Does the T-1000 know that the âbig guy on a bikeâ is a T-800 before he meets him?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In the movie Terminator 2: Judgement Day (1991), after the terminators had arrived from the future to 1995, they are both trying to acquire John Connor.
The T-1000 arrives at John Connor's address and interrogates his foster parents:
Janelle: There was a guy here this morning looking for him too.
Todd: Yeah, a big guy on a bike, has that got something to do with this?
T-1000: No. I wouldn't worry about him.
At this point, is there any evidence that the T-1000 knows that this "big guy" is a T-800, or is he just confident he can handle anyone else aiming to acquire John?
plot-explanation terminator-2-judgment-day
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In the movie Terminator 2: Judgement Day (1991), after the terminators had arrived from the future to 1995, they are both trying to acquire John Connor.
The T-1000 arrives at John Connor's address and interrogates his foster parents:
Janelle: There was a guy here this morning looking for him too.
Todd: Yeah, a big guy on a bike, has that got something to do with this?
T-1000: No. I wouldn't worry about him.
At this point, is there any evidence that the T-1000 knows that this "big guy" is a T-800, or is he just confident he can handle anyone else aiming to acquire John?
plot-explanation terminator-2-judgment-day
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In the movie Terminator 2: Judgement Day (1991), after the terminators had arrived from the future to 1995, they are both trying to acquire John Connor.
The T-1000 arrives at John Connor's address and interrogates his foster parents:
Janelle: There was a guy here this morning looking for him too.
Todd: Yeah, a big guy on a bike, has that got something to do with this?
T-1000: No. I wouldn't worry about him.
At this point, is there any evidence that the T-1000 knows that this "big guy" is a T-800, or is he just confident he can handle anyone else aiming to acquire John?
plot-explanation terminator-2-judgment-day
In the movie Terminator 2: Judgement Day (1991), after the terminators had arrived from the future to 1995, they are both trying to acquire John Connor.
The T-1000 arrives at John Connor's address and interrogates his foster parents:
Janelle: There was a guy here this morning looking for him too.
Todd: Yeah, a big guy on a bike, has that got something to do with this?
T-1000: No. I wouldn't worry about him.
At this point, is there any evidence that the T-1000 knows that this "big guy" is a T-800, or is he just confident he can handle anyone else aiming to acquire John?
plot-explanation terminator-2-judgment-day
plot-explanation terminator-2-judgment-day
edited 34 mins ago
asked 5 hours ago
StuperUser
1666
1666
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
Yes
The script confirms that, at the very least, the T-1000 (in the script as "Officer X") has a very good idea as to who the previous visitor was...
JANELLE
There was a guy here this morning asking about
him, too.
TODD
Yeah, big guy. On a bike. Has that got
something to do with it?
Officer X registers the significance of that. He realizes who the
big guy must be. He smiles. Reassuringly shakes his head no.
It seems implicit from this that the T-1000 was fully aware of the previous Terminator.
Nice find! I was going to add more speculation to my answer as per popular request
â Luciano
28 mins ago
@Luciano Feel free to still do that. Improving answers is never a bad idea.
â Napoleon Wilsonâ¦
27 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
There's nothing that can prove that, it's never shown to us in the movie. Although:
He could have figured out: "If I'm here and the resistance sent someone too, this time it might be a captured T-800 adapted to protect John Connor".
The script shows that during the interview with Connor's foster parents "He (the T-1000) realizes who the big guy must be." Perhaps he just realized that it was Connor's protector, another human sent from the future, he might still not be aware the resistance had a T-800 on their side.
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
â KharoBangdo
3 hours ago
4
@KharoBangdo "nobody knows" is a perfectly reasonable answer to various questions
â OrangeDog
2 hours ago
1
@OrangeDog nobody knows is a perfectly fine answer to a question. In fact, I have reasoned it on this site multiple times. But it should be backed up with sources/proof to make it an acceptable answer. Right now this answer stands as ones opinion & nothing more. It isn't backed up by anything & hence more suitable as a comment
â KharoBangdo
2 hours ago
1
@Luciano Scenario 1: "We don't know. Why? because I've seen the movies. Trust me". Scenario 2: "We don't know. Why? because I've seen the movies. I think we are not supposed to know because <insert opinionated reasoning> or I think your logic is wrong, I think <insert opinionated reasoning> should be how we should interpret it". This isn't Reddit. Scenario 1 isn't acceptable on SE. At least not to me. Anyways, I owed you a reason for VT delete. You/others may disagree. Its just 1 vote.
â KharoBangdo
59 mins ago
1
@KharoBangdo You can't prove a negative, so a referenced answer proving that T-1000 didn't know isn't possible. The closest we can get (and what Luciano has answered) is "There are no scenes that provide any information that he would know". There may be something in the novelisation, but that's probably out of scope for MT.SE. My question was vague in that I was asking whether he did know, which invites speculation, I've edited it to being about the film, which validates this answer. Also, using the phrase "Trust me." would be a nice reference and slightly more suitable for an answer about T2.
