question about formalities.
– henning
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
1
I don't understand why the publisher didn't fix the published title and add a note that "The publisher regrets that this article previous appeared under the title 'ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies' without the author's approval."
– user2768
1 hour ago
If the paper has a DOI, the problem is practically insignificant and amounts to a question about formalities.
– henning
1 hour ago
1
1
I don't understand why the publisher didn't fix the published title and add a note that "The publisher regrets that this article previous appeared under the title 'ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies' without the author's approval."
– user2768
1 hour ago
I don't understand why the publisher didn't fix the published title and add a note that "The publisher regrets that this article previous appeared under the title 'ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies' without the author's approval."
– user2768
1 hour ago
If the paper has a DOI, the problem is practically insignificant and amounts to a question about formalities.
– henning
1 hour ago
If the paper has a DOI, the problem is practically insignificant and amounts to a question about formalities.
– henning
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
In this case I'd use the corrected title, and add make sure to note that the paper is corrected, e.g.
- Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (2006). ANCOVA versus change from baseline: more power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studies [corrected]. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(9): 920-925
Note that this is also how the paper is listed in Pubmed. I also recommend citing the erratum next to the paper.
answered 2 hours ago
Anyon
3,01011627
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
I'd use the published title, because, well, that's the title that has been published. You could mention that the title wasn't approved by the author, e.g.,
Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (2006). ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(9): 920-925. (The article was mistakenly published under the aforementioned title, the correct title should be "ANCOVA versus change from baseline: More power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studies.")
answered 1 hour ago
user2768
6,66112035
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
In this case I'd use the corrected title, and add make sure to note that the paper is corrected, e.g.
- Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (2006). ANCOVA versus change from baseline: more power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studies [corrected]. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(9): 920-925
Note that this is also how the paper is listed in Pubmed. I also recommend citing the erratum next to the paper.
answered 2 hours ago
Anyon
3,01011627
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
In this case I'd use the corrected title, and add make sure to note that the paper is corrected, e.g.
- Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (2006). ANCOVA versus change from baseline: more power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studies [corrected]. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(9): 920-925
Note that this is also how the paper is listed in Pubmed. I also recommend citing the erratum next to the paper.
answered 2 hours ago
Anyon
3,01011627
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
In this case I'd use the corrected title, and add make sure to note that the paper is corrected, e.g.
- Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (2006). ANCOVA versus change from baseline: more power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studies [corrected]. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(9): 920-925
Note that this is also how the paper is listed in Pubmed. I also recommend citing the erratum next to the paper.
answered 2 hours ago
Anyon
3,01011627
In this case I'd use the corrected title, and add make sure to note that the paper is corrected, e.g.
- Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (2006). ANCOVA versus change from baseline: more power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studies [corrected]. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(9): 920-925
Note that this is also how the paper is listed in Pubmed. I also recommend citing the erratum next to the paper.
answered 2 hours ago
Anyon
3,01011627
answered 2 hours ago
Anyon
3,01011627
answered 2 hours ago
Anyon
3,01011627
answered 2 hours ago
Anyon
3,01011627
3,01011627
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
I'd use the published title, because, well, that's the title that has been published. You could mention that the title wasn't approved by the author, e.g.,
Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (2006). ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(9): 920-925. (The article was mistakenly published under the aforementioned title, the correct title should be "ANCOVA versus change from baseline: More power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studies.")
answered 1 hour ago
user2768
6,66112035
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
I'd use the published title, because, well, that's the title that has been published. You could mention that the title wasn't approved by the author, e.g.,
Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (2006). ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(9): 920-925. (The article was mistakenly published under the aforementioned title, the correct title should be "ANCOVA versus change from baseline: More power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studies.")
answered 1 hour ago
user2768
6,66112035
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
I'd use the published title, because, well, that's the title that has been published. You could mention that the title wasn't approved by the author, e.g.,
Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (2006). ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(9): 920-925. (The article was mistakenly published under the aforementioned title, the correct title should be "ANCOVA versus change from baseline: More power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studies.")
answered 1 hour ago
user2768
6,66112035
I'd use the published title, because, well, that's the title that has been published. You could mention that the title wasn't approved by the author, e.g.,
Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (2006). ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(9): 920-925. (The article was mistakenly published under the aforementioned title, the correct title should be "ANCOVA versus change from baseline: More power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studies.")
answered 1 hour ago
user2768
6,66112035
answered 1 hour ago
user2768
6,66112035
answered 1 hour ago
user2768
6,66112035
answered 1 hour ago
user2768
6,66112035
6,66112035
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Phil is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Phil is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Phil is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Phil is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f117492%2fciting-a-paper-whose-title-has-received-errata%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
I don't understand why the publisher didn't fix the published title and add a note that "The publisher regrets that this article previous appeared under the title 'ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies' without the author's approval."
– user2768
1 hour ago
If the paper has a DOI, the problem is practically insignificant and amounts to a question about formalities.
– henning
1 hour ago