â StuperUser
33 mins ago
 |Â
show 3 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
Yes
The script confirms that, at the very least, the T-1000 (in the script as "Officer X") has a very good idea as to who the previous visitor was...
JANELLE
There was a guy here this morning asking about
him, too.
TODD
Yeah, big guy. On a bike. Has that got
something to do with it?
Officer X registers the significance of that. He realizes who the
big guy must be. He smiles. Reassuringly shakes his head no.
It seems implicit from this that the T-1000 was fully aware of the previous Terminator.
Nice find! I was going to add more speculation to my answer as per popular request
â Luciano
28 mins ago
@Luciano Feel free to still do that. Improving answers is never a bad idea.
â Napoleon Wilsonâ¦
27 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
Yes
The script confirms that, at the very least, the T-1000 (in the script as "Officer X") has a very good idea as to who the previous visitor was...
JANELLE
There was a guy here this morning asking about
him, too.
TODD
Yeah, big guy. On a bike. Has that got
something to do with it?
Officer X registers the significance of that. He realizes who the
big guy must be. He smiles. Reassuringly shakes his head no.
It seems implicit from this that the T-1000 was fully aware of the previous Terminator.
Nice find! I was going to add more speculation to my answer as per popular request
â Luciano
28 mins ago
@Luciano Feel free to still do that. Improving answers is never a bad idea.
â Napoleon Wilsonâ¦
27 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
Yes
The script confirms that, at the very least, the T-1000 (in the script as "Officer X") has a very good idea as to who the previous visitor was...
JANELLE
There was a guy here this morning asking about
him, too.
TODD
Yeah, big guy. On a bike. Has that got
something to do with it?
Officer X registers the significance of that. He realizes who the
big guy must be. He smiles. Reassuringly shakes his head no.
It seems implicit from this that the T-1000 was fully aware of the previous Terminator.
Yes
The script confirms that, at the very least, the T-1000 (in the script as "Officer X") has a very good idea as to who the previous visitor was...
JANELLE
There was a guy here this morning asking about
him, too.
TODD
Yeah, big guy. On a bike. Has that got
something to do with it?
Officer X registers the significance of that. He realizes who the
big guy must be. He smiles. Reassuringly shakes his head no.
It seems implicit from this that the T-1000 was fully aware of the previous Terminator.
edited 11 mins ago
JAD
3,45622139
3,45622139
answered 29 mins ago
Paulie_D
74.1k14261249
74.1k14261249
Nice find! I was going to add more speculation to my answer as per popular request
â Luciano
28 mins ago
@Luciano Feel free to still do that. Improving answers is never a bad idea.
â Napoleon Wilsonâ¦
27 mins ago
add a comment |Â
Nice find! I was going to add more speculation to my answer as per popular request
â Luciano
28 mins ago
@Luciano Feel free to still do that. Improving answers is never a bad idea.
â Napoleon Wilsonâ¦
27 mins ago
Nice find! I was going to add more speculation to my answer as per popular request
â Luciano
28 mins ago
Nice find! I was going to add more speculation to my answer as per popular request
â Luciano
28 mins ago
@Luciano Feel free to still do that. Improving answers is never a bad idea.
â Napoleon Wilsonâ¦
27 mins ago
@Luciano Feel free to still do that. Improving answers is never a bad idea.
â Napoleon Wilsonâ¦
27 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
There's nothing that can prove that, it's never shown to us in the movie. Although:
He could have figured out: "If I'm here and the resistance sent someone too, this time it might be a captured T-800 adapted to protect John Connor".
The script shows that during the interview with Connor's foster parents "He (the T-1000) realizes who the big guy must be." Perhaps he just realized that it was Connor's protector, another human sent from the future, he might still not be aware the resistance had a T-800 on their side.
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
â KharoBangdo
3 hours ago
4
@KharoBangdo "nobody knows" is a perfectly reasonable answer to various questions
â OrangeDog
2 hours ago
1
@OrangeDog nobody knows is a perfectly fine answer to a question. In fact, I have reasoned it on this site multiple times. But it should be backed up with sources/proof to make it an acceptable answer. Right now this answer stands as ones opinion & nothing more. It isn't backed up by anything & hence more suitable as a comment
â KharoBangdo
2 hours ago
1
@Luciano Scenario 1: "We don't know. Why? because I've seen the movies. Trust me". Scenario 2: "We don't know. Why? because I've seen the movies. I think we are not supposed to know because <insert opinionated reasoning> or I think your logic is wrong, I think <insert opinionated reasoning> should be how we should interpret it". This isn't Reddit. Scenario 1 isn't acceptable on SE. At least not to me. Anyways, I owed you a reason for VT delete. You/others may disagree. Its just 1 vote.
â KharoBangdo
59 mins ago
1
@KharoBangdo You can't prove a negative, so a referenced answer proving that T-1000 didn't know isn't possible. The closest we can get (and what Luciano has answered) is "There are no scenes that provide any information that he would know". There may be something in the novelisation, but that's probably out of scope for MT.SE. My question was vague in that I was asking whether he did know, which invites speculation, I've edited it to being about the film, which validates this answer. Also, using the phrase "Trust me." would be a nice reference and slightly more suitable for an answer about T2.
â StuperUser
33 mins ago
 |Â
show 3 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
There's nothing that can prove that, it's never shown to us in the movie. Although:
He could have figured out: "If I'm here and the resistance sent someone too, this time it might be a captured T-800 adapted to protect John Connor".
The script shows that during the interview with Connor's foster parents "He (the T-1000) realizes who the big guy must be." Perhaps he just realized that it was Connor's protector, another human sent from the future, he might still not be aware the resistance had a T-800 on their side.
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
â KharoBangdo
3 hours ago
4
@KharoBangdo "nobody knows" is a perfectly reasonable answer to various questions
â OrangeDog
2 hours ago
1
@OrangeDog nobody knows is a perfectly fine answer to a question. In fact, I have reasoned it on this site multiple times. But it should be backed up with sources/proof to make it an acceptable answer. Right now this answer stands as ones opinion & nothing more. It isn't backed up by anything & hence more suitable as a comment
â KharoBangdo
2 hours ago
1
@Luciano Scenario 1: "We don't know. Why? because I've seen the movies. Trust me". Scenario 2: "We don't know. Why? because I've seen the movies. I think we are not supposed to know because <insert opinionated reasoning> or I think your logic is wrong, I think <insert opinionated reasoning> should be how we should interpret it". This isn't Reddit. Scenario 1 isn't acceptable on SE. At least not to me. Anyways, I owed you a reason for VT delete. You/others may disagree. Its just 1 vote.
â KharoBangdo
59 mins ago
1
@KharoBangdo You can't prove a negative, so a referenced answer proving that T-1000 didn't know isn't possible. The closest we can get (and what Luciano has answered) is "There are no scenes that provide any information that he would know". There may be something in the novelisation, but that's probably out of scope for MT.SE. My question was vague in that I was asking whether he did know, which invites speculation, I've edited it to being about the film, which validates this answer. Also, using the phrase "Trust me." would be a nice reference and slightly more suitable for an answer about T2.
â StuperUser
33 mins ago
 |Â
show 3 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
There's nothing that can prove that, it's never shown to us in the movie. Although:
He could have figured out: "If I'm here and the resistance sent someone too, this time it might be a captured T-800 adapted to protect John Connor".
The script shows that during the interview with Connor's foster parents "He (the T-1000) realizes who the big guy must be." Perhaps he just realized that it was Connor's protector, another human sent from the future, he might still not be aware the resistance had a T-800 on their side.
There's nothing that can prove that, it's never shown to us in the movie. Although:
He could have figured out: "If I'm here and the resistance sent someone too, this time it might be a captured T-800 adapted to protect John Connor".
The script shows that during the interview with Connor's foster parents "He (the T-1000) realizes who the big guy must be." Perhaps he just realized that it was Connor's protector, another human sent from the future, he might still not be aware the resistance had a T-800 on their side.
edited 21 mins ago
answered 3 hours ago
Luciano
3,00121437
3,00121437
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
â KharoBangdo
3 hours ago
4
@KharoBangdo "nobody knows" is a perfectly reasonable answer to various questions
â OrangeDog
2 hours ago
1
@OrangeDog nobody knows is a perfectly fine answer to a question. In fact, I have reasoned it on this site multiple times. But it should be backed up with sources/proof to make it an acceptable answer. Right now this answer stands as ones opinion & nothing more. It isn't backed up by anything & hence more suitable as a comment
â KharoBangdo
2 hours ago
1
@Luciano Scenario 1: "We don't know. Why? because I've seen the movies. Trust me". Scenario 2: "We don't know. Why? because I've seen the movies. I think we are not supposed to know because <insert opinionated reasoning> or I think your logic is wrong, I think <insert opinionated reasoning> should be how we should interpret it". This isn't Reddit. Scenario 1 isn't acceptable on SE. At least not to me. Anyways, I owed you a reason for VT delete. You/others may disagree. Its just 1 vote.
â KharoBangdo
59 mins ago
1
@KharoBangdo You can't prove a negative, so a referenced answer proving that T-1000 didn't know isn't possible. The closest we can get (and what Luciano has answered) is "There are no scenes that provide any information that he would know". There may be something in the novelisation, but that's probably out of scope for MT.SE. My question was vague in that I was asking whether he did know, which invites speculation, I've edited it to being about the film, which validates this answer. Also, using the phrase "Trust me." would be a nice reference and slightly more suitable for an answer about T2.
â StuperUser
33 mins ago
 |Â
show 3 more comments
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
â KharoBangdo
3 hours ago
4
@KharoBangdo "nobody knows" is a perfectly reasonable answer to various questions
â OrangeDog
2 hours ago
1
@OrangeDog nobody knows is a perfectly fine answer to a question. In fact, I have reasoned it on this site multiple times. But it should be backed up with sources/proof to make it an acceptable answer. Right now this answer stands as ones opinion & nothing more. It isn't backed up by anything & hence more suitable as a comment
â KharoBangdo
2 hours ago
1
@Luciano Scenario 1: "We don't know. Why? because I've seen the movies. Trust me". Scenario 2: "We don't know. Why? because I've seen the movies. I think we are not supposed to know because <insert opinionated reasoning> or I think your logic is wrong, I think <insert opinionated reasoning> should be how we should interpret it". This isn't Reddit. Scenario 1 isn't acceptable on SE. At least not to me. Anyways, I owed you a reason for VT delete. You/others may disagree. Its just 1 vote.
â KharoBangdo
59 mins ago
1
@KharoBangdo You can't prove a negative, so a referenced answer proving that T-1000 didn't know isn't possible. The closest we can get (and what Luciano has answered) is "There are no scenes that provide any information that he would know". There may be something in the novelisation, but that's probably out of scope for MT.SE. My question was vague in that I was asking whether he did know, which invites speculation, I've edited it to being about the film, which validates this answer. Also, using the phrase "Trust me." would be a nice reference and slightly more suitable for an answer about T2.
â StuperUser
33 mins ago
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
â KharoBangdo
3 hours ago
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
â KharoBangdo
3 hours ago
4
4
@KharoBangdo "nobody knows" is a perfectly reasonable answer to various questions
â OrangeDog
2 hours ago
@KharoBangdo "nobody knows" is a perfectly reasonable answer to various questions
â OrangeDog
2 hours ago
1
1
@OrangeDog nobody knows is a perfectly fine answer to a question. In fact, I have reasoned it on this site multiple times. But it should be backed up with sources/proof to make it an acceptable answer. Right now this answer stands as ones opinion & nothing more. It isn't backed up by anything & hence more suitable as a comment
â KharoBangdo
2 hours ago
@OrangeDog nobody knows is a perfectly fine answer to a question. In fact, I have reasoned it on this site multiple times. But it should be backed up with sources/proof to make it an acceptable answer. Right now this answer stands as ones opinion & nothing more. It isn't backed up by anything & hence more suitable as a comment
â KharoBangdo
2 hours ago
1
1
@Luciano Scenario 1: "We don't know. Why? because I've seen the movies. Trust me". Scenario 2: "We don't know. Why? because I've seen the movies. I think we are not supposed to know because <insert opinionated reasoning> or I think your logic is wrong, I think <insert opinionated reasoning> should be how we should interpret it". This isn't Reddit. Scenario 1 isn't acceptable on SE. At least not to me. Anyways, I owed you a reason for VT delete. You/others may disagree. Its just 1 vote.
â KharoBangdo
59 mins ago
@Luciano Scenario 1: "We don't know. Why? because I've seen the movies. Trust me". Scenario 2: "We don't know. Why? because I've seen the movies. I think we are not supposed to know because <insert opinionated reasoning> or I think your logic is wrong, I think <insert opinionated reasoning> should be how we should interpret it". This isn't Reddit. Scenario 1 isn't acceptable on SE. At least not to me. Anyways, I owed you a reason for VT delete. You/others may disagree. Its just 1 vote.
â KharoBangdo
59 mins ago
1
1
@KharoBangdo You can't prove a negative, so a referenced answer proving that T-1000 didn't know isn't possible. The closest we can get (and what Luciano has answered) is "There are no scenes that provide any information that he would know". There may be something in the novelisation, but that's probably out of scope for MT.SE. My question was vague in that I was asking whether he did know, which invites speculation, I've edited it to being about the film, which validates this answer. Also, using the phrase "Trust me." would be a nice reference and slightly more suitable for an answer about T2.
â StuperUser
33 mins ago
@KharoBangdo You can't prove a negative, so a referenced answer proving that T-1000 didn't know isn't possible. The closest we can get (and what Luciano has answered) is "There are no scenes that provide any information that he would know". There may be something in the novelisation, but that's probably out of scope for MT.SE. My question was vague in that I was asking whether he did know, which invites speculation, I've edited it to being about the film, which validates this answer. Also, using the phrase "Trust me." would be a nice reference and slightly more suitable for an answer about T2.
â StuperUser
33 mins ago
 |Â
show 3 more comments